> > It's not a "6-cylinder model". If the badging is correct, it was an R/T
> > that
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> The pistol grip was no doubt added as it wasn't the standard
> shifter for a three speed.
> > The pistol grip was no doubt added as it wasn't the standard
> > shifter for a three speed.
>
> Well, while I suppose it could be done,
The shifter? Absolutely. I put a B body pistol grip shifter in
a 1967 Jeep 4X4 pick-up back in 1978.
> I really would suspect the motor
> was pulled as opposed to the badging being done.
Comparing the VIN stamping on the engine against the windshield
VIN and body stampings is all that's needed.
> The "R/T" badges
> that are chrome on the sides are just too good.
Readily available from Year One and others.
> Also, the exhaust
> appears to be original RT style, and I don't think there was any
> dual exhaust option for the 225 from the factory.
Swap the rear valance, buy some repop tips and either hang one as
a dummy or have an exhaust shop bend some pipe.
> Also, I thought the factory R/T package included an engine mark on
> the sides of the scoop. But since there was no 225 badge that I ever
> heard of, I suppose a clean scoop is ok.
Raisin Bran hood from a bone yard.
> Finally, the pistol grip is the 'flat plate' and while I can't read the top
> of the shifter, it appears to be a 4-speed, but again, I can't really tell.
Looking at the shifter won't reveal whether it's a 3 speed or a 4
speed.
> There are two possibilities. One is the motor was pulled and replaced
> with a 225, and the hood was 'filled' and repainted when the motor
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> badging was added and the mods made, someone did a pretty good
> job.
Why would someone misrepresent a real R/T as a non-R/T vehicle?