Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Dodge / Dodge Trucks / May 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Tire size / transmission question

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Davenport - 26 May 2005 02:04 GMT
A few months ago, I put 285 tires in place of the 265s on my '99 Ram 1500
4x4.  Since then, the gas mileage has gotten about 2 mpg worse (I corrected
for the difference in diameter) and just today, the "trans temp" light came
while I was driving (level road, no additional loads).  The transmission has
never overheated before.  I've had no "check engine" events.  Anybody else
had a similar problem?

Thanks.
MoParMaN - 26 May 2005 02:55 GMT
>A few months ago, I put 285 tires in place of the 265s on my '99 Ram 1500
>4x4.  Since then, the gas mileage has gotten about 2 mpg worse (I corrected
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Thanks.
I went to the 285's on my 2003 2500 Hemi, I lost about 2 mph too. I never
had a problem with my transmission. (5 speed auto). It's allot more rubber
on the road, more drag, less mileage.....

Signature

MoParMaN---Remove Clothes To Reply!
--SCUD Coordinates 32.61204 North: 96.92993 West--

Jacob Suter - 26 May 2005 04:31 GMT
If you've got a 3.55:1 axle, you're lugging the hell out of your truck.

Trust me, I know where you're at - I got a 99 1500 2WD on 265's (225
stock).  I get better fuel economy in 4th gear than 5th if I'm under 70
mph average.

It sure drives better on the bigger rubber tho.  In my case, I should
regear the truck (and tuck some decent springs under it too, its killing
my back)...

Your choices are:

A> replace the ring and pinion gears in your axle for a ratio more in
tune for the rubber you want to swing...  With that much rubber I'd
personally go with 4.10's for sure (I'm assuming a 318 or 360)...
Aproximately 10% less stress on the transmission/gearbox/engine as 3.92,
and 20% than 3.55 (correct me if my math is off, I calculated this a few
years ago)...  I was quoted about $650 for one axle rear axle, parts and
labor.  Actual parts cost appears to be about $300/axle to do the job
'right' (its a '99, you definetly want to go ahead and replace the
bearings, Chrysler has a reputation for using junk)

This is also the moment you consider the addition of limited slip and/or
air/electric lockers ;)

B> Cruise with OD off.  This most likely will do nothing for your fuel
economy but it will take the stress off your engine and torque converter
(nothing for your transmission and gearbox tho)

C> Downsize the rubber.  Prolly the cheapest solution but IMHO
sub-optimal because your truck is somewhat 'gimped' with 3.55 axles even
with smaller tires...

JS

> A few months ago, I put 285 tires in place of the 265s on my '99 Ram 1500
> 4x4.  Since then, the gas mileage has gotten about 2 mpg worse (I corrected
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Thanks.
TBone - 26 May 2005 07:33 GMT
> If you've got a 3.55:1 axle, you're lugging the hell out of your truck.
>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> 'right' (its a '99, you definetly want to go ahead and replace the
> bearings, Chrysler has a reputation for using junk)

Just remember that if you go the regearing rout, you will need to do it to
both axles.  As for the transmission, when was the last time you changed its
fluid?  I would suggest an aux trans cooler as well.

Signature

If at first you don't succeed,  you're not cut out for skydiving

High Sierra - 26 May 2005 15:29 GMT
>>If you've got a 3.55:1 axle, you're lugging the hell out of your truck.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> both axles.  As for the transmission, when was the last time you changed its
> fluid?  I would suggest an aux trans cooler as well.

Shouldn't there be an aux tranny cooler on his truck anyway.
TBone - 26 May 2005 22:41 GMT
> >>If you've got a 3.55:1 axle, you're lugging the hell out of your truck.
> >>
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> >
> Shouldn't there be an aux tranny cooler on his truck anyway.

I don't know, some do and others don't.  I think that it has to do with the
options ordered.  Either way, if the trans is getting that hot, then what is
there is simply not enough.

Signature

If at first you don't succeed,  you're not cut out for skydiving

High Sierra - 27 May 2005 15:21 GMT
>>>>If you've got a 3.55:1 axle, you're lugging the hell out of your truck.
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
> options ordered.  Either way, if the trans is getting that hot, then what is
> there is simply not enough.

OK, thanks.

 Reason I mentioned that, is mine has the tranny cooler (between rad and AC
condenser. I must have towing package or some other option that requires the cooler.

96 RAM 1500 4X4 CC 5.2L.
265 75R16 (I think these are standard with the off road package).
SnoMan - 27 May 2005 17:35 GMT
>  > > "Jacob Suter" <jsuter@intrastardotnet.com>
> wrote in message
[quoted text clipped - 53 lines]
> hot, then what is
> there is simply not enough.

It is a classic mistake that a lot of people make with tires and
gears. ALso when they look are gear ratio, some are brainwashed into
believe that you need 3.73 or taller gears for best MPG with a gas
engine in a heavy draggy 4x4 that has a OD too.  The bare minimum you
should have in a 4x4 truck with a small block sized gas engine is 4.10
because when OD is in use it is less 3 to 1 effective. Throw in
oversized tires and it gets worse. The Dodge hemi 4x4 suffers from two
problems MPG wise. THe first is that that engine reachs peak efficency
at 4000 RPM or so (torque peak) abd peak HP above 5000 rpm. This is
not a good power curve for a heavy truck and tall gears and bigger
tires make it worse. If you are running 265 or bigger with a Hemi you
should be running 4.56’s at very least to better use power curve.  The
second probel is tha Dodge remove front axle disconnects and there is
no provision for adding lockout hubs either and dragging the front
axle can cost you 1 to 2 MPG depending on speed and conditions. THis
is very poor judgement on Dodges part all to save a few bucks in
production costs. 30 year ago a had a truck without lockout hubs and
when you add them it does make a difference in MPG and smoothness too
as I could always tell on hiway when they were not disengaged and you
were dragging axle gearing.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.