2007 ford superduty - one UGLY truck

Thread view:

Enable EMail Alerts

Start New Thread

Thread rating:

Nathan W. Collier - 06 Apr 2006 00:03 GMT

http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/Features/articleId=109864

Signature

Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
http://ConcealedCarryForum.com

Reply to this Message

Budd Cochran - 06 Apr 2006 00:19 GMT

I agree, Nate. Whatever they used to inspire the designers must have looked
better before the nuclear explosion.

But there is irony in the world . . .I saw a brand new, still in the wraps,
Ford 350P-Stroke in some kind of cowboy trim, on a flat bed trailer being
towed by a 2001 Dodge 3500 Cummins.

Signature

Budd Cochran

> http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/Features/articleId=109864

Reply to this Message

Tim - 06 Apr 2006 13:46 GMT

> I agree, Nate. Whatever they used to inspire the designers must have looked
> better before the nuclear explosion.

LOL.

It's a conspiracy between Ford and the insurance industry. Wreck
the damn thing and they will refuse to pay.....'cause the damn thing
looked so god-awful ugly already.

I mean, really, how could any reasonable man tell the difference detween
wreck damage and the original sheet metal? :-)

Reply to this Message

Budd Cochran - 06 Apr 2006 16:38 GMT

<VBG>

It certainly shows what happens when you hire blind three year olds to
design vehicles.

Signature

Budd Cochran

>> I agree, Nate. Whatever they used to inspire the designers must have
>> looked
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> I mean, really, how could any reasonable man tell the difference detween
> wreck damage and the original sheet metal? :-)

Reply to this Message

Tom Lawrence - 06 Apr 2006 00:39 GMT

> http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/Features/articleId=109864

Looks like it was already driven into a brick wall...

Reply to this Message

Mike Simmons - 06 Apr 2006 00:54 GMT

Hang in there Nate. We will have a 4500 and 5500 next year, plus a new big
CI V8.

Mike

> http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/Features/articleId=109864

Reply to this Message

Nathan W. Collier - 06 Apr 2006 02:40 GMT

> Hang in there Nate. We will have a 4500 and 5500 next year, plus a new
> big CI V8.

you talking a diesel or gas v8? i hope you arent talking about a v8 diesel.

:-(

Signature

Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
http://ConcealedCarryForum.com

Reply to this Message

GeekBoy - 06 Apr 2006 04:07 GMT

>> Hang in there Nate. We will have a 4500 and 5500 next year, plus a new
>> big CI V8.
>
> you talking a diesel or gas v8? i hope you arent talking about a v8
> diesel. :-(

It is gas and will be available on the Chassis Class. And a gas V8 in a
truck larger in a 3500 is suppose to be Dodge moving ahead?

Reply to this Message

Huw - 09 Apr 2006 16:21 GMT

>>> Hang in there Nate. We will have a 4500 and 5500 next year, plus a new
>>> big CI V8.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> It is gas and will be available on the Chassis Class. And a gas V8 in a
> truck larger in a 3500 is suppose to be Dodge moving ahead?

Support the USA in its "Sponsor an Arab Country and make it richer"
campaign.

Huw

Reply to this Message

Mike Simmons - 06 Apr 2006 10:16 GMT

>> Hang in there Nate. We will have a 4500 and 5500 next year, plus a new
>> big CI V8.
>
> you talking a diesel or gas v8? i hope you arent talking about a v8
> diesel. :-(

8.3L gasser

Mike

Reply to this Message

Christopher Thompson - 06 Apr 2006 03:26 GMT

so the 4500 & 5500 is really coming? last i heard it was still a rumor.

Signature

-Chris
05 CTD
99 Durango

> Hang in there Nate. We will have a 4500 and 5500 next year, plus a new big
> CI V8.
>
> Mike
>
> > http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/Features/articleId=109864

Reply to this Message

Christopher Thompson - 06 Apr 2006 03:26 GMT

I didnt think it was possible!!!

they acctually made it uglier than the year before!

Signature

-Chris
05 CTD
99 Durango

> http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/Features/articleId=109864

Reply to this Message

GeekBoy - 06 Apr 2006 04:07 GMT

>I didnt think it was possible!!!
>
> they acctually made it uglier than the year before!

Well Ford has to justify all those layoffs some how.

>> http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/Features/articleId=109864

Reply to this Message

Christopher Thompson - 07 Apr 2006 02:37 GMT

> >I didnt think it was possible!!!
> >
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> >> http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/Features/articleId=109864

LOL

Signature

-Chris
05 CTD
99 Durango

Reply to this Message

mac davis - 06 Apr 2006 15:03 GMT

>http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/Features/articleId=109864

that's a shame... I used to like the looks of the old (2001 - 05) body style..

Mac

https://home.comcast.net/~mac.davis
https://home.comcast.net/~mac.davis/wood_stuff.htm

Reply to this Message

td - 07 Apr 2006 02:57 GMT

300 pound butt-ugly hillbilly wife to match the truck is a new option
this year.

Reply to this Message

Dale Yonz - 07 Apr 2006 09:11 GMT

She would make a good hood ornament

On 4/6/06 7:57 PM, in article
1144375035.076279.38150@i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com, "td"
<tony.diesel@gmail.com> wrote:

> 300 pound butt-ugly hillbilly wife to match the truck is a new option
> this year.

Reply to this Message

Bob M - 07 Apr 2006 18:24 GMT

> http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/Features/articleId=109864

That is just about the ugliest truck I've ever seen. It'll be a toss
up between the new Ford SD and the new GM trucks due out. They are going
to be just as ugly as the new Ford.

Bob

Reply to this Message