Dodge Ram, 1999, 318. 4X4
When a catalytic converter gets clogged (or goes bad, or whatever it
does, and causes the engine to not be able to run, acts as if it's ran
out of gas) does the clog and lack of air flow send messages to the
computer that then "send" a message to the spark plugs not to fire a
strong spark?
So if this truck were given to an inexperienced mechanic, this mechanic
might think the plugs, wires, rotor and cap are bad because there isn't
a strong spark, and when he changes all these and it still won't start
he then thinks the computer has gone bad.
Does this sound like something that could happen? Cause I think it's
exactly what is happening to me. I've had my truck in the shop since Dec
6th. It's now January 5th. The mechanic first ruled out the fuel pump,
then he said it needed new plugs, wires, rotor, and cap. Then he said he
still can't get it to run, couldn't get a good spark, so he thought it
was the computer gone bad. So he bought a used one (after we, ourselves,
looked around and found one for way under the $400.00 he wanted to
charge us) and had the truck towed to a Dodge repairshop so they could
"flash" the computer. Now, since the truck has been at this Dodge place,
the same mechanic calls us and says he recently discovered that this
truck had a recall for catalytic converters and that we are getting a
new one free of charge.
What I think happened is this. It was the catalytic converter all along
causing the symptoms that he couldn't diagnose. And when the truck ended
up at the Dodge place, with skilled mechanics, he was told what the real
problem was. Being that he now would look like a fool if he told us it
was the catalytic converter all along (even after I asked him if he had
looked into it being the catalytic converter and he said, "But that has
nothing to do with the spark being weak.") and we didn't really need the
new plugs, wires, rotor, cap, AND computer, he made up the story about
there being a recall so we would think that we'd actually still have to
pay for all the new, uneeded parts he just put in.
How far off am I?
Thanks for any help.
> Dodge Ram, 1999, 318. 4X4
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> computer that then "send" a message to the spark plugs not to fire a
> strong spark?
No. Why would there be any valid reason to reduce the level of spark? If
the engine detected a problem like this, wouldn't it make more sense to
light up the check engine light instead.
> So if this truck were given to an inexperienced mechanic, this mechanic
> might think the plugs, wires, rotor and cap are bad because there isn't
> a strong spark, and when he changes all these and it still won't start
> he then thinks the computer has gone bad.
How did he determine that the spark was weak?
> Does this sound like something that could happen? Cause I think it's
> exactly what is happening to me. I've had my truck in the shop since Dec
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> truck had a recall for catalytic converters and that we are getting a
> new one free of charge.
Recall huh, LOL. Perhaps he might want to supply you with this recall
notification and if you are the origional owner of the vehicle, why didn't
you get the notice yourself? It is possible that it went bad and if so,
would be covered by the federal emmission warranty if you were under 80,000
so it in fact would be no charge.
> What I think happened is this. It was the catalytic converter all along
> causing the symptoms that he couldn't diagnose. And when the truck ended
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> there being a recall so we would think that we'd actually still have to
> pay for all the new, uneeded parts he just put in.
He is correct in saying that the converter has nothing to do with spark
energy. Since it is your vehicle, you should be able to go to the
dealership where he had it serviced and ask them exactly what they did to it
and their opinion on the problems and why it didn't run.
> How far off am I?
It is hard to say. Remember that anything you get here is nothing more than
others opinions as none of us has actually seen the vehicle. For a more
valid opinion, you might want to say a little bit more about what happened
to the vehicle that sent it to this mechanic in the first place. Did it
break down suddenly?

Signature
If at first you don't succeed, you're not cut out for skydiving
Steve K - 05 Jan 2006 18:55 GMT
> > Dodge Ram, 1999, 318. 4X4
> >
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> the engine detected a problem like this, wouldn't it make more sense to
> light up the check engine light instead.
That's a whole other story. The check engine light has been on and off
(mostly on) for the three years that I've had it. This mechanic could
not figure out why it's on all the time. Needless to say, I am not
taking anything back to him.
> > So if this truck were given to an inexperienced mechanic, this mechanic
> > might think the plugs, wires, rotor and cap are bad because there isn't
> > a strong spark, and when he changes all these and it still won't start
> > he then thinks the computer has gone bad.
>
> How did he determine that the spark was weak?
I'm not sure.
> > Does this sound like something that could happen? Cause I think it's
> > exactly what is happening to me. I've had my truck in the shop since Dec
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> would be covered by the federal emmission warranty if you were under 80,000
> so it in fact would be no charge.
We are not the original owner and it's over 102,000.
> > What I think happened is this. It was the catalytic converter all along
> > causing the symptoms that he couldn't diagnose. And when the truck ended
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> to the vehicle that sent it to this mechanic in the first place. Did it
> break down suddenly?
It "died" on a short trip to town. All the same symptoms of it running
out of gas, except my wife was able to drive it 3 miles back home, not
being able to go over 15-20 miles per hour. When I ran out of gas
before, I went about 100 yards and it died. We put gas in it, couldn't
get it to start. So it went to the shop.
TBone - 11 Jan 2006 19:33 GMT
> > > Dodge Ram, 1999, 318. 4X4
> > >
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> not figure out why it's on all the time. Needless to say, I am not
> taking anything back to him.
I don't blame you there. If he is a real mechanic working on modern
vehicles, he should have as a minimum, a basic code reader.
> > > So if this truck were given to an inexperienced mechanic, this mechanic
> > > might think the plugs, wires, rotor and cap are bad because there isn't
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> I'm not sure.
Then it would be difficult to know if he has any clue as to what may be
going on.
> > > Does this sound like something that could happen? Cause I think it's
> > > exactly what is happening to me. I've had my truck in the shop since Dec
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> We are not the original owner and it's over 102,000.
Then you probably wouldn't get a recall notice.
> > > What I think happened is this. It was the catalytic converter all along
> > > causing the symptoms that he couldn't diagnose. And when the truck ended
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> before, I went about 100 yards and it died. We put gas in it, couldn't
> get it to start. So it went to the shop.
It could be a failed converter causing those symptoms (loss of power) and
this would have nothing to do with the level of spark. It is possible that
your mechanic misdiagnosed your problem and replace a lot of parts for
nothing. The only real chance you might have to find the truth is to speak
with the dealer that replaced the converter and find out how bad of shape it
was in (if they still remember and are willing to tell you).

Signature
If at first you don't succeed, you're not cut out for skydiving
Tom Lawrence - 06 Jan 2006 07:07 GMT
> Recall huh, LOL.
There was a recent recall for defective cats - several people have reported
receiving them. Others have received a notice that DC is extending their
warranty on the cat to 10yr/100K, whichever comes LAST.
TBone - 06 Jan 2006 14:10 GMT
Does this include the replacement cats?

Signature
If at first you don't succeed, you're not cut out for skydiving
> > Recall huh, LOL.
>
> There was a recent recall for defective cats - several people have reported
> receiving them. Others have received a notice that DC is extending their
> warranty on the cat to 10yr/100K, whichever comes LAST.
Slick Willy - 06 Jan 2006 16:08 GMT
"TBone" <tboneNOSPAM@nc.rr.com> wrote in news:mTuvf.3129$Kp.1153
@southeast.rr.com:
> Does this include the replacement cats?
I got a letter in late December saying my cat converter has been extended
to 10 years/120k miles or until 12/30.2006 whichever is later on my 99 Dak.
The other vehicles listed are ...
1996
2.5L Cherokee
3.9L Dodge Ram Van/Wagon
5.2 and 509L Dodge Ram Pickup
1997
3.9L Dodge Ram Van/Wagon
3.9L Dak
3.9L Dodge Ram Pickup
1998
3.9L Dodge Ram Pickup
1999
3.9L Dak
5.2L Dodge Ram Pickup
It also say's they will replace the cat parts and labor, but are not
responsible to pay if "Other exhaust system components require replacement,
the associated repair costs are the owner's responsibility"
Regards
Slick_Willy
TBone - 09 Jan 2006 20:28 GMT
Oh well, that leaves mine out. Fortunately for me, mine did fail within the
standard period and has already been replaced. Hopefully, this one will
last the life of the truck (at least as long as I own it ;-D).

Signature
If at first you don't succeed, you're not cut out for skydiving
> "TBone" <tboneNOSPAM@nc.rr.com> wrote in news:mTuvf.3129$Kp.1153
> @southeast.rr.com:
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
> Regards
> Slick_Willy