> http://www.pacbrake.com
thanks for the link.
> The problem with the '05s is the ECM no longer has the exhaust brake
> function turned on (those DC bastards turned it off)
is there a way to turn it back on? will the ECM from an '06 work?
> the kit uses a micro-switch on the pedal instead
anyway to avoid this? micro-switches are a common point of failure in my
industry anyway.
> Note that they also use the ATS Commander transmission controller, which
> is EB-aware, and will keep the converter locked while the exhaust brake is
> on (until you hit a pre-set speed, then it will unlock).
any need for any tranny upgrades?
thanks,

Signature
Nathan In Montana
http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
http://1911Talk.com
http://GlockCarry.com
http://HiPowerTalk.com
Tom Lawrence - 01 Jun 2007 06:11 GMT
> is there a way to turn it back on? will the ECM from an '06 work?
Nope - injector harness is different.
> anyway to avoid this? micro-switches are a common point of failure in my
> industry anyway.
Yeah.... spend $40K on a new truck
> any need for any tranny upgrades?
As I've said before, I'd spend some money on tranny upgrades because of the
weight you're pulling - not necessarily just because of an exhaust brake.
Nathan W. Collier - 01 Jun 2007 17:29 GMT
>> is there a way to turn it back on? will the ECM from an '06 work?
>
> Nope - injector harness is different.
what about turning the feature back on? is there any way to interface with
the existing ecm to turn the feature back on?
> I'd spend some money on tranny upgrades because of the weight you're
> pulling - not necessarily just because of an exhaust brake.
would you make this same recommendation if you werent running power adders,
or is this recommendation based on running additional power over stock?

Signature
Nathan In Montana
http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
http://1911Talk.com
http://GlockCarry.com
http://HiPowerTalk.com
theguy@whatever.net - 01 Jun 2007 17:51 GMT
>>> is there a way to turn it back on? will the ECM from an '06 work?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>would you make this same recommendation if you werent running power adders,
>or is this recommendation based on running additional power over stock?
that really is a great question. i'll be interested to see what tom
says. i would say for both. i know that tdr is full of people that
added power without adding tranny upgrades and i would guess that way
over half of them ended up with serious tranny problems that made them
regret not upgrading the tranny. those who added power and upgraded
their tranny's seem to be pretty happy, especially those that went to
a "good" tranny source. but then the extra weight that you have, i
would think, will make the cumins throw some real hard power to the
tranny to get the weight started and i'm not sure the tranny would
hold up real well under that either.
Tom Lawrence - 01 Jun 2007 21:10 GMT
> what about turning the feature back on? is there any way to interface
> with the existing ecm to turn the feature back on?
I don't know... you'd have to ask a friendly DC tech with a DRB3.
Remember, Dodge changed the programming in the Cummins ECM so Cummins can't
interface with it anymore... only Dodge can talk to the ECM anymore. I
would think that if there were a way, companies like Pacbrake wouldn't be
coming out with "fix-it" kits.
> would you make this same recommendation if you werent running power
> adders, or is this recommendation based on running additional power over
> stock?
Either way. As I said, the stock torque converter is the last of the known
"weak links"... it will be first thing to go from the heavy use of pulling
that trailer. The new valve body gives you firmer shifts, a little more
line pressure, and the ability to actuate shifts with the TC locked up
(where lockup is maintained through the electronic controller - the same box
that engages the exhaust brake)*.
* This is all assuming ATS parts and upgrades... can't speak to other
transmission shop's products