Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Ferrari Cars / February 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

LA Auto Show report

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
MC - 11 Jan 2004 23:07 GMT
Went to the LA Auto Show last night.  Fairly enjoyable, very crowded.
Saw the 2005 Mustang, in fastback and GT configuration.  I like it.
They had a blue-and-white Ford GT - seeing that car in person gave me
goosebumps.

I didn't like the BMW 645 CI in person.  The Acura TL has more soul.

Chrysler didn't have that outrageous ME Four Twelve showcar I've seen
pictures of recently from the Detroit Auto Show, which I was told is
still going on (also the reason why the Shelby Cobra Concept wasn't
there either).

Interesting link to Chrysler ME Four Twelve:
http://www.allpar.com/cars/me412.html

Chevy ... had this outstanding SS Concept Car I had never heard about.
Alas, the 2005 Corvette they had on display was a real disappointment to
me.  From the back and sides it looks a lot sleeker, if that's possible,
but then when you see the front end ... the headlights look like they
were lifted from a 575M.  It is such an unoriginal treatment that it
kind of drags the whole design down.

http://www.seriouswheels.com/top-2003-Chevrolet-SS-Concept.htm

And there was the Cadillac Sixteen, along with a black CTS-V and two
XLRs with great paint jobs.  The CTS-V really is a knockout, though in
this case they could have done without the gangsta-gangsta high-polish
chrome billeted grille.  Maybe Dr. Dre likes it, but it didn't look
right on the car to me.

http://www.supercars.net/cars/2003@$Cadillac@$Sixteen%20Conceptg.html

The aftermarket section had all kinds of outrageousness, mostly
involving spinning chrome rims the size of trash can lids.  LOTS of
aftermarket Porsches.

The exotic section wasn't really showing anything new.  The Bentley
Continental GT looks great in person but kind of "unBentley-ish".  At
the same time, the two Rolls-Royces Phaetons, both in black with
high-gloss black rims, looked totally pimped out.  I think most of the
folks gawking at it were NBA players and families.

A nice surprise: the Panoz Esperante, in black, looked awesome.  And
over at the Morgan display, there was a very nice gentleman with a
ponytail and a junior handlebar mustache, who campaigns a yellow Morgan
Aero 8 in a racing series I didn't catch the name of, standing next to
Tiger's dad's World Challenge race car.  He briefed me on the power
upgrades coming for the Tiger Racing Aero 8 which I hope will put it
into a position where SPEED might let us have an extended look at it
once in while.

Finally, Ferrari didn't have an Enzo.  I asked the floor guy why, just
out of curiousity, and he said, "There's no need to show it.  We're done
making them, they're all sold, and we don't have any more."  I decided
not to ask him why every road car in their display had Scuderia shields
on it.  Except for the 612 Scaglietti, in a kind of bold blue, which
didn't really excite me.  They put it in the middle of the display in a
spot that kind of obscured it; folks couldn't wander up close to it.

All in all, an enjoyable experience but - not wishing to sound elitist -
marred by the crush of common, clueless, self-absorbed breeder clones
this country (and the world) is overstuffed with.  Everywhere one stood
was an unsupervised small child screaming or spilling a drink, or some
asswipe sticking their cell phone up high in front of my face to take a
shot of a car, or a pack of Snoop Doggs walking around bumping into
people instead of yielding, then getting into your face, or the
everpresent crush of obnoxious suburban teenage "wannabee" gangstas
climbing all over the cars yelling "Yeah, G!" or "Bling-bling, baby!".

The coming Armaggeddon may well incinerate a lot of beautiful cars but
in terms of population control and the extinction of an overrated and
underachieving species it will be the smart move.  Call me a
misanthrope, perhaps even a sociopath, but after spending a night
mingling with the great unwashed of the Southern California I wish I
could help throw that switch.
jjW - 12 Jan 2004 00:42 GMT
Every year i always see all those ghetto low life 17 year old kids /
there baseball caps on sideways sitting in some high priced car
pretending that they are in the market for a new Mercedes. I just laugh
at the losers...The closest they will ever come to driving one is if
they carjack one in south central l.a. This one guy was sitting in a BMW
a few years ago & he was adjusting the seat & he really thought in his
lame mind that he might be buying one & he had the radio on (for some
reason the car was hooked up to a battery) & he was saying "this car is
sick"!! listening to some rap crap real loud & the BWM rep came over and
yelled "TURN IT DOWN!!!"....i just laughed.
Paul Duffin - 12 Jan 2004 09:59 GMT
> Every year i always see all those ghetto low life 17 year old kids /
> there baseball caps on sideways sitting in some high priced car
> pretending that they are in the market for a new Mercedes. I just laugh
> at the losers...

So when you were a '17 year old kid', you never went to a car show to
look at the shiny machines that you hoped one day you might be lucky
enough to own? Well I certainly did, and I'm sure a lot of people here
did too - the whole point of a car show is... to show cars - and whilst I'll
agree with psycho Mike that legions of screaming children are somewhat
distracting, to dismiss people as 'losers' for simply  fulfilling the
entire reason d'etre of the event (whilst separating yourself from this
category by virtue of some supposedly superior 'buying power') is
arrogantly contemptuous.

Why is everyone so unpleasant of late?

Paul
Signature

Http://www.redmist.freeserve.co.uk

TigerRace1 - 12 Jan 2004 22:28 GMT
<<Why is everyone so unpleasant of late?>>

Ask him if he's PMSing. G'head.

C.
MC - 12 Jan 2004 22:58 GMT
> Why is everyone so unpleasant of late?

The white pills.
matt  borland - 14 Jan 2004 19:27 GMT
"Paul Duffin" <paul.duffin@dial.pipex.removethisbit.com> wrote in message

> Why is everyone so unpleasant of late?
>
> Paul

Shut up, sissy.

Heh heh heh...

-Matt- "8^D"
TigerRace1 - 12 Jan 2004 22:24 GMT
<<Every year i always see all those ghetto low life 17 year old kids /there
baseball caps on sideways sitting in some high priced car pretending that they
are in the market for a new Mercedes. I just laugh at the losers...The closest
they will ever come to driving one is if they carjack one in south central
l.a.>>

Oh, and clearly you are far superior to those day dreamers, eh? Although, to be
honest, it's not all that clear in this particular post. What with all your
typos, punctuation and spelling errors. And, of course, there is the fact that
anyone crowing their superiority thru such bigoted, obnoxious and obliquely
racist statements has rather proven the reverse.

<<This one guy was sitting in a BMW a few years ago & he was adjusting the seat
& he really thought in his lame mind that he might be buying one & he had the
radio on (for some reason the car was hooked up to a battery)>>

Could it be that BMW wanted to demonstrate the stereo, GPS or other systems
that their cars carry?

<<& he was saying "this car is sick"!! listening to some rap crap real loud &
the BWM rep came over and yelled "TURN IT DOWN!!!"....>>

Yes, I'm quite sure that if you had parked your butt in his place and blared
Britney Spears, the Dixie Chicks or Clay Aiken thru the sound system that the
BMW representative would have practically gifted you a car.

C.
MC - 12 Jan 2004 23:10 GMT
<snip>

> Yes, I'm quite sure that if you had parked your butt in his place and blared
> Britney Spears, the Dixie Chicks or Clay Aiken thru the sound system that the
> BMW representative would have practically gifted you a car.
>
> C.

Y,know, you kind of blasted that kid for commenting on essentially some
of the same things I saw.  Every display, except the ultra-exotics which
were roped off, had cars full of teenagers yelling, goofing off, and
cranking rap on the stereo.  Part of me saw some youthful exuberance,
yes, but the rest of me wanted to angrily part the crowd and start
throwing the little f.cks off the merchandise.

Maybe it's just a tough time to be a kid, what with all the judgemental
psychos standing nearby, notebook in mind.

MC
TigerRace1 - 13 Jan 2004 00:54 GMT
<<Y,know, you kind of blasted that kid for commenting on essentially some of
the same things I saw.>>

Your comments weren't as blatantly racist. When they are, I call you on them.
Lamenting the general decline of humanity is one thing. Declaring one sector as
superior based on locale or musical preference is ludicrous.

<<Every display, except the ultra-exotics which were roped off, had cars full
of teenagers yelling, goofing off, and cranking rap on the stereo.  Part of me
saw some youthful exuberance, yes, but the rest of me wanted to angrily part
the crowd and start throwing the little f.cks off>>

As EuroPaul pointed out, examining the merchandise up close and personal is
what the Auto Show is all about. If the auto makers didn't want people to
explore, then they wouldn't let them. As usual, I found the adults to be as
offensive as the kids, with no excuses available to them like *youthful
exuberance*. I didn't see any kids scrambling up on roped off platforms or
rubbing dirt into a car's paint or juggling a beer and bag of chips in one hand
while leaning into a show vehicle to rub their greasy hands on the leather
seats.

Not that I can't imagine teenagers doing such things, it's just that what I saw
most of the kids doing was exploring the vehicles just like they would if one
of their friends showed up in their driveway with a new ride. They weren't
disrespectful, they were just enthusiastic. OTOH, the adults treated the cars
like they were worthless. They didn't care if they scratched them or spilled
nacho sauce onto the new carpet. I don't think they treat their own property
like that, but since it was someone else's, they didn't give a rat's fuzzy butt
what happened to it.

<<Maybe it's just a tough time to be a kid>>

It always is.

C.
Michael Hanson - 14 Jan 2004 04:12 GMT
> <<Y,know, you kind of blasted that kid for commenting on essentially some of
> the same things I saw.>>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> like that, but since it was someone else's, they didn't give a rat's fuzzy butt
> what happened to it.

I appreciate enthusiasm whatever the form.  But I wish people were just more
courteous sometimes, or just more self-aware, or something.  I try to make
it to the Florida Int'l Auto Show every year, and we generally go as a
family.  My daughter is in a wheelchair, and it seems like I spend half my
time just trying to keep people from tripping over her, falling on her, and
god help us getting through crowds sometimes.

Of course, it's not reserved to the car show.  Also happens at pretty much
any public event.
Signature

Mike Hanson
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
www.scaleautosport.com

TigerRace1 - 15 Jan 2004 22:38 GMT
<<My daughter is in a wheelchair, and it seems like I spend half my time just
trying to keep people from tripping over her, falling on her, and god help us
getting through crowds sometimes.

Of course, it's not reserved to the car show.  Also happens at pretty much any
public event.>>

Most people are oblivious to anyone shorter than they are, regardless of
physical ability. My own experience has led me to have much sympathy for kids
in general. I've learned that nobody ever looks down when they are in a crowded
room and little kids get trampled on a regular basis. I'm surprised that we
don't hear about more ER visits. I try to maintain my own civility, but if I
have to, I'll hurt someone with my wheelchair. Funny thing is, if I smack into
somebody with my chair, they are most likely to apologize to me. <eg>

C. :::who can easily clear a path thru a crowd:::
Dean For America, 2004 - 14 Jan 2004 17:54 GMT
><<Y,know, you kind of blasted that kid for commenting on essentially some of
>the same things I saw.>>
>
>Your comments weren't as blatantly racist. When they are, I call you on them.
>Lamenting the general decline of humanity is one thing. Declaring one sector as
>superior based on locale or musical preference is ludicrous.

I'm fairly certain music based on a culture exalting murder and rape
is evidence of a specific decline of humanity.

TigerRace1 - 15 Jan 2004 22:40 GMT
<<I'm fairly certain music based on a culture exalting murder and rape is
evidence of a specific decline of humanity.>>

What about movies and cinema that exalt murder, mayhem and not just rape, but a
general disregard for the value of women and minorities? Careful where you toss
that stone. Too many glass houses around here.

C.
Dean For America, 2004 - 16 Jan 2004 21:45 GMT
><<I'm fairly certain music based on a culture exalting murder and rape is
>evidence of a specific decline of humanity.>>
>
>What about movies and cinema that exalt murder, mayhem and not just rape, but a
>general disregard for the value of women and minorities? Careful where you toss
>that stone. Too many glass houses around here.

I'm fairly certain music, movies, Power Point presentations or comic
books based on a culture exalting murder and rape is evidence of a
specific decline of humanity...

...I don't care *what* "Spike Puff Diddy Cent" sh.ts out:  It's all
misogynistic, misanthropic, exploitative, least common-denominator
crap.

f.ck the ignorant little bastards:  Long live the harpsichord, I say!
TigerRace1 - 28 Jan 2004 00:57 GMT
<<What about movies and cinema that exalt murder, mayhem and not just rape, but
a general disregard for the value of women and minorities? Careful where you
toss that stone. Too many glass houses around here. >> C.

<<I'm fairly certain music, movies, Power Point presentations or comic books
based on a culture exalting murder and rape is evidence of a specific decline
of humanity...

...I don't care *what* "Spike Puff Diddy Cent" sh.ts out:  It's all
misogynistic, misanthropic, exploitative, least common-denominator crap.>>
Dean's Support

I was actually referring to your common, everyday, Hollywood blockbuster or TV
fare. Our entire culture exalts violence and degrades women. If you're going to
go pointing fingers, start with your side of the race line.

C.
Paul Duffin - 13 Jan 2004 09:22 GMT
> Yes, I'm quite sure that if you had parked your butt in his place and blared
> Britney Spears, the Dixie Chicks or Clay Aiken thru the sound system that the
> BMW representative would have practically gifted you a car.

<snigger>

Paul
Signature

Http://www.redmist.freeserve.co.uk

Paul Duffin - 12 Jan 2004 09:42 GMT
> The aftermarket section had all kinds of outrageousness, mostly
> involving spinning chrome rims the size of trash can lids.

Just when you thought people's taste in bolt-ons couldn't get any
lower....

We saw a load of these in Nashville. The first time you see them
they are quite fascinating (especially if they are counter rotating slowly
as the vehicle to which they are fitted moves off at any speed).

> All in all, an enjoyable experience but - not wishing to sound elitist -
> marred by the crush of common, clueless, self-absorbed breeder clones
> this country (and the world) is overstuffed with.

"Self-absorbed breeder clones"?  Jeez... Your love for humanity knows
no bounds.

> The coming Armaggeddon may well incinerate a lot of beautiful cars but
> in terms of population control and the extinction of an overrated and
> underachieving species it will be the smart move.  Call me a
> misanthrope, perhaps even a sociopath, but after spending a night
> mingling with the great unwashed of the Southern California I wish I
> could help throw that switch.

I'm tempted to make my usual poor joke about you needing
to take more of the blue pills, but I think it's getting beyond that.

FFS, CHILL OUT, MIKEY!

Paul
Signature

Http://www.redmist.freeserve.co.uk

TigerRace1 - 12 Jan 2004 22:30 GMT
<<"Self-absorbed breeder clones"?  Jeez... Your love for humanity knows no
bounds.>>

I'm telling you, it's all summed up in *PAI*.

C.
Speaker for the D00d - 12 Jan 2004 13:21 GMT
> ... the great unwashed of the Southern California ...

It never rains in California ...  ;^)

Sounds like  Miss Ann Thoroeau, Pissed

-- Speaker for the D00d
"I love mankind.  It's people I can't stand" - Linus, "Peanuts"
TigerRace1 - 12 Jan 2004 21:47 GMT
<<Saw the 2005 Mustang, in fastback and GT configuration.  I like it.>>

I need to get me one o'those!

<<And there was the Cadillac Sixteen, along with a black CTS-V and two XLRs
with great paint jobs.  The CTS-V really is a knockout, though in this case
they could have done without the gangsta-gangsta high-polish chrome billeted
grille.>>

I'm not looking forward to getting my butt kicked this season by something that
looks like a chromed, government issue, armored car.

<<over at the Morgan display, there was a very nice gentleman with a ponytail
and a junior handlebar mustache, who campaigns a yellow Morgan Aero 8 in a
racing series I didn't catch the name of, standing next to Tiger's dad's World
Challenge race car.  He briefed me on the power upgrades coming for the Tiger
Racing Aero 8 which I hope will put it into a position where SPEED might let us
have an extended look at it once in while.>>

As long as dad stays behind me, he can have all the *power upgrades* that he
wants. BTW, that's the *Aero Racing, USA* Morgan. Aero Racing is a division of
Tiger Racing.

<<Finally, Ferrari didn't have an Enzo.  I asked the floor guy why, just out of
curiousity, and he said, "There's no need to show it.  We're done making them,
they're all sold, and we don't have any more.">>

The man has a point. Why sell what's already sold? OTOH, there are still
Morgans available for sale. <g>

<< I decided not to ask him why every road car in their display had Scuderia
shields on it.>>

One decision made by Luca that I will never agree with.

<<Except for the 612 Scaglietti, in a kind of bold blue >>

You mean Ford Sonic Blue? I hate it.

<<All in all, an enjoyable experience>>

After spending an evening looking over the current crop of new cars, all I
wanted to do was go home and hug my '95 GT. She's fully paid for, is
practically worthless to anyone but me and I can't imagine trading her for any
one of those lumps of sheet metal and plastic moulding. Except, perhaps, for
the 2005 Mustang.

<<The coming Armaggeddon may well incinerate a lot of beautiful cars but in
terms of population control and the extinction of an overrated and
underachieving species it will be the smart move.>>

I tend to agree with you.

C.
Michael Hanson - 14 Jan 2004 04:17 GMT
> <<Saw the 2005 Mustang, in fastback and GT configuration.  I like it.>>
>
> I need to get me one o'those!

I really like the new GT.  Looking forward to seeing it in person.  Like it
a LOT more than the new 'vette.

> <<And there was the Cadillac Sixteen, along with a black CTS-V and two XLRs
> with great paint jobs.  The CTS-V really is a knockout, though in this case

> I'm not looking forward to getting my butt kicked this season by something that
> looks like a chromed, government issue, armored car.

Oh yeah, the new CTS-V race car looks just AWESOME.  Very macho, aggressive.
http://www.maximum-cars.com/Cars/Car.php?carnumber=520

> <<Except for the 612 Scaglietti, in a kind of bold blue >>
>
> You mean Ford Sonic Blue? I hate it.

Hey!  My 'stang looks GREAT in Sonic Blue!

MH
www.scaleautosport.com
TigerRace1 - 15 Jan 2004 22:33 GMT
<<Oh yeah, the new CTS-V race car looks just AWESOME.  Very macho,
aggressive.>>

Like I said, I think it looks like a government issue, armored car. It's a big,
shiny brick. It's as *macho* as an H2. And they are both just Chevys under the
skin. The World Challenge CTS-V will bear little resemblence to the street car
though.

http://bbs.sccaproracing.com/ubb/Forum2/HTML/003050.html

<<Hey!  My 'stang looks GREAT in Sonic Blue!>>

And rightly so! A Ferrari looks silly in a Ford colour though.

C.
Michael Hanson - 16 Jan 2004 04:48 GMT
> <<Oh yeah, the new CTS-V race car looks just AWESOME.  Very macho,
> aggressive.>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> http://bbs.sccaproracing.com/ubb/Forum2/HTML/003050.html

Read through some of the forum.  One thing I didn't see mentioned - anybody
thought that perhaps the ultimate goal of GM is to get the Caddy into the
DTM series in Europe, to improve their image/sales over there?  When I first
saw the car I jumped to that conclusion right off.
Signature

Mike Hanson
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
www.scaleautosport.com

TigerRace1 - 16 Jan 2004 19:26 GMT
<<Read through some of the forum.>>

One of the Cadillac threads was removed by SCCA. They didn't think it was
appropriate for people to be debating the rules in a public forum.

<<One thing I didn't see mentioned - anybody thought that perhaps the ultimate
goal of GM is to get the Caddy into the DTM series in Europe, to improve their
image/sales over there?  When I first saw the car I jumped to that conclusion
right off.>>

I don't know how many cars GM sells in Europe or how many they want to sell.
I've heard no mention of the DTM, but there's been plenty of talk of Cadillac
entering ALMS and going to Le Mans.

C.
Dean For America, 2004 - 16 Jan 2004 17:06 GMT
><<Oh yeah, the new CTS-V race car looks just AWESOME.  Very macho,
>aggressive.>>
>
>Like I said, I think it looks like a government issue, armored car. It's a big,
>shiny brick. It's as *macho* as an H2.

And yet BMW's "flame front" designs are sexy...

> And they are both just Chevys under the skin.

...References, please.

>The World Challenge CTS-V will bear little resemblence to the street car
>though.
>http://bbs.sccaproracing.com/ubb/Forum2/HTML/003050.html

Unlike every other "silhouette" formula?
TigerRace1 - 16 Jan 2004 19:42 GMT
<<And yet BMW's "flame front" designs are sexy...>>

I haven't a clue what you're referring to. I think that up until this year,
BMWs have gotten better and better looking. Some of the 2004 and 2005 models
have morphed into something Chrysler would be proud of though.

<<...References, please.>>

What *references* do you  need? Are you unaware of the fact that the new Caddy
utilizes multiple components from the Corvette, the engine being the most
obvious, and that the H2 shares the Suburban platform? It's not some big
secret. Read any review of these cars.

<<Unlike every other "silhouette" formula?>>

Quite. The World Challenge Caddy isn't just tweaked mechanically, the body work
is totally different from the street car. It's been chopped, dropped and
stretched. That *silhouette* is one thing that so many competitors have a
problem with. Not to mention the dog box they're being allowed to start the
season with and the motor modifications they're running which will give them
some 50 hp more than the Vette guys have.

C.
Dean For America, 2004 - 16 Jan 2004 21:20 GMT
><<And yet BMW's "flame front" designs are sexy...>>
>I haven't a clue what you're referring to. I think that up until this year,
>BMWs have gotten better and better looking. Some of the 2004 and 2005 models
>have morphed into something Chrysler would be proud of though.

Ah...  The vaunted female memory.

><<...References, please.>>
>What *references* do you  need? Are you unaware of the fact that the new Caddy
>utilizes multiple components from the Corvette,

Since it's all just GM anyway, what could possibly be your point or
implication; since the Cadillac XLR cabriolet was released first it's
more correct to say the C6 uses Caddy components; as far I can find,
the CTS-V merely uses the same archaic GM small block as the Vette, a
GM practice dating back to the Middle Ages.

> the engine being the most obvious,

"Obviously"...  What other "multiple components" do they share?

>and that the H2 shares the Suburban platform? It's not some big
>secret. Read any review of these cars.

_Which_ cars?  When you say "the new Caddy utilizes multiple
components from the Corvette" do you mean the CTS-V, or the XLR, the
latter which does _actually_ share most of its chassis and running
gear with the C6?  ...And when did SUVs, _especially_ short bus-sized
SUVs, become cars in the first place?

><<Unlike every other "silhouette" formula?>>
>
>Quite. The World Challenge Caddy isn't just tweaked mechanically, the body work
>is totally different from the street car. It's been chopped, dropped and
>stretched.

Unlike the competitions' designs?

>That *silhouette* is one thing that so many competitors have a
>problem with. Not to mention the dog box they're being allowed to start the
>season with

The problem there being?

>and the motor modifications they're running which will give them
>some 50 hp more than the Vette guys have.

Which the " 'Vette guys" are prevented from using, why?

...And yet somehow Porsche gets a pass every time.
Michael Hanson - 17 Jan 2004 04:01 GMT
> ><<And yet BMW's "flame front" designs are sexy...>>
> _Which_ cars?  When you say "the new Caddy utilizes multiple
> components from the Corvette" do you mean the CTS-V, or the XLR, the
> latter which does _actually_ share most of its chassis and running
> gear with the C6?  ...And when did SUVs, _especially_ short bus-sized
> SUVs, become cars in the first place?

Well, we were specifically discussing the new Caddy race car - the CTS-V(R).
It basically has the LS1 Corvette engine sitting in it, with mods to the
intake and such - it actually puts out *more* HP that the C5R ran in SCCA.
As far as the C6 - it shares the chassis with the XLR, but not the
powertrain.  The XLR has the OHC Northstar V8.  The 'vette still has the
trusty Chevy OHV 5 litre.  Big difference there.

>>Quite. The World Challenge Caddy isn't just tweaked mechanically, the body work
>>is totally different from the street car. It's been chopped, dropped and
>>stretched.
>Unlike the competitions' designs?

Well, yes, actually.  The debate seems to be that it appears that SCCA has
given in to a lot of pressure from GM on that car.  It does appear to have
been chopped a bit, which is not really in keeping with the rules.  Audi and
BMW were not allowed to do that previously - thus the controversy.  I've
heard (through others) that GM has said that they didn't change the lines of
the car, but if you compare it to the street version of the CTS-V there does
appear to be some differences, some would say pretty obviously chopped down.

Signature

Mike Hanson
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
www.scaleautosport.com

TigerRace1 - 28 Jan 2004 03:17 GMT
<<Since it's all just GM anyway, what could possibly be your point or
implication>>

Oh, Blessed Irony...

So Caddy and Corvette are *all just GM*, but you're having a conniption over
Ferrari using Enzo bits to build a racing Maserati?

<< ...And when did SUVs, _especially_ short bus-sized SUVs, become cars in the
first place?>>

Oh, that's terribly relevant. Did you really not understand what I meant or are
you just looking for a nit to pick?

<<The World Challenge Caddy isn't just tweaked mechanically, the body work is
totally different from the street car. It's been chopped, dropped and
stretched.>> C.

<<Unlike the competitions' designs?>> Dean's Supporter

Pay attention. Yes, the new Caddy that is being brought to World Challenge
looks to be radically modified in ways that have not been allowed for any other
car. That's the beef that many competitors have right now. I'm not one of them.
Not yet anyway. <g>

<<The problem there being?>>

The problem being that the Corvettes aren't allowed to use that dog box AND the
Caddy is lighter than the Corvette. Usually, a gearbox like that is permitted,
there are weight restrictions.  

<<and the motor modifications they're running which will give them >some 50 hp
more than the Vette guys have. >> C.

<<Which the " 'Vette guys" are prevented from using, why?>> Dean's Supporter

None of the Vette guys are allowed to use the motor mods that are being
permitted for the Caddy. Why? Ask SCCA. Everyone else is.

<<...And yet somehow Porsche gets a pass every time.>>

Obviously you don't follow World Challenge or you'd know what a joke that is.
Aside from it being an obvious joke in a Ferrari forum. The top teams aren't
even running Porches anymore. 3-R, the only team that managed to get a Porch on
the podium last year, has dropped theirs and is bringing a Viper Comp Coupe
instead, because they don't think the Porches stand a chance this year.

C.

BTW, the Mustang is a Ford Fairmont, not a Fairlane as I stated in a previous
post.
Dean For America, 2004 - 30 Jan 2004 17:04 GMT
><<Since it's all just GM anyway, what could possibly be your point or
>implication>>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>So Caddy and Corvette are *all just GM*, but you're having a conniption over
>Ferrari using Enzo bits to build a racing Maserati?

What aspect of the intertwined nature of GM's subsidiaries versus the
distinct identity of the components of Gruppo Ferrari-Maserati escape
you?

>Obviously you don't follow World Challenge or you'd know what a joke that is.

Guilty as charged.

>Aside from it being an obvious joke in a Ferrari forum. The top teams aren't
>even running Porches anymore. 3-R, the only team that managed to get a Porch on
>the podium last year, has dropped theirs and is bringing a Viper Comp Coupe
>instead, because they don't think the Porches stand a chance this year.

...Then it's the only class in history that wasn't tweaked to
Stuttgart's advantage

>BTW, the Mustang is a Ford Fairmont, not a Fairlane as I stated in a previous
>post.

LOFL
TigerRace1 - 12 Feb 2004 23:48 GMT
<<...Then it's the only class in history that wasn't tweaked to Stuttgart's
advantage>>

SCCA has always done a great job of equalizing cars in the past. We'll see what
happens with the Cadillac this year.

C.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.