Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Dodge / Dodge Trucks / May 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Exchange my V-10 for a diesel cost effective?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Tom Allemani - 30 Apr 2006 21:21 GMT
Was wondering how involved it would be to rip out my V-10 and install a
diesel provided the cost was not excessive. Meaning more than trading it in
for a new one. Mine is a 1999 4x4 quad cab, tow package w 39,000 mi on it.
Pretty much mint except for some parking lot dings. I like the truck the-
mileage - not so much anyway I thought somebody here might have done this
and was willing to share info on the subject.       Thanks,  Tom
GeekBoy - 30 Apr 2006 21:57 GMT
It would be cheaper to sell yours and buy one.

I bought a 2000 with 93k miles club cab and long box with performance
goodies, tow package and 54 gal fuel tank for 15k.

> Was wondering how involved it would be to rip out my V-10 and install a
> diesel provided the cost was not excessive. Meaning more than trading it
> in for a new one. Mine is a 1999 4x4 quad cab, tow package w 39,000 mi on
> it. Pretty much mint except for some parking lot dings. I like the truck
> the- mileage - not so much anyway I thought somebody here might have done
> this and was willing to share info on the subject.       Thanks,  Tom
Christopher  Thompson - 30 Apr 2006 23:25 GMT
i recently traded a 99 v10 for a 05 cummins best move ive made in a while.
the cummins pulls like a dream and is getting twice the fuel milage the 8L
was empty.

Signature

-Chris
05 CTD
99 Durango
06 Liberty CRD

> Was wondering how involved it would be to rip out my V-10 and install a
> diesel provided the cost was not excessive. Meaning more than trading it in
> for a new one. Mine is a 1999 4x4 quad cab, tow package w 39,000 mi on it.
> Pretty much mint except for some parking lot dings. I like the truck the-
> mileage - not so much anyway I thought somebody here might have done this
> and was willing to share info on the subject.       Thanks,  Tom
SnoMan - 01 May 2006 00:11 GMT
>Was wondering how involved it would be to rip out my V-10 and install a
>diesel provided the cost was not excessive. Meaning more than trading it in
>for a new one. Mine is a 1999 4x4 quad cab, tow package w 39,000 mi on it.
>Pretty much mint except for some parking lot dings. I like the truck the-
>mileage - not so much anyway I thought somebody here might have done this
>and was willing to share info on the subject.       Thanks,  Tom

If you want to do something radical, convert it to run on propane as
it has not skyrocketed like other fuels and it has a octane of 110
plus so you could raise compression up to 12 to 1 or more and get some
really impressive power too. Bulk propane is running about 1.65 a
gallon here.
-----------------
The SnoMan
www.thesnoman.com
Carolina Watercraft Works - 01 May 2006 03:51 GMT
That would be interesting.  Anyone have any insight on
this conversion?

Signature

------------------------------------------
Laszlo Almasi
----Cool Toys (formerly Carolina Watercraft Works)
----Mack Daddy Trailers
----Ice Angels

>>Was wondering how involved it would be to rip out my V-10 and install a
>>diesel provided the cost was not excessive. Meaning more than trading it
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> The SnoMan
> www.thesnoman.com 
SnoMan - 01 May 2006 13:23 GMT
>That would be interesting.  Anyone have any insight on
>this conversion?

I have read about several of them and I have a 79 Jeep J20 that I want
to restore someday and I am seriously considering making it a propane
only vehical.  The problem with some conversions is that they put
propane in a stock engine (and it will burn fine with extremely low
emissions too) but propane has about 25% les energy per gallon than
gas so you need more of it in a stock engine but since propane has a
LOT higher octane, you can raise CR to 12 to 1 no sweat and increase
power and efficency and get MPG simular to gas on stock compression
but with a lot cheap fuel. It also burn a bit slower so more spark
advance is needed to which most dual fuel (gas/propane) engine do not
properly do.  The draw back is you have to install a somewhat heavy
tank for fuel stored under pressure but since propane weighs 4 lbs a
gallon vs 6.5lbs/gal for gas, the lighter fuel ofsets most or all of
this weight. Pound for pound, propane has more energy than gas. By
weight, 6.5 lbs of gas (one gallon) contain about 120,000BTU (plus or
minus depending on blend) and 6.5 lbs of propane has approx 145,000
BTU's (this heat energy is what drives the engine) while the same
amout of E85 has only about 60.000 BTU (and a gallon of E85 weighs
almost 8 lbs too). THe main reason that diesel get good MPG is because
the fuel has a higher energy content (about 140,000 BTU/gal) and with
the very high CR or 16 to 20 to 1 you get much higher thermodynamic
efficency (convert more heat energy to work). But, if you use a fuel
like propane (or even high octane fuel) it is possible to raise CR
ratio a good bit and improve efficency. Some mention running cars on
natural gas or hydrogen but the problem there is it take a lot of
pressue and technology to store them in a ligud state to get a lot of
range where propane is a LOT easier to store and handle.
-----------------
The SnoMan
www.thesnoman.com
randolf_scott@hotmail.com - 05 May 2006 17:32 GMT
Still to get the full benefit you'd have to pull the v10 out and make
modifications.  Trade that v10 in on a 12-valve cummins and then
install a CNG (compressed natuarl gas) fuel system so that it is true
bi-fuel.

With a flip of a switch you'd run either straight diesel or "diesel
pilot"/CNG.  I've dreampt of it, but money is tight...of course these
days it might be a consideration of who cannot afford to do so.  I was
thinking CNG was closer to 130 octane, but I only have three PhD's and
two Lunar missions under my belt.

Still range is limited with CNG.  Average CNG fuel tanks, 18gge at 3600
psi, is not going to take you as far as chemical fuels...300 mile range
would be optomistic.  Ford currently makes CNG dedicated vehicles that
have a range of 425 miles!  I could live with that.

Downside is depending on where you live you can't fuel up your CNG
tank.  Limited places where you can refuel at present :(  Good news is
CNG is the future baby...have no doubt.

One cool option would be to have a compressor in your garage attached
to your natural gas line.  Then you could recharge your vehicles tank
over night using an automated compressor like those used for scuba
tanks.  Imagine getting your fuel bill embedded within your utility
bill!

Here's a sight that lists where many alternative fuel stations can be
found within the United States...

http://www.ngv.org/ngv/ngvorg01.nsf/bytitle/nrelstationlocator.htm

Randolf
Tom Allemani - 01 May 2006 19:09 GMT
I guess I should have been more clear  What I was looking for was what was
involved in removing the V-10 and installing a deisel. To trade my truck in
for a new Dodge [same equiptment] would take appr $25-30k,  I thought mabey
having a deisel put in my truck might be a little cheaper than that.  Most
used deisel's are about to expire their warrante so they are traded, not my
cup of tea.
I suppose the comp has to be adjusted or different comp  Don't know if the
Dsl will bolt in the tranny either,  Anyway that was actually my question
Thanks, Tom  Ps   Chris you diddn't say if you traded engines or trucks.
> Was wondering how involved it would be to rip out my V-10 and install a
> diesel provided the cost was not excessive. Meaning more than trading it
> in for a new one. Mine is a 1999 4x4 quad cab, tow package w 39,000 mi on
> it. Pretty much mint except for some parking lot dings. I like the truck
> the- mileage - not so much anyway I thought somebody here might have done
> this and was willing to share info on the subject.       Thanks,  Tom
Tom Lawrence - 01 May 2006 20:30 GMT
> having a deisel put in my truck might be a little cheaper than that.  Most
> used deisel's are about to expire their warrante so they are traded, not
> my cup of tea.

And you think you'll have any kind of warranty on your truck after you
install an engine that it wasn't originally equipped with?

But - that aside...  an engine will run you about $7K.  The transmission
will actually bolt up.  You'll need an intercooler (about $1K), an exhaust
($500), an intake ($200-$300), a different fuel tank module and fuel lines
($300), a different PCM ($400), and other misc. stuff...  you'll be at $10K
before labor.

I would think you could easily trade your truck for a similarly-used diesel
for under $10K in cash.
GeekBoy - 01 May 2006 23:56 GMT
It was quite clear what you wanted. As you see, everyone is in consensus
that it is a better decision to trade in the vehicle for a diesel. Sure,
used ones may not be warrantied, but you can buy an extended warranty.

>I guess I should have been more clear  What I was looking for was what was
>involved in removing the V-10 and installing a deisel. To trade my truck in
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>> the- mileage - not so much anyway I thought somebody here might have done
>> this and was willing to share info on the subject.       Thanks,  Tom
Christopher  Thompson - 02 May 2006 01:19 GMT
i traded trucks. like i said best move ive made. the cummins is a dream. at
the cost of a new diesel engine plus the headaches of figuring out what all
has to swap ect. i sincerly doubt it would be a worthy venture. my honest
opinion is trade for a new and you will be amazed at the fuel savings alone.
not to mention the amount of pullin power (like the v10 isnt impressive
enough)

Signature

-Chris
05 CTD
99 Durango
06 Liberty CRD

> I guess I should have been more clear  What I was looking for was what was
> involved in removing the V-10 and installing a deisel. To trade my truck in
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> > the- mileage - not so much anyway I thought somebody here might have done
> > this and was willing to share info on the subject.       Thanks,  Tom
randolf_scott@hotmail.com - 05 May 2006 18:01 GMT
You would loose money and time and sanity.  I'd shop around for one of
those rare jewels...1998 - Quad Cab - 2-wheel drive - Long wheel base -
12-valve diesel  with manual transmission.  As beautiful as they are
dependable!

Randolf
Tom Allemani - 01 May 2006 22:53 GMT
So it would cost me about 10k before labor- and if i understand you
correctly they don't warrentee their desiel engines that they sell if they
are not installed  in the factory?  If labor was appr 2k-2.5k =12-14k Still
cheaper than trading it in for new.  Well just exploring my options.  Buying
used is ok if you buy it from somebody used to running deisel and maintaning
same. I drove OTR and many of my friends do that also. Still curious as if
anybody has done this.  Thanks  Tom

> Was wondering how involved it would be to rip out my V-10 and install a
> diesel provided the cost was not excessive. Meaning more than trading it
> in for a new one. Mine is a 1999 4x4 quad cab, tow package w 39,000 mi on
> it. Pretty much mint except for some parking lot dings. I like the truck
> the- mileage - not so much anyway I thought somebody here might have done
> this and was willing to share info on the subject.       Thanks,  Tom
Tom Lawrence - 02 May 2006 04:55 GMT
> are not installed  in the factory?  If labor was appr 2k-2.5k =12-14k
> Still cheaper than trading it in for new.

You're comparing apples to oranges...  by trading for new, you're also
getting a new truck wrapped around the new engine.  You need to compare the
costs to trading in for a comparable '99 CTD.
Tom Allemani - 02 May 2006 19:15 GMT
Not to be trite but the truck I have is in great shape, I dont really need a
new one,  Being Afraid of buying other people's troubles, would rather spend
the trade in money on new parts and I would at least know what I got. I
checked a couple dealers about trade in for a truck with about the same
miles on it = 39,528  They had nothing under 50,000mi. For the same type w
deisel engine truck with 50,000 they wanted 11,000 to boot and my truck.
Simaliar deals at other dealers.  This is where I got the idea for swaping
engines. For about the same money i would have a new diesel engine,  better
mileage, in a truck that i know has been taken care of. This is where i am
coming from, So to speak. But didn't have a good idea what is involved so
came to this newsgroup to see if anybody has done this already or something
similar.  Oh almost forgot tradeing for new would be about 25k - 30k to boot
in my area.  Thanks again for the replys      Tom
>> are not installed  in the factory?  If labor was appr 2k-2.5k =12-14k
>> Still cheaper than trading it in for new.
>
> You're comparing apples to oranges...  by trading for new, you're also
> getting a new truck wrapped around the new engine.  You need to compare
> the costs to trading in for a comparable '99 CTD.
.boB - 02 May 2006 05:02 GMT
> Was wondering how involved it would be to rip out my V-10 and install a
> diesel provided the cost was not excessive. Meaning more than trading it in
> for a new one. Mine is a 1999 4x4 quad cab, tow package w 39,000 mi on it.
> Pretty much mint except for some parking lot dings. I like the truck the-
> mileage - not so much anyway I thought somebody here might have done this
> and was willing to share info on the subject.       Thanks,  Tom

   The good news is that since it's a stock engine/trans, the swap can be done with
all factory parts.  No need to scour dozens of catalogs and web sites to find
everything you need.

   Of course, you have to buy the engine and trans.  Also, fuel system (tank to
engine), and electronic controls (wire harness and computer).  Don't forget the new
exhaust system.  The diesel engine is a bit heavier than the V-10, so you'll have to
replace the appropriate front suspension bits.  CLutch linkage.  Motor and trans
mounts.  Drive shafts.  Etc, Etc.  Your best bet would be to find a wrecked truck to
be a donor.

   On the plus side, all the parts you remove will have some value.  But probably
not as much as you might think.  If I were looking for a V-10 for a performance
project, I'd be looking for the viper engine and trans, not the ram.  But you could
find another truck owner who needs a new engine.

  Is it economical?  Good question.  If you do the math, you'll probably find it
will take a lot of miles to break even on a project like this.  Lets say you could
get it all done for $10K.  How much gas can you buy for $10K?  Around here, diesel
cost more than premium gas.   Unless you really have a hankering to undertake a
project like this, forget it.

Signature

.boB
Arrived:  2006 FXDI, Red.
1997 HD FXDWG - Turbocharged   Stolen 11/26/05 in Denver
    1HD1GEL10VY3200010    CO License J5822Z
2001 Dodge Dakota QC 5.9/4x4/3.92
1966 Mustang Coupe - Daily Driver
1965 FFR Cobra -  427W EFI, Damn Fast.

Tom Lawrence - 02 May 2006 07:46 GMT
> will take a lot of miles to break even on a project like this.  Lets say
> you could get it all done for $10K.  How much gas can you buy for $10K?

Good point... I completely overlooked that.

Based on a previous response, diesel vs. gas, at today's prices (and in my
area, where diesel is a little cheaper than anything but 87 octane), it took
about 50,000 miles to make up $5K.  Obviously, that's 100,000 miles to break
even on the $10K, or more if he's in a situation like you are where diesel
is more expensive (probably around 130,000 miles or so).

That's why the $5K premium for the diesel at the time of initial purchase is
such a good deal...  at 62,000 miles, my engine's already paid for  :)
Tom Allemani - 02 May 2006 17:27 GMT
Thanks for the replys, It looks like having a swap to deisel done may not be
cost effective if done with new parts, engine ect, finding a donor is more
than I am willing to deal with because there is no way of me telling how
that vechicle was  maintained. I have bought engines from the local boneyard
and got an engine as bad as I had allready, shure they would exchange it for
another but the re-exchange is a lot of work. Sill cheaper than buying new
truck but you don't get that new truck smell  :]  Also I see one post says I
would have to change trannys 1 says not. I failed to mention I have an
automatic tranny, I don't know if that makes any difference as to bolt up.
You know- gas auto to deisel auto trannys.     Anyway thanks again for the
replys,    Tom.
> Was wondering how involved it would be to rip out my V-10 and install a
> diesel provided the cost was not excessive. Meaning more than trading it
> in for a new one. Mine is a 1999 4x4 quad cab, tow package w 39,000 mi on
> it. Pretty much mint except for some parking lot dings. I like the truck
> the- mileage - not so much anyway I thought somebody here might have done
> this and was willing to share info on the subject.       Thanks,  Tom
Tom Lawrence - 03 May 2006 00:53 GMT
> Also I see one post says I would have to change trannys 1 says not. I
> failed to mention I have an automatic tranny, I don't know if that makes
> any difference as to bolt up.

The diesel and V10 used the same transmission in that year - the 47RE.
Since the adapter plate on the back of the Cummins is made by DC, they would
have no reason not to match the existing bellhousing pattern.

The real question is are you going to keep this truck for 100,000+ miles to
accumulate enough fuel savings to offset the cost of the engine swap?
Tom Allemani - 04 May 2006 13:42 GMT
Well I got my answer, It's not cost effective. Unless something like engine
failure occured there seems to be no real benifit to doing a swap like this.
Even then it would probably be better to have a 360 installed. This is the
2nd V-10 in this truck, the first one failed at 17,000, something to do with
porus castings I belive. Dodge replaced that engine at no cost. If this one
goes it will be my dime then as the extended warrentee time limit is up. It
seems to be doing just fine now but you never know.... BTW I pulled a
9,000Lb TT from Minnesota to San Francisco and back the engine didn't seem
to notice any mountians : ]  It did favor the pit stops but no problems. Oh
I talked to a guy in a campground that says his Chevy truck is on it's 3rd
Allison tranny. Of course I have no way of verifing his story but that don't
sound good.  Anyway thanks for the replys.    Tom
>> Also I see one post says I would have to change trannys 1 says not. I
>> failed to mention I have an automatic tranny, I don't know if that makes
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> The real question is are you going to keep this truck for 100,000+ miles
> to accumulate enough fuel savings to offset the cost of the engine swap?
Christopher  Thompson - 04 May 2006 20:17 GMT
food for thought. ive got a 360 in my durango and owned a 99 2500 v10 before
i bought my 05 cummins. the 360 WILL NOT give you any better gas milage and
the v10 will out pull it hands down.

Signature

-Chris
05 CTD
99 Durango
06 Liberty CRD

"Will the highways on the Internet become more few?" --George W. Bush,
Concord, New Hampshire; January 29, 2000

> Well I got my answer, It's not cost effective. Unless something like engine
> failure occured there seems to be no real benifit to doing a swap like this.
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> > The real question is are you going to keep this truck for 100,000+ miles
> > to accumulate enough fuel savings to offset the cost of the engine swap?
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.