I assume you have the 3.0 Mitsubishi in it.
My parents have just under 300,000 km on theirs.
My wife's 96 with the same motor has about 285k.
I'm not planning on changing either of them any time soon.
Kevin
> I assume you have the 3.0 Mitsubishi in it.
> My parents have just under 300,000 km on theirs.
> My wife's 96 with the same motor has about 285k.
> I'm not planning on changing either of them any time soon.
>
> Kevin
Bad mistake, Kevin. Have you ever seen the after effects of
a broken belt on a 3.0? It's ugly. I suggest that you change
both of them in the very near future.

Signature
Bruce Grant
Westminster, Md
95 2500 Club 4x4(w/"Dynatrac" manual hubs) Cummins/Auto 265/70Rx19.5(G)
Ron - 16 Aug 2005 07:23 GMT
I have heard that the valves will hit the piston when a belt breaks but
when I had my 3.0 it have notches in the pistons for valve clearance so
I guess I don't understand unless my pistons were not what was standard
in these engines.
>>I assume you have the 3.0 Mitsubishi in it.
>>My parents have just under 300,000 km on theirs.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> a broken belt on a 3.0? It's ugly. I suggest that you change
> both of them in the very near future.
aarcuda69062 - 16 Aug 2005 14:16 GMT
> I have heard that the valves will hit the piston when a belt breaks but
> when I had my 3.0 it have notches in the pistons for valve clearance so
> I guess I don't understand unless my pistons were not what was standard
> in these engines.
The 3.0 is NOT an interference engine.
No bent valves.
TranSurgeon - 16 Aug 2005 14:27 GMT
the last 'interference' engine used by Mopar was the infamous 2.6 4 cylinder
> > I have heard that the valves will hit the piston when a belt breaks but
> > when I had my 3.0 it have notches in the pistons for valve clearance so
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> No bent valves.
Ron - 16 Aug 2005 16:38 GMT
So what is Bruce talking about being a mess. I could see the belt
breaking and talking out the plastice covers but that's about it.
Ron
> the last 'interference' engine used by Mopar was the infamous 2.6 4 cylinder
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>>
>>No bent valves.
aarcuda69062 - 16 Aug 2005 21:22 GMT
> So what is Bruce talking about being a mess. I could see the belt
> breaking and talking out the plastice covers but that's about it.
>
> Ron
Bruce is in error.
aarcuda69062 - 16 Aug 2005 21:24 GMT
> the last 'interference' engine used by Mopar was the infamous 2.6 4 cylinder
Ay-yup. Still have one customer with a 2.6 in an 87 Caravan.
Stupid thing won't die like it should...
LOWERLINK@webtv.net - 17 Aug 2005 00:34 GMT
ok,if thats so,how do you explain 2 bent intake valves,and 2 exhaust
valves on a pl,neon,that dropped a water pump,and the t-belt followed?i
also know the 3.0 mitts.wont do that.mo.jeep service tech.
Bruce Grant - 17 Aug 2005 22:26 GMT
> > I have heard that the valves will hit the piston when a belt breaks but
> > when I had my 3.0 it have notches in the pistons for valve clearance so
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> No bent valves.
I disagree. I recently had the heads off of a '94 Caravan that had
snapped a belt and it had bent valves

Signature
Bruce Grant
Westminster, Md
95 2500 Club 4x4(w/"Dynatrac" manual hubs) Cummins/Auto 265/70Rx19.5(G)
Ron - 17 Aug 2005 22:25 GMT
>>>I have heard that the valves will hit the piston when a belt breaks but
>>>when I had my 3.0 it have notches in the pistons for valve clearance so
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> I disagree. I recently had the heads off of a '94 Caravan that had
> snapped a belt and it had bent valves
Did you notice if it had any cut outs in the pistons ? I just had a 1989
3.0L apart and it had them thus making it a non interference eng
Ron - 16 Aug 2005 16:36 GMT
Bruce what kind of mess are you talking about being that this is not an
interference engine ?
>>I assume you have the 3.0 Mitsubishi in it.
>>My parents have just under 300,000 km on theirs.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> a broken belt on a 3.0? It's ugly. I suggest that you change
> both of them in the very near future.
Bruce Grant - 17 Aug 2005 22:26 GMT
> Bruce what kind of mess are you talking about being that this is not an
> interference engine ?
Bent valves.

Signature
Bruce Grant
Westminster, Md
95 2500 Club 4x4(w/"Dynatrac" manual hubs) Cummins/Auto 265/70Rx19.5(G)