Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Citroen Cars / February 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Evasion or 2.0CT engine experience

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
klg - 02 Feb 2004 19:43 GMT
I am going to buy an Evasion (Synergie) MPV with 2.0CT engine (turbo
gasoline) or 2.0i 16v. Does anyone has any experiences with these
engines or cars? I would appreciate any comment (positive or negative)
or hint.

Thanks,

Dalibor
usenet@isbd.co.uk - 03 Feb 2004 09:32 GMT
> I am going to buy an Evasion (Synergie) MPV with 2.0CT engine (turbo
> gasoline) or 2.0i 16v. Does anyone has any experiences with these
> engines or cars? I would appreciate any comment (positive or negative)
> or hint.

I think that's the same engine as the XM 2.0i turbo isn't it?  We had
one of those which we just sold (still running well) and the engine
had done 200000 miles.  The turbo had begun to whistle a bit but
otherwise it seemed very sweet still, didn't use oil, still pulled
well, etc.

Signature

Chris Green

Adrian - 03 Feb 2004 21:48 GMT
(usenet@isbd.co.uk) gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying :

>> I am going to buy an Evasion (Synergie) MPV with 2.0CT engine (turbo
>> gasoline) or 2.0i 16v. Does anyone has any experiences with these
>> engines or cars? I would appreciate any comment (positive or negative)
>> or hint.

> I think that's the same engine as the XM 2.0i turbo isn't it?

Yep.

Just a pity about the rest of the Synergie/Evasion/806/Ulysse/whatever.

Only one I've seen close up was a 1.9TD - about 5 years old, with a big
engine prob. Wasn't worth an engine swap, even though it was the perfectly
normal (and therefore available) lump.

The mechanical access was so abysmal it would have taken forever and a week,
and the labour charge would have been about twice the value of the vehicle.

You don't need a mechanic, you need a gynaecologist.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.