> > I just bought an '07 Dodge Nitro with "part time" 4WD. There is no
> > high or low. How fast can I go while in 4WD without doing any
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> than that. Likewise, you don't need to worry about the difference in
> gas mileage.
> I have been in situations before where I have thought the roads are in
> good condition, then hit an ice patch and almost killed myself.. I
> guess with part time 4WD, you can't really use it until you are
> absoultely sure there is little traction. In other words, you can't
> just put it in 4WD to be on the "safe side".
I don't think the best full-time 4wd or AWD system would help you one
iota in that case either. 4WD or AWD helps you get moving on ice and
snow, but you can't stop any faster than any other car because all cars
have 4-wheel bakes. What good is 4wd going to do if you hit an ice patch
at speed? None.
> What I liked about the Nitro was all of the safety features. Assuming
> 4WD won't save me in the above situation, how about the other safety
> features like Electronic Stability Control, Anti Roll Mitigation,
> Automatic Traction Control, etc.. Does anyone have any opinions on any
> of these features?
No substitute for driving skill.
Ted Mittelstaedt - 18 Dec 2007 06:18 GMT
> > I have been in situations before where I have thought the roads are in
> > good condition, then hit an ice patch and almost killed myself.. I
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> have 4-wheel bakes. What good is 4wd going to do if you hit an ice patch
> at speed? None.
I have an AWD van. What AWD gives you is every 80K miles or so you
have to pay about $200 to have the driveline from the front transfer case to
the rear axles rebuilt. Or, spend $500 to get a new driveline. Sadly, the
AWD designers threw away 70 years of learned design in building drivelines
and U-joints and opted to go instead to this booted CVS design like what
is used in axles in FWD cars. The boots on the suckers fail at the same
rate that the boots on the CVS axles do, which means that once the boot
fails, you get grease slung all over the bottom of the vehicle and have to
go
get the driveline rebuilt.
Ted
Joe Pfeiffer - 18 Dec 2007 16:05 GMT
> I have an AWD van. What AWD gives you is every 80K miles or so you
> have to pay about $200 to have the driveline from the front transfer case to
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> go
> get the driveline rebuilt.
Wow -- I don't think I've ever seen anybody go through CV boots at
that rate...
Ted Mittelstaedt - 19 Dec 2007 18:12 GMT
> > I have an AWD van. What AWD gives you is every 80K miles or so you
> > have to pay about $200 to have the driveline from the front transfer case to
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> Wow -- I don't think I've ever seen anybody go through CV boots at
> that rate...
That's only 2 or 3 CV joints replaced during the typical lifetime of the
vehicle. But, a rebuilt half-shaft is available in the box from most
auto parts places for about $50. Rather different than a driveline which
you have to remove - thereby disabling the vehicle - carry in to the One
Place in the city that rebuilds them, then wait a week, and if the line is
torn up, wait longer for them to find another line from a wrecker that
doesen't
have the same parts hashed.
Call around to the driveline places if you have one of these that's older
than 10 years. Your going to find that some of the repair parts for them
are no longer available from Chrysler or anywhere else.
I don't know about the other vehicle manufacturers, but the AWD driveline
Chrysler produced for the vans is clearly a bad design. No wonder they
stopped making
them.
Ted
Richard Ehrenberg - 20 Dec 2007 14:07 GMT
The only reason the minivans dropped AWD is that it wouldn't clear Stow'N'Go
seats.
The AWD systems simply moved to the Pacifica, which is really just a
"compressed" minivan platform.
Rick
> > > I have an AWD van. What AWD gives you is every 80K miles or so you
> > > have to pay about $200 to have the driveline from the front transfer
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
>
> Ted
Ted Mittelstaedt - 20 Dec 2007 18:02 GMT
> The only reason the minivans dropped AWD is that it wouldn't clear Stow'N'Go
> seats.
If there had really been the market demand for AWD in a minivan, Chrysler
would have figured something out. AWD was dropped because there
wasn't enough people buying them for Chrysler to spend the money and
time to design it in. Obvious options would have been to not make the
stow and go available on AWD vans.
I have a 94 AWD and a 95 non-AWD and have disassembled the AWD
pretty far in the past. There's no difference in body design between the
two. AWD is mainly a bolt-on option, it didn't take a lot of rework to
add it in.
Ted
Ted Mittelstaedt - 19 Dec 2007 18:12 GMT
> > I have an AWD van. What AWD gives you is every 80K miles or so you
> > have to pay about $200 to have the driveline from the front transfer case to
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> Wow -- I don't think I've ever seen anybody go through CV boots at
> that rate...
That's only 2 or 3 CV joints replaced during the typical lifetime of the
vehicle. But, a rebuilt half-shaft is available in the box from most
auto parts places for about $50. Rather different than a driveline which
you have to remove - thereby disabling the vehicle - carry in to the One
Place in the city that rebuilds them, then wait a week, and if the line is
torn up, wait longer for them to find another line from a wrecker that
doesen't
have the same parts hashed.
Call around to the driveline places if you have one of these that's older
than 10 years. Your going to find that some of the repair parts for them
are no longer available from Chrysler or anywhere else.
I don't know about the other vehicle manufacturers, but the AWD driveline
Chrysler produced for the vans is clearly a bad design. No wonder they
stopped making
them.
Ted