 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Car Forum / Dodge / Dodge Trucks / November 20071995 Dakota waterpump
anyone have a good web site with howto info on r&r a waterpump on a 95 Dakota 3.9 engine? all help appreciated,I am trying to avoid $375 400 cost of repair shop Thanks Lee > anyone have a good web site with howto info on r&r a waterpump on a 95 > Dakota 3.9 engine? > all help appreciated,I am trying to avoid $375 400 cost of repair shop > Thanks Lee I helped a friend replace his about 6 months ago. It's pretty straight forward, remove the fan shroud, remove the belt, remove the fan blade, etc. If you have a service manual you will be ago, the new pump should run you about 150 or so. > anyone have a good web site with howto info on r&r a waterpump on a 95 > Dakota 3.9 engine? all help appreciated,I am trying to avoid $375 400 cost > of repair shop Thanks Lee The subscription fee for www.alldata.com is not real bad if I remember correctly and it has complete manualls, service bullitens and wiring diagrams for your vehical. Denny > diagrams for your vehical. I've always wondered... what in the heck is a vehical? :) >> diagrams for your vehical. > > I've always wondered... what in the heck is a vehical? :) It is friggin' Rabbit speak!! <BFG> Roy >> diagrams for your vehical. > >I've always wondered... what in the heck is a vehical? :) It's what a wabbit wides in. beekeep >> diagrams for your vehical. > > I've always wondered... what in the heck is a vehical? :) I can't seem to think of anything good right now so I guess a hearty F.O. is in order... <GBMFG> Denny It the fan assembly is like the one in my 99 5.9L, you don't want to lay it on it's side when you take it out, rather keep it in a verticle position - something to do with the stuff in the thermal coupler. > anyone have a good web site with howto info on r&r a waterpump on a 95 > Dakota 3.9 engine? all help appreciated,I am trying to avoid $375 400 cost > of repair shop Thanks Lee > It the fan assembly is like the one in my 99 5.9L, you don't want to lay it > on it's side when you take it out, rather keep it in a verticle position - > something to do with the stuff in the thermal coupler. The silicone gel stuff is unstable. Roy laid on the beach for an hour on his side, now his boobs are misshapen. >>anyone have a good web site with howto info on r&r a waterpump on a 95 >>Dakota 3.9 engine? all help appreciated,I am trying to avoid $375 400 cost >>of repair shop Thanks Lee > > It the fan assembly is like the one in my 99 5.9L, you don't want to lay it > > on it's side when you take it out, rather keep it in a verticle position - [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > - Show quoted text - Now just how in hell are you able to confuse yourself and Roy? Even Snojob isn't that bad off in the head? punkin: >>>It the fan assembly is like the one in my 99 5.9L, you don't want to lay it >>>on it's side when you take it out, rather keep it in a verticle position - [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > Now just how in hell are you able to confuse yourself and Roy? Even > Snojob isn't that bad off in the head? Look, punkin! Now I'm not really using Mosaic on a DEC 3000-700 Alpha running OpenVMS V7.3-2 > punkin: > [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > > - Show quoted text - Whoopie! Would you like a doggie cookie? punkin: >>punkin: >> [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > > Whoopie! Would you like a doggie cookie? Maybe, Mr. IT Tech/stalker/header-scrutinizer, you'll explain... "from reading a few other threads in a different group, she wasn't smart enough to know that the browser she uses is firefox" ... how I'd post to Supernews using Firefox, a standalone web browser with no newsreader. > punkin: > [quoted text clipped - 32 lines] > > - Show quoted text - Aww, what's the matter sheba, you don't like it when some one does to you, the exact same thing you do to them? How about if I post the link to said comment I reference? Would that make you feel better. Also, how about you explain to me anywhere, ever that I scrutinized a header? Problem (once again) you can't and if you are refering to the fact that I politely point out to abby that his reply was in the wrong thread, that was not "scrutinizing" the header you ignorant f.ck, it was because the reply was directed at Nate and the question he asked, and it would have been useful to him had the reply go to the correct thread. See you stupid bitch, Nate posts what he needs to, when he needs you and doesn't read everything, so something that important would have been missed. However, for as long as you claim to have been a lurker in this group you would have known that, as well as the fact that you have choosen to show all your attention to someone (me) that you claim to be a punk. But I doubt you have been here that long because if you had, you would have seen that I have been here since 98 and your thoughts are wrong. I (we all) know you have no life out side of Snoballs crotch, but if you are going to continue to be the slimmy troll that you are and have no sole purpose in life other then to be the problem child that you are, I suggest maybe that you learn how to tell the difference between something as simple as a friendly pointer and ignorant bullshit like your lover spews all the time. Anyway, have at it you dick licking ignorant douch bag... punkin: >>punkin: >>>>punkin: [quoted text clipped - 60 lines] > > Anyway, have at it you dick licking ignorant douch bag... WTF are you babbling about? I answered a Firefox History question in a freeware group, idiot. http://groups.google.co.in/group/alt.comp.freeware/msg/beb3237e96edbb2b And I see that my browser ID string wasn't even changed there! Now try to explain "from reading a few other threads in a different group, she wasn't smart enough to know that the browser she uses is firefox by mozilla (or a slightly older version of the same thing), when some one was asking a quiestion about firefoxs' history." > punkin: >>> punkin: [quoted text clipped - 77 lines] > firefox by mozilla (or a slightly older version of the same thing), > when some one was asking a quiestion about firefoxs' history." Never mind, punkin, I'll do it for you. My "User-Agent:" header on that post is "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20060414" Mozilla is just plain Mozilla, it isn't Firefox. That's why I ended my answer with "I'm using Mozilla, but I'd guess that Firefox has at least the same if not more." And then some dink, LouB, felt compelled to add 'Uh "Mozilla" is the outfit that make FireFox.' Well duh! So what? So you're not a header-scrutinizer. Someone simply said something stupid, and you ran with it. >> punkin: >>>> punkin: [quoted text clipped - 93 lines] > So you're not a header-scrutinizer. Someone simply said something stupid, > and you ran with it. Ya know Meryl, this really seems to bother you alot. Going by the timestamps on your posts, it seems you're putting alot of time in this. Don't you wish you had a life??? Denny ... >>So you're not a header-scrutinizer. Someone simply said something stupid, >>and you ran with it. > > Ya know Meryl, this really seems to bother you alot. Sometimes, yes. Punkin should be able to process information by himself. > So you're not a header-scrutinizer. Someone simply said something > stupid, and you ran with it.- Hide quoted text - Thank you, I'll accept your appology! > punkin: > [quoted text clipped - 32 lines] > > - Show quoted text - Oh yeah, if you want to talk about stalking, how about you point that poker in your own eye bitch... > punkin: > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] >>>The silicone gel stuff is unstable. Roy laid on the beach for an hour on >>>his side, now his boobs are misshapen. Ya know I just watched the vid that Larry posted and then I come to you(shakes head) and I wonder if you are worthy of a response in kind. Nah, you soil the day. > anyone have a good web site with howto info on r&r a waterpump on a 95 > Dakota 3.9 engine? all help appreciated,I am trying to avoid $375 400 cost > of repair shop http://www.pavementsucks.com has an article in their Tech section on the R&R of a timing chain, which includes removing/reinstalling the water pump. This is on a 5.2/5.9, but should be very similar to your 3.9. |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.