 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Car Forum / Ferrari Cars / March 2006incredible pics from Palm Beach
Interesting to see one of the Villenueve F1 cars for sale http://www.ultimatecarpage.com/frame.php?file=event_item.php&rid=88  SignatureIf you can see Chuck Norris, he can see you. If you can't see Chuck Norris you may be only seconds away from death. > Interesting to see one of the Villenueve F1 cars for sale > > http://www.ultimatecarpage.com/frame.php?file=event_item.php&rid=88 What happened to all of the incredibly entertaining mindless chatter on this group? I miss you all! Please come back. I promise to buy a Ferrari if you come back. > Interesting to see one of the Villenueve F1 cars for sale > > http://www.ultimatecarpage.com/frame.php?file=event_item.php&rid=88 What happened to all of the incredibly entertaining mindless chatter on this group? I miss you all! Please come back. I promise to buy a Ferrari if you come back. >> Interesting to see one of the Villenueve F1 cars for sale >> [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > I promise to buy a Ferrari if you come back. I also promise to figure out how to drive a computer so I don't double post! > > I promise to buy a Ferrari if you come back. Buy ME one and I'll post all day, everyday... :-) > I also promise to figure out how to drive a computer so I don't double post! On the gun forums we call that a "double tap"... -Matt- "..." matt borland" <mborland@columbus.rr.com> wrote > On the gun forums we call that a "double tap"... Guns.. Have you seen the film 'Crash' ? -Paul > matt borland" <mborland@columbus.rr.com> wrote > > On the gun forums we call that a "double tap"... > > Guns.. Have you seen the film 'Crash' ? > > -Paul Hey buddy! No I haven't, but it's on my list... -Matt- "..." >> matt borland" <mborland@columbus.rr.com> wrote >> > On the gun forums we call that a "double tap"... [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Hey buddy! Hey Buddy! It's good. Sad, but good. A little unbelievable in parts, but well observed and absorbing -Paul > >> matt borland" <mborland@columbus.rr.com> wrote > >> > On the gun forums we call that a "double tap"... [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > -Paul That one fell off my radar screen for a couple years, but I've been meaning to check it out. I always thought the premise sounded interesting. I'm taking this thread all the way to Cuba, BTW. -Matt- :::thread hijacker::: "matt borland" <mborland@columbus.rr.com> wrote > I'm taking this thread all the way to Cuba, BTW. See? 'Chez Borland' in action. Didn't I tells ya? -MCPD >>>Guns.. Have you seen the film 'Crash' ? >>> [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > -Paul Maybe you should try the other one then, the one with James Spader. SignatureIf you can see Chuck Norris, he can see you. If you can't see Chuck Norris you may be only seconds away from death. > >>>Guns.. Have you seen the film 'Crash' ? > >>> [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > If you can see Chuck Norris, he can see you. If you can't see Chuck > Norris you may be only seconds away from death. Funny thing is, at first I thought that was the one he was talking about... -Matt- "..." "matt borland" <mborland@columbus.rr.com> wrote >> Maybe you should try the other one then, the one with James Spader. >> [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > Funny thing is, at first I thought that was the one he was talking > about... No, no, no - we did the whole David Cronenberg, (based on the novel by JG Ballard) 'Crash' discussion years ago. This is in fact a recent remake - featuring a different director, different cast and different story (and not based on the novel by JG Ballard... ....although it may be that some of the cast had seen the original... ...however it's difficult to determine whether their performances were driven in any by the experience... ....I dunno, ask Mr Spielberg [tee-hee!]). Anyway, it's a good film and I'd be interested in the views of you good gun-toting folk (whom I only refer to as 'good' due to the gun-toting bit... never upset an American with a gun. Actkshully, I married an American with a gun, so I pretty much have to watch myself 24/7... I just hope tonight's lasagne goes down well... ). -McPauloD "Paul Duffin" <someone@somewhere.com> wrote in message > Anyway, it's a good film and I'd be interested in the views of you good > gun-toting folk (whom I only refer to as 'good' due to the gun-toting [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > -McPauloD I find the vast majority of gun portrayal in cinema to be aggravating at best. They tend to have major technical flaws, like a guy repeatedly pumping an obviously empty shotgun followed by him firing a shot with it, which is impossible. Other gun-in-media flubs that are common are law enforcement officers in movies and on TV breaking all the rules of gun safety, showing civilians sporting fully automatic weapons (which are available to them, but they cost over $10k and you have to jump through several bureaucratic hoops to obtain one), and my personal favorite, the gun that apparently holds 900 rounds because they fire that much and never reload. Guns and gun owners are rarely portrayed with any accuracy in movies, which isn't surprising since last time I checked Hollywood was still located in the People's Republic of Kalifornia... I could rant for hours on this one, but I'd better just relax and have another Smithwicks... -Matt- "Blaming guns for crime is like blaming spoons for making Rosie O'Donnell fat." >> > I promise to buy a Ferrari if you come back. > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > >On the gun forums we call that a "double tap"... ...Three it seems though. matt borland wrote: >>>I promise to buy a Ferrari if you come back. > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > -Matt- "..." And not a word from ANY of you about the pics. You dorks. I didn't notice the name of the group had changed to alt.autos.mindlessbullshit! We do have a charter, you know. I'll just go to someone who cares. Hey T3, on one pic of a Ferrari 365 California Spyder I noticed a tail light set that appeared to have "eyebrows" - can't throw down the link but I'll send you the pic if you'd like to analyze. Weird, ugly, and yet beautiful ... what was the deal, was that a one-off? Don't remember seeing that on any other California. SignatureIf you can see Chuck Norris, he can see you. If you can't see Chuck Norris you may be only seconds away from death. "Cogentin" <user@example.net> wrote in message > I'll just go to someone who cares. Hey T3, on one pic of a Ferrari 365 > California Spyder I noticed a tail light set that appeared to have > "eyebrows" - I've seen a pic of that car myself. What gives? -Matt- "..." >And not a word from ANY of you about the pics. You dorks. I didn't >notice the name of the group had changed to alt.autos.mindlessbullshit! [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] >deal, was that a one-off? Don't remember seeing that on any other >California. 365 California should not be called a SPIDER. It is a Cabriolet. Do you mean the yellow reflector "trapezoids" filling the space above the triple light clusters? Not a one off at all. Iirc, they used at least five different taillight forms. >>And not a word from ANY of you about the pics. You dorks. I didn't >>notice the name of the group had changed to alt.autos.mindlessbullshit! [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > > Iirc, they used at least five different taillight forms. Nope, they're red. Go through those pics at ultimatecarpage.com and find it, it's like the 10th page through, and you'll see what I mean. As far as the "S" word, I just went by what they called it, I never get it right anyway. SignatureIf you can see Chuck Norris, he can see you. If you can't see Chuck Norris you may be only seconds away from death. >>>And not a word from ANY of you about the pics. You dorks. I didn't >>>notice the name of the group had changed to alt.autos.mindlessbullshit! [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] >As far as the "S" word, I just went by what they called it, I never get >it right anyway. Jezzus... Per http://www.ultimatecarpage.com/frame.php?file=event_item.php&rid=88 "No search results for '365 california'. Try to rephrase your query and search again." There were 14 365 Californias, at least five different taillight treatments, not one of them a SPIDER. ..."Original Ferrari V-12 1965-1973", Keith Bluemel, Motorbooks International , 1999. ...There is no "y" in the Italian alphabet. > ...There is no "y" in the Italian alphabet. That is so, but it never stopped the factory (even on Italian only documents like the Omologazione forms) from using it! T308 (Who never tries to apply logic or reason to Ferrari naming convention...) > Jezzus... > [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > ...There is no "y" in the Italian alphabet. On the top of the page featuring the photo it said "Ferrari 365 California Spyder". I cut and pasted it. At this point I don't give a f.ck if it was called "Baloney Sandwich", all I wanted to know about was the taillight treatments. I sent the pic to your email, anyway. Sorry, bad mood. Today is one day I wish all children under the age of 18 could be rounded up and exterminated. f.cking blight on society. I'm certain that tomorrow I will feel differently. SignatureIf you can see Chuck Norris, he can see you. If you can't see Chuck Norris you may be only seconds away from death. > 365 California should not be called a SPIDER. It is a Cabriolet. Oh no, let's not go down that road again! T308 > matt borland wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > deal, was that a one-off? Don't remember seeing that on any other > California. Sure, pass it on. There are several different tail treatments, none of them nice, on these cars. I find them the ugliest of the open cars. T308 >> I'll just go to someone who cares. Hey T3, on one pic of a Ferrari 365 >> California Spyder I noticed a tail light set that appeared to have [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >Sure, pass it on. There are several different tail treatments, none of >them nice, on these cars. I find them the ugliest of the open cars. Beautiful cars, ugly taillights. |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.