Hi,
Anyone have experience with either of these brands for ball joints?
Coni-seal is about half the Moog price.
Coni-seal have been around in brake parts for about 20 years so their
brake stuff must be OK. Apparently they have only recently begun with
the suspension parts.
Thanks
Dave
Denny - 10 Sep 2006 01:11 GMT
> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Dave
Never heard of Coni-seal but Moog has been around for decades and has about
the best reputation you can get. I've used many Moog parts over the years
and never have had a problem with them.
Denny
Budd Cochran - 10 Sep 2006 04:40 GMT
I agree with Denny and prefer Moog over even Mopar OEM.

Signature
Budd Cochran
John 3:16-17, Ephesians 2:8-9, Romans 3:23, 6:23
"Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people.
It is wholly inadequate for the government of any other."
(John Adams)
> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Dave

Signature
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
Warning: Do not use Ultimate-Anonymity
They are worthless spamers that are running a scam.
.boB - 11 Sep 2006 02:40 GMT
> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Dave
You often get what you pay for. You're comparing a known part from a known
company against something that costs half as much from a company you've never heard
of. I'de shell out the few extra pennies for the kown quality part.

Signature
.boB
Arrived: 2006 FXDI, Red.
1997 HD FXDWG - Turbocharged Stolen 11/26/05 in Denver
1HD1GEL10VY3200010 CO License J5822Z
2001 Dodge Dakota QC 5.9/4x4/3.92
1966 Mustang Coupe - Daily Driver
1965 FFR Cobra - 427W EFI, Damn Fast.
Dave, I can't do that - 15 Sep 2006 15:27 GMT
DUH, boB,
>from a company you've never heard
Coni-seal have a good reputation for brake stuff and only recently have
launched into the suspension parts arena.
Dave