> Saw a 2001 chevy advertised as having a 350 w/ a 5.7... is this true???
> I thought 98 (or maybe 99) was the last year for these motors.
> > Saw a 2001 chevy advertised as having a 350 w/ a 5.7... is this true???
> > I thought 98 (or maybe 99) was the last year for these motors.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> --
> Chris
Chevy dropped the classic body mid year 99 but some may have carried
over with a 00 sticker on it. So yes you might see a few configured
like that. The new body still didn't come with a 5.2l as that was a
Dodge power plant (318) it came with a 5.3l (325ci)
Picasso - 18 Nov 2007 22:20 GMT
>>> Saw a 2001 chevy advertised as having a 350 w/ a 5.7... is this true???
>>> I thought 98 (or maybe 99) was the last year for these motors.
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> like that. The new body still didn't come with a 5.2l as that was a
> Dodge power plant (318) it came with a 5.3l (325ci)
Yep, this is a 2001...
there were a few but not many 99.5's made i think that retained the old
style... ..
ford did the same in 04... calling it the heritage...
But this is very strange... an 01 w/ a 350... i just didn't think it was
available...
Christopher Thompson - 19 Nov 2007 00:10 GMT
>> > Saw a 2001 chevy advertised as having a 350 w/ a 5.7... is this
>> > true???
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> like that. The new body still didn't come with a 5.2l as that was a
> Dodge power plant (318) it came with a 5.3l (325ci)
whoops i got it wrong by .1 L oh well!!! LOL i knew it was close to that
anyways and you obviously knew witch engine i was talking about, or maybe
i was trying to give chevy a little credit on MAYBE using a GOOD engine
instead of their usual crap??? <GBMFG>

Signature
Chris
Picasso - 19 Nov 2007 00:40 GMT
>>>> Saw a 2001 chevy advertised as having a 350 w/ a 5.7... is this
>>>> true???
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> i was trying to give chevy a little credit on MAYBE using a GOOD engine
> instead of their usual crap??? <GBMFG>
haahaaa