>My point was that it would be nice if Chrysler, a historically U.S.
>automobile company, was actually owned by a U.S. company and monies
>generated stayed in the U.S. A concept that is amazingly "foreign"
>nowadays.
> It would be good for Chysler to break from current owner but this
> potentail partner is not their answer. They would likely "raid" their
> assest in time and kill of the automaker.
Not necessarily. Not all private equity buy-outs are rape jobs.
> Chyslers best long term hope
> may be a employee by out but that is not very likely either.
I tend to agree. There is a company here in Dallas called
"TDIndustires" that is supposedly employee owned. They are very
successful and lauded as one of the better places to work. Granted,
it's not as large or complex as Chrysler ... but the employees have a
great sense of loyalty and interest in the success of the company.
Maybe Cummins could buy them. That'd be interesting. :-)
Craig C.
SnoMan - 04 Apr 2007 18:39 GMT
>but the employees have a
>great sense of loyalty and interest in the success of the company.
Yes and they are also more aware of the bottom line and what it cost
to run a company (wages, benifits and such) when they own it. I do
think that a employee buyout with the right leadership could turn
company around.
-----------------
TheSnoMan.com
Max Dodge - 04 Apr 2007 21:32 GMT
Blackstone Group and Magna Drivetrain are also well financed and in the
running for Chrysler. Magna supplies assemblies to Chrysler.

Signature
Max
Join www.devilbrad.com and find out what free exchange of info is all about.
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
>> It would be good for Chysler to break from current owner but this
>> potentail partner is not their answer. They would likely "raid" their
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Craig C.