Seems to me this has been done. I read the op's post that he HAD the tech
were he works SCAN the car! Stating that cam position sensor! He replaced
the crank sensor previously.
But please do as Bob suggest and read the codes with the key trick. It must
be more specific then the tech reading it with a scanner.
> Seems to me this has been done. I read the op's post that he HAD the
> tech were he works SCAN the car! Stating that cam position sensor! He
> replaced the crank sensor previously. But please do as Bob suggest and
> read the codes with the key trick. It must be more specific then the
> tech reading it with a scanner.
The key trick provides considerably LESS detail than a proper scan.
Bob Shuman - 18 Jan 2006 22:11 GMT
> > Seems to me this has been done. I read the op's post that he HAD the
> > tech were he works SCAN the car! Stating that cam position sensor! He
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> The key trick provides considerably LESS detail than a PROPER SCAN.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
These are the key words (Proper Scan). I was asking for the codes since the
OP was clearly confusing cam and crank and claimed that someone scanned, but
had no details. My assumption was that getting the engine codes was a
no-brainer and could provide CURRENT and ACCURATE info. While it may indeed
be less detailed, I felt it was a logical first step. But no codes and only
a vague recollection of what the previous code was and what was replaced, so
I give up and am done reading this thread.
Bob