Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Dodge / Dodge Trucks / September 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Warped manifold?! (darn it!)

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
jmc - 11 Sep 2007 09:14 GMT
So, I finally got the truck in to have the manifold gasket replaced (per
my posts a little bit ago).

Walked to the mechanic's this afternoon to find my truck still in the
shop with the hood up.  He was supposed to call if it wasn't ready!

Ah, well.  He said the manifold was warped, and he'd sent it out to have
it machined.  That was done, and the truck will be ready tomorrow.

In my short Google excursion, I saw that warped manifolds are usually
replaced.  But this is Outback Australia, and replacing parts ain't
always easy (and doubly hard for a Yank Tank), so I imaging machining is
probably the norm around here.

But for my particular truck (2001 Dakota), should I be concerned?  Will
a freshly machined manifold be as good as new?  Are there consequences
to this I should know about?

And, how does a manifold warp, anyway?  Was it likely always that way,
and the gasket's just gotten old enough for me to notice the tik?

And, could a warped manifold cause the P0455 code (Exhaust leak?)  The
mechanic didn't seem to think replacing the gasket would fix the leak...

As always, any advice appreciated.

jmc
Ed M. - 11 Sep 2007 12:35 GMT
> So, I finally got the truck in to have the manifold gasket replaced (per
> my posts a little bit ago).
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>
> jmc

If a good machinist does the job, it should be fine. Warped manifolds
(assuming exhaust manifold since I missed your previous post) are usually
caused by extreme changes in temperature, but CAN just happen from normal
usage in rare cases. It could have been an improperly machined manifold
right from the start and the gasket hid the problem for the most part, but
you had some small leakage causing your code. I would assume that the
mechanic pre-mounted the manifold and saw some daylight between it and the
block and decided to fix the problem the right way instead of just covering
the problem with another gasket. This is probably the most likely scenerio
because a very small leak may not be noticeable until it finally just blows
the gasket completely.

Ed
jmc - 11 Sep 2007 12:46 GMT
Suddenly, without warning, Ed M. exclaimed (9/11/2007 9:05 PM):
>> So, I finally got the truck in to have the manifold gasket replaced (per
>> my posts a little bit ago).
[quoted text clipped - 37 lines]
>
> Ed

Ed, thanks for the response.  Yup, exhaust manifold.  Mechanic didn't
have the option of covering the problem with a second gasket, 'cause he
only has one.  I live overseas and had to order the gasket from the US.

Extreme changes in temperature.  Well, we got that here (gets well into
the 100s), but the computer's had the "small code" since we were in a
place without extremes (p0422? can't remember); the code though did
change to a 'bigger leak' while in this much hotter desert location.

jmc
Chris Thompson - 11 Sep 2007 13:10 GMT
In response to Ed M. 's post. I thought everyone should know:

>> So, I finally got the truck in to have the manifold gasket replaced (per
>> my posts a little bit ago).
[quoted text clipped - 37 lines]
>
> Ed

ed the warped manifold on a dakota v6 is common, done lots of them and the
broken studs too.

Signature

Chris

jmc - 11 Sep 2007 21:10 GMT
Suddenly, without warning, Chris Thompson exclaimed (9/11/2007 9:40 PM):

> ed the warped manifold on a dakota v6 is common, done lots of them and the
> broken studs too.

Mine's a v8 (sorry forgot to mention, but good info anyway.

jmc
Steve Lusardi - 11 Sep 2007 19:57 GMT
It is a much more common problem than it once was because of modern casting
techniques. The new processes allow much thinner and lighter castings, but
this by itself, wouldn't be an issue if the casting was annealed before they
machine it. Of course that costs money and it isn't done. The newly machined
manifold is actually better than a new one because your useage has already
annealed the casting and it will not move again. In point of fact a gasket
will not be necessary at all. However, I would replace the studs as a matter
of common sense. It costs very little when they are whole, but very
expensive if you have to pull the head to drill out a broken one and be sure
to use anti seize compound on the threads.
Steve

> So, I finally got the truck in to have the manifold gasket replaced (per
> my posts a little bit ago).
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>
> jmc
Ed M. - 12 Sep 2007 14:13 GMT
> It is a much more common problem than it once was because of modern
> casting techniques. The new processes allow much thinner and lighter
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> threads.
> Steve

That would be my thoughts exactly. Since he lives in a hostile environment,
his vehicle has probably be through tons of heat/cooling cycles and the
castings are "set" and will not move/warp anymore. Every single part, it
seems, is thinner and smaller these days because of the emphisis on reducing
weight (cheaper.....:-) to get in-line with MPG increases in light trucks.

Ed
>> So, I finally got the truck in to have the manifold gasket replaced (per
>> my posts a little bit ago).
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>>
>> jmc
Roy - 12 Sep 2007 19:09 GMT
>> It is a much more common problem than it once was because of modern
>> casting techniques. The new processes allow much thinner and lighter
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> That would be my thoughts exactly. Since he lives

He?????

Did I miss something??
jmc - 14 Sep 2007 11:18 GMT
Suddenly, without warning, Roy exclaimed (9/13/2007 3:39 AM):
>>> It is a much more common problem than it once was because of modern
>>> casting techniques. The new processes allow much thinner and lighter
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Did I miss something??

Ah, he just doesn't know me :)

jmc
Ed M. - 14 Sep 2007 12:49 GMT
> Suddenly, without warning, Roy exclaimed (9/13/2007 3:39 AM):
>>>> It is a much more common problem than it once was because of modern
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> jmc

Very true. I am fairly new here and am just getting to know folks. Sorry if
I 'mis-gendered' you jmc........:-)

Ed
Roy - 14 Sep 2007 13:44 GMT
>> Suddenly, without warning, Roy exclaimed (9/13/2007 3:39 AM):
>>>>> It is a much more common problem than it once was because of modern
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
> Ed

Speaking of gender, watch out for the rabbit. We are still trying to figure
that one out.<BFG>
FMB - 14 Sep 2007 14:01 GMT
>>> Suddenly, without warning, Roy exclaimed (9/13/2007 3:39 AM):
>>>>>> It is a much more common problem than it once was because of modern
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
> Speaking of gender, watch out for the rabbit. We are still trying to
> figure that one out.<BFG>

Da wabbit has a gender?  With that belly, how can he tell? (vbg)

FMB
(North Mexico)
Roy - 14 Sep 2007 16:18 GMT
>>>> Suddenly, without warning, Roy exclaimed (9/13/2007 3:39 AM):
>>>>>>> It is a much more common problem than it once was because of modern
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
>
> Da wabbit has a gender?

Does a food processor really have a gender?

With that belly, how can he tell? (vbg)

> FMB
> (North Mexico)
Denny - 14 Sep 2007 22:41 GMT
>>>>> Suddenly, without warning, Roy exclaimed (9/13/2007 3:39 AM):
>>>>>>>> It is a much more common problem than it once was because of modern
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
>
> With that belly, how can he tell? (vbg)

How the "f" did I get dragged into this one????  I'm behaving myself and get
attacked from behind while I'm at work. Bunch of f'n pricks around here.....
<GBMFG>

Denny
jmc - 14 Sep 2007 14:32 GMT
Suddenly, without warning, Ed M. exclaimed (9/14/2007 9:19 PM):
>> Suddenly, without warning, Roy exclaimed (9/13/2007 3:39 AM):
>>>>> It is a much more common problem than it once was because of modern
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
> Ed

Don't worry about it.  Generally only the folks that've been around for
a while know I'm missing a Y chromosome :)

"on usenet nobody knows you're a cat"

jmc
aarcuda69062 - 11 Sep 2007 19:59 GMT
> So, I finally got the truck in to have the manifold gasket replaced (per
> my posts a little bit ago).
>
> Walked to the mechanic's this afternoon to find my truck still in the
> shop with the hood up.  He was supposed to call if it wasn't ready!

Was the phone free the whole time?

> Ah, well.  He said the manifold was warped, and he'd sent it out to have
> it machined.  That was done, and the truck will be ready tomorrow.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> always easy (and doubly hard for a Yank Tank), so I imaging machining is
> probably the norm around here.

Nothing wrong with machining it.

> But for my particular truck (2001 Dakota), should I be concerned?  Will
> a freshly machined manifold be as good as new?  Are there consequences
> to this I should know about?
>
> And, how does a manifold warp, anyway?  

Heating and cooling cycles.

> Was it likely always that way,
> and the gasket's just gotten old enough for me to notice the tik?

No.

> And, could a warped manifold cause the P0455 code (Exhaust leak?)  

P0455 is an Evaporative emissions system leak.

> The
> mechanic didn't seem to think replacing the gasket would fix the leak...

Me either.

> As always, any advice appreciated.
>
> jmc
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.