>> But this stuff was $150.00 for the windshield
>> piece alone. So it doesn't take long to add up.
>
> You had the windshield tinted??????
He wrote he had it filmed.
There are clear films out there.
3M makes a 8 mil one that when you throw a brick at the window it won't go
through.
> I always try to get a top quality film. Being in Arizona I'm more
> interested in blocking out heat and UV than light. I'm not sure but I
> thought the metallic tints are better at blocking UV and heat.
> > But this stuff was $150.00 for the windshield
> > piece alone. So it doesn't take long to add up.
>
> You had the windshield tinted??????
My initial post states that very clearly. My second post reiterates,
with an emphasis on the cost. Judging from your use of a few extra
question marks it is my guess that you didn't misunderstand what I
said but that: A. I am the first person in your life that has ever
tinted a windshield, or B. You have an opinion you're just dying to
express. (my money's on B)
> I always try to get a top quality film. Being in Arizona I'm more
> interested in blocking out heat and UV than light. I'm not sure but I
> thought the metallic tints are better at blocking UV and heat.
I see. Well, I did what research I could on the subject and found the
non-metallic products to be very appealing in features and
durability. The studies will show the relative reductions in UV and
heat and they are very similar, as you will see. And we are not faced
with the type of sunlight conditions in southern Oregon that exist in
Arizona so there's a good possibility we might not arrive at the same
conclusion. You'll just have to try to take my word for it when I
tell you I put what I felt was the best product on a brand new car. I
can't imagine doing otherwise.
But the point of my post is not to convince you or anyone else of what
to use. I was merely responding the best way I could, based upon my
own experiences, to the OP.
Wolfie
Roy - 15 Feb 2007 16:14 GMT
>> > But this stuff was $150.00 for the windshield
>> > piece alone. So it doesn't take long to add up.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> said but that: A. I am the first person in your life that has ever
> tinted a windshield,
You are the first person that I know of that has tinted a windshield. Unless
you are talking about the top only.
I thought that it was illegal. But...
Wolfie - 15 Feb 2007 16:31 GMT
> >> > But this stuff was $150.00 for the windshield
> >> > piece alone. So it doesn't take long to add up.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> you are talking about the top only.
> I thought that it was illegal. But...
The laws vary from state to state but are very concise with respect to
the areas allowable and the minimum percentage of allowed light
through each area. And that is a gradient on the windshield, as
opposed to a continuous degree of darkness on any of the other
windows. http://www.tintcenter.com/laws/AZ/
The shop that we take our stuff to is the same one used by the State
Police and local Sheriff's Dept. and we have always stipulated that we
are not interested in exceeding the legal limits. What I find
interesting is that it was law enforcement, through their use of
surveillance vans and the need for darkened glass, that first promoted
the use of extreme window tinting on cars. But I *want* a LEO to be
able to see into my car at night if they need to so it's not that
extreme. Far less than is allowable in your state.
Wolfie
miles - 16 Feb 2007 00:37 GMT
> The shop that we take our stuff to is the same one used by the State
> Police and local Sheriff's Dept. and we have always stipulated that we
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> able to see into my car at night if they need to so it's not that
> extreme. Far less than is allowable in your state.
In AZ the law allows one to limo tint the back doors and rear window.
The limitations are on the front doors. I'm not much for the ultra dark
limo tint anyways. It blocks light but doesn't do much for heat and UV.
No tinting is allowed on the windshield except a small strip across
the upper part. The normal field of vision area can't be tinted at all.
cjc1200@gmail.com - 15 Feb 2007 16:15 GMT
> > > But this stuff was $150.00 for the windshield
> > > piece alone. So it doesn't take long to add up.
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>
> Wolfie
I have an '01 quad cab 4x4.....I hade the back window and the two side
ones done for $100.00 at an independent shop...The dealer wanted
$300.00 for the same stuff...go figure
Charlie
The OC
Wolfie - 15 Feb 2007 16:36 GMT
On Feb 15, 8:15 am, "cjc1...@gmail.com" <cjc1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > But this stuff was $150.00 for the windshield
> > > > piece alone. So it doesn't take long to add up.
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
> Charlie
> The OC-
I expect I'll use the same product on my '99 QC as we did on the
Maxie. And I expect, for the back window, 2 front doors and
windshield, it'll cost close to $3 to 400.00. I do like the finished
effect, though.
Wolfie
Scott - 15 Feb 2007 19:18 GMT
On Feb 15, 11:15 am, "cjc1...@gmail.com" <cjc1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > But this stuff was $150.00 for the windshield
> > > > piece alone. So it doesn't take long to add up.
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> > to use. I was merely responding the best way I could, based upon my
> > own experiences, to the OP.
> > Wolfie
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -
$100 sounds like a fair price.
Thanks again.
miles - 16 Feb 2007 00:27 GMT
> My initial post states that very clearly. My second post reiterates,
> with an emphasis on the cost. Judging from your use of a few extra
> question marks it is my guess that you didn't misunderstand what I
> said but that: A. I am the first person in your life that has ever
> tinted a windshield, or B. You have an opinion you're just dying to
> express. (my money's on B)
First off you're dang argumentative for no reason aren't ya?? Second,
you'd be wrong. I've never seen anyone tint a windshield other than a
small strip across the top to cut glare. Most newer cars already have
some tinting there from the factory.
Wolfie - 16 Feb 2007 00:55 GMT
> > My initial post states that very clearly. My second post reiterates,
> > with an emphasis on the cost. Judging from your use of a few extra
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> First off you're dang argumentative for no reason aren't ya??
Not as a rule. No offense intended. I've been waiting for my tranny
to get done for too many days now.
> Second, you'd be wrong.
Fortunately, I'm not a betting man. Even more fortunately, I'm
accustomed to being wrong.
>I've never seen anyone tint a windshield other than a
> small strip across the top to cut glare. Most newer cars already have
> some tinting there from the factory.
All the glass in the new Maxie had some tint to it. Not enough to
suit me, though. And to hear that I've been the first to do something
is simply astonishing to me. Thank you. ;-]
Wolfie
miles - 16 Feb 2007 00:57 GMT
> All the glass in the new Maxie had some tint to it. Not enough to
> suit me, though. And to hear that I've been the first to do something
> is simply astonishing to me. Thank you. ;-]
So is this tinting on the entire windshield or just an anti-glare strip
across the top? I hope the latter!!
Wolfie - 16 Feb 2007 03:43 GMT
> > All the glass in the new Maxie had some tint to it. Not enough to
> > suit me, though. And to hear that I've been the first to do something
> > is simply astonishing to me. Thank you. ;-]
>
> So is this tinting on the entire windshield or just an anti-glare strip
> across the top? I hope the latter!!
The film is cut to fit the entire glass. I'm not sure I understand
your concern. We have some big, long white sticks with red tips that
we've taped along each side of the car...really gets the attention at
crosswalks. And we can always roll down the window and stick our head
out if we need a real good look. Hell, we're almost too old to be
driving anyway so may as well enjoy it while we can; eh?
Wolfie
miles - 16 Feb 2007 04:35 GMT
> The film is cut to fit the entire glass. I'm not sure I understand
> your concern.
I have tinting on all the other windows. They are not as easy to see
out of as the front untinted windshield. I think I prefer it that way!
Wolfie - 16 Feb 2007 04:51 GMT
> > The film is cut to fit the entire glass. I'm not sure I understand
> > your concern.
>
> I have tinting on all the other windows. They are not as easy to see
> out of as the front untinted windshield. I think I prefer it that way!
I can understand and appreciate that. I think you should do whatever
you want and use whatever product suits your needs. I just have a
hard time understanding how it applies to what I do with *my*
windows.