Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Dodge / Dodge Trucks / October 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Case of Oil

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Oregon - 30 Sep 2007 04:39 GMT
Quick question:  What do you guys pay for a case (12 quarts) of standard
motor oil (e.g. 10W-30)?
Went to buy a case tonight.  Stopped at AutoZone.  They wanted $38.  Either
prices have gone way up, or I haven't paid attention the last few times I
bought oil.
O.
Beryl - 30 Sep 2007 05:38 GMT
> Quick question:  What do you guys pay for a case (12 quarts) of standard
> motor oil (e.g. 10W-30)?

About $12, for Castrol.

> Went to buy a case tonight.  Stopped at AutoZone.  They wanted $38.  Either
> prices have gone way up, or I haven't paid attention the last few times I
> bought oil.
> O.

Pay attention to the Sunday ads, and you won't get screwed so badly.
Chris Thompson - 30 Sep 2007 06:55 GMT
In response to Oregon 's post. I thought everyone should know:

> Quick question:  What do you guys pay for a case (12 quarts) of standard
> motor oil (e.g. 10W-30)?
> Went to buy a case tonight.  Stopped at AutoZone.  They wanted $38.  Either
> prices have gone way up, or I haven't paid attention the last few times I
> bought oil.
> O.

i buy the gallon jugs of 15w40

Signature

Chris

Beryl - 30 Sep 2007 07:40 GMT
> In response to Oregon 's post. I thought everyone should know:
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> i buy the gallon jugs of 15w40

One of my disposable lighters ran out of butane, but the flint's still
good. The other one is still about 1/3 full of fuel, but no more sparks.
So I use one to light the other.
Chris Thompson - 30 Sep 2007 18:47 GMT
In response to Beryl 's post. I thought everyone should know:

>> In response to Oregon 's post. I thought everyone should know:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> good. The other one is still about 1/3 full of fuel, but no more sparks.
> So I use one to light the other.

uh hu good for you,

Signature

Chris

Abby.Normal - 30 Sep 2007 19:05 GMT
I pay a little less that $50 for an oil change of 100% synthetic, 10W-30, 6
qts. and 25k mile filter.  I change oil and filter about once every 12-18
months.  It costs way more than that to change oil and filter with regular
stuff every 3500 miles - not to mention all the hassle involved of just
getting it done.  Plus I was also able to pick up 1 mpg using synthetic as
opposed to regular oil.

http://www.amsoil.com

> Quick question:  What do you guys pay for a case (12 quarts) of standard
> motor oil (e.g. 10W-30)?
> Went to buy a case tonight.  Stopped at AutoZone.  They wanted $38.
> Either prices have gone way up, or I haven't paid attention the last few
> times I bought oil.
> O.
ace - 30 Sep 2007 20:59 GMT
A discussion of various oil brands, their prices, characteristics,
and other opinions about them always reminds of what happens
when two guys sit down at the bar drinking beer and begin
discussing the merits of various beers.
Abby.Normal - 01 Oct 2007 13:32 GMT
very true.  I am trying this one out for size.  This is the first time for
me an synthetics but I also went with someone else's experience with this
product.  A couple of long time friends have been using this stuff for some
time and swear by it.  I figure the hassle alone of changing the oil and
filter is worth the extra money up front.  It generally costs me around $20
for each change and at 3500 miles each that comes to about 7 oil/filter
changes at $20 ea equals $140 plus the hassles.  $50 for one oil change
during the same amount of time with the hassle of just one just simple
sense.  It may not work but I'm going to try it.  At even 2 of the synthetic
oil changes during the same miles is worth it.

>A discussion of various oil brands, their prices, characteristics,
> and other opinions about them always reminds of what happens
> when two guys sit down at the bar drinking beer and begin
> discussing the merits of various beers.
SnoMan - 01 Oct 2007 14:21 GMT
>very true.  I am trying this one out for size.  This is the first time for
>me an synthetics but I also went with someone else's experience with this
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>sense.  It may not work but I'm going to try it.  At even 2 of the synthetic
>oil changes during the same miles is worth it.

SYN oil has merit and I have been using WalMart branded SYN in a
"test" vehicle for last 6 years and Mobile one in another for 17 years
now and it has been okay but I still change oil every 5K tops because
SYN oil may be more stable but is does still get dirty and losses it
abilty to clean engine  and suspend contaminats too with time and only
changing fixes that because filters do not remove it. I also run a few
vehicle with regualr dino oil and 3k changes or less and I have seen
nothing so far to suggest the SYN oil is a must have for long life.
Regular oil changes are a must have though.  
-----------------
TheSnoMan.com
mac davis - 01 Oct 2007 15:16 GMT
>very true.  I am trying this one out for size.  This is the first time for
>me an synthetics but I also went with someone else's experience with this
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>sense.  It may not work but I'm going to try it.  At even 2 of the synthetic
>oil changes during the same miles is worth it.

I use it in the Ram & Dakota and it seems to help both fuel mileage and heat a
little bit..

We change oil about every 15k and change the Mobile One filter every 7 or 8k..

Where we really noticed a difference, especially in towing the rv, was in
changing to synthetic in the differential..

mac

Please remove splinters before emailing
aarcuda69062 - 01 Oct 2007 15:58 GMT
> very true.  I am trying this one out for size.  

"this one" meaning Amsoil?

Be advised; only one of their products carries any sort of
approval, that being the XL series which carries API approval.

API is the rock bottom.
Amsoil carries no ILLSAC, ACEA or OEM approvals.

Use at your own peril.
Roy - 01 Oct 2007 16:28 GMT
>> very true.  I am trying this one out for size.
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Use at your own peril.

Now you will have the cult screaming.
Steve Lusardi - 01 Oct 2007 22:46 GMT
Roy,
You are mistaken the API is not rock bottom. For clarity the API (American
Petroleum Institute) tests are rather comprehensive and these tests are
performed on a special test engine where the lubricity of the oil is tested
across its utility temperature range and the additive package is also tested
for other attributes like particulate suspension and other factors. The API
rating is based on the best test passed by the oil. The first letter
represents the oil's intended usage "C" for compression ignition engines
(Diesel) and "S" for Spark ignition (Gasoline). The second letter indicates
the severity of the test passed like SH or CF. On the other hand, the SAE
test is a viscosity test only against a mean standard, similar to the
Saybolt scale used by machine tool manufacturers. This is where a fixed
volume of oil is poured through an orifice of a particular size and is
measured in time, like 30W. The multi-grade rating indicates the pour time
at 0 degrees and at 212 degrees, like 10W30, which states that the orifice
time at 0 degrees is equivalent to 10W and 212 equivalent to 30W.

In point of fact Amsoil no longer has their oil tested, as it surpasses the
most severe API tests by very wide margins. Amsoil is a double diester based
oil and is fully synthetic using no petroleum. The lubricity of petroleum
based oils starts deteriorating around 220 degrees F and Amsoil starts to
fall off around 350 degrees F. Mobil 1 and the like are synthesized,
petroleum based oils and although superior to pure petroleum oils, they are
inferior to Amsoil in both temperature and lubricity. The real question you
need to ask; Is this extra performance worth the higher cost? This is
especially true when contamination is an issue, as in a diesel application,
where oil changes are the only solution and extended usage is not available
to offset the higher cost. Amsoil has its own limitation though. Amsoil's
typical failure mode is that it tends to gel into little balls that can
block oil passages and filters and I am not sure what causes this and it can
happen with new oil as well as old.
Steve

>>> very true.  I am trying this one out for size.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Now you will have the cult screaming.
Roy - 02 Oct 2007 00:41 GMT
> Roy,
> You are mistaken the API is not rock bottom.

WTF are you talking about?? Try following the thread

<big snip>
Chris Thompson - 02 Oct 2007 01:07 GMT
In response to Steve Lusardi 's post. I thought everyone should know:

> Roy,
> You are mistaken

one Roy wasn't the one who made the comment

<big snip>

> In point of fact Amsoil no longer has their oil tested, as it surpasses the
> most severe API tests by very wide margins.

and i am supposed to believe this rubbish because you and Amsoil says
so??? NOPE!! not gonna happen! If the stuff was that good, they would have
no problems letting a independent lab test their stuff. the fact that they
don't speaks volumes about their product.

<another big snip>

Signature

Chris

aarcuda69062 - 02 Oct 2007 04:25 GMT
> Roy,

I'm not Roy. Roy is not me. (no offense Roy)

> You are mistaken the API is not rock bottom.

Actually, it is.  The very highest API approvals don't come
anywhere close to the minimum (now obsolete) ACEA approvals.

> For clarity the API (American
> Petroleum Institute) tests are rather comprehensive and these tests are
> performed on a special test engine where the lubricity of the oil is tested
> across its utility temperature range and the additive package is also tested
> for other attributes like particulate suspension and other factors.

API is a bunch of motor oil marketers getting together and
deciding on a standard that their oils will meet at the highest
profit margin using the cheapest base stocks.

Rather than rely on the guy selling me oil to tell me what I
should use, it makes much more sense to rely on the manufacturer
of the vehicle to specify which oils meet their approvals.
(survived their testing)
Anything else is like a third grader dictating what is a passing
grade in his/her respective school.

> The API
> rating is based on the best test passed by the oil.

Yeah, and -they- invent the test which makes it not so "best."

> The first letter
> represents the oil's intended usage "C" for compression ignition engines
> (Diesel) and "S" for Spark ignition (Gasoline).

Actually, "S" = service and "C" = commercial

> The second letter indicates
> the severity of the test passed like SH or CF.

Severity?

> On the other hand, the SAE
> test is a viscosity test only against a mean standard, similar to the
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> at 0 degrees and at 212 degrees, like 10W30, which states that the orifice
> time at 0 degrees is equivalent to 10W and 212 equivalent to 30W.

You jump from tests and approvals to SAE viscosities...  Why I
don't know.

> In point of fact Amsoil no longer has their oil tested,

Uh-Oh!
So, no;
Sequence IIIE, Sequence IIIF, Sequence IIIG, Sequence IVA,
Sequence VD, Sequence VE, Sequence VG, ASTM D5533, ASTM D6593,
ASTM 6891, ASTM 4683, CEC L-38A-94, etc, etc, etc.... ????

One would buy this stuff because?

> as it surpasses the
> most severe API tests by very wide margins.

And the proof is where?
And like I said, the most severe API tests don't even come close
to the minimum ACEA tests.

> Amsoil is a double diester based
> oil and is fully synthetic using no petroleum.

"Fully synthetic" is no guarantee of anything.

> The lubricity of petroleum
> based oils starts deteriorating around 220 degrees F and Amsoil starts to
> fall off around 350 degrees F. Mobil 1 and the like are synthesized,
> petroleum based oils and although superior to pure petroleum oils, they are
> inferior to Amsoil in both temperature and lubricity.

Really?  Checking the High Temperature/High Shear (HTHS)*
viscosities of Amsoil against Mobil 1 shows not much difference
for the products that would typically be used for normal day to
day service.
(i.e., excluding the racing oil)
I bet if I worked at it a little, I could find some Castrol or
Pentosin or ELF oil(s) that would put Amsoil to shame.

> The real question you
> need to ask; Is this extra performance worth the higher cost?

Which extra performance would that be?
0.06 CentiPoise @150*C?  You better believe it isn't worth the
higher cost _OR_ the brain washing.

> This is  especially true when contamination is an issue, as in a diesel application,
> where oil changes are the only solution and extended usage is not available
> to offset the higher cost. Amsoil has its own limitation though. Amsoil's
> typical failure mode is that it tends to gel into little balls that can
> block oil passages and filters and I am not sure what causes this and it can
> happen with new oil as well as old.

Sounds like another good reason to avoid it.

* HTHS = viscosity in CentiPoise @ 100*C, 300* F
User - 07 Oct 2007 17:48 GMT
>In point of fact Amsoil no longer has their oil tested, as it surpasses the
>most severe API tests by very wide margins.

This one's a keeper.

Boy, I sure get a warm fuzzy feeling about using Amsoil when I know
it's not tested.  Yep, a cult zombie message board spammer telling me
it surpasses all the tests is good enough for me.

Screw the testing, it only costs money that could be going into the
pockets of the MLM pyramid dwellers.  I prefer my oil completely
untested and completely unsullied by any certifications (which, we all
know, place an absolute upper limit on the performance).
Abby.Normal - 01 Oct 2007 19:40 GMT
as I stated earlier, I am testing it and a couple friends swear by it.  They
have been using it for years in the same vehicles and buy ahead on the
product.  So it's not like they bought it, spent big money, and are
embarrassed to say they made the mistake.  They are still buying and using
it.  I've only noticed about 1 mpg increase.  I'm looking at the hassles
involved with changing it.  I refuse to let anyone touch the general
maintenance on any of my vehicles.  I do all that myself because I need to
have it done right the first time.  Cross threaded oil pan plugs, over
filled rear ends, transmissions, etc.  You only experience that crap once
before you modify how it's done.  And to get approved by any approval agency
sometimes takes a lot of money and a lot of offerings of free products
(bribery or greasing the skids, so to speak).  You can get anything approved
if you know how and have the cash - from simple traffic tickets to The
Bridge To Nowhere.

>> very true.  I am trying this one out for size.
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Use at your own peril.
Steve Lusardi - 01 Oct 2007 21:50 GMT
I have used Amsoil years ago on a hot rod Kawasaki and it worked very well,
but if you are running a Cummins, Amsoil is NOT the plan. Frequent oil
changes are required to purge the oil of diesel ash which deposits on the
cylinder walls and then scraped into the lube oil. There is no question that
the lubricity of the Amsoil will last a year, but it won't keep the bottom
end clean, where 3500 mile oil changes will. Your call.
Steve

> very true.  I am trying this one out for size.  This is the first time for
> me an synthetics but I also went with someone else's experience with this
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>> when two guys sit down at the bar drinking beer and begin
>> discussing the merits of various beers.
trucker Z-40 - 02 Oct 2007 02:11 GMT
Down at the terminal, we been using
Shell Advance VSX 4,  semi-synthetic,
specification:  APISG
in about half the trucks.  It's the best of both worlds.

Google on    Shell Advance VSX 4     for more info.

IMHO, I'd do a heck of a lotta research before chosing a
lubricant.

Hold The Road,

Z-40
beekeep - 02 Oct 2007 01:01 GMT
>Quick question:  What do you guys pay for a case (12 quarts) of standard
>motor oil (e.g. 10W-30)?
>Went to buy a case tonight.  Stopped at AutoZone.  They wanted $38.  Either
>prices have gone way up, or I haven't paid attention the last few times I
>bought oil.
>O.

I don't use oil, I use 710.  It's cheaper than oil.  Oil is 99 cents a qt. and
710 is only 66 cents.

beekeep
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.