Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Chrysler Cars / February 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

American workers not cosseted, overpaid. They are getting SCREWED.

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Bret Ludwig - 30 Jan 2006 01:12 GMT
It's true the unions are not without faults but if you look at the
WHOLE picture the American worker has had a camshaft rammed up his rear
with no assembly lube!

Manufacturing employees in the United States are underpaid and
overworked compared to European labor. That's a fact. Manufaturing jobs
are vanishing and being replaced with poor paying stinky customer
service and retail ones.

We should harmonize safety and emissions with the EU and Japan and
then tax each imported vehicle according to the difference between US
and the source country's pay, worker safety and manufacturing emisssion
cost rules. f.ck the consumer, he will pay more. I'm so tired of
hearing about the consumer. We are all consumers but we have to be
producers first and foremost too.
tedm@toybox.placo.com - 02 Feb 2006 11:10 GMT
Tariffs do 2 good things, they help remove price pressure on domestic
producers, and they help
stunt the growth of foreign producers by keeping a lot of our consumers
from sending money to
the foreign producers.

Unfortunately, the problem with them is that they only work if your
country is the only country
in the world that does tariffs.  In reality, if you tariff, then the
other countries also tariff, and
pretty soon every country is running tariffs, and now our manufacturers
here lose all the
overseas market.  What you end up with is a world where no country
sells anything to any
other country, and all countries governments get a huge amount of money
for doing essentially
nothing, and the tariffs are now not effective.  This is a breeding
ground for world wars, since no government really has anything to lose
by attacking it's neighbors.

Ted
Daniel J. Stern - 02 Feb 2006 18:35 GMT
> Tariffs do 2 good things, they help remove price pressure on domestic
> producers, and they help stunt the growth of foreign producers by
> keeping a lot of our consumers from sending money to the foreign
> producers.

I can think of a few other good things Tariffs and other overt trade
restrictions do. I bet you can, too, if you think about it.

> Unfortunately, the problem with them is that they only work if your
> country is the only country in the world that does tariffs.

History does not support this assertion.

> In reality, if you tariff, then the other countries also tariff, and
> pretty soon every country is running tariffs, and now our manufacturers
> here lose all the overseas market.

...so? Not many American cars are sold outside North America.

> This is a breeding ground for world wars

That is an immense leap of logic.
tedm@toybox.placo.com - 03 Feb 2006 09:38 GMT
>...so? Not many American cars are sold outside North America.

Did you ever stop to think about the large number of Japanese cars sold
both here AND in Japan?  While as you say not many American cars are
sold outside North America?  And you call this "so what"?  Did you
perhaps think this might possibly be related to why companies like
Ford aren't doing so well?  Naaahhhh!!!

Clearly, if American companies are being blocked from overseas markets
we need to retaliate against those markets by closing our markets to
those countries.  Tariffs are certainly one of the tools used to do
this.  But
it is very important to hold tariffs in reserve as punative actions,
not to
instigate them.

For countries that don't close their markets to the US, it is stupid
and
foolish to tariff their products, or they are going to retaliate
against us in
kind.  And for countries that are willing to open their markets in
exchange
for us opening our markets, once again, it's stupid to tariff against
them.

Unfortunately what I see too much of is efforts by the US government to
give favored trading status to countries like China which have a
history
of not only not purchasing our manufacturers products, but outright
stealing them by making forgeries of them.  In short, the US government
tariffs countries that it shouldn't, and doesen't tariff products from
countries
that really are not in any way friendly to us.

Ted
Spam Hater - 04 Feb 2006 05:51 GMT
> Tariffs do 2 good things, they help remove price pressure on domestic
> producers, and they help
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> Ted
You're living in the past. You don't know what an import is.

American vehicles are not being killed by low priced imports, but by
foreign manufacturers building superior vehicles in NAFDA (that includes
the USA) using USA workers.
Not just Japanese either, but the likes of BMW,
also Mercedes who are owned by the same German company as Chrysler.
Dori A Schmetterling - 04 Feb 2006 13:53 GMT
And there are plenty of 'American' cars outside the US.  It's just that they
are usually not made in USA.  Plus cars like the Mercedes M-Class.

DAS

For direct contact replace nospam with schmetterling
---

[...]

> American vehicles are not being killed by low priced imports, but by
> foreign manufacturers building superior vehicles in NAFDA (that includes
> the USA) using USA workers.
> Not just Japanese either, but the likes of BMW,
> also Mercedes who are owned by the same German company as Chrysler.
Ted Mittelstaedt - 05 Feb 2006 17:22 GMT
> > Tariffs do 2 good things, they help remove price pressure on domestic
> > producers, and they help
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> Not just Japanese either, but the likes of BMW,
> also Mercedes who are owned by the same German company as Chrysler.

Superior vehicles according to whom?

Rags like Consumer Reports and Car and Driver focus on ownership costs
during the first 5 years or so, to them any vehicle older than 10 years old
is
used up and worthless.  But there are lots of people who buy cars and run
them for
10-15 years, and there's lots of 3rd generation owners buying used vehicles
out there that are 7-8 year old vehicles.  The Ragazines don't pay attention
to
those people since they aren'y buying the Rag's advertisers products.

So, if your in that market which would you buy, a 9 year old Japanese car
with 125Kmiles on an engine that will bend all the valves when the timing
belt breaks, or a 9 year old domestic non-interference engine with 125k?
Remember - you just have enough money for the car, not for dumping $300 into
a
timing belt change right after you buy it.

Now maybe your attitude is f.ck all the poor 3rd generation owners, we don't
give a sh.t about them, but what about the owners who buy new cars and don't
feel like being indebted to a car payment for the rest of their natural
lives by
continual "trading in" every 5 years?

We all know which is more expensive to buy replacement parts for when they
get long in the tooth and start needing things.

Ted
Nomen Nescio - 03 Feb 2006 00:10 GMT
Tariffs would actually function as advertised in the United States because
the U.S. can be totally self-sufficient.  It would not matter if
retaliatory tariffs where set in place by foreign nations that object to
our tariffs.  A tariff war would be to naught.

As an isolationist state we could survive because of our enormous natural
resources.  We want for nothing.  The only reason why Bush will not go for
tarrifs is because tariffs would cause a rise in prices.  No more $2 an
hour Chinese labor building our goods.  

What would happen is our goods would cost more.  We would treasure them
more, also.  That would lead to higher quality and longer service life.  No
longer would we through our broken LED wide screen HD televisions; no, we
would fix them like we used to do.

We would survive under a new economic philosophy.  We would thrive.

Let the rest of the world go to Hell where it belongs.  Restore the way of
life we knew in 1776.
Dori A Schmetterling - 04 Feb 2006 13:50 GMT
Very naive.  Companies who believe wind up going under.

DAS

For direct contact replace nospam with schmetterling
---

[...]
we have to be
> producers first and foremost too.
longlivetheZ - 04 Feb 2006 21:07 GMT
Uhhh.......

Signature

longlivetheZ

http://www.automotiveforums.com

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.