Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Dodge / Dodge Trucks / February 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

RUMOR: Is Dodge changing to CAT diesel?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Edward L. Dowdy - 30 Jan 2006 13:58 GMT
Just curious.

Ed
Tom Lawrence - 30 Jan 2006 14:06 GMT
> Just curious.

No.
TBone - 30 Jan 2006 14:59 GMT
Why would they do that when Mercedes already builds them.  I would think
that if they left Cummins, they would go their, especially since it is also
owned by Daimler.

Signature

If at first you don't succeed,  you're not cut out for skydiving

> Just curious.
>
> Ed
Edward L. Dowdy - 30 Jan 2006 16:19 GMT
I didn't think so. A friend brought it up. Another said the same thing you
did.

Thanks a bunch,
Ed

> Why would they do that when Mercedes already builds them.  I would think
> that if they left Cummins, they would go their, especially since it is also
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> >
> > Ed
Groucho - 01 Feb 2006 02:30 GMT
>I didn't think so. A friend brought it up. Another said the same thing you
>did.
>
>Thanks a bunch,
>Ed
>  

Bet your buddy asks you next to find out if Ford owns Cummins.  :-)

>  
Edward L. Dowdy - 01 Feb 2006 20:40 GMT
You hit the nail on the head!

> >I didn't think so. A friend brought it up. Another said the same thing you
> >did.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Bet your buddy asks you next to find out if Ford owns Cummins.  :-)
Mark - 08 Feb 2006 02:33 GMT
Don't they???

>>I didn't think so. A friend brought it up. Another said the same thing you
>>did.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Bet your buddy asks you next to find out if Ford owns Cummins.  :-)
Nosey - 08 Feb 2006 04:52 GMT
>> Bet your buddy asks you next to find out if Ford owns Cummins.  :-)
>>
> Don't they???

No. See: http://tinyurl.com/dnn48
Signature

Ken

Edward L. Dowdy - 09 Feb 2006 16:52 GMT
That looks like a spoofed site.

> >> Bet your buddy asks you next to find out if Ford owns Cummins.  :-)
> >>
> > Don't they???
>
> No. See: http://tinyurl.com/dnn48
Nosey - 09 Feb 2006 21:03 GMT
> That looks like a spoofed site.

It may look like it, but it's not (unless the entire Cummins website is a
spoof).
Maybe this looks less spoofish. Is that even a word?
http://www.cummins.com/na/pages/en/customerassistance/faq/index.cfm
Under the heading DodgeRam, click on #28.
Signature

Ken

td - 01 Feb 2006 04:35 GMT
No, and the big news is everyone wants a Cummins.  Toyota will probably
get one if the rumor is true.  Toyota being such a huge potential buyer
it would cost DC a lot to monopolize the Cummins in the HD pickup
market.

http://www.pickuptruck.com/html/autoshows/naias2006/diesels/page1.html

FWIW It's all just speculation at this point.  Plus I think the article
itself is broken the author says Dodge is "...the weakest player in the
space with an engine/transmission combo that just doesn't measure up to
superior Ford and GM diesel powertrains."  This does not jive with all
the Japanies companies drooling over Cummins so take it all with a
grain of salt.
TBone - 01 Feb 2006 14:55 GMT
Why would DC even try.  Mercedes also builds some damn nice diesels and I
would take one in place of a Cummins if they went that way.

Signature

If at first you don't succeed,  you're not cut out for skydiving

> No, and the big news is everyone wants a Cummins.  Toyota will probably
> get one if the rumor is true.  Toyota being such a huge potential buyer
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> the Japanies companies drooling over Cummins so take it all with a
> grain of salt.
Christopher  Thompson - 01 Feb 2006 16:42 GMT
why would they want to change though? the Cummins is selling on its
reliability and power heck thats why i bought mine. besides it being a dodge
in general, the Cummins was the BIG selling point.

Signature

-Chris
05 CTD
99 Durango

> Why would DC even try.  Mercedes also builds some damn nice diesels and I
> would take one in place of a Cummins if they went that way.
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> > the Japanies companies drooling over Cummins so take it all with a
> > grain of salt.
Carolina Watercraft Works - 01 Feb 2006 16:43 GMT
I agree...I think that even though Mercedes does make a good
powerplant, the Cummins is a bigger draw than the Merc option.

Signature

------------------------------------------
Laszlo Almasi
Cool Toys (formerly Carolina Watercraft Works)
Ice Angels

> why would they want to change though? the Cummins is selling on its
> reliability and power heck thats why i bought mine. besides it being a
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>> > the Japanies companies drooling over Cummins so take it all with a
>> > grain of salt.
TBone - 01 Feb 2006 16:53 GMT
While I agree that the Cummins is a great engine, I would also put Mercedes
above both the Duramax and the currently troublesome PowerChoke and if they
could reduce the price by using an in-house engine....

Signature

If at first you don't succeed,  you're not cut out for skydiving

> I agree...I think that even though Mercedes does make a good
> powerplant, the Cummins is a bigger draw than the Merc option.
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> >> > it would cost DC a lot to monopolize the Cummins in the HD pickup
> >> > market.

http://www.pickuptruck.com/html/autoshows/naias2006/diesels/page1.html

> >> > FWIW It's all just speculation at this point.  Plus I think the article
> >> > itself is broken the author says Dodge is "...the weakest player in the
> >> > space with an engine/transmission combo that just doesn't measure up to
> >> > superior Ford and GM diesel powertrains."  This does not jive with all
> >> > the Japanies companies drooling over Cummins so take it all with a
> >> > grain of salt.
Roy - 01 Feb 2006 17:31 GMT
> why would they want to change though? the Cummins is selling on its
> reliability and power heck thats why i bought mine. besides it being a
> dodge
> in general, the Cummins was the BIG selling point.

I agree totally. If ford had the Cummins I would have one in the yard. If dc
goes to a mercedes power plant the questions I'd ask would be which one, hp
& tq. what transmission, what truck will it go into, warranty, and of course
can ya plow with it.

Toyota has a diesel of it's own doesn't it? I can't see a toyota with a 900
pound engine in it.

Roy
> -Chris
> 05 CTD
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>> > the Japanies companies drooling over Cummins so take it all with a
>> > grain of salt.
Christopher  Thompson - 01 Feb 2006 19:04 GMT
seen one the other day it was standing on its back bumper tryin to haul the
thing *grin*

Signature

-Chris
05 CTD
99 Durango

> > why would they want to change though? the Cummins is selling on its
> > reliability and power heck thats why i bought mine. besides it being a
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> >> > it would cost DC a lot to monopolize the Cummins in the HD pickup
> >> > market.

http://www.pickuptruck.com/html/autoshows/naias2006/diesels/page1.html

> >> > FWIW It's all just speculation at this point.  Plus I think the article
> >> > itself is broken the author says Dodge is "...the weakest player in the
> >> > space with an engine/transmission combo that just doesn't measure up to
> >> > superior Ford and GM diesel powertrains."  This does not jive with all
> >> > the Japanies companies drooling over Cummins so take it all with a
> >> > grain of salt.
mac davis - 01 Feb 2006 17:21 GMT
>Why would DC even try.  Mercedes also builds some damn nice diesels and I
>would take one in place of a Cummins if they went that way.

for sure... love to see one of their smaller turbo diesels in the Dakota and
durango.. and isn't it about time for a td 1500?????

mac

Please remove splinters before emailing
Christopher  Thompson - 01 Feb 2006 19:09 GMT
i would consider buying my wife a durango again if they put a TD in it. as
it stands now her next truck is a crewcab sb 2500.

Signature

-Chris
05 CTD
99 Durango

> >Why would DC even try.  Mercedes also builds some damn nice diesels and I
> >would take one in place of a Cummins if they went that way.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Please remove splinters before emailing
Ruppster - 02 Feb 2006 04:29 GMT
>Just curious.
>
>Ed

Dodge did use Cat diesels in their trucks 30 years ago. <g> I used to
have a 1973 Dodge LCF C800 with a 573 CI Cat V-8 (it was listed as a
special order engine). I have a few pics of it on my web site at
http://www.dodge-semis.com/MT/. Dodge even used Detroit Diesel's 6-71
and 8V-71 2 stroke diesels around the same time as they used the Cats.
The first number in the engine designation indicates the number of
cylinders while the last 2 digits are the CI displacement of each
cylinder. The most powerful Detroit Diesel used in the Dodges back
then was even called a 318 as it put out 318 horsepower. It had a
turbo mounted on top of a roots type supercharger. I know of a cab
over Dodge L1000 with a DD 318 that is a for sale that is not to far
from me. I would love to get my hands on a 12V-71. It was 2 6V-71 put
end to end. Had 2 separate blowers (one for the front half of the
engine and a second blower for the rear half) and each one had a turbo
on top of it. <seg>

Ruppster
Edward L. Dowdy - 03 Feb 2006 19:53 GMT
Thanks Rupp! I'll check yer site.

Ed

> >Just curious.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> Ruppster
John - 05 Feb 2006 03:02 GMT
Pictures were great. It must have hurt to have to leave it behind. What
a classic!
John
RamMan@dodgecity.cc - 05 Feb 2006 17:45 GMT
I think with the resounding success of the Cummins Turbo-Diesel, the mere
thought of anything else under the hood is just rumor-mongering. If it
ain't broke, don't fix it.

There's two kinds of diesel powered pickup owners on the road today;
those who have a CTD and
those who wish they did
Ed Dunn - 06 Feb 2006 05:09 GMT
>I think with the resounding success of the Cummins Turbo-Diesel, the mere
>thought of anything else under the hood is just rumor-mongering. If it
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>those who have a CTD and
>those who wish they did

Last week I was at a dealer looking at a new CTD 3500 for towing a 5th
Wheel.

The hitch weight of the trailer we want pushes the limit of our 2500 so
I need a 3500. The trailer I want also pushes the limits of the 3500
Dodge in towing weight.

When I complained that I wasn't going to have much cushion on GCWR the
Fleet truck guy said that if I wasn't in a big hurry that there were
rumors of a Ram 3500 with a lot more power and gross towing weight being
available late this summer in the 07's.  

That is all he would say.  I do put a little credence to it because it
is not very often that a customer, even a repeat customer is told that
he should wait to spend big bucks on a truck.  However that is exactly
what he did, he suggested I wait for the '07s to be announced, and then
we would get on the computer and order me just the truck I wanted and
needed.  

Has anyone else heard this?  Perhaps the Mercedes-Benz MBE 900 or even
an MBE 4000 for the real power users and leave the other trucks in the
dust once and for all.

Ed
Greg Surratt - 06 Feb 2006 11:15 GMT
>When I complained that I wasn't going to have much cushion on GCWR the
>Fleet truck guy said that if I wasn't in a big hurry that there were
>rumors of a Ram 3500 with a lot more power and gross towing weight being
>available late this summer in the 07's.  

I'd wait.  I haven't seen or heard anything, but Dodge and GM are
playing "catch-up" to Ford's heavy hauler package (19,000+ tow
capacity) with integrated brake controller.
RamMan@dodgecity.cc - 06 Feb 2006 14:03 GMT
If true it may be good news to those of us for whom the current 3500
dually is a perfect fit. Power mongers such as yourself will dump their
current models for the '07, leaving the rest of us with some good deals on
the used ones. Kind of like the summer of '97 when the 4-door QC replaced
the 2-door CC.

I'm kind of in the same situation as you Ed, looking for a 3500 dually.
With a potential layoff looming in the wings and negroes now living on
three sides of me I figure the net of my severance check would be a nice
sendoff to take to the dealership. Buy the truck, put a 4-sale sign in the
yard and "me and momma" will just drive off into the sunset and become
full-time RV'ers.

Happiness is Houston, Texas in the rear-view mirror.

>Last week I was at a dealer looking at a new CTD 3500 for towing a 5th
>Wheel.

>The hitch weight of the trailer we want pushes the limit of our 2500 so
>I need a 3500. The trailer I want also pushes the limits of the 3500
>Dodge in towing weight.

>When I complained that I wasn't going to have much cushion on GCWR the
>Fleet truck guy said that if I wasn't in a big hurry that there were
>rumors of a Ram 3500 with a lot more power and gross towing weight being
>available late this summer in the 07's.  

>That is all he would say.  I do put a little credence to it because it
>is not very often that a customer, even a repeat customer is told that
>he should wait to spend big bucks on a truck.  However that is exactly
>what he did, he suggested I wait for the '07s to be announced, and then
>we would get on the computer and order me just the truck I wanted and
>needed.  

>Has anyone else heard this?  Perhaps the Mercedes-Benz MBE 900 or even
>an MBE 4000 for the real power users and leave the other trucks in the
>dust once and for all.
GT - 06 Feb 2006 18:12 GMT
>If true it may be good news to those of us for whom the current 3500
>dually is a perfect fit. Power mongers such as yourself will dump their
>current models for the '07, leaving the rest of us with some good deals on
>the used ones. Kind of like the summer of '97 when the 4-door QC replaced
>the 2-door CC.

That was what I was thinking myself.  There may be some excellent deals
this fall and perhaps I can persuade the wife that we can live with less
trailer.  Although, I must point out that I'm much happier when SWMBO is
happy, but she is reasonable and frugal.

The wife and I are retired and want to take extended trips to see the
country. We have a 'vacation trailer' but it isn't conducive for
full-timing.  

>I'm kind of in the same situation as you Ed, looking for a 3500 dually.
>With a potential layoff looming in the wings and negroes now living on
>three sides of me I figure the net of my severance check would be a nice
>sendoff to take to the dealership. Buy the truck, put a 4-sale sign in the
>yard and "me and momma" will just drive off into the sunset and become
>full-time RV'ers.

Sounds like an idea, I have a nephew who was a steam fitter who liked to
work construction on the coasts and power plants, especially nuclear. I
don't understand the in's and out's of the trade but he seemed to keep
jobs lined up.  He and his wife lived in a trailer or 5th wheel for
years and raised two kids. Between jobs they took vacation trips around
the country.  And he tried to find jobs where they hadn't been before.

They had a home base near Ft. Smith Arkansas where they retired to
between jobs and when he finally retired.

>Happiness is Houston, Texas in the rear-view mirror.

I can agree with that. I spent a whole year there one hot week in
August. The humidity was a killer, especially for someone from the
desert where 30% humidity was considered high.  The next time I was
there was in January and it was nice.

Ed
RamMan@dodgecity.cc - 07 Feb 2006 23:50 GMT
>>Happiness is Houston, Texas in the rear-view mirror.

>I can agree with that. I spent a whole year there one hot week in
>August. The humidity was a killer, especially for someone from the
>desert where 30% humidity was considered high.  The next time I was
>there was in January and it was nice.

We're only here because 19 years ago a job transfer I couldn't afford to
turn down brought us here from Kansas City. It sure wouldn't be my choice.
Housing is really cheap even for all-brick homes, but that's about all. As
miserable as the climate is in June thru September, the city has recently
become a hotbed of crime, far moreso than ever before. Of the estimated
200,000 "evacuees" who landed here in Katrina's wake, most of them came
from "the projects" which in case you haven't noticed, AREN'T being
rebuilt.  New Orleans doesn't want the scourge of their society back.
They're Houston's problem now.
GT - 08 Feb 2006 05:39 GMT
>>>Happiness is Houston, Texas in the rear-view mirror.
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>rebuilt.  New Orleans doesn't want the scourge of their society back.
>They're Houston's problem now.

I hadn't thought of that.  A 200,000 population increase of questionable
characters must have put a huge strain on law enforcement and the law
abiding citizens.

You mentioned you were thinking of full timing. Can you retire or would
you just move to a new job and call the 5er home?  Actually, it sounds
like moving into a trailer and out to a 30 mile commute or so might be
worth the trouble.

GT
RamMan@dodgecity.cc - 09 Feb 2006 01:07 GMT
>I hadn't thought of that.  A 200,000 population increase of questionable
>characters must have put a huge strain on law enforcement and the law
>abiding citizens.

Houston's extremely popular mayor (won reelection practically by
acclamation) is very sorry now that he opened up the Astrodome and
welcomed "life's walking wounded" with open arms. He has now turned to
FEMA asking for $6 mil to offset addt'l police overtime in the areas of
town where these people went after they left the "Dome".

>You mentioned you were thinking of full timing. Can you retire or would
>you just move to a new job and call the 5er home?  Actually, it sounds
>like moving into a trailer and out to a 30 mile commute or so might be
>worth the trouble.

I'll be only 60 this year and so cannot really "afford" to retire since I
won't be able to start Social Security until I'm 63. I do have a small
retirement + small 401K (approx $350k total combined) which spread out
over (guessing) 20 years doesn't allow for a very lavish retirement, even
invested at 8~10% return. The problem is our home isn't paid for and won't
be for several years, but we do have about $70k equity in it right now.

We also have some issues that we need to address. We desperately need to
move due to a recent and rapid deterioration of the neighborhood (white
flight). We can neither afford nor do we want to purchase a new home in an
Anglo neighborhood because taxes would double, house note would double,
commuting distance would double, etc. The idea of full-time RV'ing seems
to have some positive appeal although we would be in much closer quarters
and maybe claw each other's eyes out after a month or two of living in 320
Sq Ft after previously living in 1900 sq. ft. We also have pets; 2 golden
retrievers and 5 (yes, 5) cats. All are indoor pets and are considered
"members of the family".  Are we nuts or what?

We've thought about going to the 5er now or within a year and continuing
with the job as long as it lasts, but knowing that a layoff is imminent
and could come at any time. Ideally I need to work 6 more years until I'm
66, but minimum I need to work 3 more until I'm 63. The layoff could come
in a year tho and at age 60 you're kind of unemployable, so we were
looking at full-timing as a potential way of DRAMATICALLY cutting our
living expenses. The idea being that the home sale would net enough to pay
off the RV and the severance check would nearly pay for the truck. We
really don't want RV or truck payments in our retirement (voluntary or
forced).
Ruppster - 06 Feb 2006 21:55 GMT
>Pictures were great. It must have hurt to have to leave it behind. What
>a classic!
>John

Thanks John,
Yeah, it hurt having to leave it behind but that's the fun of being
with the military. Right now I am trying to get my hands on another
LCF C800 but this one has a 413 gas engine with a 10 speed RoadRanger
tranny. Would rather have another Cat powered C800 but the one I left
in Alaska is the only one I've ever come across with the Cat option.
Most of the diesels were either inline 6 Cummins or Detroits. To add
insult to injury there was not enough room to put the inline 6 diesels
under the hood (due to the snub nose) so they had to notch out the
firewall and use a cowling in the cab (like a full size van) to cover
up the rear of the engine. This cowling is hard to find so converting
a gas powered LCF Dodge to an inline 6 diesel is next to impossible. I
know where a turbocharged Detroit 6V92 is and might try putting that
in place of the 413. The bad part with that idea is that the old
Detroits got about the same fuel mileage as the 413 did and with the
cost of diesel fuel being higher then super unleaded I don't think it
would be worth it. Oh well, six of one and half a dozen of another I
guess. <g>

Ruppster
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.