Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Chrysler Cars / July 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Brake inspection not part of standard service!?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Percival P. Cassidy - 20 Jul 2007 16:41 GMT
Our '02 300M has been serviced regularly at 3000 Mile (never much
longer) intervals by a Chrysler dealer.

Today they called to say that the left rear brake pads are worn to the
point that there is metal-to-metal contact with wear greater than will
permit skimming the rotor, so $290 for new rotor + pads + labor.

I asked how come it could have worn so much in 3000 miles and how come
they didn't detect it 3000 miles ago and replace the pads, saving me the
cost of a new rotor now. They said that checking the brakes is only a
15,000 mile item and that if I want them checked more often it'll cost
me $15 a time.

Surely disk brakes are even easier to check than drum brakes. Why
wouldn't that be a more frequently checked item?

Perce
Mike Y - 20 Jul 2007 17:10 GMT
> Our '02 300M has been serviced regularly at 3000 Mile (never much
> longer) intervals by a Chrysler dealer.
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> Perce

I'd tell them you want the old rotor (it's your right, you own it) and see
if
the story changes.

Personally, I would never turn a rotor, not when brand new they are under
$60 (aftermarket).
Larry - 20 Jul 2007 18:13 GMT
For my 99 Intrepid, I got both rear rotors ($26 each) and both sets of rear
brake pads for $71 total, including tax, at NAPA.

Larry

: > Our '02 300M has been serviced regularly at 3000 Mile (never much
: > longer) intervals by a Chrysler dealer.
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
: Personally, I would never turn a rotor, not when brand new they are under
: $60 (aftermarket).

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Percival P. Cassidy - 20 Jul 2007 19:31 GMT
I guess I'd better stop letting my Chrysler dealer do my work.

Perce

> For my 99 Intrepid, I got both rear rotors ($26 each) and both sets of rear
> brake pads for $71 total, including tax, at NAPA.

> : > Our '02 300M has been serviced regularly at 3000 Mile (never much
> : > longer) intervals by a Chrysler dealer.
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> : > Surely disk brakes are even easier to check than drum brakes. Why
> : > wouldn't that be a more frequently checked item?
who - 20 Jul 2007 20:28 GMT
Sounds like a good idea considering the age of your car.
After the guarantee period I always get a shop such as Speedy or Midas
do my brakes.

> I guess I'd better stop letting my Chrysler dealer do my work.
>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> > : > Surely disk brakes are even easier to check than drum brakes. Why
> > : > wouldn't that be a more frequently checked item?
ks - 21 Jul 2007 14:19 GMT
Do they advertive an inspection with every oil change, if not why would you
assume so.

Dealers are damed no mater what they do. People want the price of a quick
lube (who will recomend and new air filter and try to sell you a coulant
flush and tranny flush every 3000 miles) and the service of a best freind
private mechinc.

It's your car unless you ask for something to be inspected you need to
assume it hasn't been.

KS

>I guess I'd better stop letting my Chrysler dealer do my work.
>
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>> : > Surely disk brakes are even easier to check than drum brakes. Why
>> : > wouldn't that be a more frequently checked item?
Joe - 21 Jul 2007 21:07 GMT
> Do they advertive an inspection with every oil change, if not why would
> you assume so.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> KS

This is definitely the answer to the question that was asked by the OP.
What he got was an oil change every 3000 miles, and now he's wishing he'd
gotten a brake inspection every 3000 miles.  That's not what he got. He
didn't mention what "service" was, and so he forced us to assume.  It's not
a very good customer who obfuscates on the internet.

Let's just say he had his tires rotated instead.  It's certainly true that
brakes are very visible when your tires are rotated, and they ought to be
looking at them.  Once the tires off, it's right there.  So if you were
having the tires rotated every 5000 or so, I think you'd have a legitimate
complaint, but that's all you'd have.  It still wouldn't be their
responsibility to catch that, unless they advertise it and you asked for it.
Rather, it would have been a nice thing to do.
who - 22 Jul 2007 07:05 GMT
> It's your car unless you ask for something to be inspected you need to
> assume it hasn't been.

Over the last few years I've had my oil changed at both Speedy and the
Chrysler dealer a few times each. Both say they do an overall inspection.

My EGR hose fell apart early this year. I'm very surprised no one
noticed that, particularly since the car is 10+ yrs old.
The moral of the story is you have to inspect things yourself,
particularly on an older car.
Percival P. Cassidy - 23 Jul 2007 10:55 GMT
> Do they advertive an inspection with every oil change, if not why would you
> assume so.

But I wasn't taking it in every 3000 miles for "an oil change." I was
taking it in every 3000 miles for "the standard 3000 mile service,"
which I assumed -- wrongly, as it turns out -- included looking the car
over to see what other preventive or remedial maintenance was required.

> Dealers are damed no mater what they do. People want the price of a quick
> lube (who will recomend and new air filter and try to sell you a coulant
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> It's your car unless you ask for something to be inspected you need to
> assume it hasn't been.

When they had it the other day, they pointed out that the air filter
needed to be replaced. And, on a previous occasion, they pointed out
that the transmission fluid cooler was leaking.

And if it's not possible to check the brakes without taking the wheels
off, how come they found a crapped-out rotor and pads in the course of
doing "just an oil-and-filter change"? How come they didn't find nearly
crapped-out rotor and pads in the course of "just an oil-and-filter
change" 3000 miles before?

Perce
aarcuda69062 - 23 Jul 2007 12:29 GMT
> And if it's not possible to check the brakes without taking the wheels
> off, how come they found a crapped-out rotor and pads in the course of
> doing "just an oil-and-filter change"? How come they didn't find nearly
> crapped-out rotor and pads in the course of "just an oil-and-filter
> change" 3000 miles before?

You should be asking the dealership.
Mike Y - 23 Jul 2007 12:57 GMT
> But I wasn't taking it in every 3000 miles for "an oil change." I was
> taking it in every 3000 miles for "the standard 3000 mile service,"
> which I assumed -- wrongly, as it turns out -- included looking the car
> over to see what other preventive or remedial maintenance was required.

This is the rub.  Some dealers advertise an 'oil change' and try to be
competitive with the local speedy shop.  (My local guy usually lubes all
chassis fittings, tops off all fluids for free, and I've caught him actually
looking in the wheels to check pad thickness.  Hey, it's good business,
and he is possibly finding more work to do.)  Dealers that want you in
and out for cheap are one thing.  Other dealers stand firm that they are
'dealer service' and are worth more than the local garage because they
are 'factory' and are not only more experienced and have more training
with your make of car, but also clearly imply they are doing more for
your increased dollar amout than the local mechanic.

So how upset you are really depends on what kind of service the
dealer presented as what he was providing.

Even still, it IS possible that the dealer DID check, and your brakes
WERE acceptable at the last check.

> And if it's not possible to check the brakes without taking the wheels
> off, how come they found a crapped-out rotor and pads in the course of
> doing "just an oil-and-filter change"? How come they didn't find nearly
> crapped-out rotor and pads in the course of "just an oil-and-filter
> change" 3000 miles before?

Actually, I side with you, but to be fair, if the brakes weren't making any
noise 3000 miles ago, and they weren't checking, then they might not have
reason to look at them.  Now, they may be making noise, so they looked.
Especially if you are now to the point the rotors are gouged.
Steve B. - 20 Jul 2007 22:33 GMT
>Surely disk brakes are even easier to check than drum brakes. Why
>wouldn't that be a more frequently checked item?
>
>Perce

Lots of things are easy to check but the dealership is a business and
as a business they need to move cars through as fast as they can to
turn a profit.  They don't check all the bulbs either which is another
thing that should be done on a regular basis.  If the brakes are as
worn as they are stating they should have been making noise for a
while.

Not to bad mouth the dealers but to me it doesn't make sense to pay
dealer prices to have "easy" repairs done.  Find yourself a good
independent shop to take care of you oil changes, brakes and that kind
of stuff and save the hard stuff for the top dollar guys.  Those
rotors are pretty cheap in the aftermarket as are the pads but a
dealer is only going to use factory (expensive as hell) parts.

            Steve B.
Bill Putney - 21 Jul 2007 00:07 GMT
>>Surely disk brakes are even easier to check than drum brakes. Why
>>wouldn't that be a more frequently checked item?
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
>              Steve B.

Signature

Bill Putney
(To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
address with the letter 'x')

Bill Putney - 21 Jul 2007 00:24 GMT
> Lots of things are easy to check but the dealership is a business and
> as a business they need to move cars through as fast as they can to
> turn a profit.  They don't check all the bulbs either which is another
> thing that should be done on a regular basis.  If the brakes are as
> worn as they are stating they should have been making noise for a
> while.

Not necessarily.  Coincidentally, just a couple of weeks ago, I had to
replace rear pads and one rear rotor on my Concorde (same car as 300M
brake-wise) because I failed to notice the rear pads were low in time -
my first time ever in 40 years of driving and DIY'ing of letting brakes
on any of my cars go to the point of rotor damage.  The pads were
riveted type, and some rivet heads deeply gouged the rotor - no
noticeable noise while that was going on.

> Not to bad mouth the dealers but to me it doesn't make sense to pay
> dealer prices to have "easy" repairs done.  Find yourself a good
> independent shop to take care of you oil changes, brakes and that kind
> of stuff and save the hard stuff for the top dollar guys.  Those
> rotors are pretty cheap in the aftermarket as are the pads but a
> dealer is only going to use factory (expensive as hell) parts.

Yep.  You can get top-end, excellent quality complete rear pad set and
one rotor for under $100 - in fact you'd have trouble spending over $90
for completer rear pads and one rotor.  Labor?  I can do both wheels in
my driveway in 1 hour - tops - and I am in my mid 50's!

I agree.  $290 for that!?  I don't think so.

Bill Putney
(To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
address with the letter 'x')
maxpower - 21 Jul 2007 20:55 GMT
> Our '02 300M has been serviced regularly at 3000 Mile (never much
> longer) intervals by a Chrysler dealer.
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> Perce

Alot of dealers have a lube tech and all he does is oil changes. Doesn't
check the vehicle over just gets them in and out. If the dealer offers a
special on an oil change like having it done in a certain time or you get it
free they may not check your vehicle out either. You would also be surprised
of how many people come in and ask for and oil change and get mad that the
technicians pulled wheels to check brakes. Do an oil change and give the
customer an estimate of brakes and they said I never asked you to check my
brakes.

Glenn
C-BODY@webtv.net - 22 Jul 2007 01:37 GMT
Perce, I believe you need to look at the Maintenance Schedule in your
car's owner's manual.  It should have an interval for "Inspect Brakes"
in it, I believe, which is NOT each 3000 miles.  Be that as it may . . .

When you take your vehicle into almost ANY service facility, dealership
or not, and ask for an oil and oil filter change, that's what you get
and you get it in (sometimes) "30 minutes or less, or the next one's
free".  Some dealers also manage to get a quicky rinse off in their
automatic car wash, too, in that same general time frame.

In the "old days" of serivce stations, you didn't even get a brake
inspection with each oil change.  While the car was up on the lift, it
might be possible to look at the brake rotor surfaces to see if there
any unusual wear showing up, but that's about all--plus, you can usually
only see one side of the rotor anyway.  With the wheel off, then you can
see the entire outer rotor surface, but the inner surface is generally
hidden by the splash shield.  What you can see of it can still leave
much unseen with respect to wear patterns.

Sometimes, you can see how much brake lining is left on the brake pads,
but not knowing if the pads are "riveted" or "bonded", even that's a hit
or miss situation without pulling the caliper off.

With all due respect, this situation proves that if a dealership
"touches" the vehicle, they are magically supposed to see everything's
condition via "magic vision" or similar.  They are supposed to also know
that something going to fail next week, too, although everything looks
and sounds fine NOW.  And, when that does not happen, the dealership
gets bad-mouthed for not "knowing" something was as it turned out to be,
later, in advance.

Now, depending upon how much is being paid for the oil and oil filter
change, will depend upon how much time is spent on the vehicle by the
technician--just as YOU would do if it was your job to do (at a fixed
labor rate).  In other words, as already mentioned, it's about getting
the vehicles' processed and doing a quality job in a certain amount of
time.  There will be time to check the air filter element and see if
there might be something else under the hood that might need attention
(while they are draining the oil oil and putting the new oil in), but
not much else.  As modern vehicles now take less general maintenance
prior to 100K miles, there is less to check for.

One foreign brand dealership in DFW is advertising an oil change and
tire rotation in "an hour".  If that includes resetting the tire
pressure monitor, that would be about right.  Whether they might check
for nails in the tires might be open for discussion.

Also, a "brake inspection" would be a separate and different labor
operation than "oil and oil filter change".  Therefore, more cost
involved.

Now, Perce, as you perceive you have been taking good care of your
vehicle with the 3000 mile oil changes, have you ALSO been following the
Chrysler Recommended Maintenance Schedule at the same time?  Key point!  

As for what's better, a dealership or a private garage or chain service
store . . . that's debateable.  At least at the dealership, there should
be some guidance of what the particular  vehicle's supposed to be
"doing" (just as a prior service station mechanic, who was used to
seeing YOUR car every so often and knew pretty much how YOU drove the
car, might know when something needed fixing), but when you take a
vehicle into a chain store (of any kind), you might see the same techs
in the shop from time to time and you might not--and this can vary from
store to store, too.  And . . . an important thing to consider, they
might put some incorrect fluid in the vehicle (highly important with
respect to ATF with many newer vehicles, especially non-GM brands!) or
put the right fluid in the wrong place.  

These places might be more convenient and you might not have had any
problems with them, but it can all depend upon many factors.  And, they
might have "better" hours than the dealerships, too, which can be a
plus.  Generally, as long as you're in their area of expertise, things
can be ok and you can build a relationship with the people there, too.

Regardless of where you take your vehicle for service, it always helps
to build a good working relationship with those there--whether it's a
dealership or somewhere else.  The prices at a dealership can be higher
than at one of the other places, which can be a factor, too, but the old
"You get what you pay for" can become very operative if the
non-dealership entity does something wrong in what they did.

As for the brake job, you can request the dealership not use their OEM
parts, or at least ask them to get you a quote with OEM and using a
quality part from a local auto supply.  Sometimes, the OEM is more
expensive but NOT always.  

Also, Perce, you did not mention what the labor charges were, just the
total price.  I suspect that when labor and shop supplies are deducted
from the amount you mentioned, the parts prices might NOT be that
different from the aftermarket.  

Also, I need to mention that some brake repair chain stores will
advertise a really inexpensive price for their brake service.  But you
also need to listen to their "fast taking disclaimer" at the end of the
radio advertisement.  A friend used to work at an auto supply near one
of those places.  He said the brake shop was always calling over and
ordering parts and not asking about the prices as the customer was going
to pay them anyway (he claimed) so it was more important to get the car
repaired than what the customer was going to pay.  So, read the fine
print on those deals!

In the case of using non-OEM brake rotors, make sure that the ones you
get have the SWIRL FINISH pattern on them.  This "non-directional"
finish is there to keep the metallic pads from trying to "phonograph
needle" follow the cutter's grooves and cause chattering.  If the rotors
have just a satin finish, you'll need to carefully "bed" the pads in
with several medium-decel stops (which will probably cause smells and
early fade until the satin finish is more polished by the brake pads).
I know, that's what happened to me one time when I bought non-OEM
rotors.  Later, I bought some more (really good price, too!) that had
the swirl finish on them.  NONE of the prior "break-in" problems.  

As thin as the current production rotors generally are, not cutting them
is a better long-term option.

And, of course, make sure the brake pads are at least OEM spec.  The
"cheap pads" are just that, but something like Carbon Metallic are
generally a little more money, but worth it.  

Just some things to consider . . .


C-BODY
Joe - 25 Jul 2007 03:22 GMT
> Perce, I believe you need to look at the Maintenance Schedule in your
> car's owner's manual.  It should have an interval for "Inspect Brakes"
> in it, I believe, which is NOT each 3000 miles.  Be that as it may . . .
snip

> With all due respect, this situation proves that if a dealership
> "touches" the vehicle, they are magically supposed to see everything's
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> gets bad-mouthed for not "knowing" something was as it turned out to be,
> later, in advance.

Well put.  The OP can't take responsibility for something as simple as his
own brakes, but expects somebody else to see intio the future.

So the next fact that needs to be brought out is that "standard service" is
an oil change.  If somebody thinks there's something else included, let the
burden of proof lie on them.
C-BODY@webtv.net - 26 Jul 2007 21:42 GMT
Thanks for the kind words, Joe.

A few more "reality" issues --

You can look at the disc brake rotor outer wear surface for unusual wear
patterns, but all you can usually see of the INNER surface is probably
not much (due to splash shields and such).  

You can look at the caliper with it still attached to the car, to look
for remaining brake pad amounts, BUT unless you know if it's a riveted
lining pad or a bonded lining pad, you still don't know how much is
left.  Both can look to have the same lining left on them, but you have
to also realize that a riveted pad's last 25% or so of lining is not
useable as the rivets which retain the lining to the pad stucture go
through that last 25% of lining.  THEREFORE, unless you remove the
caliper from its mounting bracket, it's still pure speculation how much
useable lining is left.

So, at this point, we've looked through the slots in the wheels and the
possible open areas of the splash shield to see the wear surfaces of the
rotor.  This would be a simple "look see" situation, for which no real
labor would be charged.

IF you also request a tire rotation, then that would result in the
wheels being removed and reinstalled in a different mounting location.
At this time, the calipers could be looked at--probably for no extra
charge as the rotation labor would pay for getting the wheels off in the
first place.  Still, a "goodwill" inspection situation.

BUT if you request to have the calipers pulled off and the linings
inspected, then that's an extra labor operation AND one that would be
charged for--no matter what.  If you decide to get the pads replaced at
that time, then the "remove" labor would be considered part of the total
brake pad replacement.

Just some additional clarifications.

Plus if you back out the sales tax, environmental fees, and LABOR from
the amount quoted for the new rotor and brake job, parts prices might be
more reasonable than they appear.

Unless something's written on the repair order, always presume it has
not been done.

C-BODY
philthy - 27 Jul 2007 00:56 GMT
why is your nic c -body   are you into  the c bodys  looking for one??

> Thanks for the kind words, Joe.
>
[quoted text clipped - 41 lines]
>
> C-BODY
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.