>> http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=4626384844
(link changed from the ridiculously over-long kind to the short kind)
> Nice 880. I have always found it interesting that the 1964 880 gets it
> looks from the early 1960's Chryslers (Virgil Exner), while the 1964
> Polara and other *B* body models were clearly the work of Mr. Engle, who
> had come from Chevrolet, if I remember correctly.
Engle was hired over from Ford. The reason why the Custom 880s look like
Engle-facelifted Exner efforts is because that's exactly what they are.
The 1962 "full-size" Dodge and Plymouth cars were significantly downsized
from the 1961 models, because Chrysler management misinterpreted the
rumours of the 1962 Chevy II as meaning that the full-size Chevrolet was
to be downsized. An eleventh-hour downsizing order came down and Styling
had to shrink the '62s in a very big hurry. The public were aghast at the
results (which we now know as the first B-bodies and some of us like quite
a bit, thank you very much), and dealers hollered bloody murder, for they
had nothing to go against the (still completely large) full-sized Fords
and Chevrolets. As a stopgap, the 1962 Chrysler Newport was hurriedly
retrimmed and given a (hallucinatory) 1961 Dodge front end treatment --
voila, the 1962 Dodge Custom 880.
Custom 880s carried on being sold on the same bodyshell, reskinned and
retrimmed for 1963 and 1964. In 1965, the new C-body included a "designed
intentionally" Custom 880.
More details and pictures at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dodge_Custom_880
kmatheson@sisna.com - 30 Mar 2006 19:06 GMT
Dan, I figured that you would know the answer to this. I had always
wondered what happened when the full-sized models got shrunk for 1962.
Did the 1965 880 share the same body with the Polara and the Monaco?
I guess that I have never seen a '65 880, or if I have I probably
mistook it for a Polara or Monaco.
-Kirk Matheson