 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Car Forum / Dodge / Dodge Trucks / February 2006NEW Subject for the week end!!
I find it odd that all you repub zealots have been unusually quite while your VP has finally gone into action. No D&A test, waits 20 hours to report it. The case is closed. Damn, I think I'd be safer in a car with TK. <GBMFG> C'mon it's the weekend!! Roy >I find it odd that all you repub zealots have been unusually quite while >your VP has finally gone into action. No D&A test, waits 20 hours to report [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Roy Surprised you didn't call him a terrorist? http://www.huffingtonpost.com/alec-baldwin/will-they-go-to-court_b_15875.html >I find it odd that all you repub zealots have been unusually quite while >your VP has finally gone into action. No D&A test, waits 20 hours to report >it. The case is closed. >Damn, I think I'd be safer in a car with TK. ><GBMFG> >C'mon it's the weekend!! Well, it's too late to do a blood test, and no one has come forward with any "story" contrary to the official one, but that doesn't seem to have deterred the bloodthirsty media one bit. Waiting 20 hours to report it to whom? The Sheriff was called immediately. What -legal- obligation (or for that matter what -moral- obligation) does the veep have to notify a single living soul? Why does it always have to turn into a Goddamned witch hunt when someone famous is involved? The U.S. Secret Service (i.e., Federal officers) knew about it the moment it happened and within minutes the SS at the White House did too because the US Secret Service communicates those kind of incidents within their own organization. Just whose job is it to inform the prez? If you had accidentally shot your own best friend on a hunting trip, who all would -YOU- notify and in what order? More importantly, outside of your own immediate circle of family and friends, who the hell would even care? Would you think to call the media? No story here. Headlines: Hunter injured in accidental shooting No story here. Headlines: Lawyer peppered with pellets in hunting accident Again, no story. Headlines: V.P. Cheney involved in hunting accident Well now we've got a story. But the story is it was accidental and there is no evidence of anything to the contrary. Aside from WHO was involved it was nothing more than a simple hunting accident, with all due emphasis here on the word "accident". The Sheriff's office investigated and apparently found no cause to go digging any further. Case closed. You're absolutely right, "case closed", except to the Liberal Democrats. Funny how they also tried to used the wire tapping of the Kings to support their case but conveniently forgot who ordered the wire tap, John F Kennedy.  SignatureBudd Cochran Romans 3:23, Romans 6:23, John 3:16-17, Ephesians 2:8-9 >>I find it odd that all you repub zealots have been unusually quite while >>your VP has finally gone into action. No D&A test, waits 20 hours to [quoted text clipped - 38 lines] > digging any further. > Case closed. >You're absolutely right, "case closed", except to the Liberal Democrats. i don't think so. wouldn't matter if the vice pres was a liberal or a conservative. the media is just gonna get involved when the vice pres of the us of america shoots his hunting partner in the face with a shotgun. the circumstances are the important, just the fact that it happened. its news. look, i'm not condemning the man, it looks to me like an accident. but i sure don't critisize the media for playing it up. it's news. >Funny how they also tried to used the wire tapping of the Kings to support >their case but conveniently forgot who ordered the wire tap, John F Kennedy. >>You're absolutely right, "case closed", except to the Liberal Democrats. > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > shotgun. the circumstances are the important, just the fact that it > happened. its news. Well, the historical evidence of the media's handling of the Bush administrations says otherwise, but you have to be willing to look to find it. > look, i'm not condemning the man, it looks to me like an accident. > but i sure don't critisize the media for playing it up. it's news. I do. . .but then I don't approve of the liberal media's methods anyway. >>Funny how they also tried to used the wire tapping of the Kings to support >>their case but conveniently forgot who ordered the wire tap, John F >>Kennedy. SignatureBudd Cochran Romans 3:23, Romans 6:23, John 3:16-17, Ephesians 2:8-9 >>>You're absolutely right, "case closed", except to the Liberal Democrats. >> [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] >administrations says otherwise, but you have to be willing to look to find >it. lol. look real hard and you can find anything. calling it the "liberal" media makes you just like the folks you are bitching about. using generic trigger words only opens you up to the same. say what you don't like about the media, thats cool, but labels like liberal media really doesn't say a thing, it is just looks like baseless bias. it gets old. >> look, i'm not condemning the man, it looks to me like an accident. >> but i sure don't critisize the media for playing it up. it's news. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >>>their case but conveniently forgot who ordered the wire tap, John F >>>Kennedy. > lol. look real hard and you can find anything. calling it the > "liberal" media makes you just like the folks you are bitching about. > using generic trigger words only opens you up to the same. say what > you don't like about the media, thats cool, but labels like liberal > media really doesn't say a thing, it is just looks like baseless bias. > it gets old. It's not baseless, not in the least, it's proven fact. Only a left wing vantage point can make it seem right wing. http://www.newsroom.ucla.edu/page.asp?RelNum=6664 While the editorial page of The Wall Street Journal is conservative, the newspaper's news pages are liberal, even more liberal than The New York Times. The Drudge Report may have a right-wing reputation, but it leans left. Coverage by public television and radio is conservative compared to the rest of the mainstream media. Meanwhile, almost all major media outlets tilt to the left. >>>>You're absolutely right, "case closed", except to the Liberal Democrats. >>> [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > media really doesn't say a thing, it is just looks like baseless bias. > it gets old. It would . . to a liberal. To a conservative, it's telling it like it is. The media paints every news report with liberal biases, supports the liberal platforms and adds personal liberal beliefs into the reports . . .gee, that makes it a liberal media. One of the worst: Cokie Roberts. >>> look, i'm not condemning the man, it looks to me like an accident. >>> but i sure don't critisize the media for playing it up. it's news. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] >>>>their case but conveniently forgot who ordered the wire tap, John F >>>>Kennedy. I notice you chose to ignore this little truth about liberals. SignatureBudd Cochran Romans 3:23, Romans 6:23, John 3:16-17, Ephesians 2:8-9 >>>>>You're absolutely right, "case closed", except to the Liberal Democrats. >>>> [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] >platforms and adds personal liberal beliefs into the reports . . .gee, that >makes it a liberal media. One of the worst: Cokie Roberts. wow, my comment just went straight over your head, apparently missed you by several yards. but then,, when your mind is so full of stereotypical bias and mundane mantra, there just isn't much room for actual thought and ideas. i wasn't defending the liberals or the conservatives for that matter, but the philosophy of your argument. >>>> look, i'm not condemning the man, it looks to me like an accident. >>>> but i sure don't critisize the media for playing it up. it's news. [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] >> >I notice you chose to ignore this little truth about liberals. >>>>>>You're absolutely right, "case closed", except to the Liberal >>>>>>Democrats. [quoted text clipped - 30 lines] > actual thought and ideas. i wasn't defending the liberals or the > conservatives for that matter, but the philosophy of your argument. No, I caught the insult, that I'm like the folks I complain about. I tried to ignore until you pointed it out again. Why should you defend the philosophy of my argument when the media's biases are self-evident to those willing to realize them? What's sterotypical about truth? Other than it can only be truth and nothing else? >>>>> look, i'm not condemning the man, it looks to me like an accident. >>>>> but i sure don't critisize the media for playing it up. it's news. [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] >>> >>I notice you chose to ignore this little truth about liberals. SignatureBudd Cochran Romans 3:23, Romans 6:23, John 3:16-17, Ephesians 2:8-9 >I find it odd that all you repub zealots have been unusually quite while >your VP has finally gone into action. No D&A test, waits 20 hours to report >it. The case is closed. Typical of this administration, shoot first and then spin the story. >>I find it odd that all you repub zealots have been unusually quite while >>your VP has finally gone into action. No D&A test, waits 20 hours to report >>it. The case is closed. > >Typical of this administration, shoot first and then spin the story. i was just impressed with the whole thing. i didn't think chaney could actually hit anyone. shows hes not getting as old as some of you guys think. Typical of Liberals to ignore the truth ( it was reported as required by law, to the proper authorities, on time) and to think the nation's liberals should be notified whenever anyone in the government breaks wind. SignatureBudd Cochran Romans 3:23, Romans 6:23, John 3:16-17, Ephesians 2:8-9 >>I find it odd that all you repub zealots have been unusually quite while >>your VP has finally gone into action. No D&A test, waits 20 hours to >>report it. The case is closed. > > Typical of this administration, shoot first and then spin the story. > Typical of Liberals to ignore the truth ( it was reported as required by > law, to the proper authorities, on time) and to think the nation's > liberals should be notified whenever anyone in the government breaks wind. Not so. Remember Vince Foster? Roy No, I don't, but the point I'm referring to is that the reports were made to the people that were supposed to be notified, on time. Hang the liberal media. SignatureBudd Cochran Romans 3:23, Romans 6:23, John 3:16-17, Ephesians 2:8-9 >> Typical of Liberals to ignore the truth ( it was reported as required by >> law, to the proper authorities, on time) and to think the nation's [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Roy > No, I don't, but the point I'm referring to is that the reports were made > to the people that were supposed to be notified, on time. > > Hang the liberal media. Curious,where do you get your news? Roy Probably Fox News, as you know, "fair and balanced reporting". SignatureIf at first you don't succeed, you're not cut out for skydiving > > > No, I don't, but the point I'm referring to is that the reports were made [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Roy Fox, like Tom mentions. I got sick of Cokie Roberts and her kind newscaster on the main broadcasting networks advocating abortion on demand, evolution as a fact (it still isn't anything but a theory). Of course, Tom's complaint is the same as all liberals in that Fox doesn't allow liberals or anyone else to browbeat or dominate a report or interview. SignatureBudd Cochran Romans 3:23, Romans 6:23, John 3:16-17, Ephesians 2:8-9 >> No, I don't, but the point I'm referring to is that the reports were made >> to the people that were supposed to be notified, on time. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Roy >Fox, like Tom mentions. > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >Of course, Tom's complaint is the same as all liberals in that Fox doesn't >allow liberals or anyone else to browbeat or dominate a report or interview. i never heard tom say that. when did he say that? >>Fox, like Tom mentions. >> [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > i never heard tom say that. when did he say that? <LOL> He has complained that Bill O'Reilly, for example, won't allow liberal guests to "speak freely", a catch phrase for "dominating and browbeating in an interview", if you will. Unfortunately for the liberals, it's Fox network and they give full content control to the program principals, be that Bill O'Reilly or whomever. That means, if necessary, they could kick a guest off the show and out the door if they so choose. Just like you could kick a ( insert party affiliation) campaigner off your property or out of your domicile. Exact words? No, he didn't say those exact words. He, among others, have repeatedly implied it, however. Ya know, it's funny how I can't be allowed to hold a strict interpretation of the words in the Bible, but you, Roy, and Tom often demand strict interpretations when it suits your purpose. It's called a "double-standard", in case you've forgotten. SignatureBudd Cochran Romans 3:23, Romans 6:23, John 3:16-17, Ephesians 2:8-9 >>>Fox, like Tom mentions. >>> [quoted text clipped - 26 lines] >interpretations when it suits your purpose. It's called a "double-standard", >in case you've forgotten. no, it is called unfair to attribute words to someone else that didn't say them. it is easy to argue with someone else i guess if you get to say what they said. makes an arguement pretty easy and that is what you try to do. this one is on you budd. (bg) >>>>Fox, like Tom mentions. >>>> [quoted text clipped - 35 lines] > no, it is called unfair to attribute words to someone else that didn't > say them. Gee, it's done to me a lot and you never spoke up for me . . . . But then I'm not one you would want to call a friend, am I? And it's a double standard, that is, " don't do as I do but as I say you should do". ROTFLMBO!!!!!!!!!!! > it is easy to argue with someone else i guess if you get to > say what they said. makes an arguement pretty easy and that is what > you try to do. this one is on you budd. (bg) Once again I admit an error and it gets twisted into a condemnation . . . .No politically correct tolerance in that, is there? But you did managed to damage your credibility. Congrats. SignatureBudd Cochran Romans 3:23, Romans 6:23, John 3:16-17, Ephesians 2:8-9 >>>>>Fox, like Tom mentions. >>>>> [quoted text clipped - 41 lines] >And it's a double standard, that is, " don't do as I do but as I say you >should do". you are the most paranoid person that i have ever read. it always comes down to poor budd. you can't discuss anything without it ending up with a poor budd thing. gee, everyone gets treated good but poor budd. gee, you never stand up for poor budd. gee, you let them say it about poor budd but not about other people. >ROTFLMBO!!!!!!!!!!! > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] >.No politically correct tolerance in that, is there? But you did managed to >damage your credibility. Congrats. budd, my credibiltywas not in question here. you were questioning my "fair" treatment of you, as in whether or not i had treated you fairly in realtion to tbone. different topics. then, while i actually do try to be fair to everyone, including you, you still miss the biggest piece of all of this. i don't care what "credibility" i have with you or for that matter with anyone else here. i only care that i try to be fair and honest, and as along as i am satisfied with that, that is all that matters. unlike you, who cries and whines everytime you feel that you have been mistreated or disrespected (which is several times a day), i honestly don't give a sh.t. i care about the issues that we argue about. as far as who respects who, or who likes who, or who supports who..........or who whatever budd...........i will leave that to the rest of you. it isn't personal budd. sh.t, you'd think you were in junior high school. >>>>>>Fox, like Tom mentions. >>>>>> [quoted text clipped - 50 lines] > budd. gee, you never stand up for poor budd. gee, you let them say > it about poor budd but not about other people. ROTFLMBO!!!!!! I wasn't talking about me. I was talking about double standards. Maybe if you would stop looking for places where I've done a "poor Budd" thing, you would see something else. After all, you are one of the top two people to accuse me of that, deserved or not matters not. >>ROTFLMBO!!!!!!!!!!! >> [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > budd, my credibiltywas not in question here. Yeah, it is. It always is. It's called "personal image". > you were questioning my > "fair" treatment of you, as in whether or not i had treated you fairly > in realtion to tbone. Noo-o-o-o-o, I was questioning why you sat back and let others do to me what you accused me of doing, that is using a double standard. > different topics. Not really. . . . . > then, while i actually do > try to be fair to everyone, including you, you still miss the biggest > piece of all of this. i don't care what "credibility" i have with you > or for that matter with anyone else here. Really? > i only care that i try to > be fair and honest, and as along as i am satisfied with that, that is > all that matters. ROTFLMBO!!!!!!!!! Thanks for the joke. Btw, I'll never accuse you of being fair and honest, because you haven't been toward me. > unlike you, who cries and whines everytime you feel > that you have been mistreated or disrespected (which is several times > a day), i honestly don't give a sh.t. Gee, tell me again where I asked you to care? In your twisted outlook, anyone that reports their medical condition to concerned friends in open forum is a whiner. Or does that only apply to me? > i care about the issues that we > argue about. I don't. Most of the time I feel like I'm talking to a broken recording that keeps reepeating the same crap. > as far as who respects who, or who likes who, or who > supports who..........or who whatever budd...........i will leave that > to the rest of you. Ok, you don't want to be involved in life? move to a deserted island. Life happens, ya know. > it isn't personal budd. When you twist a health report into a supposed constant whining, tell me how that isn't personal? Guess what? That's when you made it personal. > sh.t, you'd think you > were in junior high school. Considering our age difference, I'm still a few grades ahead of you, at least. SignatureBudd Cochran Romans 3:23, Romans 6:23, John 3:16-17, Ephesians 2:8-9 Funny, when Bill accidentally shot Monica in the face (and nobody was hurt) it became international news and nobody on the right complained about that. Gee, I wonder why not. SignatureIf at first you don't succeed, you're not cut out for skydiving > Typical of Liberals to ignore the truth ( it was reported as required by > law, to the proper authorities, on time) and to think the nation's liberals [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > *** Free account sponsored by SecureIX.com *** > *** Encrypt your Internet usage with a free VPN account from http://www.SecureIX.com *** > Funny, when Bill accidentally shot Monica in the face (and nobody was > hurt) > it became international news and nobody on the right complained about > that. > Gee, I wonder why not. That was her fault. She closed her mouth. Roy >> Typical of Liberals to ignore the truth ( it was reported as required by >> law, to the proper authorities, on time) and to think the nation's [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] >> *** Encrypt your Internet usage with a free VPN account from > http://www.SecureIX.com *** > > Funny, when Bill accidentally shot Monica in the face (and nobody was > > hurt) [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Roy LOL!!! SignatureIf at first you don't succeed, you're not cut out for skydiving > >> Typical of Liberals to ignore the truth ( it was reported as required by > >> law, to the proper authorities, on time) and to think the nation's [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > >> *** Encrypt your Internet usage with a free VPN account from > > http://www.SecureIX.com *** > Typical of Liberals to ignore the truth ( it was reported as required by > law, to the proper authorities, on time) and to think the nation's > liberals should be notified whenever anyone in the government breaks wind. And how typical of a Bible thumping hypocrite to defend anything Republican. BTW, Republicans don't fart, they candy. >>>I find it odd that all you repub zealots have been unusually quite while >>>your VP has finally gone into action. No D&A test, waits 20 hours to >>>report it. The case is closed. >> >> Typical of this administration, shoot first and then spin the story. Budd appears to be the definition of one who bites his nose off to spite his face. If the right wing had their way, he would either be on the street or dead. SignatureIf at first you don't succeed, you're not cut out for skydiving > > Typical of Liberals to ignore the truth ( it was reported as required by > > law, to the proper authorities, on time) and to think the nation's [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > >> > >> Typical of this administration, shoot first and then spin the story. > If the right wing had their way, he would either be on the street or > dead. So true. Roy > If at first you don't succeed, you're not cut out for skydiving > [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] >> >> >> >> Typical of this administration, shoot first and then spin the story. >> Typical of Liberals to ignore the truth ( it was reported as required by >> law, to the proper authorities, on time) and to think the nation's [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > Republican. > BTW, Republicans don't fart, they candy. Aw, gee, John . . .and here I thought you'd grown out of you name calling childishness. SignatureBudd Cochran Romans 3:23, Romans 6:23, John 3:16-17, Ephesians 2:8-9 -- Budd Cochran Romans 3:23, Romans 6:23, John 3:16-17, Ephesians 2:8-9 -- Budd Cochran Romans 3:23, Romans 6:23, John 3:16-17, Ephesians 2:8-9 -- Budd Cochran Romans 3:23, Romans 6:23, John 3:16-17, Ephesians 2:8-9 -- Budd Cochran Romans 3:23, Romans 6:23, John 3:16-17, Ephesians 2:8-9 -- Budd Cochran Romans 3:23, Romans 6:23, John 3:16-17, Ephesians 2:8-9 -- Budd Cochran Romans 3:23, Romans 6:23, John 3:16-17, Ephesians 2:8-9 -- Budd Cochran Romans 3:23, Romans 6:23, John 3:16-17, Ephesians 2:8-9 -- Budd Cochran Romans 3:23, Romans 6:23, John 3:16-17, Ephesians 2:8-9 -- Budd Cochran Romans 3:23, Romans 6:23, John 3:16-17, Ephesians 2:8-9 -- Budd Cochran Romans 3:23, Romans 6:23, John 3:16-17, Ephesians 2:8-9 -- Budd Cochran Romans 3:23, Romans 6:23, John 3:16-17, Ephesians 2:8-9 -- Budd Cochran Romans 3:23, Romans 6:23, John 3:16-17, Ephesians 2:8-9 -- Budd Cochran Romans 3:23, Romans 6:23, John 3:16-17, Ephesians 2:8-9 -- Budd Cochran Romans 3:23, Romans 6:23, John 3:16-17, Ephesians 2:8-9 -- Budd Cochran Romans 3:23, Romans 6:23, John 3:16-17, Ephesians 2:8-9 -- Budd Cochran Romans 3:23, Romans 6:23, John 3:16-17, Ephesians 2:8-9 -- Budd Cochran Romans 3:23, Romans 6:23, John 3:16-17, Ephesians 2:8-9 -- Budd Cochran Romans 3:23, Romans 6:23, John 3:16-17, Ephesians 2:8-9 -- Budd Cochran Romans 3:23, Romans 6:23, John 3:16-17, Ephesians 2:8-9 -- Budd Cochran Romans 3:23, Romans 6:23, John 3:16-17, Ephesians 2:8-9 -- Budd Cochran Romans 3:23, Romans 6:23, John 3:16-17, Ephesians 2:8-9 -- Budd Cochran Romans 3:23, Romans 6:23, John 3:16-17, Ephesians 2:8-9 -- Budd Cochran Romans 3:23, Romans 6:23, John 3:16-17, Ephesians 2:8-9 -- Budd Cochran Romans 3:23, Romans 6:23, John 3:16-17, Ephesians 2:8-9 -- Budd Cochran Romans 3:23, Romans 6:23, John 3:16-17, Ephesians 2:8-9 -- Budd Cochran Romans 3:23, Romans 6:23, John 3:16-17, Ephesians 2:8-9 news:x4idnaqIQ-u1-mreRVn-vA@comcast.com... >>> >>>>I find it odd that all you repub zealots have been unusually quite while >>>>your VP has finally gone into action. No D&A test, waits 20 hours to >>>>report it. The case is closed. >>> >>> Typical of this administration, shoot first and then spin the story. >>> Typical of Liberals to ignore the truth ( it was reported as required by >>> law, to the proper authorities, on time) and to think the nation's [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > Aw, gee, John . . .and here I thought you'd grown out of you name calling > childishness. Name calling childishness? Your overuse of the "L" word is typical pot/kettle. You don't consider labeling anyone who disagrees with the right wing philosophy a "Liberal" to be name calling? While you wear your religion on your sleeve and freely espouse your political beliefs, you have no idea of mine; my labeling you a Bible thumper is spot on accurate (your signature line is proof of that) while the label Liberal doesn't anywhere near fit me. Not surprising, anyone who would buy into the God/Jesus myth is unlikely to understand the principle of free thought. >>>> Typical of Liberals to ignore the truth ( it was reported as required >>>> by law, to the proper authorities, on time) and to think the nation's [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > Name calling childishness? Your overuse of the "L" word is typical > pot/kettle. Oh? If it walks like a liberal, talks like a liberal, stinks like a liberal, spends taxpayers money like a liberal, then it's safe to say it's a liberal, right? > You don't consider labeling anyone who disagrees with the right wing > philosophy a "Liberal" to be name calling? Nope. Because fo the answer above. > While you wear your religion on your sleeve and freely espouse your > political beliefs, you have no idea of mine; my labeling you a Bible > thumper is spot on accurate (your signature line is proof of that) while > the label Liberal doesn't anywhere near fit me. "LABEL" : (N) To place a name or designation on. To give a reference connotation to. To identify specifically. "Labeling" : The act of doing the prevous definitions. Yep, that a synonym for name calling, Now what was that about P/K/B???????? And thank you for the compliment on my sig line. > Not surprising, anyone who would buy into the God/Jesus myth is unlikely > to understand the principle of free thought. Uh, Oh . . .a religious bashing . . .my, my. Let me take a really wild guess . . . . . . you believe in Evolution. SignatureBudd Cochran Romans 3:23, Romans 6:23, John 3:16-17, Ephesians 2:8-9 >>> Aw, gee, John . . .and here I thought you'd grown out of you name >>> calling childishness. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > liberal, spends taxpayers money like a liberal, then it's safe to say it's > a liberal, right? Yep, sounds like a Liberal but doesn't even remotely resemble me. A small mind couldn't possibly grasp the concept that being anti-conservative does not automatically make one a Liberal. BTW, considering the massive deficits being run up by your hero Bush, you might want to rethink the "spends taxpayer's money...." comment. >> You don't consider labeling anyone who disagrees with the right wing >> philosophy a "Liberal" to be name calling? > > Nope. Because fo the answer above. Small minds have their limits. >>>> Aw, gee, John . . .and here I thought you'd grown out of you name >>>> calling childishness. [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > Yep, sounds like a Liberal but doesn't even remotely resemble me. No, you'd have to develop a personality first. > A small mind couldn't possibly grasp the concept that being > anti-conservative does not automatically make one a Liberal. Voice of experience? > BTW, considering the massive deficits being run up by your hero Bush, you > might want to rethink the "spends taxpayer's money...." comment. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Small minds have their limits. Yep, voice of experience. >I find it odd that all you repub zealots have been unusually quite while >your VP has finally gone into action. No D&A test, waits 20 hours to report [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > >Roy Hey, if you can't shoot your freinds, who can you shoot? beekeep Now, Greg, don't get me started . . . . . . <VBG> SignatureBudd Cochran Romans 3:23, Romans 6:23, John 3:16-17, Ephesians 2:8-9 >>I find it odd that all you repub zealots have been unusually quite while >>your VP has finally gone into action. No D&A test, waits 20 hours to [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > beekeep >Now, Greg, don't get me started . . . . . . > ><VBG> Hey, I've been there and done that. Back in 1970 I was on the receiving end of some #4 shot. One still sits right in the corner of my eye. It felt like marbles hitting me. I just feel lucky that I didn't loose an eye or two. beekeep > On Sun, 19 Feb 2006 12:04:36 -0700, "Budd Cochran" <mr-d150@preciscom > SPAM.net> [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > beekeep I'm glad you didn't. When a bicycle tire exploded back in junior high, it took out a chunk of my right ear. Bled like a stuck hog all the way home. It felt like a small rock nailed me. Like you, it just missed my right eye as I had turned my head to shut the air hose off for my friend. If I hadn't turned . . . It's not exactly like your situation, but similar. The missing part of the ear never grew back. Budd |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.