> >I actually got choked up when Schumacher announced his retirement.
> >Right now I am regretting that I never saw him drive in person. I can't
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> "...Luigi follow only the Ferraris."
>> >I actually got choked up when Schumacher announced his retirement.
>> >Right now I am regretting that I never saw him drive in person. I can't
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>engines, unlimited cylinders. Minimum weight 500kg with driver.
>Unlimited aero aids and traction control permitted.
Alas, most of what is actually wrong with F1 these days can properly
be laid at the feet of over-dependance on aero influence and traction
control. The influence and dependance on aerodynamic effects and
forces make closing a gap in cornering unwise and unsuccessful and
traction control along with the myriad of electronic baby sitters
making the cars no more difficult to control than an X-box console.
...The problem then becomes how to reign in these too much goodnesses
without dumbing the thing down to a Formula Ford.
>Any combination
>over 650kg with driver receives an additional 200kg of ballast, which
>must be placed in front of the driver's feet. Max weight pre-ballast is
>700kg with driver.
I don't understand what your trying to do here: A maximum weight
which gets penalized with more weight on the nose?
...Have you been uncritically reading Audi ad copy? Weight is bad.
>Imagine, with the emphasis on lightness the aero stuff would have to be
>really wicked,
It's already truly wicked in practice.
>and forcing the ballast on the front means the car will
>plow like a mofo without some killer engineering. Small engines without
>power adders will rev to the moon and utilize the latest technology.
It's that very ecu technology which engenders cheating and provides
for boring parades of lock-step uniformity.
>Small tires help explore the limits of suspension tech and traction
>control without taking the driver out of the equation.
...And allow insane top end speeds.
I fundamentally disagree: Traction control is a wonderful thing in an
overpowered burhgermeister sedan, or 'rear engined' sportscar', but
the traction of a racecars driven wheels should be controlled by the
driver's right foot.
If the aero effects can be minimized the tires can get wider to
provide greater "mechanical" grip, which most seem to agree is a large
answer to F1's no passing problem.
>Okay, time for someone to shoot holes in my theory.
My counter proposal:
600kg w/driver, no fuel, no fluids. Ban removable ballast.
Flat bottom, no diffusers,
Minimal wing areas, 90deg monoplanar endplates: No fences, furbelows,
or vortex generators.
3liter NA Otto-cycle engine, no restriction on cams, valves,
cylinders.
Mechanical differential.
ECU cannot accept road wheel, drive shaft, transmission shaft or GPS
data inputs.
Transmission CU cannot accept wheel speed or GPS information.
No TC, no anti-stall, no pit lane speed limiter. No rev limiter.
Slick tires, road wheels whatever size the 360CS uses.
12" brake disks.
Any dophin-safe materials may be utilized.
Of course, I've just given the money interests apoplexy, but the
sportsmen will love it.

Signature
"...Luigi follow only the Ferraris."
Paul Duffin - 12 Sep 2006 07:23 GMT
"Luigi Topolino" <tifoso@mindspring.com>
> traction control along with the myriad of electronic baby sitters
> making the cars no more difficult to control than an X-box console.
<blink>*
I think one or two drivers might have something to say about that.
...but I do agree with the rest of what your 'counter proposal'.
If only the powers that be listenned to the tifosi...
-Paul
* Copyright MJF 2000-2006. Used without permission.
Luigi Topolino - 12 Sep 2006 12:59 GMT
>"Luigi Topolino" <tifoso@mindspring.com>
>> traction control along with the myriad of electronic baby sitters
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
>If only the powers that be listenned to the tifosi...
You wouldn't trust it was me were there no hyperbole.

Signature
"...Luigi follow only the Ferraris."
John Doe - 01 Oct 2006 15:25 GMT
How about as back to basics as possible?
Narrower tires, with 1 spec compound per race.
2-2.5L engines, ECU for engine control only, NO data from any other part
of the car.
Spec fuel.
Fully manual transmissions, without any aids, electronics etc.
Flat bottoms.
Max limit on wing area and placement.
Mandated 1 pit stop per race, with a minimum of a 4 wheel tire change.
Good for a start anyway-
I was unaware that next year F-1 was moving to a spec engine. Bad in a
way, but also a return to the days when there were 20 Cosworths in the
field.
Best,
Ross
>> "Luigi Topolino" <tifoso@mindspring.com>
>>> traction control along with the myriad of electronic baby sitters
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> You wouldn't trust it was me were there no hyperbole.
Tiger Racing - 03 Oct 2006 08:27 GMT
<<How about as back to basics as possible?>>
F1 is meant to be the pinnacle of motorsport. Dumbing it down so that
some club race car is more high tech defeats the purpose.
C.