Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Dodge / Dodge Trucks / January 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

2006 2500 MegaCab 5.9L Cummins loses power

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
chad@pengar.com - 29 Dec 2006 09:24 GMT
A week or 2  ago my 2006 Dodge Ram 2500 MegaCab with the Cummins 5.9L
and 6 speed manual started to cough and lose power/RPMs and lots of
white smoke (or smoke looking substance like water vapor) came out.
(It had an unknown percentage of bio-diesel in it -- small repeated
fillups of various percents of bio with intermittentent straight dino
diesel -- truck is 4 months old but only had 600-700 miles on it. This
coughing and loss of power lasted a few minutes and then it seemed to
work fine for a while.  Then it happened again.   I added 10 gallons of
dino diesel and was able to drive home 4 miles without incident.  Next
day went out and had similar episodes.   When it drives fine there is
no smoke.  When it starts to cough and lag and power loss occurs lots
of white smoke comes out.  A ton of it.

I drained the water filter a few times thinking that maybe there was a
high water content in the fuel.  I also added some Power Service
additive that is supposed to displace water.

I was able to drive 50-70 miles without incident when it started again
tonight.   It would idle fine but when I pushed the accelerator it was
like there was a regulator on it.  It would rev up a little and then
just totally lose power.  I added another 7 or so gallons of dino
tonight and some more Power Service additive.  We are now up close to
800 miles on the odometer.  I went and got some Howes Lubricator Diesel
Treat, which claims to eliminate water, and added some of that.  After
that I was able to drive 5 or 6 miles when it started to happen again
but the symptoms are now a lot less severe.   I don't see as much smoke
or any when it "power losses" and it does not lose as much power,
though it is still very noticable.  It is like a governor is on the
engine.  It will idle and I can slowly increase the throttle and then
between 1800 and 2500 (not always at the same point) the power loss
happens and the rpms will drop.  I was able to keep it going at up to
2000 rpm without loss sometimes but then get above that and it happens.

Any ideas?   I started to think that maybe the fuel filter was getting
clogged and it was allowing enough fuel through for lower power use but
as the throttle is increased it cannot get enough fuel to the engine.
But everything is new and there should not be all sorts of deposits to
come loose and clog the filter...

Thanks
Chad
Scott Hendryx - 29 Dec 2006 10:11 GMT
>A week or 2  ago my 2006 Dodge Ram 2500 MegaCab with the Cummins 5.9L
> and 6 speed manual started to cough and lose power/RPMs and lots of
[quoted text clipped - 37 lines]
> Thanks
> Chad

Take it to the dealer, don't mess with a truck under warranty.

Signature

------MoParMaN------

---Signature Pending Yet Another Assine Comment by MIANDERSON---

Roy - 29 Dec 2006 13:01 GMT
>A week or 2  ago my 2006 Dodge Ram 2500 MegaCab with the Cummins 5.9L
> and 6 speed manual started to cough and lose power/RPMs and lots of
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
> But everything is new and there should not be all sorts of deposits to
> come loose and clog the filter...

Change the fuel filter! While your at it buy a couple of them, sounds like
you will be needing them. I'd stop putting anything else in the tank other
than diesel. Actually I'd be inclined to drain the tank. I also would not go
to the dealer unless you are darn sure you are covered due to the bio you
added.

Roy
> Thanks
> Chad
Chris Thompson - 29 Dec 2006 14:10 GMT
>>A week or 2  ago my 2006 Dodge Ram 2500 MegaCab with the Cummins 5.9L
>> and 6 speed manual started to cough and lose power/RPMs and lots of
[quoted text clipped - 42 lines]
>
> Roy

i may be mistaken but i thought that bio blends up to 20% were considered
acceptable by Dodge and Cummins engine company on 06 and later models.

Signature

----------------------------
-Chris
05 CTD
06 Liberty CRD

Real Trucks don't NEED spark plugs.

>> Thanks
>> Chad
Scott Hendryx - 29 Dec 2006 14:27 GMT
>>>A week or 2  ago my 2006 Dodge Ram 2500 MegaCab with the Cummins 5.9L
>>> and 6 speed manual started to cough and lose power/RPMs and lots of
[quoted text clipped - 45 lines]
> i may be mistaken but i thought that bio blends up to 20% were considered
> acceptable by Dodge and Cummins engine company on 06 and later models.

I think my book says 5%.
I'm not gonna burn it at all.  Not until everyone else is finished burning
up their engines.

Signature

------MoParMaN------

---Signature Pending Yet Another Assine Comment by MIANDERSON---

Craig C. - 29 Dec 2006 15:41 GMT
> I think my book says 5%.
> I'm not gonna burn it at all.  Not until everyone else is finished burning
> up their engines.

Or ... you can get from a reputable source and actually do something
positive for your country.

Craig C.
Scott Hendryx - 29 Dec 2006 16:28 GMT
>> I think my book says 5%.
>> I'm not gonna burn it at all.  Not until everyone else is finished
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Craig C.

I already did something positive and I damn near died. Screw 5 percent fuel,
when they make hydrogen fuel cells, I might buy into that.  Diluting fossil
fuel is no f.cking answer!

Signature

------MoParMaN------

---Signature Pending Yet Another Assine Comment by MIANDERSON---

Craig C. - 29 Dec 2006 16:49 GMT
> I already did something positive and I damn near died.

Don't know what you're talking about here, but if you fought for this
country, you have my thanks.  But that doesn't fix our current
problems.

>Screw 5 percent fuel,
> when they make hydrogen fuel cells, I might buy into that.  Diluting fossil
> fuel is no f.cking answer!

Have you actually reserched this subject or are you talking out of your
a.s?

Here's the real deal ... 100% FOSSIL FUEL isn't the right answer and
NEVER was.

1)  It's not renewable (that means we'll eventually run out).
2)  It pollutes the air we breathe.
3)  It causes war.
4)  Adds CO2 and other greenhouse gases to the atmosphere which is
causing a shift in our climate.  (Did you read the news today?  An
artic shelf the size of 11000 football fields broke free.  Gee ... I
wonder what caused that?)

There are renewable sources of energy that are BETTER in *every* way.

If you want to continue making Arabs rich and polluting our air, then
go ahead.  It's your right, as an American, to do nothing while others
fix the problem.

Craig C.
Scott Hendryx - 29 Dec 2006 16:52 GMT
>> I already did something positive and I damn near died.
>
> Don't know what you're talking about here, but if you fought for this
> country, you have my thanks.  But that doesn't fix our current
> problems.

Yes, your welcome\

>>Screw 5 percent fuel,
>> when they make hydrogen fuel cells, I might buy into that.  Diluting
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Have you actually reserched this subject or are you talking out of your
> a.s?

Yes, I prefer nucular power to fossil fuel.  I'll be the first to buy a
Cummin Reactor as soon as they are on the market.  Fossil fuel manipulation
is doing nothing.  The slant eyed gooks in the far east are burning more
than we ever will.  The US can't stop the onslaught.  Have you actual done
any research outside of Ames Iowa?  Get your head outta your a.s.

Signature

------MoParMaN------

---Signature Pending Yet Another Assine Comment by MIANDERSON---

Craig C. - 29 Dec 2006 17:09 GMT
> Yes, I prefer nucular power to fossil fuel.  I'll be the first to buy a
> Cummin Reactor as soon as they are on the market.

Yeah ... that's gonna happen.

>Fossil fuel manipulation
> is doing nothing.

You are WRONG.

1)  It cuts down on OUR dependence of crude oil, mostly foreign.
2)  Keeps OUR air cleaner.
3)  Contributes $$$ to the development of newer, better solutions for
the future.

>The slant eyed gooks in the far east are burning more
> than we ever will.

So what?  If we invest in and USE alernative sources, even blends, then
when the fossil fuel runs out, we'll be in great shape because we were
forward thinking enough to resolve the problem before it crippled us.

>The US can't stop the onslaught.

There is no onslaught.  We have no choice but to find a better
solution.

>Have you actual done
> any research outside of Ames Iowa?  Get your head outta your a.s.

I'm working on a PHD.  Environmental Science.  Field of study:
Alternative Energy.  I just completed a research paper on bio-diesel
that included:

1)  making it.
2)  doing the chemical analysis on it.
3)  burning it.
4)  doing the analysis on the air quality before, during and after
burning it.

Other than that, I burn B20 with no problems at all and have for last
30,000 miles.  In fact, I'd bet my bottom dollar that my truck, burning
B20, is going to outlast your truck, burning dino diesel, by at least
50,000 miles.

I live about 2000 miles from Iowa.

If my head is in my a.s, where is yours, genius?

Craig C.
Yabahoobs - 31 Dec 2006 02:22 GMT
I wish they made the 1500 w/ an available diesel.
chad@pengar.com - 31 Dec 2006 05:19 GMT
> 4)  Adds CO2 and other greenhouse gases to the atmosphere which is
> causing a shift in our climate.  (Did you read the news today?  An
> artic shelf the size of 11000 football fields broke free.  Gee ... I
> wonder what caused that?)

There is no empirical proof that global warming is man made.  It is all
in models that have been shown to be unreliable.  Unfortunately the
topic has become politicized so not many scientists will speak out on
the lack of evidence and flimsy models.

junkscience.com is one interesting place to start (but not the only
one).

A few interesting things that they don't tell you on the news is that
1) climate started warming [biggest shifts] before the largest
increases in CO2, and not the other way around
2) CO2 input affects on climate is logarithmic and not linear. That
means that as you get more CO2 in the atmosphere, the effects of that
extra CO2 are much less.
3) climatologists, especially paleo climatoligists, who study LONG TERM
climate change, do not think that the current bit is more than a
natural cycle.

I am not denying that the climate is changing -- that is what climates
do.  Just that man's affect on it is not the cause of the change.

I still think BIO is a good thing to do.  Better for your engine if
done in a quality way etc and also reduces dependency on those
wonderful adherents to the "religion of peace" and helps the
environment on the polution side of things and makes us less dependent
on other countries etc etc etc

Chad
Yabahoobs - 31 Dec 2006 06:01 GMT
> I still think BIO is a good thing to do.  Better for your engine if
> done in a quality way etc and also reduces dependency on those
> wonderful adherents to the "religion of peace" and helps the
> environment on the polution side of things and makes us less dependent
> on other countries etc etc etc

At least I agree with this part..."Religion of Peace"...What a sack of
sh.t that is.

Islam-lunacy aside, it's pretty hard to make a case that global warming
is not happening.  And YES, Al Gore is an idiot.
chad@pengar.com - 31 Dec 2006 06:48 GMT
> Islam-lunacy aside, it's pretty hard to make a case that global warming
> is not happening.  And YES, Al Gore is an idiot.

But it is easy to argue and make the case that any global warming that
is actually happening is not man made.   The scientists who make this
claim make it based on computer models, not physical evidence, and the
computer models have been shown to be unreliable (fed old data they do
not predict where we are today).

In the last 7 or so years there has not been an increase in global
temperature, btw.  (Exact number of years escapes me).  The rises were
previous.
Craig C. - 02 Jan 2007 21:56 GMT
> There is no empirical proof that global warming is man made.

Agreed.  There is, however, some startling results.  The cause of
global warming is very difficult to prove 'empirically'.  In fact, a
true scientist doesn't "empirically prove" anything.  They test a
hypothesis and document the result that support or do not support the
orginal hypothesis.  It's up to the public and the government to listen
or ignore the results.

In short, what we do know is this:

1)  We are expelling HUGE amounts of Carbon Oxide (CO, CO2), Nitrogen
Oxides and other gases/particulate matter into the atmosphere.  Mostly
from the burning of fossil fuels, either by automobiles or industrial
uses (electricity generation, etc).

2)  We know that these gases/particulate matter "trap" heat.

> It is all
> in models that have been shown to be unreliable.  Unfortunately the
> topic has become politicized so not many scientists will speak out on
> the lack of evidence and flimsy models.

I agree to a certain extent.  The political red tape that exists for
*any* environmental problem is rediculous.  There are plenty of viable
models ... just nobody to listen to the results.

> junkscience.com is one interesting place to start (but not the only
> one).

I'll stick to the books written by scientists.

> A few interesting things that they don't tell you on the news is that
> 1) climate started warming [biggest shifts] before the largest
> increases in CO2, and not the other way around

Might want to check your sources.

> 2) CO2 input affects on climate is logarithmic and not linear. That
> means that as you get more CO2 in the atmosphere, the effects of that
> extra CO2 are much less.

True ... but this does not mean that the amount already in the
atmosphere isn't enough to shift the climate.

> 3) climatologists, especially paleo climatoligists, who study LONG TERM
> climate change, do not think that the current bit is more than a
> natural cycle.

There are a few that believe this.  There are more that believe that we
are impacting the climate with greenhouse gases.  We know who the Bush
administration choses to listen to.

> I am not denying that the climate is changing -- that is what climates
> do.  Just that man's affect on it is not the cause of the change.

I disagree.  Global warming is not my focus, but I do dabble quite a
bit in air quality in my studies.  There is enough viable evidence of
global warming to warrant that our government take a more proactive
role.

> I still think BIO is a good thing to do.  Better for your engine if
> done in a quality way etc and also reduces dependency on those
> wonderful adherents to the "religion of peace" and helps the
> environment on the polution side of things and makes us less dependent
> on other countries etc etc etc

Agreed.  Becoming self sufficient is going to be this countries biggest
challenge.  Especially in regards to energy production and consumption.

Craig C.
Yabahoobs - 03 Jan 2007 05:29 GMT
> > 3) climatologists, especially paleo climatoligists, who study LONG TERM
> > climate change, do not think that the current bit is more than a
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> are impacting the climate with greenhouse gases.  We know who the Bush
> administration choses to listen to.

VERY few.  Basically, the guy from University of Denver, followed by a
bunch of idiots.
Yes the global climate thermal cycling is generally accepted fact.
However, the RATE OF FLUCTUATION that is occuring now is essentially
unprecedented.  Most of these temperature and atmospheric CO2 values
going backward in time are taken from direct sampling of ancient ice in
Antartica.  Pretty simple stuff.  Not much room for any debate, amoung
anyone who approaches the data unbiased.  And dont tell me those guys
drilling for ice down there are political junkies...
Roy - 29 Dec 2006 15:23 GMT
>>>A week or 2  ago my 2006 Dodge Ram 2500 MegaCab with the Cummins 5.9L
>>> and 6 speed manual started to cough and lose power/RPMs and lots of
[quoted text clipped - 45 lines]
> i may be mistaken but i thought that bio blends up to 20% were considered
> acceptable by Dodge and Cummins engine company on 06 and later models.

You are probably very well correct. My thought is he has "unknown
percantages of bio" different amounts of  two.different additives and
diesel. A fuel sample may be the last thing he needs dc to do, knowing how
friendly they are to warranrty claims. I figure it is easier to dump the
tank, fill with diesel and see what happens. If it continues then go to dc
without all the other crap in the tank. Sorta avoid what could be a bunch of
bs imho.

Roy
> ----------------------------
> -Chris
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>>> Thanks
>>> Chad
Chris Thompson - 29 Dec 2006 21:17 GMT
>>>>A week or 2  ago my 2006 Dodge Ram 2500 MegaCab with the Cummins 5.9L
>>>> and 6 speed manual started to cough and lose power/RPMs and lots of
[quoted text clipped - 53 lines]
> without all the other crap in the tank. Sorta avoid what could be a bunch
> of bs imho.

agreed.

as a side note:
ive still had no complaints about the b20 in either truck myself.

Signature

----------------------------
-Chris
05 CTD
06 Liberty CRD

Real Trucks don't NEED spark plugs.

Craig C. - 29 Dec 2006 15:45 GMT
> i may be mistaken but i thought that bio blends up to 20% were considered
> acceptable by Dodge and Cummins engine company on 06 and later models.

B20 is considered acceptable by Cummins for 2007+ models, last I read.
I run B20 in my 2004 and get outstanding results.  Like:

1)  Less noise.
2)  Richer Americans.
3)  Poorer Arabs.
4)  Cleaner Air.
5)  Good feeling from knowing that I'm using a renewable energy source
(at least 20% of it).

It's the future of diesel, ladies.

:-)
Craig C.
Scott Hendryx - 29 Dec 2006 16:29 GMT
>> i may be mistaken but i thought that bio blends up to 20% were considered
>> acceptable by Dodge and Cummins engine company on 06 and later models.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> It's the future of diesel, ladies.

For you ladies maybe, I'll burn Uranium if I can get away with it.

Signature

------MoParMaN------

---Signature Pending Yet Another Assine Comment by MIANDERSON---

Craig C. - 29 Dec 2006 16:35 GMT
> no smoke.  When it starts to cough and lag and power loss occurs lots
> of white smoke comes out.  A ton of it.

Where did you purchase the bio?

What is the source of the bio?  (i.e. Soybean, used vegetable fry oil,
etc.)

> Any ideas?   I started to think that maybe the fuel filter was getting
> clogged and it was allowing enough fuel through for lower power use but
> as the throttle is increased it cannot get enough fuel to the engine.
> But everything is new and there should not be all sorts of deposits to
> come loose and clog the filter...

You're thinking correctly, if the truck was older, the bio maybe
freeing deposits left by dino diesel and clogging the filter.  However,
being fairly new, that is unlikely the cause.

My *guess*, without knowing more, is that you are consistently getting
poor fuel or as Roy stated, your fuel filter needs replacing.

I would start with replacing the fuel filter and burning 2-3 tanks from
a good, known source.  Usually diesel from truck stops is fairly safe
since you know that the diesel has not been sitting for months.

If you prefer bio, like I do (for many, many reasons), I wouldn't burn
any B100.  Stick with B20 for at least a few more months until some of
the big boys start embracing B100.

I fill up with B20 from Loves Truck Stop.  It is made from soybean oil
and is the safest out there.  I've never had a problem.

Don't give in to the scare tactics of some people in this ng about
bio-diesel.  Stick with reputable B20 and your truck will run the same,
if not better.

BTW, not to put a feather in my own hat, but I am pursuing a phd.
Alternative Energy is my field of study.  So, I'm not talking out my
a.s ... I've actually done some research on bio-diesel.

Craig C.
Roy - 29 Dec 2006 21:04 GMT
>> BTW, not to put a feather in my own hat,

Hmmmmm.. wearing feather's in your hat? Ah, what else do ya wear with your
feathered hat?

<BFG>

Roy

> Craig C.
Craig C. - 29 Dec 2006 22:10 GMT
>Hmmmmm.. wearing feather's in your hat? Ah, what else do ya wear with your feathered hat?

Wingtips and my pimp coat.

:-)
Craig C.
azwiley1 - 29 Dec 2006 22:12 GMT
> >Hmmmmm.. wearing feather's in your hat? Ah, what else do ya wear with your feathered hat?Wingtips and my pimp coat.
>
> :-)
> Craig C.

What next, you going pimp out the ride with some dingle balls and
crushed velour?  LOL
Craig C. - 29 Dec 2006 22:22 GMT
> What next, you going pimp out the ride with some dingle balls and crushed velour?  LOL

Nah ... I'm going to lower it and put 26 inch rims on it.  Oh ... and
I'm going to start wearing my blue jeans with the crotch at my knees.

This morning I saw a kid with blue jeans worn as I described above
trying to run up steps.  That's one of those memories that will make me
laugh when all else has gone to sh.t.

:-)
Craig C.
azwiley1 - 29 Dec 2006 22:26 GMT
> > What next, you going pimp out the ride with some dingle balls and crushed velour?  LOLNah ... I'm going to lower it and put 26 inch rims on it.  Oh ... and
> I'm going to start wearing my blue jeans with the crotch at my knees.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> :-)
> Craig C.

Hell you need to get hydralics on it then!
Chris Thompson - 30 Dec 2006 03:59 GMT
>> > What next, you going pimp out the ride with some dingle balls and
>> > crushed velour?  LOLNah ... I'm going to lower it and put 26 inch rims
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Hell you need to get hydralics on it then!

nawww the in thing ive been seeing is the air suspension...drop the body all
the way to the ground when you park, then pump it all the way up before you
drive off. make sure those shocks only see the 2 extreemes.

couple kids round town here have their trucks done like that. first time i
heard them drop em to the ground i thought a air hose had blown off a big
compressor.

Signature

----------------------------
-Chris
05 CTD
06 Liberty CRD

Real Trucks don't NEED spark plugs.

Scott Hendryx - 01 Jan 2007 21:11 GMT
>>> BTW, not to put a feather in my own hat,
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Roy

Prolly a pink TuTu!

Signature

------MoParMaN------

---Signature Pending Yet Another Assine Comment by MIANDERSON---

Craig C. - 01 Jan 2007 21:51 GMT
On Jan 1, 3:11 pm, "Scott Hendryx"
<scott.hendryx.clot...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>Prolly a pink TuTu!

Poor Scott ... your ignorance was exposed, so now you resort to gay
jokes.  Pathetic redneck.

Don't you have people in the RV group to irritate?

Craig C.
Nosey - 30 Dec 2006 00:03 GMT
> A week or 2  ago my 2006 Dodge Ram 2500 MegaCab with the Cummins 5.9L
> and 6 speed manual started to cough and lose power/RPMs and lots of
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
> Thanks
> Chad

I make and burn my own biodiesel without any trouble but I don't burn B100
in the winter because the low temps cause the biodiesel to jell up. I think
that might be happening to you. The different feedstocks that biodiesel is
made from affects the jell temperature of the fuel. I know of at least one
commercial biodiesel producer that uses poultry fat to make their biodiesel.
It has a fairly high cloud point. The cloud point of biodiesel could be as
low as 20°F or as high as 40°F. I'd pull a fuel sample from the water drain
on the fuel filter, put a thermometer in it, and put it in the freezer.
Check it about every 10 minutes and see what temperature the fuel is when it
starts to look cloudy. If the cloud point is above the normal low
temperatures you see you need to mix your biodiesel with kerosene or #2
diesel fuel to get the cloud point lower.
Signature

Ken

chad@pengar.com - 30 Dec 2006 17:48 GMT
Thanks for the replies.  I will report back shortly on my efforts.

I am still thinking along the lines of some fuel gone bad.  I don't
think the fuel was bad out of the tank -- been fueling there for a
while and never had issues and they seem to sell a lot.   Also, the
truck was running fine on the same fuel a while back, but the truck was
not being driven a lot so the same tank of fuel had been in the tank
for several weeks.  We got a bunch of wet and cold weather a few weeks
ago, starting soon before this started, and I think the fuel just
"attracted" the moisture.

The bio in there is from a reputable dealer that most of the bio
drivers here (SLC UT area) use.  The tank had been 100% full with dino
diesel and then over time small 3 to 9 or 10 gallon fillups of various
things (some B100 in small amounts, some B50, and some dino diesel)
were added as I was trying to keep the tank full to remove available
surface area for condensation to happen and just because I like to keep
the tank pretty full.  The current bio % is probably between 10 and 30
right now.  I have all the fueling receipts since purchase and should
sit down and caluclate it :-)

I am going to change the fuel filter and see what happens and report
back.

Thanks
Chad
chad@pengar.com - 31 Dec 2006 04:06 GMT
Ok, with a new fuel filter we seem to be good to go.  Went about 65
miles tonight, mostly highway, after the change without issue.

Old filter was gummy looking with gelled fuel or something and/or maybe
some ice looking stuff.  Must of gotten gummed up before I stuck the
additives in.

I'll run a tank or two through it and change it again to see and to put
a real Stratopore filter in (this was some other brand [Luber Finer] I
could find on the weekend at a local parts store since the Cummins
people were not close and the long weekend coming up).

We'll see how this works longer term but I think the problem was the
filter getting gummed up.  Probably as I had not added much anti-gel
stuff and we had a few really cold days and I am not sure what the bio
percentage was since it was several small 3-10 gallon adds of various
B% and a little straight dino diesel added to a tank of dino diesel...

Thanks all
Chad
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.