Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Dodge / Dodge Trucks / September 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Rear wheel hop

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
kvand - 30 Aug 2006 21:47 GMT
First, the basics - '06 Ram QC, SB, 4X4, CTD, Anti-spin diff.
On a recent camping trip, I thought I could save a little effort and
back onto the beach to load my boat back on. Had the truck in four
wheel low and backing down went smoothly as there was a bit of an
incline down to the water's edge. After loading the boat the drive back
up was a bit more interesting - there was quite a bit of rear wheel
hop, almost violent, to the point I had to stop and try again 2 or 3
times.
Has anyone found an effective solution to this for their Dodge?
Thanks,
Kevin
.boB - 30 Aug 2006 22:22 GMT
> First, the basics - '06 Ram QC, SB, 4X4, CTD, Anti-spin diff.
> On a recent camping trip, I thought I could save a little effort and
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> Thanks,
> Kevin

    Let some air out of the tires.

Signature

.boB
Arrived:  2006 FXDI, Red.
1997 HD FXDWG - Turbocharged   Stolen 11/26/05 in Denver
    1HD1GEL10VY3200010    CO License J5822Z
2001 Dodge Dakota QC 5.9/4x4/3.92
1966 Mustang Coupe - Daily Driver
1965 FFR Cobra -  427W EFI, Damn Fast.

Roy - 31 Aug 2006 00:20 GMT
>> First, the basics - '06 Ram QC, SB, 4X4, CTD, Anti-spin diff.
>> On a recent camping trip, I thought I could save a little effort and
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>>
>     Let some air out of the tires.

Yup, that and easy on the go pedal.

Roy
> .boB
> Arrived:  2006 FXDI, Red.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> 1966 Mustang Coupe - Daily Driver
> 1965 FFR Cobra -  427W EFI, Damn Fast.
SnoMan - 31 Aug 2006 12:09 GMT
>> First, the basics - '06 Ram QC, SB, 4X4, CTD, Anti-spin diff.
>> On a recent camping trip, I thought I could save a little effort and
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>>
>     Let some air out of the tires.

THis can work but what cause wheel hop is driveline and wrapup from
torque (rear springs and chassis) When pulling hard like this the rear
spring wind up against wheel torque ( for ever action there is a equal
oposite reaction)  and then there is also a traction shift too and as
drive tract winds up under load it tends to unload RR tire and load LR
a equal amount. When traction is lost the engery stored in driveline
and spring is released suddenly and causes the hop  whish can get ugly
sometimes. Cures? well as one suggested lower air pressure helps a bit
of soft surfaces because it changes traction. A better long term fix
is  a stiffer rear suspension (add a leaf or two to rear axle) and
better shock dampening. The light weight springs that they put is a
1500 for ride can realy wrap up under torque and this together with
bigger stock tires or ofter market ones with relatively tall stock
gears  sets the stage for this to happen. (this is not just a Dodge
problem either) You cannot have good drive axle torque control and a
soft ride with just a few leaf springs. You need a coil over multilink
suspension for that which you are seeing more of in some SUV's because
it allows for a softer ride and excellant axle wrap/torque control
too. With leaf springs you need to scarifice ride some and a add a few
more leafs to better control the axle wrap up in conditions such as in
this thread.
-----------------
TheSnoMan.com
Tom Lawrence - 31 Aug 2006 15:42 GMT
> better shock dampening. The light weight springs that they put is a
> 1500 for ride

He doesn't have a 1500
SnoMan - 31 Aug 2006 22:18 GMT
>> better shock dampening. The light weight springs that they put is a
>> 1500 for ride
>
>He doesn't have a 1500

No matter, still can happen even more so due to high drive shaft
torque but then there those that think that 1500 ft lbs of driveshaft
torque or so has no effect on chassis/axle wrap up that can agrevate
wheel hop. They believe that this all has not effect at all on
traction. As you laod drive shaft it changes weight bias between rear
wheels relative to torque input. When traction breaks loose the drive
line unloads and weight bias changes then traction improves and weight
start to shift again until traction is lost again and the cycle goes
over and over and sometimes violently in some traction conditions. Fix
include stiff springs, better shocks and deeper axle ratios that limit
drive line torque relative to tractive effort.  

THis first link shows the effect of tractive effort and axle ratio vs
input torque
http://forum.snoman.com/viewtopic.php?t=63

This next link shows the amount of twist on springs when pulling a
load up a hill. I could make one that show vs tractive effort but
basically ther you can take the actaul tractive force you are placing
on the ground (ie say 3000 ft lbs of draw bar pull) and multiply it by
about 1.3 with stock tires and that is the amout of twisting force
that the springs have to counter act or control and this is
independant on thrust on push/pull axis too. So with 3000 lbs of pull
there is and 4000 ftlbs of axle twist in springs in addtion to torque
bias weight shift. Links give you a idea of effects
http://forum.snoman.com/viewtopic.php?t=52

-----------------
TheSnoMan.com
Tom Lawrence - 01 Sep 2006 01:16 GMT
>>He doesn't have a 1500
>
> No matter

Your entire pontification was predicated on the fact that the OP was driving
a 1/2 ton truck with "light weight springs for a soft ride", and now that
it's pointed out that you made an incorrect assumption, it doesn't matter??

Facts just aren't welcome in your world, are they?

How's that V10 spark retard dissertation coming along?
SnoMan - 01 Sep 2006 02:31 GMT
>Your entire pontification was predicated on the fact that the OP was driving
>a 1/2 ton truck with "light weight springs for a soft ride", and now that
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>How's that V10 spark retard dissertation coming along?

No Tom actually ist is the same beacuse a CTD uses a lower axle ratio
than a HD gas truck so there is more axle wrap up and you would know
this if you really had a clue of the physics and dynamics of what
takes place in a drive train with you step on the throttle but since
you do not your responces are easily predicted. You are a real trip.
-----------------
TheSnoMan.com
Roy - 01 Sep 2006 02:57 GMT
>>Your entire pontification was predicated on the fact that the OP was
>>driving
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> you do not your responces are easily predicted. You are a real trip.
> -----------------

Your a real a.s hole, now answer the question!
azwiley1 - 01 Sep 2006 03:07 GMT
He did answer the question man, didn't you hear him? He said "I'm a dumb a.s 
and have no idea what I am talking about and you really shouldn't listen to
me."

>>>Your entire pontification was predicated on the fact that the OP was
>>>driving
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Your a real a.s hole, now answer the question!
TBone - 01 Sep 2006 03:12 GMT
Hey, I've been saying that about you for a while now.  Glad to see you
finally admit to it <BFG>

Signature

If at first you don't succeed,  you're not cut out for skydiving

> He did answer the question man, didn't you hear him? He said "I'm a dumb a.s
> and have no idea what I am talking about and you really shouldn't listen to
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> >
> > Your a real a.s hole, now answer the question!
azwiley1 - 01 Sep 2006 03:42 GMT
Yeah, whatever Tom

> Hey, I've been saying that about you for a while now.  Glad to see you
> finally admit to it <BFG>
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>> >
>> > Your a real a.s hole, now answer the question!
Tom Lawrence - 01 Sep 2006 03:11 GMT
> No Tom actually ist is the same beacuse a CTD uses a lower axle ratio
> than a HD gas truck

Again....  WRONG!  Care to guess what the standard axle ratios are for a
2500/Hemi vs. a 2500CTD vs. a 3500CTD?  Here's a hint - they're all the
same.
Chris Thompson - 01 Sep 2006 13:40 GMT
>> No Tom actually ist is the same beacuse a CTD uses a lower axle ratio
>> than a HD gas truck
>
> Again....  WRONG!  Care to guess what the standard axle ratios are for a
> 2500/Hemi vs. a 2500CTD vs. a 3500CTD?  Here's a hint - they're all the
> same.

Shhhh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

don't confuse him with facts. it will just mess the whole world up.

Signature

----------------------------
-Chris
05 CTD
06 Liberty CRD

Real Trucks don't NEED spark plugs.

Tom Lawrence - 01 Sep 2006 17:12 GMT
> don't confuse him with facts. it will just mess the whole world up.

Oh yeah, facts....  bad....

Sorry 'bout that  :)
Roy - 31 Aug 2006 16:17 GMT
>>> First, the basics - '06 Ram QC, SB, 4X4, CTD, Anti-spin diff.
>>> On a recent camping trip, I thought I could save a little effort and
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
> more leafs to better control the axle wrap up in conditions such as in
> this thread.

Hey a.s hole! You are doing it again, posting BS. Read the OP again.
.boB - 01 Sep 2006 01:55 GMT
>>>First, the basics - '06 Ram QC, SB, 4X4, CTD, Anti-spin diff.
>>>On a recent camping trip, I thought I could save a little effort and
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> torque (rear springs and chassis) When pulling hard like this the rear
> spring wind up against wheel torque

    Well, sort of.  Ask any drag racer this question, and you'll get a slightly
different answer.

   It's a question of traction.  During a hard launch (or "high" torque
application), there's some axle wrap.  Always has, always will be.  Just a function
of a leaf spring suspension.  The tires grab the pavement and try to turn one way.
The axle tries to turn the other way.  The springs and shocks try to prevent that
unwanted axle housing rotation.  That works good until the tire reaches it's traction
limit.
    When the tire breaks free, the axle housing snaps back due to it's pressure on
the spring pack.  When it grabs traction again, the cycle is repeated.
    You can try and make the springs stiffer.  But a CTD already has pretty stiff
springs.
    You could add stiffer shocks.  But because of the way they are mounted, that
really won't help much.  You could add horizontal shocks, like Ford did in the
mustang.  That actually works pretty well w/o destroying the ride and handling.
    You could add an under rider style traction bar.  I haven't seen anything off
the shelf for this; you'd probably end up making your own.  Not complicated, but
could get expensive and time consuming.
    All of the above "solutions" will prevent the axle wrap and subsequent wheel
hop. It will also make the suspension stiffer, worsen the ride, and make everyday
handling worse.   What they will NOT do, is improve traction.  And that's the root of
the problem.  Instead of wheel hop, you get wheel spin.  Which is probably worse.
You managed to get up the ramp with wheel hop.  You'll slide backwards with wheel
spin.  That would be fun.

    That's why I suggested removing some air.  It will increase the contact patch,
soften the sidewall, and increase traction.  It's temporary, and it's free.  Watch a
drag car take off, the sidwalls are so soft they actually wrinkle.

Signature

.boB
Arrived:  2006 FXDI, Red.
1997 HD FXDWG - Turbocharged   Stolen 11/26/05 in Denver
    1HD1GEL10VY3200010    CO License J5822Z
2001 Dodge Dakota QC 5.9/4x4/3.92
1966 Mustang Coupe - Daily Driver
1965 FFR Cobra -  427W EFI, Damn Fast.

kvand - 01 Sep 2006 20:38 GMT
Being smarter than the average bear ;>) , I've read, with interest, the
replies that have been sent and have come to the conclusion that the
simplest solution probably would have solved the wheel hop situation I
experienced.
You see, the tires on the truck were still in "tow mode" after hauling
my 30' Jayco to the park where we were camped. That is, the fronts were
at 60psi and the rears were at 70psi. Thanks bOB for the reply earlier
- I should have realized this myself, but oh well. Still, it might have
been kind of cool to throw a set of traction bars at the thing - don't
see too many 3/4 ton trucks with those., hehe
Kevin
06 Ram 2500, CTD, QC, 4X4
unmodified yet - 5 years of warranty at stake.
kvand - 01 Sep 2006 20:38 GMT
Being smarter than the average bear ;>) , I've read, with interest, the
replies that have been sent and have come to the conclusion that the
simplest solution probably would have solved the wheel hop situation I
experienced.
You see, the tires on the truck were still in "tow mode" after hauling
my 30' Jayco to the park where we were camped. That is, the fronts were
at 60psi and the rears were at 70psi. Thanks bOB for the reply earlier
- I should have realized this myself, but oh well. Still, it might have
been kind of cool to throw a set of traction bars at the thing - don't
see too many 3/4 ton trucks with those., hehe
Kevin
06 Ram 2500, CTD, QC, 4X4
unmodified yet - 5 years of warranty at stake.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.