> Just a guess but it sounds like you have water in the fuel.
>
> Bob
I'm excited to report that I took the fuel hose off the side of the gas tank
and drained 12 gallons of gas out of the tank (took forever). In each few
gallon bucket that I would empty out I would notice a section of totally
clear water pouring out of the bucket. After draining all of the gas out, I
filled the PT up with 4 gallons of 93 grade.
Now when I start the car it fired right up with a little sputter. The first
time i stepped on the gas instead of the car dying it went from about 1200
rpm to 800rpm and then started moving normally. I drove around the block
several times and everything seemed to clear up nicely. I put in a bottle
of water remover and a bottle of fuel line cleaner and put some more 93
grade gas in it. This morning I only noticed a sputter one time and that
was when I was accelerating to get on the interstate. The car also fired up
perfectly this morning.
I called Mapco to complain about the water in my gas but they said they have
special equipment that monitors for that and such things were impossible.
Liars.
At least Mapco's mistake only cost me about $40.
>I was wanting to try to drain all the fuel out but I assume that you cannot
>siphon from where you pump the fuel in. I looked under at the gas tank and
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>>
>> Bob
Bob M - 01 Oct 2007 15:58 GMT
> I'm excited to report that I took the fuel hose off the side of the gas tank
> and drained 12 gallons of gas out of the tank (took forever). In each few
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
>>>
>>> Bob
I'm glad you got it fixed. I would still report it to the proper
authorities because I am sure you are not the only person this has
happened to. You might even get your money back.
Bob
maxpower - 01 Oct 2007 18:34 GMT
> I'm excited to report that I took the fuel hose off the side of the gas tank
> and drained 12 gallons of gas out of the tank (took forever). In each few
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
> >>
> >> Bob
The engine lite should have still come on!! One more thing, it isn't a good
idea to burn high octane fuel in an engine that requires low octane, it can
and will cause drivability problems in the long run if you keep using it.
Glenn
pcm2a - 01 Oct 2007 20:50 GMT
I normally have been putting 89 grade in the PT. If I put 87 grade I hear
some pinging sometime. Do you recomend sticking with 89?
">>
> The engine lite should have still come on!! One more thing, it isn't a
> good
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Glenn
maxpower - 02 Oct 2007 00:06 GMT
> I normally have been putting 89 grade in the PT. If I put 87 grade I hear
> some pinging sometime. Do you recomend sticking with 89?
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> >
> > Glenn
87 octane. a slight ping will not cause damage. The use of a higher octane
fuel may cause carbon deposits on the pistons and this could cause the
engine to ping.
Glenn
pcm2a - 02 Oct 2007 14:07 GMT
Big sticker on the inside of the fuel door also says "premium fuel only".
>> I normally have been putting 89 grade in the PT. If I put 87 grade I
>> hear
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> Glenn
maxpower - 02 Oct 2007 19:36 GMT
> Big sticker on the inside of the fuel door also says "premium fuel only".
>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> >
> > Glenn
My bad, The thread did not carry over the Turbo engine. Turbos will take a
high octane fuel ,do not use 87 on the turbo. I looked up the standard 2.4
litre
Glenn
Bob M - 02 Oct 2007 17:48 GMT
>> I'm excited to report that I took the fuel hose off the side of the gas
> tank
[quoted text clipped - 45 lines]
>
> Glenn
I agree it should have but it didn't.
Bob