GAS
> Thinking of trading in my '99 Dakota Sport (V6) for a new '05 RAM 1500
> Quad Cab 4x2 Hemi (Sport appearance group/look). Saw some last night
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> Austin, TX
> =======
miles - 20 Aug 2005 23:53 GMT
So many say that about the Hemi but I find the opposite. I also have a
2001 Ram 1500 QC with the 5.9L. The Hemi flat outperforms it with ease
and I get better mpg. Now when I load it down such as towing the Hemi's
mpg drops to 8-10 but it does perform well.
> GAS
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>>Austin, TX
>>=======
JPH - 21 Aug 2005 04:27 GMT
You're right, the hemi will probably do a little better than that 3.9
V-6 (as long as you don't take full advantage of the extra acceleration
capability).
John
> GAS
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>>Austin, TX
>>=======
Jay - 22 Aug 2005 05:12 GMT
Just traded my 02 4.7L 4x4 Dakota in on a 05 Ram QC 4x4 Hemi with 20"
wheels. Love the go power and the big beast will stop on a dime and give you
back a nickel. Gas Mileage so far is 11.8 with 800 miles on the clock, and
no interstate just two lane highway and city. Be ready to fight on the trade
in price for your truck. It took me two days of fighting just to get Kelly
Blue Book trade in out of the dealer.
> GAS
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>> Austin, TX
>> =======
miles - 22 Aug 2005 14:19 GMT
Dealers won't give the KBB trade in value. They give the current
wholesale auction value. Why would they give more than what they can
get the same vehicle at auction? My guess is it appeared they gave you
KBB by cutting into their profit on the new vehicle. They're making a
ton of money on this employee pricing thing. I bought my 2004 last
summer and paid about $1500 less than the current employee price.
> Just traded my 02 4.7L 4x4 Dakota in on a 05 Ram QC 4x4 Hemi with 20"
> wheels. Love the go power and the big beast will stop on a dime and give you
> back a nickel. Gas Mileage so far is 11.8 with 800 miles on the clock, and
> no interstate just two lane highway and city. Be ready to fight on the trade
> in price for your truck. It took me two days of fighting just to get Kelly
> Blue Book trade in out of the dealer.
Roy - 22 Aug 2005 14:39 GMT
> Dealers won't give the KBB trade in value. They give the current
> wholesale auction value. Why would they give more than what they can get
> the same vehicle at auction? My guess is it appeared they gave you KBB by
> cutting into their profit on the new vehicle. They're making a ton of
> money on this employee pricing thing. I bought my 2004 last summer and
> paid about $1500 less than the current employee price.
You did better than me. I figure I saved about $1000 less than employee
discount on my 05 last Feb.
Roy
Jay - 25 Aug 2005 02:58 GMT
My guess is that they made money on my trade. I seen my old truck in town
today, and looking at the paper tags it was only on the lot 3 days.
> Dealers won't give the KBB trade in value. They give the current
> wholesale auction value. Why would they give more than what they can get
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>> fight on the trade in price for your truck. It took me two days of
>> fighting just to get Kelly Blue Book trade in out of the dealer.
Definitely the fuel economy. My son's friend just got a new 05 Ram 1500 QC
Hemi. Bright fire engine red and 20" wheels, leather interior. Sharp
looking truck. Around town he claims he gets between 10 and 12 mpg
depending on how he drives. He's only 21 so you know it's mostly around
10. :)
>Thinking of trading in my '99 Dakota Sport (V6) for a new '05 RAM 1500
>Quad Cab 4x2 Hemi (Sport appearance group/look). Saw some last night
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>Austin, TX
>=======
miles - 20 Aug 2005 23:51 GMT
It will improve as the engine breaks in. I have a 2004 Hemi Durango 4x4
and get about 16 around town, 19 or so highway.
The 20" wheels make little sense to me. It's a truck and a 4x4. That
might hurt the city mpg if the overall tire diameter is larger.
> Definitely the fuel economy. My son's friend just got a new 05 Ram 1500 QC
> Hemi. Bright fire engine red and 20" wheels, leather interior. Sharp
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>>Austin, TX
>>=======
Stephen Harding - 21 Aug 2005 12:31 GMT
> Definitely the fuel economy. My son's friend just got a new 05 Ram 1500 QC
> Hemi. Bright fire engine red and 20" wheels, leather interior. Sharp
> looking truck. Around town he claims he gets between 10 and 12 mpg
> depending on how he drives. He's only 21 so you know it's mostly around
> 10. :)
What ever happened to the "multi-displacement" option that was going
to be available on the Hemis? It was supposed to disable 2 or 4
cylinders when running at a stable cruise, then cut all the cylinders
back in when power was needed. Talk was something like 30 mpg during
the "small displacement" phase.
I've heard nothing more about it. Did it go the way of the older
Cadillac attempt?
SMH
.boB - 21 Aug 2005 13:56 GMT
>> Definitely the fuel economy. My son's friend just got a new 05 Ram
>> 1500 QC
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> SMH
Only used in the cars.

Signature
.boB
1997 HD FXDWG - Turbocharged!
2001 Dodge Dakota QC 5.9/4x4/3.92
1966 Mustang Coupe - Daily Driver
1965 FFR Cobra - Finally on the Road!
Denny - 21 Aug 2005 14:26 GMT
>>> Definitely the fuel economy. My son's friend just got a new 05 Ram 1500
>>> QC
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>>
> Only used in the cars.
But we should be seeing it in the next year on the trucks, according to the
gurus in Auburn Hills anyway.
Denny
Mike Simmons - 21 Aug 2005 15:33 GMT
>>>> Definitely the fuel economy. My son's friend just got a new 05 Ram 1500
>>>> QC
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
> Denny
Yup! Will be available in the DR 1500 series.
Mike
Jay - 22 Aug 2005 05:02 GMT
Starting with the 06 hemi's all will be multi-displacement.
>> Definitely the fuel economy. My son's friend just got a new 05 Ram 1500
>> QC
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> SMH