Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Dodge / Dodge Trucks / October 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

durango help

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Nathan W. Collier - 21 Oct 2007 02:02 GMT
my daughter turns 15 in a couple months and im in the process of buying her
first vehicle (montana licenses kids at 15).  after a lot of careful
consideration, we have decided to get her a durango and we spent the day
test driving.  heres what i found so far:

2001 durango slt loaded w/ 4.7 v8.  41,000 original miles, $10,700 out the
door.  no third seat.  leather, very clean.
http://billings.montanawheelsforyou.com/details.php?eqvehicleid=24921826&eqdeale
rid=150738

carfax says its clean, with only 1 owner.  vehicle originally registered in
alaska.  service records on carfax were impeccable.

2000 durango slt loaded with 5.9 v8.  99,500 miles, $8,000 out the door.
http://billings.montanawheelsforyou.com/details.php?eqvehicleid=24921821&eqdeale
rid=150738

carfax says its clean with 2 previous owners (wisconsin and montana).  truck
drives great, feels a little weak compared to the 4.7.  4x4 indicator did
not work, dealer says 4x4 works.

2000 durango slt loaded with 5.9 v8.  88,000 miles, $8,500 out the door.
(sorry no link) leather, overall very clean BUT the truck has racing
stripes, glass pack mufflers, air box replaced by an edelbrock carb style
breather.  no obvious signs of abuse, but typically people who do these
sorts of things to their trucks drive them harder.  4x4 indicator did not
work, dealer says 4x4 works.

2000 durango  loaded with 4.7 v8.  87,000 miles, $7500 out the door.  cloth
seats, no rear air.  front end shows minor damage, but nothing major.
carfax shows the vehicle originally listed in michigan as a leased fleet
vehicle, and shows a total of 6 owners (no differentiation between 1 and 4,
uses same slot.  perhaps lease renewal or something?).  overall it appears
to be the cleanest of everything i drove today, with exception to the 2001.
"brother lean" in the steering wheel (needs aligned probably) and a very
slight vibration in steering wheel at 75 mph.  the 4.7 was surprisingly
perky.  truck has a trailer brake controller installed which means the truck
did tow (not necessarily a bad thing).  tranny fluid appeared new.  4x4
indicator did not work, dealer says 4x4 works.

so far im strongly considering the 2000 durango with the 4.7 @ 87,000 miles
and the 2001 durango with the 4.7 @ 41,000 miles and could go either way at
this point.  i like that the '01 has only had 1 owner and has 41,000 miles
on it.  i like that the '00 has the third row seating as well as cloth seats
instead of leather.

- is there any real advantage to the 4.7 over the 5.9?  both _felt_ stronger
than the 5.9s.
- are there any known tranny concerns with either?
- is the 4x4 indicator known for going out?  none of the 3 different '00s i
drove indicators worked.
- anything else i should know or consider before purchasing?
thanks,

Signature

Nathan In Montana
http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
http://1911Talk.com
http://HiPowerTalk.com
http://GlockCarry.com
http://p99sw99.com
http://PPStalk.com
http://P7talk.com

Christopher Thompson - 21 Oct 2007 02:23 GMT
> my daughter turns 15 in a couple months and im in the process of buying
> her first vehicle (montana licenses kids at 15).  after a lot of careful
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> 2000 durango slt loaded with 5.9 v8.  99,500 miles, $8,000 out the door.
> http://billings.montanawheelsforyou.com/details.php?
eqvehicleid=24921821&eqdealerid=150738
> carfax says its clean with 2 previous owners (wisconsin and montana).
> truck drives great, feels a little weak compared to the 4.7.  4x4
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
> indicators worked.
> - anything else i should know or consider before purchasing? thanks,

Nathan i cant speak for the 4.7 as i never owned one, but the 5.9 drank
gas like it was going out of style in my 99 that my wife insisted we buy
(this was her truck before the liberty and fuel costs to feed it were the
reason for the liberty)

IRRC the 4.7 sees the 545RFE trans, its the same trans thats in my
liberty and aside from a torque converter recall i have nothing bad to
say about the trans. someone can correct me if im wrong about the 545
behind the 4.7

Signature

Chris
05 CTD
06 Liberty CRD

Ubuntu 7.10 Gnome/KDE/XFCE desktops

Tom Lawrence - 21 Oct 2007 02:28 GMT
> - is there any real advantage to the 4.7 over the 5.9?  both _felt_
> stronger than the 5.9s.

The 4.7 will feel a little peppier driving, and will get a little bit better
MPG.  The 5.9 will out-tow the 4.7 easily.

> - are there any known tranny concerns with either?

You're probably a little ahead of the game with the 45RFE behind the 4.7.
The 46RE behind the 5.9 has the concern with the OD unit, which went south
on my co-workers '00 Durango.  Granted, he wasn't the best at maintaining
the transmission, and he did tow with it quite a bit.

> - is the 4x4 indicator known for going out?  none of the 3 different '00s
> i drove indicators worked.

Same deal as on your other Dodge (you've had so many, I've lost track - but
the one I sent you the replacement vacuum lines for)...  suspect either the
wiring to the switch on the CAD, or the vacuum lines.  Either way, no big
deal to fix.  If the dealers say the 4x4 works, and you can verify that (try
it on the pavement, and go into a gentle turn, feeling for a little binding
[hey, you don't own it yet  :^)] - if so, the front axle's engaged), then
it's just the indicator switch or wiring.

> - anything else i should know or consider before purchasing?

I have three friends that own '00 Durangos with the 5.9, and they've been
having similar failures regular as clockwork...  brake lines at about 100K,
waterpumps at about 120K, PS pumps at about 125K.  Nothing really shocking
here...  they are pretty normal wear items - just something to consider with
the mileages you're looking at.
Nathan W. Collier - 21 Oct 2007 07:01 GMT
many thanks chris and tom.  is an '01 with 41,000 miles _really_ worth
$10,700?
thanks,

Signature

Nathan In Montana
http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
http://1911Talk.com
http://HiPowerTalk.com
http://GlockCarry.com
http://p99sw99.com
http://PPStalk.com
http://P7talk.com

miles - 21 Oct 2007 07:17 GMT
> many thanks chris and tom.  is an '01 with 41,000 miles _really_ worth
> $10,700?
> thanks,

That seems high for a 2001.  I don't think my 2004 Hemi SLT Durango is
worth much more.
Max Dodge - 21 Oct 2007 15:05 GMT
> You're probably a little ahead of the game with the 45RFE behind the 4.7.
> The 46RE behind the 5.9 has the concern with the OD unit, which went south
> on my co-workers '00 Durango.  Granted, he wasn't the best at maintaining
> the transmission, and he did tow with it quite a bit.

IMO, the big problem with the 46RE was the number of clutches in the front
clutch pack. Behind the 5.9, three clutches isn't enough. With maintenance,
it should last quite a while, but still isn't "bullet proof."

Max
Nathan W. Collier - 23 Oct 2007 04:54 GMT
http://inlinediesel.com/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=824

Signature

Nathan In Montana
http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
http://1911Talk.com
http://GlockCarry.com
http://HiPowerTalk.com
http://p99sw99.com
http://PPStalk.com
http://P7talk.com

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.