Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Dodge / Dodge Trucks / December 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

headlamps?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
jmc - 15 Dec 2008 20:42 GMT
Thinkin' about replacing the headlamps on my 2001 Dakota for something
brighter - halogen?

Any suggestions?

Also, I haven't seen Mike S. here for a while - Mike, you still out there?

jmc
SteveB - 15 Dec 2008 21:34 GMT
> Thinkin' about replacing the headlamps on my 2001 Dakota for something
> brighter - halogen?
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> jmc

Why don't you do what all the other airheads do?  Put some FlameThrower
lights on there for bright, override the switch on the high beams and fog
lights, then drive around with all of them burning?  In clear weather.  In
the daytime.  If you need that much light to see, you need to have your eyes
checked.

Steve
Roy - 15 Dec 2008 23:59 GMT
>> Thinkin' about replacing the headlamps on my 2001 Dakota for something
>> brighter - halogen?
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> Steve

Why don't you stop being such a ashole? She asked a legit question.
jmc - 16 Dec 2008 00:31 GMT
Suddenly, without warning, SteveB exclaimed (12/15/2008 5:31 PM):
>> Thinkin' about replacing the headlamps on my 2001 Dakota for something
>> brighter - halogen?
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> Steve

What, get up on the wrong side of the bed today?  It's a legit question.
  I have no intention of doing the stupid things you suggest, as I'd
like to actually survive my commute to work (narrow, twisty, two lane
road)  Sometimes the lights just go dim over time (gets a film?).  Right
now, the lights of whomever is behind me, shines underneath my truck and
is brighter than my own headlights.  Isn't a problem if there's someone
in front, but on that narrow, twisty road, if I can't see far enough
ahead to slow down for the deer, or the turn... you see my point, I hope.

Please, relax.  You'll have a more harmonious outcome (cookies for the
first person who can name the movie).

jmc
beekeep - 16 Dec 2008 09:15 GMT
>Suddenly, without warning, SteveB exclaimed (12/15/2008 5:31 PM):
>>> Thinkin' about replacing the headlamps on my 2001 Dakota for something
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>
>jmc

Aren't they tearing down Yankee Stadium.  Should be some good salvage lights
there that you could install!

beekeep
jmc - 16 Dec 2008 20:46 GMT
Suddenly, without warning, beekeep exclaimed (12/16/2008 4:15 AM):

>> Suddenly, without warning, SteveB exclaimed (12/15/2008 5:31 PM):
>>>> Thinkin' about replacing the headlamps on my 2001 Dakota for something
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
>
> beekeep

Lol, yea, those will work.  Thanks for the tip!

jmc
Roy - 16 Dec 2008 00:01 GMT
> Thinkin' about replacing the headlamps on my 2001 Dakota for something
> brighter - halogen?
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> jmc

There was a guy, I think David Stern that had some sort of a headlight deal
going. Maybe he'll show up. Or Tom L. probably has some idea what you can
put in without a bunch of bs.
jmc - 16 Dec 2008 00:37 GMT
Suddenly, without warning, Roy exclaimed (12/15/2008 7:01 PM):
>> Thinkin' about replacing the headlamps on my 2001 Dakota for something
>> brighter - halogen?
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> going. Maybe he'll show up. Or Tom L. probably has some idea what you can
> put in without a bunch of bs.

Thanks, Roy.  Do you remember when I was posting about the headlamp
adjustments?  Well, no surprise, the mechanic lied, or is unaware his
machine is broken - had the truck in to my TRUSTED mechanic (the other
place is very conveniently located, only), and he said they were way
off, and fixed 'em.  So maybe I'll actually be able to *see* in the fog now.

They also replaced the PCV valve, and did a fuel service - lots of
carbon on the throttle body - likely from that horrific Opal gas I was
forced to use sometimes in Australia.

Truck runs noticeably better, so I trust both were legitimate repairs.

jmc
Neville MADDEN - 16 Dec 2008 01:45 GMT
>They also replaced the PCV valve, and did a fuel service - lots of
>carbon on the throttle body - likely from that horrific Opal gas I was
>forced to use sometimes in Australia.

Curious as to what "  horrific Opal gas I was
forced to use sometimes in Australia".

All I know is that we have
       E10  (Standard 93 RON ULP Plus 10% Ethylene)
       Standard ULP  RON 93
       Premium ULP -about 98 RON

Neville
CASINO NSW
Australia
jmc - 16 Dec 2008 20:55 GMT
Suddenly, without warning, Neville MADDEN exclaimed (12/15/2008 8:45 PM):
>> They also replaced the PCV valve, and did a fuel service - lots of
>> carbon on the throttle body - likely from that horrific Opal gas I was
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> CASINO NSW
> Australia

Opal is a supposedly non-sniffable petrol they are forcing stations to
use in the NT because of, well, the petrol-sniffing problems in some areas.

They keep saying it won't hurt engines, but they finally had to admit it
WILL hurt old engines (prior to 1976, and there's still quite a few of
them on the road in the NT).

When I put Opal in my truck, I saw an immediate loss of power and at
least a 3mpg loss of mileage (sorry, I never did learn to measure petrol
efficiency the Australian way).  I didn't realize it was the Opal at
first, and was told by one station, when I described the truck's
symptoms, that I'd need new sparks and a fuel service.  A second station
immediately asked if I was using Opal, and when I said I was, told me to
simply stop using Opal and the problems would go away.  I did, and they did.

But, sometimes I was forced to use it because premium petrol wasn't
available, especially at outback roadhouses.  Dunno if it was the Opal
that caused a lot of carbon or if it was just time.

Oh, and Opal being non-sniffable?  My trusted mechanic said that very
quickly, they learned that you could put styrofoam in Opal, and it
"become sniffable" - probably from the styro rather than the fuel, but
still.  And petrol sniffers also stepped up theft of petrol from
vehicles, or simply purchased premium instead.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opal_(fuel)

Little surprised you haven't heard about it, but NSW is a long way from
the NT :)

jmc
Neville MADDEN - 21 Dec 2008 23:38 GMT
>Suddenly, without warning, Neville MADDEN exclaimed (12/15/2008 8:45 PM):
>>> They also replaced the PCV valve, and did a fuel service - lots of
[quoted text clipped - 44 lines]
>
>jmc

Thanks for the interesting reply.  Now I understand what you are talking
about.  The auto associations here are starting to say that putting E10 (10%
ethlylene) fuel in the tank is wasting money as over any sort of long drive
the cost savings soon fall behind the extra fuel used because of the lower
energy output.

And, as you well know - long drives here are normal!!!

Enjoy Christmas and have a Happy and safe New Year

Neville
Casino  NSW
Australia
FMB - 16 Dec 2008 04:03 GMT
>> Thinkin' about replacing the headlamps on my 2001 Dakota for something
>> brighter - halogen?
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> deal going. Maybe he'll show up. Or Tom L. probably has some idea what you
> can put in without a bunch of bs.

Hey Roy.  That was Daniel Stern over at http://www.danielsternlighting.com/ 
.

FMB
(North Mexico)
Roy - 16 Dec 2008 10:42 GMT
>>> Thinkin' about replacing the headlamps on my 2001 Dakota for something
>>> brighter - halogen?
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> FMB
> (North Mexico)

That's him, thanks!!

Roy
SteveB - 16 Dec 2008 01:46 GMT
> Thinkin' about replacing the headlamps on my 2001 Dakota for something
> brighter - halogen?
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> jmc

You have my permission to get some halogen lights.  And please have them
installed by a qualified mechanic.

Steve
Carolina Watercraft Works - 16 Dec 2008 02:26 GMT
Have you checked to see what voltage you are getting at the
lamp yet?  Could be a reason for lower light levels.  I'm not
getting full voltage to high beams....yet.

Signature

------------------------------------------
Laszlo Almasi
----Cool Toys
----Mack Daddy Trailers
----Ice Angels

> Thinkin' about replacing the headlamps on my 2001 Dakota for something
> brighter - halogen?
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> jmc
Steve W. - 16 Dec 2008 15:34 GMT
> Thinkin' about replacing the headlamps on my 2001 Dakota for something
> brighter - halogen?
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> jmc

Sounds like you have the same problem many of the early Chrysler
vehicles with composite lights have. The headlamp lenses are getting
cloudy and yellowed. About the only solutions are to buff out the lenses
 or replace the assemblies. You could stick an arc lamp behind them but
if the lens is cloudy it won't help.

Signature

Steve W.
Near Cooperstown, New York

jmc - 16 Dec 2008 20:57 GMT
Suddenly, without warning, Steve W. exclaimed (12/16/2008 10:34 AM):
>> Thinkin' about replacing the headlamps on my 2001 Dakota for something
>> brighter - halogen?
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>   or replace the assemblies. You could stick an arc lamp behind them but
> if the lens is cloudy it won't help.

"or replace the assemblies", which is what I'm considering doing.
Perhaps I need to be more clear (pun intended), what would be a good
brand name to look into for replacement head lamps on a 2001 Dodge
Dakota SLT?

jmc
jmc - 16 Dec 2008 20:58 GMT
Suddenly, without warning, jmc exclaimed (12/16/2008 3:57 PM):
> Suddenly, without warning, Steve W. exclaimed (12/16/2008 10:34 AM):
>>> Thinkin' about replacing the headlamps on my 2001 Dakota for something
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> jmc

um, aside from Daniel Stern, forgot that bit, apologies for replying to
my own post.  SEND finger a bit too fast :)
SteveB - 16 Dec 2008 21:25 GMT
> Suddenly, without warning, jmc exclaimed (12/16/2008 3:57 PM):
>> Suddenly, without warning, Steve W. exclaimed (12/16/2008 10:34 AM):
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> um, aside from Daniel Stern, forgot that bit, apologies for replying to my
> own post.  SEND finger a bit too fast :)

And drop the

> Suddenly, without warning, jmc exclaimed (12/16/2008 3:57 PM):
>> Suddenly, without warning, Steve W. exclaimed (12/16/2008 10:34 AM):

It's annoying.  I'd rather hear your original comments.

Steve
Roy - 16 Dec 2008 21:57 GMT
>> Suddenly, without warning, jmc exclaimed (12/16/2008 3:57 PM):
>>> Suddenly, without warning, Steve W. exclaimed (12/16/2008 10:34 AM):
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
>
> Steve

WTF!! Another net nanny!!
SteveB - 17 Dec 2008 05:06 GMT
>>> Suddenly, without warning, jmc exclaimed (12/16/2008 3:57 PM):
>>>> Suddenly, without warning, Steve W. exclaimed (12/16/2008 10:34 AM):
[quoted text clipped - 37 lines]
>
> WTF!! Another net nanny!!

And someone who interrupts conversation between other people.  Get a life,
dude.  jmc can speak for jmc.
Roy - 17 Dec 2008 11:57 GMT
>>>> Suddenly, without warning, jmc exclaimed (12/16/2008 3:57 PM):
>>>>> Suddenly, without warning, Steve W. exclaimed (12/16/2008 10:34 AM):
[quoted text clipped - 40 lines]
> And someone who interrupts conversation between other people.  Get a life,
> dude.  jmc can speak for jmc.

I have yet to see the conversation you write about. Just your mindeless bs.

I have all kinds of a life, dude. What I don't have is patience when it
comes to a.sholes, which is what your posts in this thread have shown you to
be.
SteveB - 17 Dec 2008 15:57 GMT
>>>>> Suddenly, without warning, jmc exclaimed (12/16/2008 3:57 PM):
>>>>>> Suddenly, without warning, Steve W. exclaimed (12/16/2008 10:34 AM):
[quoted text clipped - 47 lines]
> comes to a.sholes, which is what your posts in this thread have shown you
> to be.

And you to be a control freak who can't understand that your comments are
not relevant to the conversation between myself and jmc.  I bet you went to
Catholic school.

Steve
Roy - 17 Dec 2008 19:18 GMT
>>>>>> Suddenly, without warning, jmc exclaimed (12/16/2008 3:57 PM):
>>>>>>> Suddenly, without warning, Steve W. exclaimed (12/16/2008 10:34 AM):
[quoted text clipped - 54 lines]
>
> Steve
SteveB - 18 Dec 2008 02:24 GMT
>>>>>>> Suddenly, without warning, jmc exclaimed (12/16/2008 3:57 PM):
>>>>>>>> Suddenly, without warning, Steve W. exclaimed (12/16/2008 10:34
[quoted text clipped - 56 lines]
>>
>> Steve

(clear space where roy's comments should be)

Roy, Roy.  Get a grip, man.  Compose your message, THEN hit the SEND button.
First, you interrupt a conversation, then interrupt it and don't even say
anything.

But then, Daddy said, "If you aren't the one being spoken to, STFU."

Was that what you were doing?

Yes?

No?

Maybe?

Definitely?

Think about it, roy.

Steve
Roy - 18 Dec 2008 09:13 GMT
>>>>>>>> Suddenly, without warning, jmc exclaimed (12/16/2008 3:57 PM):
>>>>>>>>> Suddenly, without warning, Steve W. exclaimed (12/16/2008 10:34
[quoted text clipped - 64 lines]
>
> But then, Daddy said, "If you aren't the one being spoken to, STFU."

<snip of more bs>

You should learn the difference between a conversation and comments.

Your first comment in the thread made it clear that your an a.shole. All the
typing and damage control in the world won't change that.

Jodi is much more forgiving that I.
SteveB - 18 Dec 2008 16:15 GMT
>>>>>>>>> Suddenly, without warning, jmc exclaimed (12/16/2008 3:57 PM):
>>>>>>>>>> Suddenly, without warning, Steve W. exclaimed (12/16/2008 10:34
[quoted text clipped - 73 lines]
>
> Jodi is much more forgiving that I.

Does that mean I won't be getting a Christmas card this year?  If so, please
return mine.

Steve
Roy - 17 Dec 2008 19:27 GMT
>>>>>> Suddenly, without warning, jmc exclaimed (12/16/2008 3:57 PM):
>>>>>>> Suddenly, without warning, Steve W. exclaimed (12/16/2008 10:34 AM):
[quoted text clipped - 54 lines]
>
> Steve
I'm a control freak? Get a friggin' clue will ya.

It was you who decided what was appropriate for one to post. Actually you
told them to drop the lead in their post.

You continue to reference a "conversation" between you and jmc. I use a
couple of readers and have yet to see any "conversation", just you being a
a.shole.

The school's I attended is pretty much irrelevant for this exercise. What
education you did or didn't receive appears to be pretty much of a waste.
Now run along before you further embarrass yourself
jmc - 17 Dec 2008 22:13 GMT
Suddenly, without warning, Roy exclaimed (12/17/2008 2:27 PM):
>>>>>>> Suddenly, without warning, jmc exclaimed (12/16/2008 3:57 PM):
>>>>>>>> Suddenly, without warning, Steve W. exclaimed (12/16/2008 10:34 AM):
[quoted text clipped - 59 lines]
> education you did or didn't receive appears to be pretty much of a waste.
> Now run along before you further embarrass yourself

C'mon boys, play nice.

jmc
SteveB - 18 Dec 2008 02:24 GMT
> Suddenly, without warning, Roy exclaimed (12/17/2008 2:27 PM):
>>>>>>>> Suddenly, without warning, jmc exclaimed (12/16/2008 3:57 PM):
[quoted text clipped - 66 lines]
>
> jmc

As always, class rises to the top.  You are one classy person.

Steve
jmc - 18 Dec 2008 02:34 GMT
Suddenly, without warning, SteveB exclaimed (12/17/2008 10:21 PM):
>> Suddenly, without warning, Roy exclaimed (12/17/2008 2:27 PM):
>>>>>>>>> Suddenly, without warning, jmc exclaimed (12/16/2008 3:57 PM):
[quoted text clipped - 70 lines]
>
> Steve

Why, thank you sir, but I *was* talking to you, too.  I'd take exception
if you were calling me classy because you thought I was only chiding Roy.

jmc
SteveB - 18 Dec 2008 16:15 GMT
> Suddenly, without warning, SteveB exclaimed (12/17/2008 10:21 PM):
>>> Suddenly, without warning, Roy exclaimed (12/17/2008 2:27 PM):
[quoted text clipped - 77 lines]
>
> jmc

No, I was a bad boy, and I would like to schedule a spanking.  Please
advise.

Steve
jmc - 18 Dec 2008 21:57 GMT
Suddenly, without warning, SteveB exclaimed (12/18/2008 12:08 PM):
>> Suddenly, without warning, SteveB exclaimed (12/17/2008 10:21 PM):
>>>> Suddenly, without warning, Roy exclaimed (12/17/2008 2:27 PM):

>>>> C'mon boys, play nice.
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Steve

Ok, you made me laugh.  Sorry, you'll have to go to the Castle Anthrax
for that.  Look for the Grail-shaped beacon.

(and google Monty Python if you're scratching your head)

jmc
SteveB - 18 Dec 2008 23:05 GMT
> Suddenly, without warning, SteveB exclaimed (12/18/2008 12:08 PM):
>>> Suddenly, without warning, SteveB exclaimed (12/17/2008 10:21 PM):
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>
> jmc

I know the place, and since this is all imaginary, I just want to thank you.

Steve (who is smoking an imaginary cigarette even though he doesn't smoke)
Roy - 18 Dec 2008 09:14 GMT
> Suddenly, without warning, Roy exclaimed (12/17/2008 2:27 PM):
>>>>>>>> Suddenly, without warning, jmc exclaimed (12/16/2008 3:57 PM):
[quoted text clipped - 66 lines]
>
> jmc

I always do.<BFG>
jmc - 17 Dec 2008 22:10 GMT
Suddenly, without warning, SteveB exclaimed (12/17/2008 11:54 AM):
>>>>>> Suddenly, without warning, jmc exclaimed (12/16/2008 3:57 PM):
>>>>>>> Suddenly, without warning, Steve W. exclaimed (12/16/2008 10:34 AM):
[quoted text clipped - 47 lines]
>
> Steve

I'm sorry, I think I missed something.  Were we having a conversation?
<g>. Anyway, the headlamps don't seem to be yellowed.  I'm waiting for
the next foggy day to see if adjusting the headlights fixed my problem.

As to my headers, sorry but they've been like that so long even if I
wanted to change them - which I don't - I doubt I can remember how.
You're the first person in, oh, well, since I made 'em that way, that
has complained.  Sorry.

jmc
SteveB - 18 Dec 2008 02:30 GMT
> I'm sorry, I think I missed something.  Were we having a conversation?
> <g>. Anyway, the headlamps don't seem to be yellowed.  I'm waiting for the
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> jmc

We were having an exchange of opinions, and then we were rudely interrupted.
As suggested here, if they were mine, I'd put in some halogen bulbs, and
make sure that the cover lenses were not aged or pitted in a way that
reduced the light.  And I like to go out on a dark night with an adjustment
screwdriver or torx, having located and identified the location of the
adjustment screws in broad daylight, and adjust them to the way I like them.
Because I've had it done professionally, and didn't like the way they were
"supposed" to be.  Of course, take a bottle of bubbly and your favorite
assistant.

Steve
NapalmHeart - 18 Dec 2008 23:49 GMT
>> I'm sorry, I think I missed something.  Were we
>> having a conversation? <g>. Anyway, the
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> We were having an exchange of opinions, and then
> we were rudely interrupted.
<snip>

You must be new to Usenet.
SteveB - 19 Dec 2008 01:11 GMT
>>> I'm sorry, I think I missed something.  Were we having a conversation?
>>> <g>. Anyway, the headlamps don't seem to be yellowed.  I'm waiting for
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> You must be new to Usenet.

Naw.  I'm thinking eleven or twelve years now.  Still pisses me off, though,
when people butt in.

Steve
NapalmHeart - 19 Dec 2008 23:10 GMT
>>>> I'm sorry, I think I missed something.  Were
>>>> we having a conversation? <g>. Anyway, the
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>
> Steve

I wasn't trying to start anything or make a dig at
you, but as this is a wide-open public forum the
idea that someone can "butt in" is both amusing
and interesting.  Chat or email are for private
conversations.  This is damn near communications
anarchy! :+)

I've only been at this about 10 years, so you have
seniority.

Ken
jmc - 20 Dec 2008 01:10 GMT
Suddenly, without warning, NapalmHeart exclaimed (12/19/2008 6:10 PM):
>> "NapalmHeart" <olsonfamNOSPAM@iserv.net> wrote
>> in message
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> Ken

My first newsgroup was a bbs...that'd be darn near 20 years, I think.
Man, I feel old.  Do I win?

For those too young to know what they are:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bulletin_board_system

I had my first real computer, a Vic20, before I bought my first car, a
1976 Chevette.  My hubby's first "computer" was a Tandy 102.

And I walked to school 5 miles in my bare feet.  Uphill. Both ways :)

jmc
Steve W. - 21 Dec 2008 04:14 GMT
> My first newsgroup was a bbs...that'd be darn near 20 years, I think.
> Man, I feel old.  Do I win?
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> jmc

My first "home computer" was an Altair. Then a string of a Sinclair
ZX-80, Couple of Trash 80s, An Atari, C64 and then to an AST. Now days I
just use whatever one I'm near...

BBS boards, Yep remember them well, along with my acoustic modem and
that high speed tape storage...

Signature

Steve W.

SteveB - 19 Dec 2008 01:11 GMT
>>> I'm sorry, I think I missed something.  Were we having a conversation?
>>> <g>. Anyway, the headlamps don't seem to be yellowed.  I'm waiting for
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> You must be new to Usenet.

I was in when you could only have eight characters to your name.
Steve W. - 16 Dec 2008 22:21 GMT
>>> Thinkin' about replacing the headlamps on my 2001 Dakota for something
>>> brighter - halogen?
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> jmc

Well, personally I would buff out the originals. Why? Most of the
aftermarket ones are of iffy quality.
That said I have used ones from www.rockauto.com
They were REAL close to the factory parts for my 97 S Blazer. I replaced
mine because someone backed into it at a fire scene. One of the hazards
of the job. They work fine and aimed OK.

They show the ones for your vehicle for $88-$105 a side, depending on
the ones you have.

Signature

Steve W.

Curmudgeon - 17 Dec 2008 16:38 GMT
I replaced the assemblies on my 97 Dak with new lights from Anzo....much
better lighting with them, more of a Euro pattern with a strong spike up
the right side of the road on low beam.  I really like 'em.  Clear lens
with faceted/focused reflector.
Suggest you get 'em from someplace like O'Reilly's, rather than
internet.  That way if you have any problem, you have a place to return
them.  A number of internet vendors make it very hard if not impossible
to return such items.
Good Luck!

http://www.anzousa.com/pages/products/headlights.html

> Thinkin' about replacing the headlamps on my 2001 Dakota for something
> brighter - halogen?
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> jmc
jmc - 17 Dec 2008 22:14 GMT
Suddenly, without warning, Curmudgeon exclaimed (12/17/2008 11:38 AM):
>> Thinkin' about replacing the headlamps on my 2001 Dakota for something
>> brighter - halogen?
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> http://www.anzousa.com/pages/products/headlights.html

Thank you.  I'll go have a look.

jmc
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.