Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Citroen Cars / July 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

My first Citroen? which one do i choose? ds? or cx? or bx?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Damian - 12 Jul 2006 01:18 GMT
Hi all, ive come to the point in my life where i need an unusual car.
Citroen would be my first choice, ive always loved their style. Basically
the choice is between a ds or cx (some people have suggested a bx, but i
think the styling isnt as nice as the old ones)

It seems the cx is getting quite rare, how are these for parts and
reliability and keeping up with modern traffic? any big things to look out
for when i come to inspecting one? rust i take it is a one of the big things
to look out for, anything else?

Im quite hand with my hands, and have owned old cars before, so working on
the basics doesnt scare me, but what about these hydrulics? only to be done
by an expert?

well thats about all of it i think, just looking for some opinions from
owners, thanks for listening to my question.
Dave Ryman - 12 Jul 2006 03:42 GMT
> Hi all, ive come to the point in my life where i need an unusual car.
> Citroen would be my first choice, ive always loved their style.
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> well thats about all of it i think, just looking for some opinions
> from owners, thanks for listening to my question.

Having owned two CXs and a BX, I would say that the CX is by far the
superior car. I recall the advert Citroen for the BX that ran something
like "Loves roads, hates garages" - my feeling was at the time that this
was because the BX spent so much time in the garage, that it was sick of
the place.

Signature

Regards,
      Dave

email: dave_ryman@hotmailNOSPAM.com

My Homepage: http://www.zdp06.ukgateway.net/
The F1 travel guide: http://www.zdp06.ukgateway.net/f1_travel.htm

Adrian - 12 Jul 2006 08:07 GMT
> Hi all, ive come to the point in my life where i need an unusual car.
> Citroen would be my first choice, ive always loved their style.
> Basically the choice is between a ds or cx (some people have suggested
> a bx, but i think the styling isnt as nice as the old ones)

Don't get me wrong, there's nothing wrong with BXs - but they really aren't
to be considered in the same breath as the D and CX...

Are Ds and CXs really to be considered in the same breath? No, I'm not sure
they are. They're very different beasts. I've had four CXs, but never a D -
and, to be perfectly honest, I just can't see myself owning one, even
thought I adore them deeply.

> It seems the cx is getting quite rare, how are these for parts and
> reliability

No problem at all.

> and keeping up with modern traffic?

A CX turbo has damn near 170bhp...

> Im quite hand with my hands, and have owned old cars before, so
> working on the basics doesnt scare me, but what about these hydrulics?
> only to be done by an expert?

Not at all. Very straightforward.

Are you in the UK? If so, come along to the CCC National Rally this
weekend, at Wood Green Showground, Godmanchester, Huntingdon. Have a damn
good look at CXs, have a damn good look at Ds - see which floats your boat.
:::Jerry:::: - 12 Jul 2006 09:18 GMT
> Hi all, ive come to the point in my life where i need an unusual car.
> Citroen would be my first choice, ive always loved their style.
<snip>

> Im quite hand with my hands, and have owned old cars before, so working on
> the basics doesnt scare me, but what about these hydrulics? only to be done
> by an expert?

Your main issues are going to be corrosion IMO [1], assuming that you
can get your head around the hydraulics (have a look at this site
http://www.citroen-ds-id.com/), both the D and the CX are real post
war Citroens - the BX has a lot of Peugeot influence, especially in
the engine and drive-chain.

If you are just handy with mechanicals then you might be best
thinking about a BX, although even BX rust.

[1] unless you are very fortunate or can throw a cheque book at the
car!
2Rowdy - 12 Jul 2006 09:54 GMT
I was reading
<news:44b4b626$0$17965$892e7fe2@authen.yellow.readfreenews.net>, made
by the entity known as :::Jerry::::, that requests spam to be sent to
<me@privacy.INVALID> and I became inspired,

> If you are just handy with mechanicals then you might be best
> thinking about a BX, although even BX rust.

The BX doesn't have the *Aaaah* factor.
Signature

d:J0han; Certifiable me http://www.aacity.net Citroen Newsgroup

They killed the Credo. Viva el Credo!

:::Jerry:::: - 12 Jul 2006 10:24 GMT
> I was reading
> <news:44b4b626$0$17965$892e7fe2@authen.yellow.readfreenews.net>, made
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> The BX doesn't have the *Aaaah* factor.

Nor does a CX for that matter, if you are a purist!
Adrian - 12 Jul 2006 11:23 GMT
:::Jerry:::: (me@privacy.INVALID) gurgled happily, sounding much like they
were saying :

>> The BX doesn't have the *Aaaah* factor.

> Nor does a CX for that matter, if you are a purist!

Kill the heretic! A CX most certainly does have "Aaaah". An XM, otoh...
2Rowdy - 12 Jul 2006 11:49 GMT
I was reading
<news:Xns97FE73EF995FCadrianachapmanfreeis@204.153.244.170>, made by
the entity known as Adrian, that requests spam to be sent to
<toomany2cvs@gmail.com> and I became inspired,

>>>> Jerry:::: (me@privacy.INVALID) gurgled happily, sounding much
>>>> like they were saying :
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Kill the heretic! A CX most certainly does have "Aaaah". An XM,
> otoh...

I think the mk1 has some *Aaah*. The mk2 otoh..
Signature

d:J0han; Certifiable me
http://www.aacity.net Citroen Newsgroup
I drank of the purifying Nirang, the sterile urine of the spotless white bull of which there is but one in ten thousand. I am the wearer of The Secret Girdle that once belonged to DE.

Tony Fisk - 12 Jul 2006 23:56 GMT
> The BX doesn't have the *Aaaah* factor.

I thought my Mk1 16V had loads of Aaaah  (as well as Eeek on occasions!)

TF
2Rowdy - 13 Jul 2006 08:54 GMT
I was reading <news:l6ftg.377$sz1.71@newsfe6-gui.ntli.net>, made by
the entity known as Tony Fisk, that requests spam to be sent to
<fiskfamily @tesco.net> and I became inspired,

>> The BX doesn't have the *Aaaah* factor.
>> --
>
> I thought my Mk1 16V had loads of Aaaah  (as well as Eeek on
> occasions!)

Had an accident with a mk1 once. I was so distracted by the weird
speedometer I didn't see that the car in front of me was braking.
The BX has become so common it's easily forgotten that it was a
revolutionary model.
Signature

d:J0han; Certifiable me
http://www.aacity.net Citroen Newsgroup

Random sigs                             should be banned from Usenet

Frank Kemper - 12 Jul 2006 10:41 GMT
"Damian" <bigbruggsy@hotmail.com> haute in die Tasten:

> It seems the cx is getting quite rare, how are these for parts and
> reliability and keeping up with modern traffic?

A DS clearly is a vintage car, which means that you have to take care
for it and search for spare parts etc. Usualy DS-cars do not have an
catalytic converter, ABS brakes are not available, so the use of an
DS in everey day life is somewhat limited (okay, the use of a pre-war
15 CV Traction Avant may be even more limited). Compared to that a
late CX is a more modern solution - which may well fall into the gap
between vintage cars and modern cars. You will also have to search
for parts and for experts to maintain this car, but its outdated
emission standards may cause problems when running it in metropolitan
areas (you will not be allowed to run such a car in many european
cities, soon).

Ever thought about a nice XM, fully loaded, in perfect condition?

Frank
Adrian - 12 Jul 2006 11:20 GMT
> A DS clearly is a vintage car

Strictly speaking, no.
"Vintage" is a clearly defined term, applying to cars built after 1918
(Before that would be Veteran) and before 1931.

> which means that you have to take care for it

Same applies to a CX.

> and search for spare parts etc.

D parts are easier to find than CX parts.

> Usualy DS-cars do not have an catalytic converter

Nor do CXs. And that's good. Catalytic converters are bloody horrible
things that should never have been legally enforced.

> ABS brakes are not available

They're only on very late CXs, not on s1 CXs which is - I suspect - what's
being considered here.

> so the use of an DS in everey day life is somewhat limited

But you forgot airbags! And traction control! And ESP suspension! And Xenon
lights! And headlights that turn with the steering! And fancy hi-tech
manual gearboxes that operate the clutch for you! And all the other utterly
unnecessary crap modern cars are inflicted with.

I drove the Acadiane to work today, instead of the XM. And I enjoyed it FAR
FAR more. There's loads of Ds in every day use in the UK, with many of them
doing quite large mileages.

> but its outdated emission standards may cause problems when running it in
> metropolitan areas (you will not be allowed to run such a car in many
> european cities, soon).

Fortunately, that is very unlikely to be a problem in the UK in the
foreseeable future. Traffic causing ridiculous journey times is a *far*
bigger problem.

> Ever thought about a nice XM, fully loaded, in perfect condition?

Speaking as an ex-CX owner and current XM owner, I can only say... <yawn>
The XM just doesn't cut it HERE <thumps chest> in the same way as a CX or a
DS does. Sure, it's a far more practical car. If you don't mind all the
little niggly problems they have. But it's just not got the same emotional
involvement.

Oh, and XM parts and expertise aren't exactly common.
2Rowdy - 12 Jul 2006 11:52 GMT
I was reading
<news:Xns97FE735CDCBC9adrianachapmanfreeis@204.153.244.170>, made by
the entity known as Adrian, that requests spam to be sent to
<toomany2cvs@gmail.com> and I became inspired,

> But you forgot airbags! And traction control! And ESP suspension!
> And Xenon lights! And headlights that turn with the steering! And
> fancy hi-tech manual gearboxes that operate the clutch for you! And
> all the other utterly unnecessary crap modern cars are inflicted
> with.

Er. Headlights that turn with steering?
Signature

d:J0han; Certifiable me
http://www.aacity.net Citroen Newsgroup

Changing life, Breaking ground

Adrian - 12 Jul 2006 12:13 GMT
>> But you forgot airbags! And traction control! And ESP suspension!
>> And Xenon lights! And headlights that turn with the steering! And
>> fancy hi-tech manual gearboxes that operate the clutch for you! And
>> all the other utterly unnecessary crap modern cars are inflicted
>> with.

> Er. Headlights that turn with steering?

<evil grin>
and the gearbox...?
2Rowdy - 12 Jul 2006 12:41 GMT
I was reading
<news:Xns97FE7C6C8C9F7adrianachapmanfreeis@204.153.244.170>, made by
the entity known as Adrian, that requests spam to be sent to
<toomany2cvs@gmail.com> and I became inspired,

>>> But you forgot airbags! And traction control! And ESP suspension!
>>> And Xenon lights! And headlights that turn with the steering! And
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> <evil grin>
> and the gearbox...?

Also a Cit first?
Signature

d:J0han; Certifiable me
http://www.aacity.net Citroen Newsgroup
[18 lines]

[Press ENTER to retrieve this message.]
[Press M to mark this message for later retrieval.]

Adrian - 12 Jul 2006 12:53 GMT
>>>> But you forgot airbags! And traction control! And ESP suspension!
>>>> And Xenon lights! And headlights that turn with the steering! And
>>>> fancy hi-tech manual gearboxes that operate the clutch for you!
>>>> And all the other utterly unnecessary crap modern cars are
>>>> inflicted with.

>>> Er. Headlights that turn with steering?

>> <evil grin>
>> and the gearbox...?

> Also a Cit first?

I dunno about that. I'm sure there were semi-auto boxes before - Citroen
never really did anything *NEW*-new, they just slapped it all together and
had the balls to sell it - but the BVH in the D was certainly a milestone
that got forgotten and has recently been resurrected with many computers
and much hype... Just like the headlights.
:::Jerry:::: - 12 Jul 2006 12:16 GMT
> "Damian" <bigbruggsy@hotmail.com> haute in die Tasten:
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> DS in everey day life is somewhat limited (okay, the use of a pre-war
> 15 CV Traction Avant may be even more limited).

Err neither of those 'things' are required for everyday motoring,
indeed there are arguments to be made that both cause more problems
than they solve. A DS is quite capable of keeping up with normal
everyday driving - in fact (again there is an argument to be made
that the DS is some what better equipped to do so than many cars
built now.

Indeed there is a parts supply problem, but then again try obtaining
some parts for 15 year old cars - of most makes.

Compared to that a
> late CX is a more modern solution - which may well fall into the gap
> between vintage cars and modern cars. You will also have to search
> for parts and for experts to maintain this car, but its outdated
> emission standards may cause problems when running it in metropolitan
> areas (you will not be allowed to run such a car in many european
> cities, soon).

Says who, can you cite such retrospective (EU?) legislation please -
if you are correct it will mean that just about all old cars
(remember that the CX remained in production well into the 1980's)
will fall foul of this.

> Ever thought about a nice XM, fully loaded, in perfect condition?

Hmmm, anything that relies on software and silicon chips is going to
be bad news when the obsolete E[lectronic] CU or sensors give up.
Ever wonder why the 2CV is so popular?!...
Adrian - 12 Jul 2006 13:33 GMT
:::Jerry:::: (me@privacy.INVALID) gurgled happily, sounding much like they
were saying :

> Says who, can you cite such retrospective (EU?) legislation please -

It's not retrospective, in that it doesn't require all cars to be retro-
fitted with the kit - it just restricts the use of those without. It is
part of local legislation in some EU countries - others go for different
methods, like allowing city access to vehicles with odd numbers on the
plates on some days, even numbers on others.

> (remember that the CX remained in production well into the 1980's)

CX saloon went out of production in 1989, estate in 1991.

>> Ever thought about a nice XM, fully loaded, in perfect condition?

> Hmmm, anything that relies on software and silicon chips is going to
> be bad news when the obsolete E[lectronic] CU or sensors give up.

That'll be fuel injected CXs and Ds f.cked, then, as well as any post-82
CX20 or 22 when the ignition brain dies.
:::Jerry:::: - 12 Jul 2006 14:04 GMT
> :::Jerry:::: (me@privacy.INVALID) gurgled happily, sounding much like they
<snip>

> > Hmmm, anything that relies on software and silicon chips is going to
> > be bad news when the obsolete E[lectronic] CU or sensors give up.
>
> That'll be fuel injected CXs and Ds f.cked, then, as well as any post-82
> CX20 or 22 when the ignition brain dies.

Indeed, dead and obsolete ECU's will be the cause of more vehicles
being taken off the road (and probably scrapped) than mechanical or
body failure in the future.

Even if the electronic parts are available the cost could well be
more than the vehicles worth, IIRC there is / was at least one (then
current) BMW that used to get written off due to bad accident damage
to the LHF door simply because BMW in their wisdom placed the main
ECU in the door.
. - 12 Jul 2006 21:47 GMT
>>>> Jerry:::: (me@privacy.INVALID) gurgled happily, sounding much like
>>>> they were saying :
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> CX saloon went out of production in 1989, estate in 1991.

what's teh guide price for a top spec A1 example of both/either of them ?
Adrian - 12 Jul 2006 22:37 GMT
. (_-@.com) gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying :

> what's teh guide price for a top spec A1 example of both/either of
> them ?

You'd struggle to pay more than £3-4k for a CX, unless it's a RHD Prestige
Turbo (Cit only built five...)

Any really nice D is closing on £10k - and a decap sold a little while ago
for Eur125,000 - in need of restoration...
:::Jerry:::: - 12 Jul 2006 23:04 GMT
<snip>

> Any really nice D is closing on £10k - and a decap sold a little while ago
> for Eur125,000 - in need of restoration...

To think, when I started in the trade, people couldn't give them
away - even the scrap yards didn't want them! Time machine, isolated
dry old barn, trailer....
. - 13 Jul 2006 00:01 GMT
:::Jerry:::: wrote:
> <snip>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> away - even the scrap yards didn't want them! Time machine, isolated
> dry old barn, trailer....

but where are you going to get the 1.21 jigawatts of electricity ?
. - 13 Jul 2006 00:03 GMT
> . (_-@.com) gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying :
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Any really nice D is closing on £10k - and a decap sold a little
> while ago for Eur125,000 - in need of restoration...

I'll wait 10 years. let the bubble burst.
Damian - 13 Jul 2006 01:50 GMT
Wow thanks guys, i didnt realise id get so much advice, im in australia and
im thinking a cx is for me (earlier series, id love a prestige)
i'll have to wait a bit though as ive searched the usual spots and havent
come up with one in australia for sale. I think from what youve all said and
what ive read a low mileage, no rust, higher priced car is the one for me,
rather buying the cheapest and doing it up.

Id love a SM but theres only a few here in oz and over 40k in price.

I think i can get a good cx for under 10k though.

I'll sign up with a citroen club first though and learn as much as i can,
and i'll keep an eye on this forum, im sure when the time comes you'll be
able to help out.

Thanks again.

>> . (_-@.com) gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying :
>>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> I'll wait 10 years. let the bubble burst.
Adrian - 13 Jul 2006 08:53 GMT
> Wow thanks guys, i didnt realise id get so much advice, im in
> australia

That makes a big difference, then.

Cut out everything we've said about rust, for a start, and a D will be
easier for you to find out there than a CX.

Where in Aus are you?

> I think from
> what youve all said and what ive read a low mileage

Don't worry about mileage - both CXs and Ds are perfectly capable of
running up silly amounts of miles with no problem - my '89 CX GTi Auto was
on 170k miles when I sold it - and it ran perfectly and looked damn nice.

> Id love a SM but theres only a few here in oz and over 40k in price.

"How do you make a small fortune?"
"Start with a large fortune and an SM"

> I'll sign up with a citroen club first though and learn as much as i
> can

You'll also find that's where the good cars are for sale. The really nice
ones don't even get advertised - they just get sold by word of mouth.
Damian - 13 Jul 2006 22:55 GMT
Thanks for the advice, im in sydney, but from what ive seen the majority of
citroens are in melbourne, just a short 8 hour drive away.

We still get rust too though, but d's are just asking silly money (the good
ones that is, a bad one will only cost you a few grand)

Why arent there many cx's here?

>> Wow thanks guys, i didnt realise id get so much advice, im in
>> australia
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> You'll also find that's where the good cars are for sale. The really nice
> ones don't even get advertised - they just get sold by word of mouth.
Adrian - 13 Jul 2006 23:12 GMT
> Thanks for the advice, im in sydney, but from what ive seen the
> majority of citroens are in melbourne, just a short 8 hour drive away.

This guy's near Melbourne - well worth talking to. Don't know many round
Sydney way, though.

http://www.aussiefrogs.com/shane/

> We still get rust too though

<chortle>
No, trust me on this, you do not.

You get a little bit of surface corrosion that soon cleans up.
We get cars that break in half.

> but d's are just asking silly money (the
> good ones that is, a bad one will only cost you a few grand)

Yes, same here. Except ours are a few grand in pounds, not Aussie Pesos...
<grin>

> Why arent there many cx's here?

Because Citroen didn't import many. Because people didn't buy many, and
because the Aussie Design Rules had their heads up their arses and insisted
on lots of really really silly changes to some of the bits.
2Rowdy - 13 Jul 2006 23:15 GMT
I was reading
<news:44b6c165$0$21714$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au>,
made by the entity known as Damian, that requests spam to be sent to
<bigbruggsy@hotmail.com> and I became inspired,

> Thanks for the advice, im in sydney, but from what ive seen the
> majority of citroens are in melbourne, just a short 8 hour drive
> away.

http://www.citroenclassic.org.au/
Signature

d:J0han; Certifiable me
http://www.aacity.net Citroen Newsgroup

No, I am not demented,
                                             just gray haired

Willem van der Steen - 12 Jul 2006 23:27 GMT
Did you consider an SM? That is really something special, but unfortunately
hard to find too...
grtx, Willem

> Hi all, ive come to the point in my life where i need an unusual car.
> Citroen would be my first choice, ive always loved their style. Basically
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> well thats about all of it i think, just looking for some opinions from
> owners, thanks for listening to my question.
Theo van Riet - 14 Jul 2006 21:45 GMT
> Did you consider an SM? That is really something special, but unfortunately
> hard to find too...
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> > the choice is between a ds or cx (some people have suggested a bx, but i
> > think the styling isnt as nice as the old ones)

Correct I owned one and it wasn't "a citroen". It looks as an exercise
on computer modelling (CAD first generation)... didn't buy a second one,
as I did with the GS...

Theo
2Rowdy - 14 Jul 2006 22:19 GMT
I was reading <news:1hihlra.6xz9r41kfv7oN%tvanriet@planetinternet.be>,
made by the entity known as Theo van Riet, that requests spam to be
sent to <tvanriet@planetinternet.be> and I became inspired,

>> Did you consider an SM? That is really something special, but
>> unfortunately hard to find too...
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Correct I owned one

BX or CX ?

> and it wasn't "a citroen". It looks as an
> exercise on computer modelling (CAD first generation)... didn't buy
> a second one, as I did with the GS...
.
Signature

d:J0han; Certifiable me
http://www.aacity.net Citroen Newsgroup

Changing life, Breaking ground

Theo van Riet - 15 Jul 2006 21:01 GMT
> I was reading <news:1hihlra.6xz9r41kfv7oN%tvanriet@planetinternet.be>,
> made by the entity known as Theo van Riet, that requests spam to be
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> BX or CX ?

BX
Theo

Rate this thread:






 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.