 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Car Forum / Ferrari Cars / September 2007A Ferrari 1-2 & no posts!?
Guess everyone's out on vacation? James (aka, giallo355) > Guess everyone's out on vacation? > > James > (aka, giallo355) Hey... I just woke up! We have to watch it in the wee small hours here (australia). Yes, a sterling job! The constructors' is still winnable!!!! I'm hopeful that a driver's championship will come along with the constructor's title. However, that hope's fading fast as Hamilton continues to impress. Let's hope that McLaren's really stupid & chooses Alonso as their driver for '08 & let's Hamilton explore other options... >> Guess everyone's out on vacation? >> [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > Yes, a sterling job! The constructors' is still winnable!!!! > I'm hopeful that a driver's championship will come along with the > constructor's title. However, that hope's fading fast as Hamilton continues [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] >> >>Yes, a sterling job! The constructors' is still winnable!!!! if anything, it'll be the other way round. Alonso might just be looking elsewhere in 2008. He know's that he's not quicker and in modern day F1, if you're not faster than your team mate, you've got to find a new team! T308 I'd much rather have Hamilton at Ferrari. Alonso's good, but Hamilton's better. I also believe that he'd get along much better w/Kimi. Massa's done, especially after tucking-tail (once Alonso passed him). >> I'm hopeful that a driver's championship will come along with the >> constructor's title. However, that hope's fading fast as Hamilton [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > > T308 > I'd much rather have Hamilton at Ferrari. Alonso's good, but Hamilton's > better. I also believe that he'd get along much better w/Kimi. Massa's > done, especially after tucking-tail (once Alonso passed him). Indeed. I think Nigel Roebuck said that Kimi's unique on the grid in that he truly doesn't care what his team mate is doing and as such would be an ideal partner to Hamilton. His comment was that McLaren would have been better served by retaining Kimi and letting Alonso go elsewhere. T308 >> I'd much rather have Hamilton at Ferrari. Alonso's good, but >> Hamilton's better. I also believe that he'd get along much better [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > T308 Oh, and then there's this.. http://www.speedtv.com/articles/auto/formulaone/39851/ Not that Bild is a good source, but... T308 (Who's been reduced to replying to his own posts here....) >His comment was that McLaren would >have been better served by retaining Kimi and letting Alonso go elsewhere. As would Ferrari. Kimi's proven to be every bit the load I'd wished he wouldn't be. > Guess everyone's out on vacation? > > James > (aka, giallo355) Or still shocked. Very pissed at Kimi, two races in a row and he throws in the fastest lap at the end. If he's not winnin', he's not tryin' T308 >> Guess everyone's out on vacation? >> [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > T308 Yes, it does look a bit odd, what? >> Very pissed at Kimi, two races in a row and he throws in the fastest lap >> at the end. If he's not winnin', he's not tryin' >> >> T308 > > Yes, it does look a bit odd, what? Not really - it just translated to: "I could race this joker in front of me but the team won't allow it" I. >>> Very pissed at Kimi, two races in a row and he throws in the fastest lap >>> at the end. If he's not winnin', he's not tryin' [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >Not really - it just translated to: "I could race this joker in front of me >but the team won't allow it" Nonsense. His pit in-out laps are completely lackadaisical. Why would the team hold him back there? |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.