 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Car Forum / Dodge / Dodge Trucks / May 2006Maximum340
email me.  SignatureBudd Cochran John 3:16-17, Ephesians 2:8-9 "Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate for the government of any other." (John Adams) > email me. Because I have no more friends. Tbone, why must you instigate something when there was ABSOLUTELY nothing said that should have or would have concerned you? Why the hell can't some people just grow up a little and keep their comments to themselves. >> email me. > Because I have no more friends. > Tbone, why must you instigate something when there was ABSOLUTELY nothing > said that should have or would have concerned you? Why the hell can't > some people just grow up a little and keep their comments to themselves. Because the 'bone' really means bonehead >>> email me. >> Because I have no more friends. It means something alright. It's a shame that some folks have to be like that. >> Tbone, why must you instigate something when there was ABSOLUTELY nothing >> said that should have or would have concerned you? Why the hell can't [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >>>> email me. >>> Because I have no more friends. >It means something alright. It's a shame that some folks have to be like >that. He'd probably be alright with a little A-1. beekeep >Tbone, why must you instigate something when there was ABSOLUTELY nothing >said that should have or would have concerned you? Why the hell can't some >people just grow up a little and keep their comments to themselves. > >>> email me. >> Because I have no more friends. I love this bar. beekeep PKB dude! SignatureIf at first you don't succeed, you're not cut out for skydiving > Tbone, why must you instigate something when there was ABSOLUTELY nothing > said that should have or would have concerned you? Why the hell can't some > people just grow up a little and keep their comments to themselves. > > >> email me. > > Because I have no more friends. > PKB dude! Because you think someone is an a.shole doesn't justify you being an a.shole. Ironically, the same statement also means you admit to being an a.shole. Please, reply and add proof to what you've been called. SignatureMax "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) > PKB dude! > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] >> >> email me. >> > Because I have no more friends. > > PKB dude! > > Because you think someone is an a.shole doesn't justify you being an > a.shole. Ironically, the same statement also means you admit to being an > a.shole. Actually Max, I was referring to his butting in to complain about me doing it. Now who is the a.shole MAX!!!! SignatureIf at first you don't succeed, you're not cut out for skydiving Hey f.ck nuts, re-read what I posted. If you were literate enough, you should have caught the first time you read it, that I asked you a question. ? signifies that in the English language. But hell once an ignorant f.ck, always an ignorant f.ck. >> > PKB dude! >> [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > Actually Max, I was referring to his butting in to complain about me doing > it. Now who is the a.shole MAX!!!! Listen fuckface, it is really non of your business what I do. If you don't like what I have to say, don't read it. I would think that even you might be bright enough to figure out that much but I guess I was wrong. SignatureIf at first you don't succeed, you're not cut out for skydiving > Hey f.ck nuts, re-read what I posted. If you were literate enough, you > should have caught the first time you read it, that I asked you a question. [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > Actually Max, I was referring to his butting in to complain about me doing > > it. Now who is the a.shole MAX!!!! Hey penis puffer, when you post something on a public forum, it is Everyone's business. I don't like what you have to say but then again neither does anyone else! You had no right interjecting into Budd's post, however you did, follow your own advice. Oops, sorry, you can, you would rather tell others what to do then practicing what you preach. > Listen fuckface, it is really non of your business what I do. If you > don't [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > doing >> > it. Now who is the a.shole MAX!!!! > Hey penis puffer, when you post something on a public forum, it is > Everyone's business. Penis puffer huh, is that a nickname of yours or just your job? Like you said Butt Breath, it is a public forum so it is everyones business so I have every right to say whatever the hell I want to and if not, then the same goes for you. > I don't like what you have to say but then again > neither does anyone else! Oh gee, that really hurt, give me a minute to compose myself.... Ah, that's better. > You had no right interjecting into Budd's post, I had as much right to interject into his post as you did to do it to mine or do your own rules not apply to you? > however you did, follow your own advice. As I said before, PKB! > Oops, sorry, you can, you would > rather tell others what to do then practicing what you preach. Read above. SignatureIf at first you don't succeed, you're not cut out for skydiving > > Listen fuckface, it is really non of your business what I do. If you > > don't [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > > doing > >> > it. Now who is the a.shole MAX!!!! > Actually Max, I was referring to his butting in to complain about me doing > it. Now who is the a.shole MAX!!!! Thanks for the reply and the new spin, always an expectation. BTW, questions, as Wiley told you, are signified by a "?", not "!!!!". Yet another example of how you don't communicate well. And the answer remains.... You are the a.shole, Tbone, you are. SignatureMax "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) >> > PKB dude! >> [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > Actually Max, I was referring to his butting in to complain about me doing > it. Now who is the a.shole MAX!!!! > > Actually Max, I was referring to his butting in to complain about me doing > > it. Now who is the a.shole MAX!!!! > > Thanks for the reply and the new spin, always an expectation. It is not spin Maxi, is is yet another one of the endless corrections of your wild ASSumptions. > BTW, questions, as Wiley told you, are signified by a "?", not "!!!!". Yet > another example of how you don't communicate well. No, just another example of your lack of comprehension. It was not a question Max, it was a statement. > And the answer remains.... You are the a.shole, Tbone, you are. There was no question for you to answer Max although that has never stopped you before. What's the matter Maxi, are you just upset because you have had your a.s handed back to you in quite a few threads now????? <see, question marks> You really need to either change your spin techniques or STFU when you really don't know something because your old methods are getting easy to see thru and you have proven yourself not to know half as much as you claim to. SignatureIf at first you don't succeed, you're not cut out for skydiving > It is not spin Maxi, is is yet another one of the endless corrections of > your wild ASSumptions. Nope, its your spin. No other way to cut it. >> BTW, questions, as Wiley told you, are signified by a "?", not "!!!!". >> Yet >> another example of how you don't communicate well. > > No, just another example of your lack of comprehension. It was not a > question Max, it was a statement. Incorrect. You used an interrogatory, such as "who is", making it a question. As I said, you lack a basic grasp of the english language. >> And the answer remains.... You are the a.shole, Tbone, you are. > > There was no question for you to answer Max although that has never > stopped > you before. Actually, there was. Any english speaking fool could tell you that, given enough knowledge. > What's the matter Maxi, are you just upset because you have had > your a.s handed back to you in quite a few threads now????? <see, question > marks> It really would be interesting for you to point out where that was done. > You really need to either change your spin techniques or STFU when > you really don't know something because your old methods are getting easy > to > see thru and you have proven yourself not to know half as much as you > claim > to. Another case of your psychosis manifesting itself in the phenomena known as "projection", wherein you take your faults as you see them and find the signs and symptoms of those faults in someone else. Are you seeing a psychologist for this problem? SignatureMax "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) >> > Actually Max, I was referring to his butting in to complain about me > doing [quoted text clipped - 25 lines] > claim > to. > > It is not spin Maxi, is is yet another one of the endless corrections of > > your wild ASSumptions. > > Nope, its your spin. No other way to cut it. LOL, just no other way for you to see since any other way would force you to admit to error and we both know that can never happen. > >> BTW, questions, as Wiley told you, are signified by a "?", not "!!!!". > >> Yet [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > Incorrect. You used an interrogatory, such as "who is", making it a > question. As I said, you lack a basic grasp of the english language. For someone who claims to be as educated as you do, you really are kinda dumb. > >> And the answer remains.... You are the a.shole, Tbone, you are. > > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > Actually, there was. Any english speaking fool could tell you that, given > enough knowledge. Then you must be below a fool because once again, you are wrong. An interrogative without a question mark makes it a sarcastic comment, not a question. I guess you must have spun your way thru college as well. > > What's the matter Maxi, are you just upset because you have had > > your a.s handed back to you in quite a few threads now????? <see, question > > marks> > > It really would be interesting for you to point out where that was done. Lets see, the train thread, the DC thread, the power inverter thread, hell, just about every thread you have been in for the past few months including this one. > > You really need to either change your spin techniques or STFU when > > you really don't know something because your old methods are getting easy [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > signs and symptoms of those faults in someone else. Are you seeing a > psychologist for this problem? I guess this is your denial talking now. Since you really have contributed nothing of value, I'm done with you here. SignatureIf at first you don't succeed, you're not cut out for skydiving Perhaps a minor question at this point ... but what does 'PKB' mean? :-) Craig C. PKB simply stands for Pot, Kettle, Black and I suspect that you know what that means. I do find it funny that Budd has been making a complete a.s out of himself, attacking everyone, including his friends and I get yelled at for a lame little joke that Budd probably never saw if he kill filed me like he said. SignatureIf at first you don't succeed, you're not cut out for skydiving > Perhaps a minor question at this point ... but what does 'PKB' mean? > > :-) > Craig C. > LOL, just no other way for you to see since any other way would force you > to > admit to error and we both know that can never happen. Please show the error that I made. >> Incorrect. You used an interrogatory, such as "who is", making it a >> question. As I said, you lack a basic grasp of the english language. > > For someone who claims to be as educated as you do, you really are kinda > dumb. And you really avoid using facts and proof, as well as the entire subject when you know you have nothing to say. Got proof that I'm dumb? How about proof that my statement is wrong? >> Actually, there was. Any english speaking fool could tell you that, given >> enough knowledge. > > Then you must be below a fool because once again, you are wrong. An > interrogative without a question mark makes it a sarcastic comment, not a > question. I guess you must have spun your way thru college as well. Incorrect, as any english teacher can tell you, lack of a question mark after an interrogatory means poor grammar or bad punctuation. There is no rule in grammar that says "lack of a question mark means its sarcasm." >> It really would be interesting for you to point out where that was done. > > Lets see, the train thread, Got proof? I did, and anyone with a lick of sense saw that. > the DC thread, Got proof? I did, and anyone with a lick of sense saw that. > the power inverter thread, hell, Got proof? I did, and anyone with a lick of sense saw that. > just about every thread you have been in for the past few months including > this one. Got proof? I do, and anyone with a lick of sense can see that. >> Another case of your psychosis manifesting itself in the phenomena known > as [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > contributed > nothing of value, I'm done with you here. LOL, sure you are. You were done with me a week ago when you announced that you wouldn't argue with me because it went nowhere...... only, you lied there too. Face it, you are an a.shole. Nothing but sh.t comes from you, save for some foul smelling hot air, you are circular in character, and generally the only noise you make is indescribable, but occurs as you are forced to accept the sh.t you've spewed is unwanted. Only an a.shole would claim Helium has no weight. Only an a.shole would claim math isn't what it looks like when all the numbers work. Only an a.shole would take a crack at someone without provocation. You'll reply, but I won't. YOU can't resist. SignatureMax "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) >> > It is not spin Maxi, is is yet another one of the endless corrections >> > of [quoted text clipped - 61 lines] > contributed > nothing of value, I'm done with you here. >> It is not spin Maxi, is is yet another one of the endless corrections of >> your wild ASSumptions. [quoted text clipped - 37 lines] >signs and symptoms of those faults in someone else. Are you seeing a >psychologist for this problem? actually that is not projection at all. what you are describing is known as freudian projection. in a psychological perspective, that is quite different than the definition of projection. but then you probably knew that you were wrong, you are after all.....max > actually that is not projection at all. what you are describing is > known as freudian projection. in a psychological perspective, that is > quite different than the definition of projection. but then you > probably knew that you were wrong, you are after all.....max Well, having taken a few courses in the stuff, and having a brother who has a degree in it, AND having a mother who revels in being psycho..... and yet I still found proof that I'm correct. http://www.heretical.com/sexsci/bpsychol.html Notice that both are defined on the page. Notice that: >>2b. (General) Projection Here projection is assuming that others act or perceive similarly - according to this definition it is not necessary for a projected trait to be undesirable or unconscious. Projection is probably inherent in social animals and the single most important psychological mechanism. The following are given as examples: 1) Individual A assumes that B sees the colour red as he does, until informed that B is colour-blind; >{ In this case, Tbone assumes that others must see things as he does, until >informed that others have actually got facts, instead of assumptions}< 2) Someone who never lies is easy to deceive because he projects his truthfulness onto others, assuming that others are honest also; >{ The reverse is also true... someone who lies assumes that others are also >lying or not necassarily telling the truth because he projects his >dishonesty on others.}< 3) 'It takes one to know one'; >{ Does "PKB" ring a bell?}< 4) An inept con-man fears that others are trying to cheat him, signals his fear and alerts others; >{ Much the same happens with Tbone, who goes to great lengths to prove >individuals wrong, or at least demean them enough that he feels others will >see the individual in the same light that he does.}< 5) (Freudian) An individual who possesses malicious characteristics, but who is unwilling to perceive himself as a protagonist, convinces himself that his opponent feels and would act the same way. >{ again, "PKB" applies here, as well as Tbone's persistance in claiming >others drag out the argument, and he has nothing to do with that action.}< So yeah, I AM Max, and I AM pretty sure of what I'm saying, unlike say... Tbone, or even you, who while being correct that Freudian Projection fits this situation, obviously failed to actually look at how well (general) projection fit before attempting to slam me. Are we done here? SignatureMax "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) >>> It is not spin Maxi, is is yet another one of the endless corrections of >>> your wild ASSumptions. [quoted text clipped - 45 lines] > quite different than the definition of projection. but then you > probably knew that you were wrong, you are after all.....max >> actually that is not projection at all. what you are describing is >> known as freudian projection. in a psychological perspective, that is [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >a degree in it, AND having a mother who revels in being psycho..... and yet >I still found proof that I'm correct. you have just proven yourelf wrong max. for crying out loud, take time to red your own references. general projection does not have anything to do with attributing negative traits to others. it is simply attributing your traits to others. in your attempt to use the "jargone", what you said was.......... >Another case of your psychosis manifesting itself in the phenomena known as >"projection", wherein you take your faults as you see them and find the >signs and symptoms of those faults in someone else. Are you seeing a >psychologist for this problem? taking your "faults" and attributing them to others (you used the word "faults", not me---faults would be a type of undesireable trait) would be, as i said a freudian projection. very simple. projections itself has no limitations to undesirable traits max, it simply involves attributing your traits to others as your own reference below states. it is not necessarily even a negative attribute of human beings, it is simply something that we all do. now freudian projection is considered a negative thing that some human beings do. max, this isn't hard, you need to slow down. what you wrote supports what i said the first time and this time, i think you just forgot to read it yourself. as for your brother, well maybe you could get a little free help. oops, i meant to put a ? after that. sorry. btw, i once took a few courses in physics but i don't think that qualifies me to split the atom or build a bomb just yet. >http://www.heretical.com/sexsci/bpsychol.html > [quoted text clipped - 39 lines] > >Are we done here? > btw, i once took > a few courses in physics but i don't think that qualifies me to split > the atom or build a bomb just yet. Obviously you aren't qualified to read simple Psych 101 definitions either, never mind your course work. SignatureMax "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) >>> actually that is not projection at all. what you are describing is >>> known as freudian projection. in a psychological perspective, that is [quoted text clipped - 84 lines] >> >>Are we done here? >> btw, i once took >> a few courses in physics but i don't think that qualifies me to split >> the atom or build a bomb just yet. > >Obviously you aren't qualified to read simple Psych 101 definitions either, >never mind your course work. ok max. lol. >>Obviously you aren't qualified to read simple Psych 101 definitions >>either, >>never mind your course work. > > ok max. lol. I figured that was easier than repeating what I had already said. SignatureMax "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) >>> btw, i once took >>> a few courses in physics but i don't think that qualifies me to split [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > ok max. lol. >>>Obviously you aren't qualified to read simple Psych 101 definitions >>>either, [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > >I figured that was easier than repeating what I had already said. yeah. at least that. >> > PKB dude! >> [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >Actually Max, I was referring to his butting in to complain about me doing >it. Now who is the a.shole MAX!!!! Can't we all just get along? beekeep > >> > PKB dude! > >> [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > beekeep As you know, I always try. SignatureIf at first you don't succeed, you're not cut out for skydiving >>> > PKB dude! >>> [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > >beekeep we could but..........that would take a hell of a lot of drugs i think. |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.