> And what exactly is the PCM basing its input on? How about engine load
> and
> it determins that baced on the MAP, TPS, and RPM of the engine.
Um, no. It determines shift points based on RPM TPS and input from the
governor pressure sensor. Remember that list I posted? No? Here:
>> Fluid temp
>> TPS
>> speed sensor
>> Gov pressure sensor
>> PCM
>> Gov pressure solenoid valve
You'll notice that the MAP sensor isn't on there. Notice also that ALL of
those inputs go to the PCM. So if all the inputs go to the PCM, they could
say that the PCM determines shift points. But they listed the inputs that
the PCM uses to shift the trans, and MAP isn't one of them.
> LOL, you really do like making a fool out of yourself, don't you? How do
> you make an out of tune engine deliver the same amount of power? How
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> the vacuum is LESS. So while you are correct on throttle position in
> relation to RPM, you seem to have no concept on what is can effect it..
How well the engine is tuned has very little to do with RPM and throttle
position when looking at vacuum. Those two variables are what determine
vacuum in the engine. Not the sparkplugs, or the plug wires, or the cap and
rotor, or the coil, or coil packs. None of those change vacuum.
If you want to argue that TPS signal is changed, thats true, and I'd agree,
but lets look at something....
> Hi all,98 Ram 1500,5.9 4x4 Quad Cab.90715 miles. For the past week,it
> has started shifting later than it used to,and a couple of times wouldnt
> shift out of first unless I let off the gas,then it shifted with up
> through the gears. When this happened,I just got off the
> freeway,pulling away from a stop sign. It hanging on longer to shift.Any
> ideas ,and suggestions would be appreciated. Thanks.
Clearly he is describing a problem that has to do with PCM control of the
trans, NOT a change in tire size, or a poorly tuned motor (no mention of
sluggishness). Furthermore, the problems he describes have been attributed
to the governor pressure sensor and the governor pressure transducer. Thus,
we're not looking at a tune up, we're looking at pulling the codes and
seeing what the PCM has to say.
> First step would be to check the PCM for codes. Since its a 98, you'll
> need
> to have it scanned for these codes. Second might be to change filter and
> fluid in the trans and put a new set of solenoids for the governor
> pressure
> sensor and transducer.
Interesting, since thats the first thing I mention doing.
>> Correct, but the state of tune would have to be drastically degraded to
> have
>> a change in shift point, no something that generally happens overnight.
> Really???
Really.
> What if the cap cracks or an injector hangs or fails
It causes a misfire, something that might be a bit more noticable than shift
points.
the
> regulator in the fuel pump goes bad
Poor engine operation would result, but the OP doesn't mention that.
> or a sensor fails. All of these things
> can happen in an instant.
Wow, a sensor fails.... what was it that I said to check?
Oh yeah....
> First step would be to check the PCM for codes. Since its a 98, you'll
> need
> to have it scanned for these codes. Second might be to change filter and
> fluid in the trans and put a new set of solenoids for the governor
> pressure
> sensor and transducer.
Just full of relevant info today, aren't you?

Signature
Max
Join www.devilbrad.com and find out what free exchange of info is all about.
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
>> > Not really, road speed and engine load and load is primarily used and
>> > it is calculated by RPM and manifold pressure (as this is a measure on
[quoted text clipped - 47 lines]
> things
> can happen in an instant.
TBone - 16 Aug 2006 02:36 GMT
> > And what exactly is the PCM basing its input on? How about engine load
> > and
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> >> PCM
> >> Gov pressure solenoid valve
Yes Max, I remember and your list includes the PCM and if the PCM is
controlling the shift points, why is it mentioned as an input?
> You'll notice that the MAP sensor isn't on there. Notice also that ALL of
> those inputs go to the PCM. So if all the inputs go to the PCM, they could
> say that the PCM determines shift points. But they listed the inputs that
> the PCM uses to shift the trans, and MAP isn't one of them.
But they included the PCM itself as said above. Why do you think that is???
Perhaps because engine load is also a factor determined by the PCM and there
is no need to further complicate matters by including all of the sensors and
inputs that the PCM uses to determine engine load.
> > LOL, you really do like making a fool out of yourself, don't you? How do
> > you make an out of tune engine deliver the same amount of power? How
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> How well the engine is tuned has very little to do with RPM and throttle
> position when looking at vacuum.
That is just about the dumbest thing to come out of you so far. It has
everything to do with it when the engine is under load.
> Those two variables are what determine
> vacuum in the engine. Not the sparkplugs, or the plug wires, or the cap and
> rotor, or the coil, or coil packs. None of those change vacuum.
They don't change the engine vacuum in relation to throttle position but
they do effect the amount of power the engine can deliver at specific
throttle position which means to recover the lost power at the same RPM the
throttle needs to be opened further which increases manifold pressure.
> If you want to argue that TPS signal is changed, thats true, and I'd agree,
> but lets look at something....
What exactly are we going to look at Max. By saying the TPS signal will
change only proves that the manifold pressure will also change for a given
RPM which basically is you saying that YOU are incorrect in your previous
statement.
> > Hi all,98 Ram 1500,5.9 4x4 Quad Cab.90715 miles. For the past week,it
> > has started shifting later than it used to,and a couple of times wouldnt
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> we're not looking at a tune up, we're looking at pulling the codes and
> seeing what the PCM has to say.
I never said that it was due to the tune of the engine. I simply disagreed
with your crap that engine load has nothing to do with shift points.
> > First step would be to check the PCM for codes. Since its a 98, you'll
> > need
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Interesting, since thats the first thing I mention doing.
And I never said that you were wong there.
> >> Correct, but the state of tune would have to be drastically degraded to
> > have
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> It causes a misfire, something that might be a bit more noticable than shift
> points.
Misfires are not always so easily detected, especially when the PCM will do
all it can to correct such things, including things that can have a
significant drop in performance but as I say again, I am not saying that
this is the cause, only that you are full of sh.t that these things can
never happen overnight.
> the
> > regulator in the fuel pump goes bad
>
> Poor engine operation would result, but the OP doesn't mention that.
Possibly, it depends on how badly it failed.
> > or a sensor fails. All of these things
> > can happen in an instant.
>
> Wow, a sensor fails.... what was it that I said to check?
LOL, once again you prove your ignorance. Not all failures flash a code
since not all failures are complete failures and if the PCM is not aware
that the sensor is not functioning properly, no code is generated.
> Oh yeah....
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Just full of relevant info today, aren't you?
No, just like watching you dance when proven wrong..

Signature
If at first you don't succeed, you're not cut out for skydiving