> It seems the Chyslers parent in Germany is not to happy about how
> things are going with US based auto unit and is in serious talks with
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> -----------------
> TheSnoMan.com
I think they want it for the trucks. 80% of Chrysler sales in 2005 were
trucks.
Coasty - 16 Feb 2007 23:35 GMT
Rams could be wearing bow ties, kind of a snappy dresser.
Coasty
>> It seems the Chyslers parent in Germany is not to happy about how
>> things are going with US based auto unit and is in serious talks with
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> I think they want it for the trucks. 80% of Chrysler sales in 2005 were
> trucks.
Chris Thompson - 16 Feb 2007 23:37 GMT
real trucks don't wear bow ties.

Signature
----------------------------
-Chris
05 CTD
06 Liberty CRD
Real Trucks don't NEED spark plugs.
> Rams could be wearing bow ties, kind of a snappy dresser.
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>> I think they want it for the trucks. 80% of Chrysler sales in 2005 were
>> trucks.
Coasty - 17 Feb 2007 00:17 GMT
Agreed but they may not have a choice
Coasty
> real trucks don't wear bow ties.
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>>> I think they want it for the trucks. 80% of Chrysler sales in 2005 were
>>> trucks.
Hp - 17 Feb 2007 02:27 GMT
Just what we need. Hemi's in Gay Man Chariots!
> Agreed but they may not have a choice
>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>>>> I think they want it for the trucks. 80% of Chrysler sales in 2005 were
>>>> trucks.
More rubbish. Daimler bought Chrysler for $40billion, so you think that
after losing $1.47Billion, DC would sustain a further loss of $35billion???
If GM buys, it'll be at a much higher price. But I wouldn't bet on DC
selling until they find a viable option to make some cash out of the deal.

Signature
Max
Join www.devilbrad.com and find out what free exchange of info is all about.
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
> It seems the Chyslers parent in Germany is not to happy about how
> things are going with US based auto unit and is in serious talks with
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> -----------------
> TheSnoMan.com
TBone - 25 Feb 2007 23:07 GMT
> More rubbish. Daimler bought Chrysler for $40billion, so you think that
> after losing $1.47Billion, DC would sustain a further loss of $35billion???
It's called cutting lossesand while I agree that they are not going to want
to give it away, they will sell at a substantial discount since they got
what they wanted out of the deal. BTS, I guess this settles out discussion
about merger of equals vs takeover.
> If GM buys, it'll be at a much higher price. But I wouldn't bet on DC
> selling until they find a viable option to make some cash out of the deal.
Any amount of money is better than just shutting it down and taking a total
loss or keeping it operating at a loss. If they would build some desirable
vehicles for a change this would not be happening.

Signature
If at first you don't succeed, you're not cut out for skydiving