 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Car Forum / Dodge / Dodge Trucks / December 2006Avoid Speeding Tickets
Think about it. No one likes to get unjust traffic tickets. Red light and speed cameras are popping up all over the world at an alarming rate. Motorists have paid in excess of $1 Billion in fines to date. The public is in desperate need for an effective product that can provide relief. PhotoBlocker Spray helps motorists avoid traffic camera tickets legally. http://www.rhys.ca but you forget that there is a 100% effective accessory already included with every automobile. the brake pedal. > Think about it. No one likes to get unjust traffic tickets. Red light and > speed cameras are popping up all over the world at an alarming rate. > Motorists have paid in excess of $1 Billion in fines to date. The public > is in desperate need for an effective product that can provide relief. > PhotoBlocker Spray helps motorists avoid traffic camera tickets legally. > http://www.rhys.ca Yes, you are right. That's my experience too, having been driving for over 30 years now. ;-) But there are those who haven't learned that lesson or don't want to. You have to admit that. > but you forget that there is a 100% effective accessory already included > with every automobile. [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] >> PhotoBlocker Spray helps motorists avoid traffic camera tickets legally. >> http://www.rhys.ca > Yes, you are right. That's my experience too, having been driving for over > 30 years now. ;-) But there are those who haven't learned that lesson or > don't want to. You have to admit that. To paraphrase James Packard, "I build them to go, not stop". "How To Beat Traffic Cameras Legally" - NOT! You show a graphic of it being sprayed on Maryland and California tags, which implies that it is legal in the US. You might want to do some research before you get yourself locked up. Or start selling brake pedals instead. I'd bet they are legal everywhere. Georgia code clearly addresses the use of your product. I suspect other states have similar laws. http://www.legis.ga.gov/legis/GaCode/data/40-2-6.1.htm  SignatureKen > "How To Beat Traffic Cameras Legally" - NOT! > You show a graphic of it being sprayed on Maryland and California tags, [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > states have similar laws. > http://www.legis.ga.gov/legis/GaCode/data/40-2-6.1.htm I think that the product is BS. But the law you reference I believe has to do with the dark plastic plate covers. The body part is probably the boot over the plate on the bike. If your gonna play you have to expect to pay. Roy > Ken > I think that the product is BS. But the law you reference I believe has to > do with the dark plastic plate covers. The body part is probably the boot > over the plate on the bike. In Arizona the law simply states that no device covering the license can be used. It has exceptions for when the license is legally displayed through the back window. Photo radar tickets in Arizona can be beaten...sorta. The state has 120 days to serve a notice. If you ignore the letter mailed and you can avoid the server tracking you down then the ticket will be dismissed. >> I think that the product is BS. But the law you reference I believe has >> to do with the dark plastic plate covers. The body part is probably the [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > days to serve a notice. If you ignore the letter mailed and you can avoid > the server tracking you down then the ticket will be dismissed. How about this? In California there is a law suit going on. Person claims the company issuing tickets are not the police and thus not legally able to issue photo tickets. >> "How To Beat Traffic Cameras Legally" - NOT! >> You show a graphic of it being sprayed on Maryland and California tags, [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > over the plate on the bike. > If your gonna play you have to expect to pay. It does work, but the company only needs to reverse the negative to see the numbers on the plate. > Roy >> Ken As the son of a photographer, I'm not sure you're making any sense. May we have a little more detail, please? Supposing the license plate is black letters on white plate. And so the negative is white numbers on a black plate. Would that be any harder to read? SignatureChristopher A. Young You can't shout down a troll. You have to starve them. . It does work, but the company only needs to reverse the negative to see the numbers on the plate. > As the son of a photographer, I'm not sure you're making any sense. > May we have a little more detail, please? > > Supposing the license plate is black letters on white plate. And so > the negative is white numbers on a black plate. Would that be any > harder to read? Apparantly if you print the image of a b/w negative as it is you will be able to see the numbers. The over exposed white then becomes black and the black letters on the plate become white thus able to see the plate number. However I am reading that a number of these cameras use IR instead of visible light, therefore no overexposure flash. Alo they have available a plate cover, which I think is the best. It makes the plate numbers visible only if you are looking directly straight at the plate from behind. It was featured on CSI: Miami On the other hand some states have police cars hidden on the side of the road taking pictures of speeders from behine. Maybe use both the spray and plate cover? > It does work, but the company only needs to reverse the negative to > see the > numbers on the plate. > As the son of a photographer, I'm not sure you're making any sense. > May we have a little more detail, please? > > Supposing the license plate is black letters on white plate. And so > the negative is white numbers on a black plate. Would that be any > harder to read? Apparantly if you print the image of a b/w negative as it is you will be able to see the numbers. The over exposed white then becomes black and the black letters on the plate become white thus able to see the plate number. CY: I've worked with a lot of black and white negatives. Sometimes you need a magnifier, but you can make out numbers either in negative or positive. However I am reading that a number of these cameras use IR instead of visible light, therefore no overexposure flash. CY: IR would be OK daytime, as dark letters or background absorbs more solar heat. I'm not sure if it would help any during th enight. Alo they have available a plate cover, which I think is the best. It makes the plate numbers visible only if you are looking directly straight at the plate from behind. It was featured on CSI: Miami CY: That coudl be useful. On the other hand some states have police cars hidden on the side of the road taking pictures of speeders from behine. Maybe use both the spray and plate cover? CY: Back to the point, you may need a magnifying lens, but you don't need to print a negative to be able to read numbers. > It does work, but the company only needs to reverse the negative to > see the > numbers on the plate. >> As the son of a photographer, I'm not sure you're making any sense. >> May we have a little more detail, please? [quoted text clipped - 33 lines] > CY: Back to the point, you may need a magnifying lens, but you don't > need to print a negative to be able to read numbers. If the image is over exposed enough then you cannot. The problem they have is that I am sure they are using CCD camera. So makes me think they are mass producing tickets since I heard revenues are in the millions. Makes it time consuming to go through all those few where the plate is not seen >> It does work, but the company only needs to reverse the negative to >> see the >> numbers on the plate. >Think about it. No one likes to get unjust traffic tickets. Red light and >speed cameras are popping up all over the world at an alarming rate. >Motorists have paid in excess of $1 Billion in fines to date. The public is >in desperate need for an effective product that can provide relief. >PhotoBlocker Spray helps motorists avoid traffic camera tickets legally. >http://www.rhys.ca Unjust traffic tickets? Running red lights kill people. I say get the aggressive drivers and yank their licences. We don't need those types of drivers on the road. If you can't see those cameras you don't belong on the road either. beekeep > Unjust traffic tickets? Running red lights kill people. I say get the > aggressive drivers and yank their licences. We don't need those types of > drivers on the road. If you can't see those cameras you don't belong on the > road either. I question the accuracy of some of the cameras here. In the news lately is about a guy who got a ticket for doing 147mph in a Hyundai Sonata. I'd like to know if a Hyundai can actually achieve that speed. Furthermore, this was a rental car so I doubt the speed limiter was disabled (Federal limit is below 147mph isn't it?). >> Unjust traffic tickets? Running red lights kill people. I say get >> the aggressive drivers and yank their licences. We don't need those [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > Furthermore, this was a rental car so I doubt the speed limiter was > disabled (Federal limit is below 147mph isn't it?). Nope. The Sonata's top speed is about 25 mph. <g> FA Anyone hear of the story in Mass where some guy blew a toll on the Pike and they sent him a photo of the car and a ticket for $50 - so he sent back a photo of $50. STory goes they then sent him a picture of handcuffs!! Dont' know if that's a true one or just a feel good urban legend though! > >> Unjust traffic tickets? Running red lights kill people. I say get > >> the aggressive drivers and yank their licences. We don't need those [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > FA > Unjust traffic tickets? Running red lights kill people. I say get the > aggressive drivers and yank their licences. We don't need those types > of drivers on the road. If you can't see those cameras you don't belong > on the road either. > > beekeep Yes....unjust traffic tickets. Documentation abounds about government games to create a revenue stream. There's a million little tricks....like setting up a hidden radar gun 1 foot behind a speed limit sign as you're coming into a small small town. (I've personally seen that one). With these red light cameras, some of the cities even shortened the yellow light duration to gain more violaters - people caight in the intersection when the light turned. In southern California, one city has given a contract to a large corporation to operate and maintain the red light cameras. The corporation gets a cut of every ticket. Does that sound like a would where you want to raise your children? Government ain't what it used to be -- if you defend their criminal conduct, what does that make you? >> Unjust traffic tickets? Running red lights kill people. I say get the >> aggressive drivers and yank their licences. We don't need those types [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > cameras. The corporation gets a cut of every ticket. Does that sound > like a would where you want to raise your children? That is why there is a law suite going on. Plantif says the company issuing tickets are not the police and thus not legally able to enforce the law. > Government ain't what it used to be -- if you defend their criminal > conduct, what does that make you? > With these red light cameras, some of the cities even shortened the yellow > light duration to gain more violaters - people caight in the intersection > when the light turned. In southern California, one city has given a > contract to a large corporation to operate and maintain the red light > cameras. The corporation gets a cut of every ticket. Does that sound > like a would where you want to raise your children? If you enter on Yellow then you are ok (in texas anyway). Shortening the cycle would only get the ones who try to speed up and beat the yellow. Speaking of ridiculous tickets.... My boyfriend just got a ticket for "failure to secure DC plates" - he is a resident of Virginia, but spends most nights with me in DC. Meters go off from 10 - 7 and he will park there during those times, or in the visitor parking areas in Georgetown. They gave him a $100 ticket at 3am for failure to secure DC plates. I'm sure they think he's a resident or something - but I told him to fight that one, you know some cop was waiting like 2 months scouting out the scene to write that bad boy! > > With these red light cameras, some of the cities even shortened the yellow > > light duration to gain more violaters - people caight in the intersection [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > like a would where you want to raise your children?If you enter on Yellow then you are ok (in texas anyway). Shortening the > cycle would only get the ones who try to speed up and beat the yellow. >> Unjust traffic tickets? Running red lights kill people. I say get the >> aggressive drivers and yank their licences. We don't need those types [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] >Government ain't what it used to be -- if you defend their criminal >conduct, what does that make you? On dual highways here in Maryland they paint the dotted line solid at the light. The length of that solid line is such that if you are doing the speed limit in that zone and the light turns yellow you have time to get through the intersection before the light turns red. beekeep |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.