>> >is the 2003 dodge intrepid se 2.7L an interference engine?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
>BDK
Hope he's keeping the oil changed - oftener than most pundits would
consider "necessary".
That engine has severe sludge problems if maintained according to the
"normal" schedule - and it is VERY unforgiving.

Signature
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
BDK - 06 Jan 2008 19:50 GMT
> >> >is the 2003 dodge intrepid se 2.7L an interference engine?
> >>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> That engine has severe sludge problems if maintained according to the
> "normal" schedule - and it is VERY unforgiving.
It's gone, I forgot he just got a 3.5 Magnum to replace it recently. He
only had it like 9 months. As soon as they hit 12K, they are gone.
My friend had a Ford van that sludged up horribly with dino oil really
fast, I guess it had a 351 in it, can't remember. Ford ended up putting
an engine in it about two years after it was made. It got synthetic
after that, and finally rusted itself to the point driving it was like
taking a shower when it rained hard. Right after they put a for sale
sign on it, the tranny blew, and off to the junkyard it went. They got
their money out of it, it had a whole lot of miles on it.
BDK
Raymond Sirois - 08 Jan 2008 04:56 GMT
>>> >is the 2003 dodge intrepid se 2.7L an interference engine?
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>That engine has severe sludge problems if maintained according to the
>"normal" schedule - and it is VERY unforgiving.
Use of synthetic oils in that engine family has been shown to reduce
the occurrance of seizure due to oil starvation.

Signature
Ray Sirois
SysOp: The Lost Chord BBS
http://thelostchord.dns2go.com:6080
telnet://thelostchord.dns2go.com:6023