Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Chrysler Cars / May 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

2001 PT Cruiser Limited Edition

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Citizen Jimserac - 07 May 2008 14:39 GMT
I just bought a 2001 limited edition PT Cruiser
and really like it.  It has 60,000 miles on it but was well maintained
and in good shape.

But the mileage is terrible - luckily I don't drive far
distance and can live with it no problem.

Any hints to improve mileage?  I'm using the cheapest
gas (lowest octane) right now.  Would using a higher
octane help?  Most of my driving is done in the city
rather than on the freeways.

Thanks
CJ
rfeirste@nycap.rr.com - 07 May 2008 16:17 GMT
I get about 18 city and 22 highway on my 01 Limited. I always use Mobil 1
5W-30 oil. Other than keeping the weight of the vehicle down, using low
rolling resistance tires inflated to 36 lb and conservative driving there is
not much else you can do to improve its fuel economy. Chrysler did a poor
job in this area with the Cruiser. Our mini-van with the same transmission
but a 3.8 V6 does better!!!!!
Steve B. - 08 May 2008 02:32 GMT
>I get about 18 city and 22 highway on my 01 Limited. I always use Mobil 1
>5W-30 oil. Other than keeping the weight of the vehicle down, using low
>rolling resistance tires inflated to 36 lb and conservative driving there is
>not much else you can do to improve its fuel economy. Chrysler did a poor
>job in this area with the Cruiser. Our mini-van with the same transmission
>but a 3.8 V6 does better!!!!!

I have a '95 Fleetwood with a 300HP LT1 8cyl engine that gets better
mileage than that.  How can a PT manage to use so much gas?

         Steve B.
Pete E. Kruzer - 08 May 2008 14:16 GMT
> I have a '95 Fleetwood with a 300HP LT1 8cyl engine that gets better
> mileage than that.  How can a PT manage to use so much gas?
>
>           Steve B.

Under powered and overweight.
Jalapeno - 08 May 2008 19:04 GMT
> > I have a '95 Fleetwood with a 300HP LT1 8cyl engine that gets better
> > mileage than that.  How can a PT manage to use so much gas?
>
> >           Steve B.
>
> Under powered and overweight.

The PT gas mileage is bad because Chrysler (DaimlerChrysler) got the
PT classified as a truck. As a truck, Chrysler (DaimlerChrysler) did
not HAVE to make the PT get good fuel mileage. At 18 mpg it did not
bring down the CAFE for autos and actually increased the CAFE for
trucks.

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m3012/is_2_179/ai_54051112
Lloyd - 07 May 2008 19:15 GMT
> I just bought a 2001 limited edition PT Cruiser
> and really like it.  It has 60,000 miles on it but was well maintained
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> Thanks
> CJ

No.  Use the grade your owner's manual recommends as long as the
engine isn't knocking.  In fact, some sources say you get lower
mileage on higher octane in an engine not designed for it.

Follow the usual ideas for mileage:  Check tire inflation, remove
unnecessary weight, don't carry anything on the roof, smooth starts,
brake early, reduce your speed, combine trips, reduce idling times, ...
FredP - 07 May 2008 19:20 GMT
>> I just bought a 2001 limited edition PT Cruiser
>> and really like it.  It has 60,000 miles on it but was well maintained
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> unnecessary weight, don't carry anything on the roof, smooth starts,
> brake early, reduce your speed, combine trips, reduce idling times, ...

Also how long has it been since it had a complete tuneup?
Count Floyd - 08 May 2008 18:25 GMT
> I just bought a 2001 limited edition PT Cruiser
> and really like it.  It has 60,000 miles on it but was well maintained
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> Thanks
> CJ
CJ,
After two PT's, a 2003 sedan and a 2005, we went with the Caliber.  We
never got over 22 with either car, we used Mobil1 synthetic, the K&N
oil filter and still, nada!  That transmission is the culprit, if it
had the CVT transmission it would get a lot better mileage.
--
Just Me (remove <nospam> to reply) - 12 May 2008 18:33 GMT
I have the same car.  I love it, it's cute.  Drives fine.  Low
maintenance except for brakes (eats through them.)

We're just stuck with the gas guzzling.

It is heavy I think.  Small engine for such a car.  Tranny may suck too.

Eventually I'll get something that is better on the gas.  Haven't found
anything I like though.  Hoping for the electric revolution to catch up.
 I'd own a Prius if it wasn't so ugly.  Boring.

When I bought it in 2000 a tank was $25.  Now it's $55.  Just didn't
care then.  I cared, just didn't worry about it.

Won't buy another one.  Probably won't by anything Chrysler/Dodge.  Need
to support car companies that are trying harder to get green.

> I just bought a 2001 limited edition PT Cruiser
> and really like it.  It has 60,000 miles on it but was well maintained
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> Thanks
> CJ
Count Floyd - 14 May 2008 20:52 GMT
> I have the same car.  I love it, it's cute.  Drives fine.  Low
> maintenance except for brakes (eats through them.)
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> Won't buy another one.  Probably won't by anything Chrysler/Dodge.  Need
> to support car companies that are trying harder to get green.

Same here with two PT Cruisers, a 2003 base Sedan and later a 2005
Convertible. Never could get over 21-22mgp and most times 17-19.  
Traded in the Convertible for a Dodge Caliber, great mileage, getting
28-29 in town with A/C running.  Over 32 on the road with A/C going
65mph.
Stay with Chrysler products.  I also own a 1940 Chrysler Royal that
still gets 20mpg with the flathead 6.
rob - 17 May 2008 05:38 GMT
so you like that Hyundai built caliber engine and trans?

>> I have the same car.  I love it, it's cute.  Drives fine.  Low
>> maintenance except for brakes (eats through them.)
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> Stay with Chrysler products.  I also own a 1940 Chrysler Royal that
> still gets 20mpg with the flathead 6.
Count Floyd - 17 May 2008 07:26 GMT
> so you like that Hyundai built caliber engine and trans?
I think that the tranny is made in Japan, JATCO.

--
rob - 18 May 2008 00:11 GMT
that could be. not sure

think its the world engine too.  I don't like the damn things unless I can
get one with an adjustable see, otherwise its a pain to see over the hood.

>> so you like that Hyundai built caliber engine and trans?
> I think that the tranny is made in Japan, JATCO.
Count Floyd - 18 May 2008 03:52 GMT
> that could be. not sure
>
> think its the world engine too.  I don't like the damn things unless I can
> get one with an adjustable see, otherwise its a pain to see over the hood.
The Caliber has a seat height adjuster that will allow you to see over
the hood.  I like that feature, my wife does not!
rob - 18 May 2008 14:46 GMT
that seat height adjuster must not be in the base model then.  the one I
test drove was a pain, noisy trans, program car ( that was part of the
problem) so good chance it was abused.

it was base model but didn't see an adjuster. I'll look at another when I
get back down there.

>> that could be. not sure
>>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> The Caliber has a seat height adjuster that will allow you to see over
> the hood.  I like that feature, my wife does not!
Count Floyd - 18 May 2008 15:42 GMT
> that seat height adjuster must not be in the base model then.  the one I
> test drove was a pain, noisy trans, program car ( that was part of the
> problem) so good chance it was abused.
>
> it was base model but didn't see an adjuster. I'll look at another when I
> get back down there.

Yea, it is the SXT, pretty well loaded, with the 2.0 engine and the
CVT transmission.  Power window, air, and all the standard SXT stuff.
You might have been driving the 1.8 base stick shift model.  There is
an adjuster on the left of the driver's seat that you use to pump up
the height of the seat.  We are VERY pleased with our Caliber, no
problems after almost one year.
rob - 18 May 2008 22:14 GMT
nope this one was 2.0.  but maybe I just didn't see the adjuster

still the one I saw was abused and never should have even been on the lot.
this dealer also needs to fire their so called "detail' guy.  put on so much
"dressing" fluid under the hood to make things looks black and shiny ( and
no it was armor all) the crap was lying in the low spots of the plastic
panels and engine covers in little puddles. I would have spent several hours
cleaning it all off if I had taken possession of that damn thing.

I'll stick to my LHS for a little longer..........then find another dealer
>:-{)

>> that seat height adjuster must not be in the base model then.  the one I
>> test drove was a pain, noisy trans, program car ( that was part of the
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> the height of the seat.  We are VERY pleased with our Caliber, no
> problems after almost one year.
rob - 19 May 2008 00:27 GMT
oops I meant was NOT armor all

> nope this one was 2.0.  but maybe I just didn't see the adjuster
>
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>> the height of the seat.  We are VERY pleased with our Caliber, no
>> problems after almost one year.
Joe Pfeiffer - 18 May 2008 04:11 GMT
> think its the world engine too.  I don't like the damn things unless I can
> get one with an adjustable see, otherwise its a pain to see over the hood.

An adjustable what?
Jerry - 17 May 2008 03:37 GMT
My 2001, stick tranny, has 74k on it.  I get 21-23 in town and 26-28
highway.  And that is in brutally hot Las Vegas and using AC.  Keep
tires at 36psi, K&N air filter, Penzoil 10w-30, and thermal barriers
around the air intake system. I think the main reasons I get these
numbers is slow acceleration, braking slowly and early, and keeping my
speed down.

> I just bought a 2001 limited edition PT Cruiser
> and really like it.  It has 60,000 miles on it but was well maintained
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> Thanks
> CJ
Count Floyd - 17 May 2008 05:28 GMT
> My 2001, stick tranny, has 74k on it.  I get 21-23 in town and 26-28
> highway.  And that is in brutally hot Las Vegas and using AC.  Keep
> tires at 36psi, K&N air filter, Penzoil 10w-30, and thermal barriers
> around the air intake system. I think the main reasons I get these
> numbers is slow acceleration, braking slowly and early, and keeping my
> speed down.
They should put the CVT transmission in the PT, my Caliber gets 28-29
around town using the A/C.
Citizen Jimserac - 17 May 2008 19:27 GMT
> My 2001, stick tranny, has 74k on it.  I get 21-23 in town and 26-28
> highway.  And that is in brutally hot Las Vegas and using AC.  Keep
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> > Thanks
> > CJ

Hah! Vegas, lived there for several
years.

I've already pumped up the tires
to 34psi and that's as high as I
feel safe with.  I've already noticed
an improvement in the mileage.

What brand and octane of gas do you use.

Ctiizen Jimserac
Jerry - 23 May 2008 04:39 GMT
>> My 2001, stick tranny, has 74k on it.  I get 21-23 in town and 26-28
>> highway.  And that is in brutally hot Las Vegas and using AC.  Keep
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>
> Ctiizen Jimserac
Various...I see no difference in mpg or performance.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.