Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Dodge / Dodge Trucks / February 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Multi-Displacement System on 2006 Ram Hemi?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Martin - 28 Jan 2007 18:51 GMT
I'd appreciate some insight from anyone in the know about this
engine.  How do they "deactivate" the four non-contributing
cylinders?  Is it always the same four, or do they shift it around in
order to spread the wear?  When does the deactivation occur?  Can the
feature be manually locked out?  Any known issues yet?

I remember the Cadillac 8-6-4 system from years ago, it was a POS
throw-away engine.  I'm looking at trading my '03 Ram Hemi before the
$7K incentives run out next week, butI  don't want to be a guinea pig
for a technology experiment that is valueless or worse.

Thanks in advance for any information,

Martin
Tom Lawrence - 28 Jan 2007 19:31 GMT
> I'd appreciate some insight from anyone in the know about this
> engine.  How do they "deactivate" the four non-contributing
> cylinders?  Is it always the same four, or do they shift it around in
> order to spread the wear?  When does the deactivation occur?  Can the
> feature be manually locked out?  Any known issues yet?

The system works with special lifters that can be disengaged, thereby
isolating the intake and exhaust valves in four of the cylinders (the same
four - #1, #4, #6, and #7, which are 1st, 3rd, 5th, and 7th in the firing
order of 1-8-4-3-6-5-7-2).  The engine controller also shuts off spark and
fuel to the cylinders, making them completely dead.  The engine switches
from 4 to 8-cylinder mode based on engine load...  it's something that's
calculated automatically, and you won't notice when it's happening.
Basically, during deceleration, idle, cruise, or light acceleration - you'll
be in 4-cylinder mode.  Mash the throttle, and you'll get all 8.
John Kunkel - 28 Jan 2007 19:32 GMT
> I'd appreciate some insight from anyone in the know about this
> engine.  How do they "deactivate" the four non-contributing
> cylinders?

The cylinders are deactivated by shutting off the oil supply to the lifters
on the effected cylinders while also shutting off the fuel/spark.

>Is it always the same four, or do they shift it around in
> order to spread the wear?

Always the same four, Mopar claims no excessive wear occurs because of the
repetive cycling.

>When does the deactivation occur?

When the engine is under a light load.

>Can the feature be manually locked out?

No, but don't be surprised if the aftermarket starts offering "chips" to
allow the driver to control the function.

>Any known issues yet?

I haven't heard of any.

> I remember the Cadillac 8-6-4 system from years ago, it was a POS
> throw-away engine.

Twenty plus years of advancements in computers/technology make the
comparison moot.
rav - 28 Jan 2007 19:35 GMT
Take a look at http://www.allpar.com/mopar/new-mopar-hemi.html and
http://www.chrysler.com/300/features/performance/index.html.

>I'd appreciate some insight from anyone in the know about this
>engine.  How do they "deactivate" the four non-contributing
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
>Martin
Roy - 28 Jan 2007 21:42 GMT
> I'd appreciate some insight from anyone in the know about this
> engine.  How do they "deactivate" the four non-contributing
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Thanks in advance for any information,

One thing to be careful of is the oil weight. I believe Denny pointed that
out to me. Use whatever is recomended on the om.

Roy
> Martin
Martin - 29 Jan 2007 16:15 GMT
Thanks for all the info and links.

How long does it actually take for a lifter to collapse when the oil
supply is interrupted?  Also, is the oil turned off and on by one
solenoid valve, or one for each cylinder (4), or one for each valve
(8)?  Are these interruptors easy to replace when they get gummed up
or malfunction?

Thanks,

Martin

> I'd appreciate some insight from anyone in the know about this
> engine.  How do they "deactivate" the four non-contributing
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Martin
Tom Lawrence - 29 Jan 2007 16:54 GMT
> How long does it actually take for a lifter to collapse when the oil
> supply is interrupted?

Dodge claims 40ms to switch from 8-to-4 or 4-to-8

> Also, is the oil turned off and on by one
> solenoid valve, or one for each cylinder (4), or one for each valve
> (8)?

4 solenoid valves

>Are these interruptors easy to replace when they get gummed up
> or malfunction?

The solenoids?  They're under the intake manifold - once the manifold is
off, they just unbolt.
JJ2 - 02 Feb 2007 23:04 GMT
> I'd appreciate some insight from anyone in the know about this
> engine.  How do they "deactivate" the four non-contributing
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Martin

Saw your question in the other thread.
The 03 just seems to have the rep of being faster and more responsive, like
dodge has been taming down the hemi's over the years.

As to the mds.
Don't care for the mds one little bit but dodge being dodge there is a wide
range of quality to their engines. Some say it's a good thing.
I guess I do know how it works, at least on mine.
What are model are you interested in?
Roy - 02 Feb 2007 23:27 GMT
>> I'd appreciate some insight from anyone in the know about this
>> engine.  How do they "deactivate" the four non-contributing
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> I guess I do know how it works, at least on mine.
> What are model are you interested in?

I sorta agree with you, one more thing to go wrong. I'm glad my hemi doesn't
have it.

Roy
JJ2 - 03 Feb 2007 00:58 GMT
> >> I'd appreciate some insight from anyone in the know about this
> >> engine.  How do they "deactivate" the four non-contributing
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>
> Roy

heh
I don't know about one more thing... maybe a hundred or so things.
Don't know exactly why but I'm not very concerned about mds failure.
Larry A. - 15 Feb 2007 05:10 GMT
>> I'd appreciate some insight from anyone in the know about this
>> engine.  How do they "deactivate" the four non-contributing
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>I guess I do know how it works, at least on mine.
>What are model are you interested in?

My '06 Durango Hemi mds works fine so far (7,000 mi.) Deactivation
(switch to 8 cyls) occurs when there is increasing load (i.e. going
uphill).   I have read specs (somewhere) that is runs on 4 cyls about
56% of the time.   You can notice the shift if you are watching for
it; it's not really objectionable at all.  Usually I have to be
watching the tach to be sure it's switching.  I live in a hilly area
(Birmingham, AL) and have had not any problems or annoyance from it.
It IS mandatory that 5W-20 oil be used, however - if not, shifting
will supposedly take longer, and it will be more noticeable.  (Neither
the dealer nor owner's manual tell you that, but numerous online
sources do - and you don't have the usual "use this oil weight for
this temperature range" chart; it says use THIS. )  I won't swear that
the cylinders don't rotate the "active" sequence, but would be quite
surprised if they did - seems an incredible lot of trouble to go to,
and it would be a nightmare to troubleshoot.   Unknown how the mds
feature could be locked out, or why anyone would want to - this is
what keeps the fuel economy reasonable.

I will say that with my former vehicle, a Chevy Colorado, I would go
nuts going up hills on cruise - very poorly set up (I have been a
Chevy man most of my life, BTW).  It would lag way back going uphill,
then downshift two gears and give you whiplash, trying to catch up. I
finally stopped even trying to use the cruise in hilly country. The
5.7 hemi, in contrast, has extremely smooth cruise control, and rarely
drops off more than 1-2 mph, even when swapping from 4-8 cyls or vice
versa.  Very nice.

- Larry A.
Martin - 16 Feb 2007 15:48 GMT
> On Fri, 2 Feb 2007 17:04:02 -0600, "JJ2"
>
[quoted text clipped - 53 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

Thanks Larry, that's a good review.  Regarding why you'd lock it out,
it seems that it doesn't do much for the mileage anyway, so if it were
noticeable switching I'd lock it out.  My 2003 hemi averages 14.5/19,
and once got 20.5 average both ways on a trip from Dallas to
Shreveport and back.  If I believe the claims, the new MDS hemi hasn't
improved on that any.

best regards,

Martin
Larry A. - 17 Feb 2007 02:50 GMT
>> On Fri, 2 Feb 2007 17:04:02 -0600, "JJ2"
>>
[quoted text clipped - 64 lines]
>
>Martin
Welcome, Martin.   My mileage is pretty much identical, except it
topped out at 19.5.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.