>>Has anyone else noticed this Dodge LRT (on eBay) with some kind of VIN
>>boondoggle ?
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> So what is the problem?
The problem is that truck appears to be a re-bodied vehicle. That should
not be confused with cloning a vehicle that would be advertised as such
(and NOT swapping VIN's). It would be like taking a '69 Satellite and
swapping the VIN tag (which is riveted to the dashboard) with a '69 GTX,
thereby creating a GTX out a Satellite. Or how about switching VIN's
and making a Hemi Cuda out of a slant six car ? That is illegal.
> Why not email him and ask him?
There have been quite a number of e-mails pointing out the obvious
problems. For starters, the fact that LRT's were only 78-79 trucks and
the one on eBay appears to be at least an '81 or newer (including the
dashboard) makes me believe that a VIN tag was swapped. The seller got a
wee bit hostile with a couple of e-mailers who pointed out these facts.
> Some states will issue a new VIN on a vehicle to comply with the 17 digit
> numbering system on the computer system software.
Where I live, that truck could get someone into big trouble.
Rachel Easson - 16 Mar 2006 21:27 GMT
>>> Has anyone else noticed this Dodge LRT (on eBay) with some kind of
>>> VIN boondoggle ?
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>>
>> So what is the problem?
<snip>
> There have been quite a number of e-mails pointing out the obvious
> problems. For starters, the fact that LRT's were only 78-79 trucks and
> the one on eBay appears to be at least an '81 or newer (including the
> dashboard) makes me believe that a VIN tag was swapped. The seller got a
> wee bit hostile with a couple of e-mailers who pointed out these facts.
yeah that's for sure. I'm not that good at spotting things but I also
thought that the dash was too young and if the VIN is on this dash it is
not on the dash it originally came from which is the definition of
swapping VIN's I think. No wonder he was hostile!
rach