Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Chrysler Cars / November 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

How to flash VIN to used PCM?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
carbide@egine.com - 17 Nov 2006 23:15 GMT
1998 Grand Voyager, 3.3L engine. My PCM ( powertrain control module )
died a while back, and I was able to find a used one quite
inexpensively. I installed it and it worked just like before. It was
from a Dodge Grand Caravan, but had the same part number as my
Plymouth, 4727154AJ.

Now it's time to smog it, and I know the VIN not matching is going to
be a problem.

Anyone have any experience changing the VIN?  I understand it can be
done with a DRB III scanner, but I expect the dealer is going to tell
me it can't be done or some such, which may or may not be true.  
-Paul
Ted Mittelstaedt - 18 Nov 2006 05:38 GMT
> 1998 Grand Voyager, 3.3L engine. My PCM ( powertrain control module )
> died a while back, and I was able to find a used one quite
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> me it can't be done or some such, which may or may not be true.
> -Paul

Why don't you start by going to the dealer, telling him your story,
and asking him about it?

Did you save the old PCM?  Maybe if it has a socketed rom chip
you can just take the rom from the old one and put it in the new one.

Frankly, I cannot imagine the smog check is going to care.  They
use the VIN number to determine engine size and such, and since your
PCM came out of a GC that presumably had the same engine, when
they key either VIN into the test computer, it's going to setup the
test computer with the same testing levels.

Ted
carbide@egine.com - 18 Nov 2006 07:29 GMT
> > 1998 Grand Voyager, 3.3L engine. My PCM ( powertrain control module )
> > died a while back, and I was able to find a used one quite
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> Why don't you start by going to the dealer, telling him your story,
> and asking him about it?

I asked for an appointment online, and filled in the details on the
online form. I'm waiting for them to get back to me. While I'm waiting,
I thought I'd find out what I could. I did find a procedure online for
initializing a new PCM. If there's not a VIN number, the DRB III tool
prompts you to enter one.

> Did you save the old PCM?  Maybe if it has a socketed rom chip
> you can just take the rom from the old one and put it in the new one.

I saved it, but the circuit board is down in a cast housing and under
an inch of tough rubbery potting compound. I'm an electronic tech and
might have been able to fix it myself if it weren't for that.  These
use surface mount flash memory chips, not old fashioned socketed ROM's.

> Frankly, I cannot imagine the smog check is going to care.

Heh heh!  Part of the price of living in paradise.  In California it's
all done by computer. The smog results are uploaded directly to the
DMV, using the VIN number is retrieved from the vehicle's computer.  I
believe they do that to prevent fraud. Normally it's very slick. This
is just an oddball case.  I may have to buy another PCM if I can't get
the proper VIN programmed into this used one.  

-Paul
Ted Mittelstaedt - 18 Nov 2006 08:15 GMT
> > > 1998 Grand Voyager, 3.3L engine. My PCM ( powertrain control module )
> > > died a while back, and I was able to find a used one quite
[quoted text clipped - 35 lines]
> is just an oddball case.  I may have to buy another PCM if I can't get
> the proper VIN programmed into this used one.

I would still talk to the smog people, they must have a way to
override the VIN that is pulled from the vehicles computer.

Legally I do not think that there is any standing for a government
agency to use a VIN pulled from a vehicle computer as the
authoratative VIN.  I suspect that buried in some federal law
is a statement that says that the VIN displayed in the winshield
is the only legal authoratative VIN.  There's certainly federal
law that requires the VIN to be unique, and for it to be displayed
in a particular location.  It would seem to me that if you have
a running vehicle that otherwise passes smog, that CA cannot
legally compel you to make a VIN that is pulled from the vehicle
computer match the actual VIN assigned to the plate riveted to
the chassis.  After all, not all car computers have VINs in them,
and I do not believe that OBD-II requires VIN availability as
one of it's parameters.  You could try going here and looking
into this:

http://www.epa.gov/obd/regtech/light.htm

I think that the VIN inclusion in OBD was for the OBD-III
standard which is after your 1998 vehicle.  I think that CA
wanted this so they could eventually design a system that when
the car's emissions systems failed that the car would
report this to a state agency that could then compel the owner
to get it fixed immediately.  But this scheme raised a huge
controversy and I think it was abandonded.

Ted
Bill Putney - 18 Nov 2006 14:21 GMT
> Legally I do not think that there is any standing for a government
> agency to use a VIN pulled from a vehicle computer as the
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> to get it fixed immediately.  But this scheme raised a huge
> controversy and I think it was abandonded.

In the land of unintended consequences and feel-good laws, they would
probably require him to scrap the vehicle because the VIN's don't match.
 Just their contribution to "saving Mother Earth".  :)

Bill Putney
(To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
address with the letter 'x')
carbide@egine.com - 18 Nov 2006 17:09 GMT
> In the land of unintended consequences and feel-good laws, they would
> probably require him to scrap the vehicle because the VIN's don't match.
>   Just their contribution to "saving Mother Earth".  :)

This is annoying, but I support the smog program.  It's really
necessary in California. Even with these laws, my eyes sting from the
smog when I visit relatives near Los Angeles.

So I guess you could say they are literally "feel-good" laws. ;-)
-Paul
Greg Houston - 18 Nov 2006 17:21 GMT
>>>>1998 Grand Voyager, 3.3L engine. My PCM ( powertrain control module )
>>>>died a while back, and I was able to find a used one quite
[quoted text clipped - 63 lines]
> to get it fixed immediately.  But this scheme raised a huge
> controversy and I think it was abandonded.

I believe you are correct about VIN not being in the OBD-II parameters.
 That level of detail generally requires specialized equipment from a
dealer (or Snap-On, etc. --very expensive)  There is no OBD-III standard
active.  The newer CAN protocol will be required by all vehicles, I
think by M.Y. 2008.  Many cars have been already using it, and started
as early as 2003.
Greg Houston - 18 Nov 2006 17:18 GMT
> Heh heh!  Part of the price of living in paradise.  In California it's
> all done by computer. The smog results are uploaded directly to the
> DMV, using the VIN number is retrieved from the vehicle's computer.  I
> believe they do that to prevent fraud. Normally it's very slick. This
> is just an oddball case.  I may have to buy another PCM if I can't get
> the proper VIN programmed into this used one.  

Are you sure the DMV/inspection station reads the VIN from the car?  I
don't believe there are any generic protocols to permit this, so they
would need specialized equipment for all makes, which doesn't sound
realistic.

Where I live, the emissions inspection station is also online in real
time to the DMV.  The VIN is obtained by scanning the barcode inside the
driver's door.  For some reason the computer always prompts for the
engine model, even after it already has the VIN (which could be decoded
for the engine model if they felt like it).  The inspection is primarily
now done via the OBD-II system, in most cases they don't even do a
dynanometer test for OBD-II cars, which they had been doing earlier.

My inspection station is friendly so I've been able to watch the process
pretty carefully.
maxpower - 18 Nov 2006 10:53 GMT
> 1998 Grand Voyager, 3.3L engine. My PCM ( powertrain control module )
> died a while back, and I was able to find a used one quite
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> -Paul
> \
Just take the smog test and be on your way, The only thing they want to know
is if the engine lite is on and what is coming out the tailpipe. If the PCM
was not right for the vehicle the lite would turn on and fail.

Glenn Beasley
Chrysler Tech
carbide@egine.com - 18 Nov 2006 16:59 GMT
> > 1998 Grand Voyager, 3.3L engine. My PCM ( powertrain control module )
> > died a while back, and I was able to find a used one quite
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> Glenn Beasley
> Chrysler Tech

That's encouraging, I guess I can ask.  I'm dubious, though, unless the
smog techs have a way to override the VIN. As I said, it isn't going to
fly if they try to send the pass data to the state with the wrong VIN
number.
-Paul
MT-2500 - 18 Nov 2006 16:40 GMT
carbide@egine.com Wrote:
> 1998 Grand Voyager, 3.3L engine. My PCM ( powertrain control module )
> died a while back, and I was able to find a used one quite
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> me it can't be done or some such, which may or may not be true.
> -Paul

Vin no. can not be reset after it is programed in but.
But you might check it with a scanner. A used one may not even have had
it programed into the pcm yet.
If that is the case you can punch it in with a good scanner.
Also when you have a scanner on it check and see if the tire size is
set right.
That part can be reset.
The Vin No. in pcm  should not be a problem on inspection as long as
check engine light is not on and no codes set.
Good Luck
MT

Signature

MT-2500

http://www.automotiveforums.com

carbide@egine.com - 25 Nov 2006 01:22 GMT
> The Vin No. in pcm  should not be a problem on inspection as long as
> check engine light is not on and no codes set.

OK, got it smogged so here's the scoop:
They just scanned the barcode on my registration renewal form which the
state (California) sent. They got the VIN number off of that form, not
from the PCM. So the junkyard PCM wasn't an issue, just as some of you
said. I worried about it for nothing. ;-)

It passed smog with flying colors, so I'm set. BTW, I paid $65 + $15
shipping for that used PCM. I found it up in Washington using this
website:
http://www.car-part.com/

Thanks for your help, guys.
-Paul
MT-2500 - 25 Nov 2006 03:20 GMT
carbide@egine.com Wrote:

> > The Vin No. in pcm  should not be a problem on inspection as long as
> > check engine light is not on and no codes set.
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> Thanks for your help, guys.
> -Paul

You are welcome and.
Thanks for posting back how it went.
Glad all went well with no problems.
I really do not know why they put the vin no. in the pcm anyway.
It does nothing as far as the pcm goes.:grinyes: :grinno: :lol:
MT

Signature

MT-2500

http://www.automotiveforums.com

MT-2500 - 18 Nov 2006 17:24 GMT
carbide@egine.com Wrote:
> 1998 Grand Voyager, 3.3L engine. My PCM ( powertrain control module )
> died a while back, and I was able to find a used one quite
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> me it can't be done or some such, which may or may not be true.
> -Paul

Talk to the inspection station and explain the situation.
And If all else fails.
A computer rebuilding  co. should be able to erase the vin no.
Or exchange you for another one.
Check you local area for one.
I have one in Texas if you need there 800 no or address.
Post back
Good Luck

Signature

MT-2500

http://www.automotiveforums.com

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.