Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Dodge / Dodge Trucks / February 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

2006 RAM 3500 Tow Limit 16250 lbs

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
RamMan@dodgecity.cc - 11 Feb 2006 17:00 GMT
I thought to stick this in a separate post from the original thread since
it might make it easier to search the next time someone is looking for
this.

Answers found.  Contrary to some numbers provided by others and some
resulting debate, the sales literature available from the dealership made
it all much clearer.

As Tom Lawrence correctly stated, the MAXIMUM *TOWING* CAPACITY of the '06
Ram 3500 is in fact 16,250 pounds - AND - read the fine print.

The fine print says "WHEN PROPERLY EQUIPPED". Now, as applied to the 3500,
"Properly Equipped" to achieve the 16,250-lb maximum towing capacity means
specifically **ALL SIX** of the following configuration specifications:

1 - Cummins Turbo-Diesel engine, mandatory

2 - SINGLE Rear Wheels! (Sorry dually fans, the DRW option reduces the max
tow capacity by 400 pounds to compensate for the added weight of that
option)

3 - 2 Wheel Drive!  (Sorry again 4X4 fans, the 4X4 option reduces the max
tow capacity by another 400 pounds to compensate for the added weight of
that option.

4 - 4.10:1 rear axle ratio required (with the 3.73 you actually sacrifice
a whopping 2000 lbs of your towing capacity)

5 - Automatic transmission (the manual tranny was rated 3000 lbs less)

6 - Long bed. (Long bed vs short bed had only 50 lbs impact, oddly the
long bed was rated higher. Go figure)

IMPORTANT - Don't confuse GCWR ratings with TOWING capacity. The GCWR
number (23,000 lbs) means the combined weight of the tow vehicle plus the
weight you are wanting to tow (GCWR = Weight of fully-loaded truck + the
weight of the fully-loaded trailer, the two weights added together).

Finally, 2500 vs 3500? No big surprises here. From the *SPECS* it appears
the 3500 out-pulls a similarly equipped 2500 by approx. 2,750 pounds. But
wait a second... On the 2500 (again from published specs) the axle ratio
(3.73 vs 4.10) suddenly makes no difference, both being rated at 13,400
pounds. I don't know about you but this makes me a bit suspicious here.
Why would the 4.10 rear-end boost the 3500's tug specs but not the 2500's?
Uhuh...

Honestly? Methinks the only reason to get a 3500 (other than bragging
rights) would be to get the dually. I think the trucks are otherwise
closer to being two peas in a pod than Chryco would have (or want) us to
believe.
Nosey - 11 Feb 2006 22:58 GMT
> I thought to stick this in a separate post from the original thread
> since it might make it easier to search the next time someone is
[quoted text clipped - 48 lines]
> closer to being two peas in a pod than Chryco would have (or want) us
> to believe.

Great post. You addressed the towing capacity but didn't mention the truck's
payload capacity. Payload has to be figured when towing a trailer. Some of
the trailer weight is going to be carried on the truck as hitch weight.
10%-15% of the trailer's weight should be on the tongue of a "bumper-pull"
type hitch (including receiver hitches mounted under the bumper). 5th wheels
should have about 20%-25% of the trailer's weight on the hitch. In my '99
owner's manual Dodge claims you need a 5th wheel hitch to tow any trailer
heavier than 10,000 lbs. If you have a trailer that weighs 13,400 lbs it
would have to be a 5th wheel with a minimum 2,680 lbs hitch weight. Can a
2500 series truck handle more than that? Is there a payload difference
between the SRW 3500 and 2500?
Signature

Ken

Tom Lawrence - 12 Feb 2006 04:53 GMT
> Is there a payload difference between the SRW 3500 and 2500?

About 900lbs.
RamMan@dodgecity.cc - 12 Feb 2006 14:37 GMT
>> Is there a payload difference between the SRW 3500 and 2500?

>About 900lbs.

Payload rating is one area where you really see some major differences
(and advantages) of DRW over SRW and to a much lesser extent the
disadvantages of the Quad & Mega cabs vs. the Regular cab. Here it's all
about weight and where you plan to put it and how you plan to support it.

Comparing 3500 configuration extremes (maximums vs. minimums), the DRW 4X4
Std cab and LB has a payload rating of 5,100 lbs.  By contrast, the same
truck except with SRW, 4X2 and Mega cab the payload rating drops to 2,510
lbs. Almost 2,000 lbs of that difference is DRW vs SRW.

Those differences become significant numbers when you're looking to set a
5th wheel in there with a pin weight of 2,300 lbs. After having spent the
better part of yesterday afternoon walking my legs off at the Houston RV
Show and talking to a lot of folks, it became apparent to me that a Dually
is pretty much called for. While you can certainly do it with SRW, the
folks who pull the heavier 5th wheels with SRW (both 2500 and 3500) report
more occurrences of catastrophic tire failure from tread separation long
before the tires are otherwise worn out. You're also going to sink a lot
deeper in the mud with SRW.

I think the bottom line is get a Dually.
MoParMaN - 12 Feb 2006 21:30 GMT
>>> Is there a payload difference between the SRW 3500 and 2500?
>
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> I think the bottom line is get a Dually.

This is one of the reasons I got mine.  My 2500 swd would also get blown
around in the wind and such, since I got my dually, i don't have that
problem anymore.

See anything good at the show, I went to the Fort Worth one about 2 weeks
ago and didn't see anything better than what I have already (2005 Montana
Mountaineer 3-slides 35 footer)

I've been wanting to see the Artic Fox or Cat, but can't seem to find one
around Nortex.  BTW, one of the deelers in Houston will get you a hell of
deal if you tell them your prolly gonna buy from Meyers RV in NY State.  If
they hadn't made me great deal last year, I would have bought from the guy
in Houston rather than FunTime in CLeburn.

Signature

MoParMaN---Remove Clothes To Reply!
--SCUD Coordinates 32.61204 North: 96.92993 West--

RamMan@dodgecity.cc - 13 Feb 2006 01:43 GMT
>See anything good at the show, I went to the Fort Worth one about 2 weeks
>ago and didn't see anything better than what I have already (2005 Montana
>Mountaineer 3-slides 35 footer)

The Montana is nice.  Didn't see anything ultra-special at the show, at
least nothing beyond what we're just about ready to cut a check for. Looks
like our "new dream home" will be a Holiday Rambler 36' Presidential. Wife
likes the 36SKQ I like the 36RLQ.

>I've been wanting to see the Artic Fox or Cat, but can't seem to find one
>around Nortex.  

Artic was very well represented at the show & we checked a couple of them
out. Nice, but I think we're pretty much sold on the HR Pres. We know what
we want, just not sure how soon we're going to pull the trigger.

>BTW, one of the deelers in Houston will get you a hell of
>deal if you tell them your prolly gonna buy from Meyers RV in NY State.  If
>they hadn't made me great deal last year, I would have bought from the guy
>in Houston rather than FunTime in CLeburn.

We're working w/Holiday World <http://www.holidayworldhouston.com/> out
West on I-10 and they seem pretty aggressive on pricing. Their first offer
to us without any haggling was $10k below sticker. We're originally from
the midwest and not at all opposed to driving up to Elkhart, IN to avoid
the $1700 delivery. (I'm also not opposed to picking up a new Dually in
Laredo if it will save a significant portion of the $900 delivery). Since
we'll be on the road I see no reason to establish any specific dealer
relationship unless someone is ready to make us an offer we can't refuse.
MoParMaN - 13 Feb 2006 02:23 GMT
>>See anything good at the show, I went to the Fort Worth one about 2 weeks
>>ago and didn't see anything better than what I have already (2005 Montana
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
> we'll be on the road I see no reason to establish any specific dealer
> relationship unless someone is ready to make us an offer we can't refuse.

That's the Houston dealer we were dealing with also.  Big Bob I think was
the salesman. They were 6 grand cheaper than FunTIme and Myers in New York
State was 14000 cheaper.  We took 4 days off and drove from Dallas to
Churchville NY to get it.  It was worth the drive. You might want to check
them out before you buy, they have a new showroom around San Antonio I'm
told.  But I haven't been to it yet.

Signature

MoParMaN---Remove Clothes To Reply!
--SCUD Coordinates 32.61204 North: 96.92993 West--

RamMan@dodgecity.cc - 14 Feb 2006 03:55 GMT
>That's the Houston dealer we were dealing with also.  Big Bob I think was
>the salesman. They were 6 grand cheaper than FunTIme and Myers in New York
>State was 14000 cheaper.  We took 4 days off and drove from Dallas to
>Churchville NY to get it.  It was worth the drive. You might want to check
>them out before you buy, they have a new showroom around San Antonio I'm
>told.  But I haven't been to it yet.

Thanks for the tip!
Tom Lawrence - 11 Feb 2006 23:15 GMT
> Honestly? Methinks the only reason to get a 3500 (other than bragging
> rights) would be to get the dually. I think the trucks are otherwise
> closer to being two peas in a pod than Chryco would have (or want) us to
> believe.

As a tow vehicle, yes...  but look at the difference in payload capacity
between a 2500 and a 3500SRW.  Now think "pin weight" instead of "payload",
and you see now where even a 3500SRW is advantageous as a tow vehicle.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.