 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Car Forum / Ferrari Cars / April 2005Hey... Jackasses...
How is the FIAT logo in this photo, http://www.f1total.de/bilder/2005/tests/05mug1/z002.jpg more obvious or apparent than the FIAT logo in this photo, http://www.pitpass.com/fes_php/pitpass_gallery_image_display.php?fes_gal_id=303& fes_image_number=16&fes_reverse_order= and then how is either more objectionable than the Renault logo in this photo? http://www.pitpass.com/fes_php/pitpass_gallery_image_display.php?fes_gal_id=304& fes_image_number=2&fes_reverse_order= > How is the FIAT logo in this photo, > http://www.f1total.de/bilder/2005/tests/05mug1/z002.jpg [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > this photo? > http://www.pitpass.com/fes_php/pitpass_gallery_image_display.php?fes_gal_id=304& fes_image_number=2&fes_reverse_order= Nice, Mark. Time to send you a Dale Carnegie book.  SignatureWhen the going gets weird, the weird turn pro. Hunter S. Thompson Yes indeed the F2205 FIAT logo is worse than last years. Much more prominent. Really the FIAt logo is the only ugly thing on the car. I guess a genuine fetching sycophant like yourself could not determine that the all white logo is worse than the blue one. >Yes indeed the F2205 FIAT logo is worse than last years. Much more >prominent. Really the FIAt logo is the only ugly thing on the car. I >guess a genuine fetching sycophant like yourself could not determine >that the all white logo is worse than the blue one. You weren't asked if it was worse, you were asked how it is more apparent or obvious. Obvious or apparent is in DIRECT relation to whether a person would percive the image as worse. I feel you are a direct result of a poor education system. >Obvious or apparent is in DIRECT relation to whether a person would >percive the image as worse. I feel you are a direct result of a poor >education system. ...You would, but you are an imbecile: Obvious or apparent are objective qualities, "worse" is a subjective and judgmental opinion. Now, must I really discriminate objective and subjective for you? > Now, must I really discriminate objective and subjective for you? Please do. And while your at it email me pictures of your Ferrari and I will do the same. That should determine who has been more successful in this life. >> Now, must I really discriminate objective and subjective for you? > >Please do. And while your at it email me pictures of your Ferrari and >I will do the same. That should determine who has been more successful >in this life. LOFL! Well there it is then, and it didn't take long at all! By your "logic" Pauley Shore is more "successful" than Albert Einstein was. ...That's all I need to know. Enjoy your inheritance, fuckwit. > Enjoy your inheritance, fuckwit. Still waiting for the photo you ignorant douchebag. And your mother wanted me to tell you hello. At least I think that's what she was saying. it was hard to understand here with her mouth full and all. >> Enjoy your inheritance, fuckwit. > >Still waiting for the photo you ignorant douchebag. And your mother >wanted me to tell you hello. At least I think that's what she was >saying. it was hard to understand here with her mouth full and all. ...I didn't realize scale models counted in your little sport, child. <<your mother wanted me to tell you hello. At least I think that's what she was saying. it was hard to understand here...>> Lovely. Do you kiss your own mother with that mouth? Come on, is that guy worth this? It's beyond tacky. It's like listening to two 14 yr olds bat around last year's insults. Unless your all time favorite movie is Dumb and Dumberer, then I would warrant that this is beneath you. C. > Come on, is that guy worth this? It's beyond tacky. It's like > listening to two 14 yr olds bat around last year's insults. Unless > your all time favorite movie is Dumb and Dumberer, then I would > warrant that this is beneath you. So why not instead give your time to e-mailing your favourite Englishman? ...um, assuming that I qualify for that title? MCPD <<So why not instead give your time to e-mailing your favourite Englishman? ...um, assuming that I qualify for that title?>> Yes, quite the assumption there. I could know all manner of Englishmen for all you know! My e-mail is quite full, thank you very much. Only so much time in the day. Busy, busy, busy... C. :::back to surfing eBay for Spider-Woman collectibles::: <<Obvious or apparent are objective qualities>> Apparently not. C. > <<Obvious or apparent are objective qualities>> > > Apparently not. > > C. One might even say "obviously they are not". Well, one might... -Matt- "..." <<One might even say "obviously they are not".>> Actually, that is what I meant to say, which is why I deleted my other post. But then you had to quote that disappeared post before I had a chance to make it disappear. Sheesh. C. >>Yes indeed the F2205 FIAT logo is worse than last years. Much more >>prominent. Really the FIAt logo is the only ugly thing on the car. I [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > You weren't asked if it was worse, you were asked how it is more > apparent or obvious. I like the logo and think it looks better (less visable!) on the car. It's a return the the FIAT script that was used from 1901-1968. You'd only have to show me the upright left side of the "A" and the curved right side and I'd know right where it came from (unlike the blue angled FIAT from 1968 to the present which is too corporate, devoid of any history). T308 (Who finds the use of the historic logo on the F2005 interesting as FIAT changed to the angled blue a few months before they purchase part of Ferrari in 1969...) >>>Yes indeed the F2205 FIAT logo is worse than last years. Much more >>>prominent. Really the FIAt logo is the only ugly thing on the car. I [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > >I like the logo and think it looks better (less visable!) on the car. Shhhh... I just got them to sleep. >It's a return the the FIAT script that was used from 1901-1968. You'd >only have to show me the upright left side of the "A" and the curved [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] >changed to the angled blue a few months before they purchase part of >Ferrari in 1969...) All very interesting in light of the upheavals at FIAT Holding, FIAT Motors, and the sundering of Ferrari-Maserati Gruppo, subsequent to GM's buyout from the put contract. Like reading the signals from the Vatican... I'd give an appendage for it to be an Alfa-Romeo logo, with their imminent return to the US market (with rear-wheel drive cars, as long as I'm dreaming). > I'd give an appendage for it to be an Alfa-Romeo logo, with their > imminent return to the US market (with rear-wheel drive cars, as long > as I'm dreaming). Which one? Maybe I can sell it on EBay. MC SignatureWhen the going gets weird, the weird turn pro. Hunter S. Thompson > Which one? Maybe I can sell it on EBay. > > MC Dude, don't even joke like that. You shoulda seen the sh.t they pulled down on me when I put that kidney up last weekend... Aaron :P >>Which one? Maybe I can sell it on EBay. >> [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Aaron :P I'm sure if you've got some whacky stuff to sell (including body parts) this guy would buy it. Check out some of the past items "purchased" including his latest.. http://feedback.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewFeedback&userid=golden_palace_casino http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=1469&item=5561537389&rd=1 &ssPageName=WDVW T308 (Who was amazed to see that Tawny Peaks' eBay user name is Enzo2002....) > I'm sure if you've got some whacky stuff to sell (including body > parts) this guy would buy it. Check out some of the past items > "purchased" including his latest.. http://feedback.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewFeedback&userid=golden_palace_ casino He sure seems to have a lot of money to throw around. That "mystery envelope" auction sounds like a good way to earn money from less mentally equipped people ;) Best Wishes Thomas AHEM ... > That "mystery envelope" auction sounds like a good way to earn money from > less mentally equipped people ;) > > Best Wishes > Thomas SignatureAnd if the cloud bursts, thunder in your ear You shout and no one seems to hear. And if the band you're in starts playing different tunes I'll see you on the dark side of the moon >> How is the FIAT logo in this photo, >> http://www.f1total.de/bilder/2005/tests/05mug1/z002.jpg [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] >> >Nice, Mark. Time to send you a Dale Carnegie book. ...Much better to swallow sh.t in the name of faux-amity? >>>How is the FIAT logo in this photo, >>>http://www.f1total.de/bilder/2005/tests/05mug1/z002.jpg [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > ...Much better to swallow sh.t in the name of faux-amity? Whatever. I'm sorry I started this one, that's for sure. I'd rather get you all red-faced and buggy-eyed over something bigger ... MC SignatureWhen the going gets weird, the weird turn pro. Hunter S. Thompson >>>>How is the FIAT logo in this photo, >>>>http://www.f1total.de/bilder/2005/tests/05mug1/z002.jpg [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] >Whatever. I'm sorry I started this one, that's for sure. I'd rather >get you all red-faced and buggy-eyed over something bigger ... You seriously mistake the attitude and intents. >>>>>How is the FIAT logo in this photo, >>>>>http://www.f1total.de/bilder/2005/tests/05mug1/z002.jpg [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > You seriously mistake the attitude and intents. Probably, but if you're the master of deadpan you're forgetting that deadpan doesn't show very well on Usenet. That's why a lot of people who cross your path feel all the worse for wear afterwards. Personally, of all people I should be to handle it and dish back. I don't know what's happening to me .... MC SignatureWhen the going gets weird, the weird turn pro. Hunter S. Thompson |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.