Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Dodge / Dodge Trucks / January 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

2004 1500

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
juanalong - 13 Jan 2007 22:27 GMT
I'm considering purchasing a 2004/1500 V6 with 27K miles.
No power windows but it does have cruise control.
The used car dealer wants 12.9K, naturally that's just
a starting price.
- Anyone out there with a 2004/1500 V6 that can share
pro's/con's with me?
- Obviously $12.9 is not what I'm gonna pay, but I'm
curious to what anyone else out there would pay.
Tks.
miles - 13 Jan 2007 22:43 GMT
> I'm considering purchasing a 2004/1500 V6 with 27K miles.
> No power windows but it does have cruise control.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> - Obviously $12.9 is not what I'm gonna pay, but I'm
> curious to what anyone else out there would pay.

If it's an ST automatic standard cab with A/C in very good condition
then I'd say a 10500 to 11500 would be a typical price.
GeekBoy - 13 Jan 2007 22:49 GMT
> I'm considering purchasing a 2004/1500 V6 with 27K miles.
> No power windows but it does have cruise control.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> curious to what anyone else out there would pay.
> Tks.

You will regret it. That V6 has NO power. I had a 99 with 5 speed with the
4.9 V6. It struggled even on over passes while in 5th gear.
Not to mention why get a vehicle that has less power than the V8 Ram and
gets the same fuel economy.

I have talked to others who had the V6 they all dispointed.

Why not get an older Diesel that will hold a better resale value for the
same price and a heck of a lot more power?
miles - 13 Jan 2007 22:54 GMT
> You will regret it. That V6 has NO power. I had a 99 with 5 speed with the
> 4.9 V6. It struggled even on over passes while in 5th gear.
> Not to mention why get a vehicle that has less power than the V8 Ram and
> gets the same fuel economy.
>
> I have talked to others who had the V6 they all dispointed.

Thats true.  I had a 2000 5.2L V8 Quad Cab 4x4 and it struggled to hold
70mph on flat ground in OD.  Even the slightest uphill rise in the
highway and I had to switch off OD.

I then got a 2001 5.9L V8 Quad Cab.  Much better.  Had plenty of power
and it got better mpg than the 5.2L.  You're right about the V6 not
getting any better mpg.

I'd recommend getting a used truck with the 5.9L.  Much nicer to drive.
 As for a used diesel they're considerably more expensive than a used
gasser.  That would be overkill for the OP's intended uses which I
assume to be rather light.
GeekBoy - 13 Jan 2007 23:52 GMT
>> You will regret it. That V6 has NO power. I had a 99 with 5 speed with
>> the 4.9 V6. It struggled even on over passes while in 5th gear.
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> That would be overkill for the OP's intended uses which I assume to be
> rather light.

Nor really. In my diesel with 3.73 rear end I get 21 MPG on higway and 18
city driving. If it still had the original 3.54 it would be 25 MPG on
highway.
Then there is a better engine quality. With the Cummins you are getting an
engine that should last 500k miles compared to  maybe 200k with the gas
engine.
Only plus benefits with the diesels. More power, longer lasting, greater
fuel enconomy and better resell value.
miles - 13 Jan 2007 23:57 GMT
> Nor really. In my diesel with 3.73 rear end I get 21 MPG on higway and 18
> city driving. If it still had the original 3.54 it would be 25 MPG on
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Only plus benefits with the diesels. More power, longer lasting, greater
> fuel enconomy and better resell value.

They cost $5000+ over a gasser.  It's overkill for someone that has no
use for the power of the diesel.  IE, not towing or hauling heavy loads.
GeekBoy - 14 Jan 2007 01:24 GMT
>> Nor really. In my diesel with 3.73 rear end I get 21 MPG on higway and 18
>> city driving. If it still had the original 3.54 it would be 25 MPG on
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> They cost $5000+ over a gasser.  It's overkill for someone that has no use
> for the power of the diesel.  IE, not towing or hauling heavy loads.

A man can never have too much power (now for the Tim Allen growl -arrgh
arrgh.)
NapalmHeart - 14 Jan 2007 02:47 GMT
>>> Nor really. In my diesel with 3.73 rear end I get 21 MPG on higway and
>>> 18 city driving. If it still had the original 3.54 it would be 25 MPG on
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> A man can never have too much power (now for the Tim Allen growl -arrgh
> arrgh.)

Too much still isn't enough!
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.