Well, I like the way it looks better than the Enzo.
I don't see the big deal, really. Ferrari made race versions of the F40,
tried to do it with the F50. Maserati is wholly-owned by Ferrari, sees the
opportunity to leverage a rather large investment of time and money by
badge-engineering. I hope to see one, eventually.

Signature
Mike Hanson
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
www.scaleautosport.com
><<It is not a Maserati>>
>Ferrari says it is.
And Kraft says Chez Whiz® is food: They are both lying.
><< it is not in keeping with the spirit of the class>>
>What *spirit* are you referring to?
GT racing...
><< it should cannibalize wins from Ferrari>>
>I'm guessing that you actually meant *could* here.
Nope; It should have the 575GTC for lunch.
><<other manufacturers will drop out>>
>Why? What proof do you have for this?
It has happened before.
><<"We'll just slap these Caddy emblems on a Nova and no one will be the
>wiser">>
>Caddy emblems on a Vette or H2 emblems on a Suburban or Mustang emblems on a
>'74 Fairlane or a new Lincoln. A Firebird is a Camaro and Porches are Vedubs.
>So what else is new?
...That it has been done before does not make it correct now.
TigerRace1 - 12 Feb 2004 23:47 GMT
<<And Kraft says Chez Whiz® is food: They are both lying. >>
Which part of Cheez Whiz isn't food?
http://pubs.acs.org/cen/whatstuff/stuff/7806sci2.html
<< it is not in keeping with the spirit of the class>> Political Man
<<What *spirit* are you referring to?>> C.
<<GT racing...>> Political Man
I didn't ask you what class of racing. I asked you what *spirit* you were
referring to.
<<Nope; It should have the 575GTC for lunch.>>
OK. And?
<<It has happened before. >>
Manufacturers come and go from various series. So what?
C.