
Signature
-- ^^^^^^^^^^
-- Whiskers
-- ~~~~~~~~~~
Whiskers <catwheezel@operamail.com> gurgled happily, sounding much like
they were saying:
>> I have a Citroen C5 HDI Exclusive Auto 2003 Variant DC4HX Version
>> DC4HXE and have two problems with it. (Will post each seperately)
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>>
>> Any idea on either of these two related )perhaps) issues?
> 400 miles on a full tank doesn't sound unreasonable, unless the tank is
> a lot bigger than I expect. The C5 is not a small car!
32mpg does sound low, though it depends which engine it is.
<quick google>
Right, DC4HXE is 2.2HDi, which is considerably thirstier than the 2.0 or
1.6HDis - mix that with an autobox, and if it's only ever been pootled
locally it's quite possible that the particulate filter's blocked and/or
burning off - which requires more fuel. Any sign of an engine management
light or "Pollution Fault" warning?
> If the fuel-consumption indicator is meant to show the varying rate for
> every minute or mile then it sounds as though yours isn't working
> correctly. I've never touched a C5 so I can't be certain of how it
> should work.
Normally (and, again, not C5-specific) there's two modes - instant and
average-since-last-reset
It's entirely possible that it's in average-since-last-reset mode and
it's not been reset for bloody ever - so the average won't exactly change
rapidly. You wouldn't expect a couple of miles to change an average
established over 27,000 miles...
As for the "Don't know how big the tank is"... SURELY it's not beyond the
wit of mankind to actually read the flamin' pump...?
Whiskers - 24 Jun 2008 14:34 GMT
> Whiskers <catwheezel@operamail.com> gurgled happily, sounding much like
> they were saying:
[...]
>> If the fuel-consumption indicator is meant to show the varying rate for
>> every minute or mile then it sounds as though yours isn't working
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> rapidly. You wouldn't expect a couple of miles to change an average
> established over 27,000 miles...
... in fact you'd probably hope very heartily that it wouldn't!
> As for the "Don't know how big the tank is"... SURELY it's not beyond the
> wit of mankind to actually read the flamin' pump...?
Hmmm ... if it's flaming I don't think trying to read the numbers would be
high on my list of priorities ;)) And with current prices, those numbers
are just scary anyway.

Signature
-- ^^^^^^^^^^
-- Whiskers
-- ~~~~~~~~~~
Richard Cole - 24 Jun 2008 19:15 GMT
>Whiskers <catwheezel@operamail.com> gurgled happily, sounding much like
>they were saying:
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>burning off - which requires more fuel. Any sign of an engine management
>light or "Pollution Fault" warning?
32mpg sounds horribly low to me, my Mercedes w203 220 CDI (same size
turbo-diesel and an auto box) returns 38 around town (9 mile trip each way)
and 44+ on journeys. So the C5 at probably a lower weight, should be at
least equalling these figures.
Richard (who's wife has a C2, hence the reason I monitor this NG).
See http://www.caravanningnow.co.uk where my caravan's for sale.

Signature
Is there another word for synonym?
Steve Newport - 24 Jun 2008 19:52 GMT
Thanks everybody - gives me something to think about.
As for reading the pump: £ per litre - MPG, Litre per gallon - head
explodes. Only other option; read manual/instructions; am bloke; does
not compute. fizz
Adrian - 24 Jun 2008 21:08 GMT
Steve Newport <steven@newport47.fsnet.co.uk> gurgled happily, sounding
much like they were saying:
> As for reading the pump: £ per litre - MPG, Litre per gallon - head
> explodes. Only other option; read manual/instructions; am bloke; does
> not compute. fizz
Clue: 4.5 litres in a gallon.
Richard Kilpatrick - 15 Jul 2008 23:48 GMT
> Steve Newport <steven@newport47.fsnet.co.uk> gurgled happily, sounding
> much like they were saying:
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Clue: 4.5 litres in a gallon.
I always worked on 4.54; I used to have a little window sticker in one
of my cars in the early 90s from Shell with a conversion chart on it.
I work out my MPG in my head when filling up. It's not that I'm smart,
it's that I'm stubborn and I've been trying to get the hang of it for 16
years ;D
Richard