>Still can't help yourself can ya.
No "troll" you cannot help yourself from spreading improper
information. Like I said the glycol does not break down only the
aditives while trying to control the galvanic reactivety of the water
in coolant with engine parts it contacts. If you run a higher
consentation of glycol you can greatly extend coolant life but there
are those such as you that will say water cools better even though
glycol is densor and it takes more heat to raise a gallon of it one
degree than it does water and it has a lower surface tension as well
and transfer heat out of motor better too. See trolls such as your
self do not know the chemistry behind things so you rant and rave a
lot. SOme may say that the temp gage is a little higher with higher
glycol consentrations but that is because it is conducting more heat
out of the block die to lower surface tension and a reduces gas bubble
bbarrier forming around hot parts that inhibits heat transfer from
metal part and temp gage reads coolant temp true not block or head
temp. BTW, I have been running 70/30 for many years and I have a
excellant coolant life and I have a 18 year old vehicle that over flow
tank is still clean as new. I also run 7 to 9 PSI caps to reduce
stress on hoses and cores and I have no overheating issude at all in
any climate with any load. (the higher pressure cap used with lower
consentrions to increase boil point and to help minimize gas bubble
barrier on hot parts is not nereded with higher gycol concentrations)
Keep up the "trooling" though and it is good for entertainment. BTW,
if you run proplyene glycol (non toxic antifreeze) you can even run
100% if you want because it has it highest freezing and boiling point
and 100% consentraion. It is used in true artic climates.
-----------------
TheSnoMan.com
Roy - 23 Apr 2007 16:31 GMT
>>Still can't help yourself can ya.
>
> No "troll" you cannot help yourself from spreading improper
> information.
What improper information? You should be the last person to remark about
improper info. You are a legend when it come to BS post's.
>but there
> are those such as you that will say water cools better even though
> glycol is densor and it takes more heat to raise a gallon of it one
> degree than it does water
When did I ever say that? Prove it or retract it.
> and transfer heat out of motor better too. See trolls such as your
> self do not know the chemistry behind things so you rant and rave a
> lot.
I'm posting what has been happening to a specific engine. Where is the rant?
Leviathan - 23 Apr 2007 19:12 GMT
So then, why aren't you using it?
Larry
Behold Beware Believe
: <snip>
:
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
: -----------------
: TheSnoMan.com

Signature
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
Heatwave - 23 Apr 2007 19:19 GMT
> >Still can't help yourself can ya.
>
> No
[SNIP]
> -----------------
> TheTrollMan.com
Stop your trolling.
Roy - 23 Apr 2007 21:21 GMT
>>Still can't help yourself can ya.
>
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> 100% if you want because it has it highest freezing and boiling point
> and 100% consentraion. It is used in true artic climates.
Now that I took the time to actually read this babble, it dawned on me that
the spelling police will have a ball with it.
Mike Simmons - 24 Apr 2007 01:59 GMT
>>Still can't help yourself can ya.
>
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
> -----------------
> TheSnoMan.com
We had this debate several months ago about glycol cooling better than
water. It was pure BS then and it is pure BS now. Don't you ever learn?
Mike