Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Dodge / Dodge Trucks / January 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

1999 Dodge Dakota 4x4 transfer case failure

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Eagle View - 27 Jan 2006 12:49 GMT
I guess I blew this subject way a moment ago, sorry.  I was trying to
edit my comment.
Anyway we lost the tranfer case at hiway speeds a couple of weeks ago.
The Truck is a 1999 Dakota with a 5.1 V8 Extended Cab with Automatic
Trany.  It has been a
really great truck with very little trouble before this.  We have had
oil changes and maintenance usually at the 3000 mile mark and once in a
while out as far as 5000 miles.  The shop that is working on it said
that the gears looked in good shape and they had never seen a failure
like this before.  Are there really 9 different Transfer setup in the
Dakota lineup?  They said that they had to have one assembled as we had
blown the part number off the case with it came apart.
Thanks
Lowell @ Eagle View
Home of the 5MM Craig
Max Dodge - 27 Jan 2006 13:14 GMT
Yes, there are several variants of the NV230 (231, 232, 233....) series
transfer cases. The one you have should be easily figured out by what shift
selector you have (manual lever or pushbutton) and by getting a build data
printout from any dealer based on your VIN.

Engine oil changes will have no effect on transfer case maintenance. If it
was never checked, the TC could easily have been low on fluid and simply
worn itself out.

Signature

Max

"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)

>I guess I blew this subject way a moment ago, sorry.  I was trying to
> edit my comment.
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> Lowell @ Eagle View
> Home of the 5MM Craig
Eagle View - 28 Jan 2006 14:07 GMT
I finally got to see the damaged transfer case and front driveshaft.
The interior of the transfer case were in great shape, still looked new
with very little sign of wear.  The failure was with the Transfer Case
end U-joint on the front drive shaft.  It failed and allowed the drive
shaft to shift and wedge against the transfer case blowing up the case.
We paid two garages to look at the u-joints within a month of the
failure.  I wish we still had self-service garages like we had in the
1970 where you could hoist a rig and look for your self.  I have a
physical impairment that prevents me from crawling under a car or I
would have done the inspection my self.  I guess I need to build
somethng that will allow me to stand and work under a rig.
Thanks for all the ideas and discussion.  These groups are a great
resource.
Lowell
Christopher  Thompson - 28 Jan 2006 14:29 GMT
if you have the money to build something you may want to look at a
parking/service lift they are drive on lifts. i would imagine you would
spend close to the same amount of money on the steel to build something (or
more) to drive up on that would be tall enough to allow you to work on the
vehicle.

Signature

-Chris
05 CTD
99 Durango

> I finally got to see the damaged transfer case and front driveshaft.
> The interior of the transfer case were in great shape, still looked new
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> resource.
> Lowell
Max Dodge - 28 Jan 2006 15:35 GMT
Chris, I think he meant something for him to be able to stand and work, not
to lift the car. However, I agree 100% on the drive-on-lift requirement, as
it eliminates the need to crawl around putting lift arms under the vehicle.
Plus, in the case of trucks with the forward weight bias, I think they are
safer than the outrigger style.

Signature

Max

"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)

> if you have the money to build something you may want to look at a
> parking/service lift they are drive on lifts. i would imagine you would
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>> resource.
>> Lowell
Christopher  Thompson - 28 Jan 2006 16:00 GMT
yes especially for the homeowner and for wheel service the air powered jacks
such as is found on alighnment racks are avail. its on my wish list (wonder
what the arch control commitie would think about a lift in the drive way
*grin*)

Signature

-Chris
05 CTD
99 Durango

> Chris, I think he meant something for him to be able to stand and work, not
> to lift the car. However, I agree 100% on the drive-on-lift requirement, as
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> >> resource.
> >> Lowell
Roy - 28 Jan 2006 15:30 GMT
.  I guess I need to build
> somethng that will allow me to stand and work under a rig.

Look here: www.eagleequip.com   A nice set up if you have the room.

Roy
Tom Lawrence - 28 Jan 2006 20:21 GMT
> Look here: www.eagleequip.com   A nice set up if you have the room.

Couldn't agree more  :)
Roy - 28 Jan 2006 20:50 GMT
>> Look here: www.eagleequip.com   A nice set up if you have the room.
>
> Couldn't agree more  :)

A friend of mine has one. 15K lift, cost him around 4K to put it in I found
it to be a quality piece of equipment.
ymmv

Roy
Tom Lawrence - 28 Jan 2006 21:28 GMT
> A friend of mine has one. 15K lift, cost him around 4K to put it in I
> found it to be a quality piece of equipment.
> ymmv

Not by much...

http://home.earthlink.net/~tlawren349/Garage/Four_Post_Lift-2.jpg
That's my 15K 4-post lift.  Long wheel base, 22" wide ramps
(dually-friendly).  Here's how I brought it home from the freight dock:
http://home.earthlink.net/~tlawrence51/lift/lift1.jpg

http://home.earthlink.net/~tlawren349/Garage/Two_Post_Lift-2.jpg
That's my 10K two-post lift.  I got that one first.  A buddy and I unloaded
that one by hand off of a semi that delivered it.  Not a lot of fun.  It was
handy to have to unload the 4-poster from the trailer...  I backed the
trailer into the bay, and used the lift arms of the two-post lift to take
components off the trailer - couple of pieces at a time.

The two-post lift was fairly easy to install with just two people and basic
tools (a rotary hammer would be helpful for drilling the concrete for the
anchors - I did it with my little 24V hammer drill, but it took a while).
The only heavy lifting is lifting the columns upright - I was able to do
that myself (probably should have two people for safety, but I was
impatient).

The four-post lift needs some type of machinery - forklift, backhoe,
something that can lift 800lbs. about 8 feet.  That's the main beam with
hydraulic cylinder that spans the columns.  It's about 14' long.  We did it
with a combination of an engine hoist, a tranny jack, and some 6x6 blocks.
I don't recommend that for anyone else...  it was decidedly unsafe.  The
tracks weigh close to 1,000lbs. each, but they can be moved around on some
moving dollies.  Oh yeah - the four post lift needs 16 holes drilled in the
concrete to anchor it.  I rented a rotary hammer for that, after burning up
the motor in my little hammer drill on the 2nd hole (amazing how much harder
concrete is with it's 2 years old vs. 1 month  :)
TBone - 29 Jan 2006 05:02 GMT
Nice garage.  How big is that thing and BTW  YOU SUCK!!! :-)

Signature

If at first you don't succeed,  you're not cut out for skydiving

> > A friend of mine has one. 15K lift, cost him around 4K to put it in I
> > found it to be a quality piece of equipment.
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
> the motor in my little hammer drill on the 2nd hole (amazing how much harder
> concrete is with it's 2 years old vs. 1 month  :)
Rachel Easson - 29 Jan 2006 06:12 GMT
> Nice garage.  How big is that thing and BTW  YOU SUCK!!! :-)

I second that!
rach

>> > A friend of mine has one. 15K lift, cost him around 4K to put it in I
>> > found it to be a quality piece of equipment.
[quoted text clipped - 40 lines]
> harder
>> concrete is with it's 2 years old vs. 1 month  :)
Tom Lawrence - 29 Jan 2006 07:26 GMT
> Nice garage.  How big is that thing and BTW  YOU SUCK!!! :-)

Yeah....  I know.  :)  about 2,000 sq. ft.  Some more pictures here:
http://home.earthlink.net/~tlawrence53/
Christopher  Thompson - 29 Jan 2006 14:47 GMT
very nice.

Signature

-Chris
05 CTD
99 Durango

> > Nice garage.  How big is that thing and BTW  YOU SUCK!!! :-)
>
> Yeah....  I know.  :)  about 2,000 sq. ft.  Some more pictures here:
> http://home.earthlink.net/~tlawrence53/
Rachel Easson - 29 Jan 2006 15:58 GMT
>> Nice garage.  How big is that thing and BTW  YOU SUCK!!! :-)
>
> Yeah....  I know.  :)  about 2,000 sq. ft.  Some more pictures here:
> http://home.earthlink.net/~tlawrence53/

adaware blocked a pop-up and crashed the browser
rach
Lorne - 29 Jan 2006 17:03 GMT
Very nice indeed!!!!  Would work great up here in the north!!!  Lorne

>> Nice garage.  How big is that thing and BTW  YOU SUCK!!! :-)
>
> Yeah....  I know.  :)  about 2,000 sq. ft.  Some more pictures here:
> http://home.earthlink.net/~tlawrence53/
TBone - 30 Jan 2006 16:27 GMT
Ok, I take it back, YOU REALLY SUCK!!!!!  What is the length / width, it
looks like 40 X 50.  That thing is huge.  Did you have to have anything
special done to the floor when it was poured to deal with the lifts
(especially the 2 post one)?

Signature

If at first you don't succeed,  you're not cut out for skydiving

> > Nice garage.  How big is that thing and BTW  YOU SUCK!!! :-)
>
> Yeah....  I know.  :)  about 2,000 sq. ft.  Some more pictures here:
> http://home.earthlink.net/~tlawrence53/
Tom Lawrence - 30 Jan 2006 23:18 GMT
> looks like 40 X 50.  That thing is huge.

32x56, actually...  shoulda went 40' deep...  and shoulda went another bay
wide.  Coming from a single 12'x20' garage, I thought the new one would be
way bigger than I needed.  <BZZZZT!> Wrong...  :)

> Did you have to have anything special done to the floor when it was poured
> to deal with the lifts
> (especially the 2 post one)?

Eagle (as well as most other lift companies) was a minimum of 4" of 3500psi
concrete.  I had a 3500psi mix, with a 4" slab (wire re-inforced), but the
guys doing the floor dug out around where the columns were going to be
placed, so I've got a little over 6" of concrete under the posts (in a
roughly oval shape, about 4' wide by about 6' long).  It probably would have
been fine with a 4" slab throughout, but they wanted to make sure I didn't
have any problems.  I wasn't going to argue  :)

We also planned for the columns, so the expansion joints that were cut into
the slab didn't run under, or anywhere near, the columns.
TBone - 31 Jan 2006 23:00 GMT
> > looks like 40 X 50.  That thing is huge.
>
> 32x56, actually...  shoulda went 40' deep...  and shoulda went another bay
> wide.  Coming from a single 12'x20' garage, I thought the new one would be
> way bigger than I needed.  <BZZZZT!> Wrong...  :)

They can never be "big enough" for long.  That is much bigger than I can
afford and I really don't have the room for it anyway.  Then on top of that
the restrictive covenants here require it to look like the house so you can
imagine the cost increase that causes.  Hell I would be afraid to pay the
heating bill on that factory that you built.  Why do you wish it was deeper?

> > Did you have to have anything special done to the floor when it was poured
> > to deal with the lifts
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> been fine with a 4" slab throughout, but they wanted to make sure I didn't
> have any problems.  I wasn't going to argue  :)

I wouldn't argue either as that sounds like a great idea with a minimum of
added concrete considering the size of that floor.  What type of heating are
you using?  By that I mean forced air, radiant, or some combination of
systems?

> We also planned for the columns, so the expansion joints that were cut into
> the slab didn't run under, or anywhere near, the columns.

Another good idea.  I am not trying to be nosey but I hope to build one
myself in a few years (was going to be this year but money was needed in
other areas) around 30 X 40 and tall enough for a lift and I find it a good
idea to ask questions from those who have done it to avoid the not so easily
corrected mistakes (like not building deep enough).

Signature

If at first you don't succeed,  you're not cut out for skydiving

Rachel Easson - 30 Jan 2006 20:44 GMT
>> Nice garage.  How big is that thing and BTW  YOU SUCK!!! :-)
>
> Yeah....  I know.  :)  about 2,000 sq. ft.  Some more pictures here:
> http://home.earthlink.net/~tlawrence53/

it's beautiful! i had real problems getting to your pics. my adaware is
programmed to block pop-ups and crashes the browser. in opera you get to
your home directory but when you click on an image a pop-up generates and
opera crashes. grudgingly i opened explorer -- in explorer this means 6-7
pop-ups generated by earthlink before it crashes. determined as i was, i
reopened opera and saved all the images to hard drive instead to look at
them

since i already downloaded them, and have some good tools, i am going to
take ten minutes to make you an index page with thumbnails of each pic and
links to full sizes and send it to you in a zip file for ideas if you want
to look at them

rach
Tom Lawrence - 30 Jan 2006 23:24 GMT
> it's beautiful! i had real problems getting to your pics. my adaware is
> programmed to block pop-ups and crashes the browser. in opera you get to
> your home directory but when you click on an image a pop-up generates

AFAIK, there weren't any pop-ups at all...  it's just a crappy little 10MB
personal web space, and just raw .JPG files.  Of course, now it's got the
images you re-did for me  (thanks again)  :)

> opera crashes. grudgingly i opened explorer -- in explorer this means 6-7
> pop-ups generated by earthlink before it crashes.

I see none of these.  I don't even get a pop-up warning.  In fact, I turned
off my pop-up blocker completely, and tried it again.  No pop-ups.

<shrug>
Rachel Easson - 31 Jan 2006 03:48 GMT
>> it's beautiful! i had real problems getting to your pics. my adaware is
>> programmed to block pop-ups and crashes the browser. in opera you get to
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> personal web space, and just raw .JPG files.  Of course, now it's got the
> images you re-did for me  (thanks again)  :)

you're very welcome -- makes it easier to access.
rach
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.