1991 Dodge Spirit, 2.5L, NON-turbo, automatic transmision
I have a broken timing belt. I verified that by checking that I have no
rotation of the distibutor rotor while cranking the engine. Before I start
replacing the belt, I would like to find out whether the engine is damaged
otherwise. Is there destructive interference between the valves and pistons
when the camshaft does not turn? Thanks for the help.
the fly - 21 Aug 2004 04:48 GMT
>1991 Dodge Spirit, 2.5L, NON-turbo, automatic transmision
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>otherwise. Is there destructive interference between the valves and pistons
>when the camshaft does not turn? Thanks for the help.
Gates' timing belt replacement list:
http://www.gates.com/downloads/download_common.cfm?file=GatesTBR.pdf&folder=brochure
does not show yours as an interference engine. You're probably OK.
Dan Fraser - 21 Aug 2004 06:04 GMT
I've lost the timing belt from this engine, the 2.5L before and had no
damage. As far as I know almost every 2 valve per cylinder engine is a
non-interference design while almost every 4 valve or greater per cylinder
is an interference design. I am sure there are exceptions but these rules of
thumb have been OK for me so far.
> 1991 Dodge Spirit, 2.5L, NON-turbo, automatic transmision
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> otherwise. Is there destructive interference between the valves and pistons
> when the camshaft does not turn? Thanks for the help.
LT - 25 Aug 2004 18:50 GMT
The 16V T3 is a non-interference design.